Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Scott Adams
    Scott Adams

    Does Gluten Free Watchdog's Stance on Trader Joe's Bagels and Other Products Found to Contain Gluten Best Serve the Celiac Community?

    Reviewed and edited by a celiac disease expert.

    Should Gluten Free Watchdog Err on the Side of Caution?

    Does Gluten Free Watchdog's Stance on Trader Joe's Bagels and Other Products Found to Contain Gluten Best Serve the Celiac Community? - Caution by dstrelau is licensed under CC BY 2.0.
    Caption:
    Caution by dstrelau is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

    Celiac.com 08/13/2024 - Gluten Free Watchdog, an advocacy site for people with celiac disease, recently responded to a study by Moms Across America, which claimed that Trader Joe's Everything Gluten-Free Bagels contained nearly 300 ppm of gluten—a controversy that has already led to a class action lawsuit against Trader Joe's

    The gluten testing was performed by Health Research Institute (HRI), an ISO17025 accredited lab approved by the FDA, and examined 46 products, including 32 GFCO-certified ones. It found that nearly 15% of the certified products exceeded the 10 ppm gluten-free standard, with nearly 10% surpassing the FDA's 20 ppm gluten-free limit, meaning they cannot be labeled gluten-free and should be subject to a product recall. A recent analysis by Celiac.com uncovered potential issues with GFCO's certification process, which may have contributed to the high failure rate found in the study, and suggests ways to improve the certification program.

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12):
    Gluten Free Watchdog, however, suggests that these findings might be false positives, possibly due to HRI not using an extra protein to prevent non-specific binding during testing. Gluten Free Watchdog tested three different batches of Trader Joe's bagels using two different assays (R5 ELISA and G12 ELISA) with and without a milk additive for protein blocking. They argue that the inconsistent results—depending on whether the milk additive was used—indicate that HRI should rerun their tests with the additive, as their original results might have been false positives.

    HRI's Response

    Celiac.com reached out by email to John Fagan, Ph.D., Chief Science Officer at HRI for comment about Gluten Free Watchdog's article, and according to him: 

    "(W)e used the Romer (AgraQuant) G12 ELISA test, exactly according to the Romer protocol. The person who did the lab work is a highly experienced scientist who has decades of experience in conducting ELISA tests. The Romer G12 ELISA is recommended by GFCO as a reliable method. There was nothing about the Trader Joe’s sample that was strange or out of the ordinary and it contained no chocolate and therefore extra protein was not called for."

    When describing their testing procedure he explained: 

    "We tested, first, the undiluted extract in duplicate. Those tests exceeded the calibration curve. We then made two dilutions of the extract and tested those in duplicate. Duplicates matched in both cases and the two dilutions were quantitatively consistent. That was the value that we reported." Further: "We have the exact sample that we tested before, and have retested it and it still came out positive."

    Romer, the manufacturer of the AgraQuant G12 ELISA test, supported Dr. Fagan's claims, stating that while the milk additive is an option, it is not mandatory for all tests, and while certain ingredients like chocolate, soy, and oats, may require adding an extra protein during the testing procedure to prevent non-specific binding, they confirmed that no such ingredients were present in the Trader Joe's bagels. 

    Tara J. Miller, Vice President of Marketing at Trader Joe's, however, claims that their tests on the same batch tested by HRI showed the bagels met FDA and GFCO standards for gluten-free labeling (below 10 ppm). When Celiac.com asked Dr. Fagen how his lab could find high gluten in a batch where Trader Joe's found none, he concurred with the possibility of "hot spots" within the sample, which could explain the discrepancy.

    Why Did Gluten Free Watchdog Test Different Batches?

    Gluten Free Watchdog's testing did not involve the same batches of bagels tested by HRI. When Celiac.com asked Dr. Fagan for his comment on the Gluten Free Watchdog article he replied with:

    "I was surprised at the Gluten Watchdog’s article. And the fact that the product contained no chocolate raises questions about their explanation. The obvious explanation for the discrepancy between the Gluten Watchdog’s results and ours is not even considered in their article, namely that they did not test the same sample that we tested. They didn't ask for that sample but we told them that we would be quite happy to set up an opportunity for them to test that sample. I suspect they would have confirmed our result. Also, during our phone call with Watchdog, they did not suggest the modification of the method where extra protein is added."
    (a recent post by Gluten Free Watchdog disputes this characterization of their contact)

    The last email we received from Dr. Fagan on this topic further emphasized his position:

    "We would be willing to share that lot with any lab that wants to test it. We would send multiple blinded samples, one of which would be the sample we tested as being positive and there would be other samples that would be indistinguishable but would be positive and negative. This would test their ability to detect the level of gluten that we found present in the sample and verify whether the sample we tested as positive was positive with their test method. We have decades of experience dealing with conflicting results on lab tests and it is this kind of routine that clarifies things definitively."

