Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Scott Adams
    Scott Adams

    Does Gluten Free Watchdog's Stance on Trader Joe's Bagels and Other Products Found to Contain Gluten Best Serve the Celiac Community?

    Reviewed and edited by a celiac disease expert.

    Should Gluten Free Watchdog Err on the Side of Caution?

    Does Gluten Free Watchdog's Stance on Trader Joe's Bagels and Other Products Found to Contain Gluten Best Serve the Celiac Community? - Caution by dstrelau is licensed under CC BY 2.0.
    Caption:
    Caution by dstrelau is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

    Celiac.com 08/13/2024 - Gluten Free Watchdog, an advocacy site for people with celiac disease, recently responded to a study by Moms Across America, which claimed that Trader Joe's Everything Gluten-Free Bagels contained nearly 300 ppm of gluten—a controversy that has already led to a class action lawsuit against Trader Joe's

    The gluten testing was performed by Health Research Institute (HRI), an ISO17025 accredited lab approved by the FDA, and examined 46 products, including 32 GFCO-certified ones. It found that nearly 15% of the certified products exceeded the 10 ppm gluten-free standard, with nearly 10% surpassing the FDA's 20 ppm gluten-free limit, meaning they cannot be labeled gluten-free and should be subject to a product recall. A recent analysis by Celiac.com uncovered potential issues with GFCO's certification process, which may have contributed to the high failure rate found in the study, and suggests ways to improve the certification program.

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12):
    Gluten Free Watchdog, however, suggests that these findings might be false positives, possibly due to HRI not using an extra protein to prevent non-specific binding during testing. Gluten Free Watchdog tested three different batches of Trader Joe's bagels using two different assays (R5 ELISA and G12 ELISA) with and without a milk additive for protein blocking. They argue that the inconsistent results—depending on whether the milk additive was used—indicate that HRI should rerun their tests with the additive, as their original results might have been false positives.

    HRI's Response

    Celiac.com reached out by email to John Fagan, Ph.D., Chief Science Officer at HRI for comment about Gluten Free Watchdog's article, and according to him: 

    "(W)e used the Romer (AgraQuant) G12 ELISA test, exactly according to the Romer protocol. The person who did the lab work is a highly experienced scientist who has decades of experience in conducting ELISA tests. The Romer G12 ELISA is recommended by GFCO as a reliable method. There was nothing about the Trader Joe’s sample that was strange or out of the ordinary and it contained no chocolate and therefore extra protein was not called for."

    When describing their testing procedure he explained: 

    "We tested, first, the undiluted extract in duplicate. Those tests exceeded the calibration curve. We then made two dilutions of the extract and tested those in duplicate. Duplicates matched in both cases and the two dilutions were quantitatively consistent. That was the value that we reported." Further: "We have the exact sample that we tested before, and have retested it and it still came out positive."

    Romer, the manufacturer of the AgraQuant G12 ELISA test, supported Dr. Fagan's claims, stating that while the milk additive is an option, it is not mandatory for all tests, and while certain ingredients like chocolate, soy, and oats, may require adding an extra protein during the testing procedure to prevent non-specific binding, they confirmed that no such ingredients were present in the Trader Joe's bagels. 

    Tara J. Miller, Vice President of Marketing at Trader Joe's, however, claims that their tests on the same batch tested by HRI showed the bagels met FDA and GFCO standards for gluten-free labeling (below 10 ppm). When Celiac.com asked Dr. Fagen how his lab could find high gluten in a batch where Trader Joe's found none, he concurred with the possibility of "hot spots" within the sample, which could explain the discrepancy.

    Why Did Gluten Free Watchdog Test Different Batches?

    Gluten Free Watchdog's testing did not involve the same batches of bagels tested by HRI. When Celiac.com asked Dr. Fagan for his comment on the Gluten Free Watchdog article he replied with:

    "I was surprised at the Gluten Watchdog’s article. And the fact that the product contained no chocolate raises questions about their explanation. The obvious explanation for the discrepancy between the Gluten Watchdog’s results and ours is not even considered in their article, namely that they did not test the same sample that we tested. They didn't ask for that sample but we told them that we would be quite happy to set up an opportunity for them to test that sample. I suspect they would have confirmed our result. Also, during our phone call with Watchdog, they did not suggest the modification of the method where extra protein is added."
    (a recent post by Gluten Free Watchdog disputes this characterization of their contact)

    The last email we received from Dr. Fagan on this topic further emphasized his position:

    "We would be willing to share that lot with any lab that wants to test it. We would send multiple blinded samples, one of which would be the sample we tested as being positive and there would be other samples that would be indistinguishable but would be positive and negative. This would test their ability to detect the level of gluten that we found present in the sample and verify whether the sample we tested as positive was positive with their test method. We have decades of experience dealing with conflicting results on lab tests and it is this kind of routine that clarifies things definitively."

