Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Goitrogenic Compounds In Tapioca And Other Foods


RiceGuy

Recommended Posts

RiceGuy Collaborator

I've been reading about foods which suppress thyroid function, and it turns out that tapioca is on the list, amongst other things. Given the extent to which tapioca is used in gluten-free baking, and that Celiac seems to often impact the thyroid, I think the following information is good to know:

Goitrogen content of fresh and cooked commonly consumed cyanogenic plant foods/vegetables viz. cabbage, cauliflower, radish, mustard, turnip, soybean, peanut, maize, bamboo shoot, papaya and cassava of Indian origin is reported. Most of these vegetables were collected from different regions of West Bengal and Tripura where endemic goitre was found during post-salt iodization phase and cassava (tapioca) was collected from Meghalaya and Kerala of India. Goitrogenic constituents of cyanogenic origin viz. cyanogenic glucosides, glucosinolates (thioglucosides) and thiocyanate were found in all the studied plants with varying concentrations. Cyanogenic glucoside content was highest in bamboo shoot followed by cassava, cauliflower, radish, cabbage, turnip and papaya; glucosinolates was maximum in cauliflower, followed by cabbage, bamboo shoot, turnip, radish, cassava, soybean, mustard etc., and thiocyanate content was highest in bamboo shoot followed by mustard, turnip, papaya, cabbage, radish, peanut, cauliflower, cassava, soybean and maize. After cooking the selected plant foods cyanogenic glucosides content was reduced markedly, glucosinolates content was decreased to a certain extent while thiocyanate content remained slightly increased or almost same in comparison to their uncooked/fresh counterparts. These results showed that the studied plant foods have the goitrogenic/anti-thyroid constituents that are capable of interfering thyroid function. Cooking does not reduce the goitrogenic content of the cyanogenic plant foods completely.

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



maile Newbie

RiceGuy,

in your studies have you ever come across what level of exposure/ingestion of the vegetables on that list is needed before it begins to supress the thyroid?

just curious.

maile

Nancym Enthusiast

Cooking usually disables most of the goitrogens.

maile Newbie
Cooking usually disables most of the goitrogens.

Thanks for the response, I like a lot of these veggies but have also had problems with hypothyroid symptoms and was starting to wonder.

RiceGuy Collaborator

Cooking does lessen the goitrogenic effects, as was mentioned. However, to what degree I don't know. I have briefly looked for a list, but didn't find anything. It seems most goitrogen food lists are just that, and the people posting them seem to feel that they want to completely avoid them like a Celiac avoids gluten (well, maybe not that much). I would only point out that there are also foods which boost thyroid function, so as the article from World's Healthiest Foods suggests, some avoidance coupled with good sense seems like a good idea to me. I think the wider and more varied a diet is, the more likely it is to have substances which cancel negative effects.

Supposedly, hard water is goitrogenic, as is calcium, magnesium, and various other nutrients. We cannot live without these nutrients, so just because there may be some lowering effect on the thyroid doesn't mean they're bad. I really think this is just one of many ways that the body regulates itself.

I read someplace, that it is better to judge by how you feel, rather than the numbers on a blood test. If there are no signs of a problem other than the blood tests, I question how much concern there should be. Obviously, if there is a continuing downward (or upward) trend, then yes, that would indicate a problem. However, if it is a little higher or lower than what is considered "normal", and remains at that level, and you aren't feeling bad effects from it, how much of a problem is it?

Hashimoto's on the other hand, is autoimmune, and as we all should know, that kind of a problem is a real concern. But there again, the cause isn't goitrogenic foods. Just as salt isn't the main cause of high blood pressure. So in that case, one needs to stop the autoimmune reaction, not continuously prop up the thyroid with drugs and such. In the mean time, limiting the goitrogenic foods may help somewhat I guess. I just can't see taking it to extremes, especially when it isn't even the cause.

Then again, I don't have hypothyroidism (as far as I know). Perhaps if I did, I might think differently about it.

  • 7 years later...
lpowmacback Rookie
On 3/30/2009 at 5:30 PM, Nancym said:

Cooking usually disables most of the goitrogens. - I know this is an old post but wanted to let anyone reading this that not all goitrogen foods can have their goitrogenic properties cooked out of them. SOY & MILLET will not have their goitrogenic effect lessened by cooking. Some say that fermenting soy (tempeh, miso) helps, but I have not found that to be the case (for me, at least). Be careful - I know they say that cooked cruciferous vegetables are okay when cooked, but for me, if they are the slightest bit al dente - or basically not REALLY REALLY SOFT (almost like mush), they can effect me!

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tim Semas
    Newest Member
    Tim Semas
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...