    Unfortunately, Gluten Free Watchdog's posts do not address how HRI found zero detectable gluten in most of the products they tested, including three types of bagels similar to Trader Joe's bagels, one of which also contained brown rice flour and sorghum flour (Canyon Bakehouse Plain Bagels). If HRI's testing required extra protein for accuracy, shouldn't these very similar products have also shown false positives?

    Every Romer AgraQuant® Gluten G12 ELISA Test Kit Includes Fish Gelatin to Prevent Non-Specific Binding

    According to the product documentation for the Romer AgraQuant® Gluten G12 ELISA Test Kit, the kits include the following:

    • Package Insert
    • Certificate of Performance
    • 5 standards (0, 4, 20, 80, 200 ppm), calibrated to the Prolamin Working Group (PWG)
    • Gliadin.
    • Gluten G12 antibody coated microwells
    • Ready to use Extraction Solution
    • 5x concentrated Diluent Buffer
    • 10x concentrated Wash Buffer
    • Ready to use Conjugate, Substrate and Stop Solutions
    • 1 sachet of Fish Gelatin

    The fish gelatin included in the AgraQuant® Gluten G12 ELISA test kit is likely used to prevent non-specific binding. In ELISA assays, non-specific binding can occur when proteins or other molecules in the sample adhere to the microwells in an undesired manner, potentially leading to inaccurate results.

    Fish gelatin is a commonly used blocking agent in such assays. It coats the surfaces of the microwells that are not already occupied by the specific antibodies, reducing the likelihood that other proteins or molecules from the sample will bind non-specifically to the microwells. This helps ensure that the only significant interactions are between the specific antibodies and the target gluten proteins, leading to more accurate and reliable test results.

    Do We Accept or Reject the Results of an FDA Accredited Laboratory?

    Celiac.com believes that Gluten Free Watchdog's recent stance is misguided and deviates from its mission to protect people with celiac disease from gluten exposure. Instead of cautioning people to avoid the products found to contain high gluten levels and possibly calling for their recall and reassessing GFCO's certification standards, Gluten Free Watchdog is creating confusion by questioning HRI's testing protocol and results.

    Given Celiac.com's understanding of the Romer AgraQuant G12 ELISA test and its testing protocol, and the fact that the Romer test is on GFCO's Approved Kit List, we see no reason to doubt the validity of HRI's results or their testing competence. We continue to recommend that people with celiac disease avoid all products in the study that tested at or above 20 ppm of gluten, and for those who are highly sensitive, products that tested at or above 10 ppm.

    Read more at: foodriskmanagement.com

    Join our forum discussion on this topic, and feel free to comment below.

     

    08/19/2024 - Added the section: "The Romer AgraQuant® Gluten G12 ELISA Test Kit Includes Fish Gelatin to Prevent Non-Specific Binding."



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    LPat02
    20 hours ago, LPat02 said:

    There isnt a single source online recommending to eat McDonald Fries. The website you sent is from 2006. They were gluten free then. They recently started to spray a coating on fries that makes them crispy that does contain wheat. McDonald’s has said they aren’t gluten free. Even if they were the oil to fry them I’m is right next to the oils they use for all the breaded items. Hamburger buns are passed over these things. The baskets get switched up and are used for both. It’s not responsible to tell people they are safe. That is what you are accusing GFWD of doing. There have been several other products recommended here that I have confirmed to have gluten per the manufacturer. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Scott Adams

    I have you two sources--Celiac.com and The Gluten Intolerance Group, so you are incorrect that there "isnt a single source online recommending to eat McDonald Fries."

    You are thinking of Burger King, as McDonald's hasn't changed their fry recipe the way that you falsely describe in your post. McDonald's has made changes to their French fry recipe in 2008, when they switched to using a trans-fat-free oil for frying. Prior to that, in 2002, McDonald’s also made modifications to reduce the amount of trans fat in their fries. However, the basic ingredients of the fries, including potatoes, vegetable oil, and natural beef flavor, have remained consistent. The introduction of the natural beef flavor, which includes hydrolyzed wheat, dates back to the early 2000s and has been a subject of debate regarding gluten content.