    Unfortunately, Gluten Free Watchdog's posts do not address how HRI found zero detectable gluten in most of the products they tested, including three types of bagels similar to Trader Joe's bagels, one of which also contained brown rice flour and sorghum flour (Canyon Bakehouse Plain Bagels). If HRI's testing required extra protein for accuracy, shouldn't these very similar products have also shown false positives?

    Every Romer AgraQuant® Gluten G12 ELISA Test Kit Includes Fish Gelatin to Prevent Non-Specific Binding

    According to the product documentation for the Romer AgraQuant® Gluten G12 ELISA Test Kit, the kits include the following:

    • Package Insert
    • Certificate of Performance
    • 5 standards (0, 4, 20, 80, 200 ppm), calibrated to the Prolamin Working Group (PWG)
    • Gliadin.
    • Gluten G12 antibody coated microwells
    • Ready to use Extraction Solution
    • 5x concentrated Diluent Buffer
    • 10x concentrated Wash Buffer
    • Ready to use Conjugate, Substrate and Stop Solutions
    • 1 sachet of Fish Gelatin

    The fish gelatin included in the AgraQuant® Gluten G12 ELISA test kit is likely used to prevent non-specific binding. In ELISA assays, non-specific binding can occur when proteins or other molecules in the sample adhere to the microwells in an undesired manner, potentially leading to inaccurate results.

    Fish gelatin is a commonly used blocking agent in such assays. It coats the surfaces of the microwells that are not already occupied by the specific antibodies, reducing the likelihood that other proteins or molecules from the sample will bind non-specifically to the microwells. This helps ensure that the only significant interactions are between the specific antibodies and the target gluten proteins, leading to more accurate and reliable test results.

    Do We Accept or Reject the Results of an FDA Accredited Laboratory?

    Celiac.com believes that Gluten Free Watchdog's recent stance is misguided and deviates from its mission to protect people with celiac disease from gluten exposure. Instead of cautioning people to avoid the products found to contain high gluten levels and possibly calling for their recall and reassessing GFCO's certification standards, Gluten Free Watchdog is creating confusion by questioning HRI's testing protocol and results.

    Given Celiac.com's understanding of the Romer AgraQuant G12 ELISA test and its testing protocol, and the fact that the Romer test is on GFCO's Approved Kit List, we see no reason to doubt the validity of HRI's results or their testing competence. We continue to recommend that people with celiac disease avoid all products in the study that tested at or above 20 ppm of gluten, and for those who are highly sensitive, products that tested at or above 10 ppm.

    Read more at: foodriskmanagement.com

    Join our forum discussion on this topic, and feel free to comment below.

     

    08/19/2024 - Added the section: "The Romer AgraQuant® Gluten G12 ELISA Test Kit Includes Fish Gelatin to Prevent Non-Specific Binding."



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    LPat02

    The manufacturer shouldn’t be trusted to hand over the samples that need tested. The FDA should go in with no warning and take the sample/ batch that needs tested. Do you think the company is going to hand over a batch that tested positive? They are going to replace it with one they have already tested and know is safe. They don’t test every batch and aren’t required to test every batch. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Cindy987

    I just read the write-up by Gluten Free Watch Dog.  You should consider a retraction and get things straightened out.  GFWD is highly respected and soundly grounded in science.  *This article* is hype and does not serve the Celiac community well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Scott Adams

    Can you share just what exactly about this article you find to be "hype"? It is Gluten Free Watchdog who needs to reconsider their position, which is the position of our article. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Cindy987

    Did you read the response from GFWD?  It seems not.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Cindy987

    I will note you only quote Fagan, not Tricia from GFWD.  This descends to rumor mongering.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Scott Adams

    I definitely read both of her responses on this topic, and totally disagree with her stance on this issue. Did you read this article? We also talked to Romer, the maker of the tests used in the Moms Across America study, and they don't agree that adding milk protein is needed in this case. Additionally, HRI also tested Canyon Bakehouse Plain Bagels which contain nearly identical ingredients, including brown rice flour and sorghum flour, and no gluten was detected in them. Assuming they also didn't add the supposedly required milk protein, why wouldn't this product also register a false positive? 

