Are Anti-GMO Campaigners Blocking Gluten-free Wheat that Could Help Celiac Sufferers?

I am celiac and reject GMOs. Humans have gone way too far in fighting nature and remaking it in their own image. GMOs are a dangerous new frontier in that one-sided war against nature and they rightly have faced opposition since their very beginning. I don't need genetically modified wheat proliferating across the globe just so I can have a wheat cracker. I'm willing to go without that very unnecessary thing.

Also, this article is very one-sided. There is literally no discussion at all of the concerns about GMOs or why people are against them and to the uneducated reader, it appears that there are just all these irrational people who are crazy and want to stop celiac sufferers from seeking "relief" from their condition. It could've used the slightest attempt at a sentence or two addressing these things or a link to an anti-GMO organization so that at a minimum the reader could look into the issue further if they wanted to hear "both sides" of the issue. Yeah, it's not surprise that there's less hurdles to developing GMOs in America v.s. Europe. America barely regulates anything. There are also thousands of harmful chemicals that are disallowed from being added to products in Europe and there's a small handful disallowed in America. I'd feel a lot safer using products that had greater restrictions put on the manufacturer to prevent them from cost-saving and corner-cutting measures that involves poisoning the user. America's greater "freedom" for corporations means nothing for me, a regular person. It makes me less free and less healthy.

I am neither for or against GMO. I think each individual GMO needs to be evaluated on it's own merit and risks. Behind the anti-GMO push is the philosophy that everything natural is necessarily good and it's corollary, that whenever humans alter nature, the outcome is necessarily bad. 

As a Christian and a student of scripture, I am aware that the curse of sin has corrupted both nature and humanity. Nature's processes and their outcomes are not always flawless and the same is true of humankind's interventions. But neither do humankind's interventions in natural processes always make things worse.

In Genesis 2:28, before the Fall and the corruption from the curse of sin, the Creator commanded the first humans to "subdue the earth." One commentator explains the import of this very well by saying, "The military terminology in no way implies hostility and resistance from the earth, for it was all “very good” (Genesis 1:31). It suggests, rather, intensive study of the earth and its creatures (that is, “science”) and then application of that knowledge (that is, technology and commerce) for the optimum benefit of mankind and the animals, and for the glory of God." So again, from my perspective, GMO is neither always good or always bad and therefore each GMO product must be evaluated on it's own merit and risks.

And there is nothing to say that if a GMO product is developed to allow celiacs to consume wheat products that it will become the de facto standard for all wheat-based products everywhere. It's very likely it may be confined to a niche market of wheat products catering to the needs of those with gluten-related health issues. I certainly would embrace that as long as it did not present other significant health dangers while giving me back the delight of some delicious and aromatic culinary delights I used to enjoy before celiac disease.