    Provide a source for your claim that "They recently started to spray a coating on fries that makes them crispy that does contain wheat."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    LPat02
    19 hours ago, Scott Adams said:

    I have you two sources--Celiac.com and The Gluten Intolerance Group, so you are incorrect that there "isnt a single source online recommending to eat McDonald Fries."

    You are thinking of Burger King, as McDonald's hasn't changed their fry recipe the way that you falsely describe in your post. McDonald's has made changes to their French fry recipe in 2008, when they switched to using a trans-fat-free oil for frying. Prior to that, in 2002, McDonald’s also made modifications to reduce the amount of trans fat in their fries. However, the basic ingredients of the fries, including potatoes, vegetable oil, and natural beef flavor, have remained consistent. The introduction of the natural beef flavor, which includes hydrolyzed wheat, dates back to the early 2000s and has been a subject of debate regarding gluten content.

    Provide a source for your claim that "They recently started to spray a coating on fries that makes them crispy that does contain wheat."

    https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/fda-publishes-final-rule-on-gluten-free-labeling-of-fermented-or-hydrolyzed-foods-the-basics/

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    LPat02

    IMG_5615.png

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    LPat02
    21 hours ago, Scott Adams said:

    I have you two sources--Celiac.com and The Gluten Intolerance Group, so you are incorrect that there "isnt a single source online recommending to eat McDonald Fries."

    You are thinking of Burger King, as McDonald's hasn't changed their fry recipe the way that you falsely describe in your post. McDonald's has made changes to their French fry recipe in 2008, when they switched to using a trans-fat-free oil for frying. Prior to that, in 2002, McDonald’s also made modifications to reduce the amount of trans fat in their fries. However, the basic ingredients of the fries, including potatoes, vegetable oil, and natural beef flavor, have remained consistent. The introduction of the natural beef flavor, which includes hydrolyzed wheat, dates back to the early 2000s and has been a subject of debate regarding gluten content.

    Provide a source for your claim that "They recently started to spray a coating on fries that makes them crispy that does contain wheat."

    It’s approved by the FDA if it is labeled gluten free. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Scott Adams

    First off, you are hijacking the comments for this article, as the article has nothing to do with either McDonald's French fries, or hydrolyzed wheat, and McDonald's does not claim that they are gluten-free, nor do they recommend them for celiacs.

    It's a personal choice whether or not celiacs decide to include them in their diets. Also, Celiac.com is a gluten-free lifestyle site, where Gluten Free Watchdog is, more or less, a site geared towards a zero gluten lifestyle--our aims are not the same. Your comments do not address the article or our position that Gluten Free Watchdog should err on the side of caution because a lab has found gluten in several "gluten-free" products, rather than attack the lab's credentials, their testing protocol, or their technicians. 

    For the record, hydrolyzed wheat protein has been on our forbidden list for many years:

    Research indicates that even after hydrolysis, some gluten peptides can remain immunogenic, meaning they can still provoke an immune response in individuals with celiac disease. For example, a study published in "Food Chemistry" found that while hydrolysis can reduce the detectable gluten content, certain peptides that can trigger a celiac response MAY persist, however, the amount that is contained within the flavoring contained in the fires makes it unlikely that there would be enough to cause issues in most people with celiac disease, which is why so many people here have reported eating them without issues--including my daughter who has DH. 

    On top of the fact that the hydrolyzation process breaks down gluten into the smallest particles that make hydrolyzed wheat test negative for gluten using all available testing methods, I believe, but haven't seen studies on this idea yet, that these particles are further denatured by sitting in ~400F cooking oil for great lengths of time, probably to the point where they would be harmless. Again, I would love to see studies done on the oil in a McDonald's fry vat to see what particles from the hydrolyzed wheat survive in tact.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate
  • About Me

    Scott Adams

    Scott Adams was diagnosed with celiac disease in 1994, and, due to the nearly total lack of information available at that time, was forced to become an expert on the disease in order to recover. In 1995 he launched the site that later became Celiac.com to help as many people as possible with celiac disease get diagnosed so they can begin to live happy, healthy gluten-free lives.  He is co-author of the book Cereal Killers, and founder and publisher of the (formerly paper) newsletter Journal of Gluten Sensitivity. In 1998 he founded The Gluten-Free Mall which he sold in 2014. Celiac.com does not sell any products, and is 100% advertiser supported.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Related Articles