    GFWD should err on protecting celiacs here. Are her posts claiming that all products tested by HRI actually contain zero gluten? What exactly do her posts even mean regarding the positive gluten results found by HRI? Her posts only sow confusion, and encourage people to ignore HRI's results, which is a mistake.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Cindy987

    I think she sows a better understanding of the complexity in testing, for those who take the time.  I did not see that in your article. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Scott Adams

    But the GFWD's posts don't make any claim either way about whether the products that tested positive for gluten should be avoided by those with celiac disease--so what then is their point--are they safe or not?

    Does GFWD mean that we can simply disregard the results entirely--which were found by an ISO17025 accredited laboratory that is approved by the FDA as a high-complexity clinical laboratory and is run by a Ph.D.? GFWD, as far as I know, is run by a Registered Dietician and not a Ph.D., yet she apparently claims to know more about how to run this test than the director of this lab. 

    According to Dr. Fagan:

    Quote

    To reiterate, we used the Romer G12 ELISA test, exactly according to the Romer protocol. The person who did the lab work is a highly experienced scientist who has decades of experience in conducting ELISA tests. The Romer G12 ELISA is recommended by GFCO as a reliable method. There was nothing about the Trader Joe’s sample that was strange or out of the ordinary and it contained no chocolate and therefore extra protein was not called for. 

    Given what we've learned in doing this story, after receiving responses from both Dr. Fagan and Romer about the G12 testing protocol, I believe that the GFWD posts serve only to sow confusion, and they don't answer the real question--why are so many GFCO products testing positive for gluten? Given the number of recalled gluten-free products this should not be so surprising, even certified gluten-free products have been subject to recalls:

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    GardeningForHealth

    I think that GFWD's suggestion that the G12 test without added protein may be a false positive is not grounded in facts and does not best serve those with Celiac and NCGS. Why? Because when it comes to our health, we need to err on the side of caution. Assuming that a positive result may be a false positive is not erring on the side of caution.

    Gluten-Free Watchdog's suggestion that the test may have been a false positive makes me feel that perhaps Gluten-Free Watchdog does not take gluten exposures as seriously as it should, and frankly I am both surprised and disappointed in their response.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    RMJ
    2 hours ago, GardeningForHealth said:

    I think that GFWD's suggestion that the G12 test without added protein may be a false positive is not grounded in facts and does not best serve those with Celiac and NCGS. Why? Because when it comes to our health, we need to err on the side of caution. Assuming that a positive result may be a false positive is not erring on the side of caution.

    Gluten-Free Watchdog's suggestion that the test may have been a false positive makes me feel that perhaps Gluten-Free Watchdog does not take gluten exposures as seriously as it should, and frankly I am both surprised and disappointed in their response.

     

    I used to develop products with the type of technology used in these tests.  It is definitely possible to have false positives if there is not enough protein to stop non-specific binding.  However, in this case that has certainly NOT been proven. It’s just one possibility. Contamination with gluten is the other possibility!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Cindy987

    Again, most of these responses do not properly address the GFWD article at all.  Appeals to emotion have no place in scientific pursuit of truth.  GFWD had zero personal attacks and zero fear mongering- unlike what I see here. It is obvious that the intent is to continue to make irrational and emotional appeals along with misrepresentations of what was written elsewhere. Instead of re-evaluating tone and retracting false statements, you are doubling down and adding to the  problem. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Scott Adams

    You haven't answered what GFWD's position is--should celiacs eat Trader Joe's bagels from that lot number if they have some in their refrigerator? What do the posts by GFWD say about this? What is their position? We are not making "personal attacks" or "fear mongering" here. Do you realize that a fully accredited lab has tested nearly 300 ppm of gluten in those bagels using one GFCO's approved testing methods? How is it fear mongering to warn celiacs to avoid them? Why isn't GFWD doing the same?

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate
  • About Me

    Scott Adams

    Scott Adams was diagnosed with celiac disease in 1994, and, due to the nearly total lack of information available at that time, was forced to become an expert on the disease in order to recover. In 1995 he launched the site that later became Celiac.com to help as many people as possible with celiac disease get diagnosed so they can begin to live happy, healthy gluten-free lives.  He is co-author of the book Cereal Killers, and founder and publisher of the (formerly paper) newsletter Journal of Gluten Sensitivity. In 1998 he founded The Gluten-Free Mall which he sold in 2014. Celiac.com does not sell any products, and is 100% advertiser supported.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Related Articles

    Kelly Carter
    How to Stay Gluten-Free in a Cross-Contaminated World
    Celiac.com 12/13/2019 - I wanted to add some new revelations I've had about cross contamination, including how not to go crazy worrying about it, and what I believe to be the number one way to prevent getting sick from it.
    There are a lot of posts on Facebook in the Celiac Groups about cross-contamination—let's talk about what it is and why it's bad for those with celiac disease.
    Cross-contamination is Our Worst Enemy
    For someone with celiac disease, cross-contamination is our worst enemy. We all know that we can't have gluten—no bread, pasta, etc. We all know that even the slightest amount of gluten can hurt us.
    Studies have shown that 1/64th of a piece of bread has enough gluten to cause autoimmune problems in celiacs. The FDA has set 20 parts per million (pp...


    Scott Adams
    Toxic Levels of Glyphosate, Pesticides, Low Mineral Content, and Even Gluten Found in Gluten-Free Products
    Celiac.com 06/11/2024 - The findings from a study conducted by Moms Across America shed light on concerning levels of glyphosate, pesticides, low mineral content, and even gluten in gluten-free products. This is particularly relevant to individuals with celiac disease and gluten intolerance, a population that relies on gluten-free products to manage their condition.
    The study tested 46 samples of organic and non-organic gluten-free food products, including bread, pasta, crackers, snacks, flour, dessert mixes, and chips, for glyphosate/AMPA, 236 pesticides, gluten, and mineral content. The results revealed that 44 out of 46 samples tested positive for glyphosate, a known contributor to gluten intolerance. What's more alarming is that 21% of these samples exceeded the EU threshold for...


    Scott Adams
    Trader Joe's Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Misleading Gluten-Free Bagel Labels
    Celiac.com 07/02/2024 - Trader Joe's Co. is being sued for allegedly mislabeling its "Almost Everything Gluten-Free Bagels" as "gluten-free," after a recent study conducted by Moms Across America found that a batch of the bagels (KLR1 24030031) may contain significant levels of gluten. This consumer class action was recently filed by Plaintiff Shaianne Starks in the Central District of California under docket number 2:24-cv-05543, Shaianne Starks v. Trader Joe’s Company.
    According to the complaint filed on June 28, testing conducted by Moms Across America, a nonprofit organization focused on raising awareness about toxins in food, revealed that the bagels contain 269.8 parts per million (ppm) of gluten. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stipulates that products labeled as...


    Scott Adams
    Critical Review of GFCO Gluten-Free Certification in Light of Recent Findings
    Celiac.com 07/12/2024 - The Gluten-Free Certification Organization (GFCO) has long been considered a gold standard for gluten-free certification, offering rigorous testing and certification processes to ensure that products meet strict gluten-free criteria. However, a recent study conducted by Moms Across America has raised significant concerns about the reliability of GFCO's certification. The study found that 15% of randomly tested GFCO-certified products contained gluten levels above the organization's threshold of 10 parts per million (ppm), prompting a re-evaluation of GFCO’s procedures and standards.
    Understanding GFCO Certification
    The Gluten-Free Certification Organization (GFCO) is a program under the Gluten Intolerance Group (GIG) and is dedicated to certifying g...


  • Recent Activity

    1. - Billy Boy replied to Billy Boy's topic in Gluten-Free Recipes & Cooking Tips
      8

      Almond flour v Almond powdered milk

    2. - BNGed8 replied to BNGed8's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      Bodywide muscle weakness/fatigue

    3. - Rubii replied to Rubii's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      Newly dignosed Celiac

    4. - cristiana replied to Ginger38's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      7

      Shaking/Tremors and Off Balance

    5. - Wheatwacked replied to Julianne101's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      4

      Seeking proper diagnosis


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      124,662
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Susan buckley
    Newest Member
    Susan buckley
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Popular Now

    • Julianne101
      4
    • Debstaats
      4
    • Ginger38
      7
    • Rubii
      4
    • Billy Boy
      8
  • Popular Articles

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
  • Upcoming Events

×
×
  • Create New...