    Kelly Carter
    How to Stay Gluten-Free in a Cross-Contaminated World
    Celiac.com 12/13/2019 - I wanted to add some new revelations I've had about cross contamination, including how not to go crazy worrying about it, and what I believe to be the number one way to prevent getting sick from it.
    There are a lot of posts on Facebook in the Celiac Groups about cross-contamination—let's talk about what it is and why it's bad for those with celiac disease.
    Cross-contamination is Our Worst Enemy
    For someone with celiac disease, cross-contamination is our worst enemy. We all know that we can't have gluten—no bread, pasta, etc. We all know that even the slightest amount of gluten can hurt us.
    Studies have shown that 1/64th of a piece of bread has enough gluten to cause autoimmune problems in celiacs. The FDA has set 20 parts per million (pp...


    Scott Adams
    Toxic Levels of Glyphosate, Pesticides, Low Mineral Content, and Even Gluten Found in Gluten-Free Products
    Celiac.com 06/11/2024 - The findings from a study conducted by Moms Across America shed light on concerning levels of glyphosate, pesticides, low mineral content, and even gluten in gluten-free products. This is particularly relevant to individuals with celiac disease and gluten intolerance, a population that relies on gluten-free products to manage their condition.
    The study tested 46 samples of organic and non-organic gluten-free food products, including bread, pasta, crackers, snacks, flour, dessert mixes, and chips, for glyphosate/AMPA, 236 pesticides, gluten, and mineral content. The results revealed that 44 out of 46 samples tested positive for glyphosate, a known contributor to gluten intolerance. What's more alarming is that 21% of these samples exceeded the EU threshold for...


    Scott Adams
    Trader Joe's Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Misleading Gluten-Free Bagel Labels
    Celiac.com 07/02/2024 - Trader Joe's Co. is being sued for allegedly mislabeling its "Almost Everything Gluten-Free Bagels" as "gluten-free," after a recent study conducted by Moms Across America found that a batch of the bagels (KLR1 24030031) may contain significant levels of gluten. This consumer class action was recently filed by Plaintiff Shaianne Starks in the Central District of California under docket number 2:24-cv-05543, Shaianne Starks v. Trader Joe’s Company.
    According to the complaint filed on June 28, testing conducted by Moms Across America, a nonprofit organization focused on raising awareness about toxins in food, revealed that the bagels contain 269.8 parts per million (ppm) of gluten. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) stipulates that products labeled as...


    Scott Adams
    Critical Review of GFCO Gluten-Free Certification in Light of Recent Findings
    Celiac.com 07/12/2024 - The Gluten-Free Certification Organization (GFCO) has long been considered a gold standard for gluten-free certification, offering rigorous testing and certification processes to ensure that products meet strict gluten-free criteria. However, a recent study conducted by Moms Across America has raised significant concerns about the reliability of GFCO's certification. The study found that 15% of randomly tested GFCO-certified products contained gluten levels above the organization's threshold of 10 parts per million (ppm), prompting a re-evaluation of GFCO’s procedures and standards.
    Understanding GFCO Certification
    The Gluten-Free Certification Organization (GFCO) is a program under the Gluten Intolerance Group (GIG) and is dedicated to certifying g...


  • Recent Activity

    1. - RMJ replied to Jean Shifrin's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      1

      Implications of glutening after repairing villi

    2. - Jean Shifrin posted a topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      1

      Implications of glutening after repairing villi

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Patrick-Tyler's topic in Gluten-Free Restaurants
      5

      Is McDonald's Safe for Gluten-Free Orders?

    4. - trents replied to Patrick-Tyler's topic in Gluten-Free Restaurants
      5

      Is McDonald's Safe for Gluten-Free Orders?

    5. - Scott Adams replied to GeordieGeezer's topic in Food Intolerance & Leaky Gut
      17

      Anybody else have a similar experience...theories welcome as its something which i dont really understand.....


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,810
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Niki111084
    Newest Member
    Niki111084
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.8k
    • Total Posts
      69k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Popular Now

    • Patrick-Tyler
    • Elliebee
    • mswhis
    • Dhruv
      20
    • GeordieGeezer
  • Popular Articles

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
  • Upcoming Events

×
×
  • Create New...