Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Scott Adams
    Scott Adams

    Exploring a New Artificial Intelligence Approach to Histological Analysis for Celiac Disease (+Video)

    Reviewed and edited by a celiac disease expert.

    By providing a more reliable and precise way to analyze biopsies, the automated approach could lead to earlier and more accurate diagnoses.

    Celiac.com 02/24/2025 - Celiac disease is a chronic condition in which the immune system reacts to gluten, causing damage to the small intestine's lining. This study explores a novel way to diagnose and monitor celiac disease using automated tools, specifically machine learning, to analyze biopsy samples. By using artificial intelligence, researchers hope to create a more reliable and consistent method for identifying and assessing tissue damage caused by celiac disease.

    The Problem with Current Methods

    Diagnosing and monitoring celiac disease often involves taking small samples, or biopsies, of the small intestine. Pathologists examine these samples under a microscope, looking for specific changes such as inflammation, an increase in certain immune cells, and damage to the tiny finger-like projections (villi) that line the small intestine. These changes are typically classified using the modified Marsh score, a system that ranks the severity of tissue damage. However, this method is subjective, meaning that different pathologists may interpret the same sample differently, leading to inconsistencies in diagnosis and treatment monitoring.

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12):
    The modified Marsh score also has limitations in sensitivity. It categorizes changes in broad groups rather than measuring them precisely, which can make it harder to track subtle changes in tissue damage or improvement. These challenges create a need for a more objective, quantitative, and reproducible system to evaluate biopsies.

    A New, Automated Solution

    To address these challenges, researchers developed an automated method that uses machine learning to analyze biopsy samples. They trained a computer model to identify different cell types, tissues, and features in images of biopsies. The model was designed to recognize important indicators of celiac disease, such as the density of specific immune cells called intraepithelial lymphocytes and changes in the villi and crypts (small pockets in the tissue).

    The training process involved feeding the model hundreds of biopsy images that had been labeled by pathologists. These images included samples from individuals with varying severity of celiac disease as well as from people without the condition. Once trained, the model could analyze new biopsy images, identifying and measuring key features of celiac disease.

    How the Automated Model Works

    The computer model focuses on several important features of the tissue to determine disease severity. These features include:

    • Villous Atrophy: The model calculates the proportion of the tissue covered by villous epithelium. A lower proportion indicates more severe damage, as villi shrink or disappear in advanced celiac disease.
    • Crypt Hyperplasia: The model measures the size and area of crypt epithelium. An increase in crypt size is a sign of tissue trying to compensate for villous loss, which is a hallmark of celiac disease.
    • Immune Cell Density: The model quantifies the number of intraepithelial lymphocytes, which are immune cells that increase in response to gluten exposure in people with celiac disease.

    By analyzing these and other features, the model generates measurements that correlate with the modified Marsh score. However, unlike the Marsh score, these measurements are continuous rather than categorical, meaning they provide more detailed and precise information about tissue changes.

    Key Findings

    The study found that the automated model performed well in identifying and measuring the features of celiac disease. Key observations included:

    • Strong Correlation with Marsh Scores: The model's measurements of villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia closely matched the severity rankings given by pathologists using the Marsh score.
    • Improved Sensitivity: The model detected subtle changes in tissue structure that might be missed by traditional scoring methods, making it a valuable tool for monitoring disease progression or response to treatment.
    • Distinguishing Healthy and Diseased Tissue: The model effectively differentiated between biopsies from people with celiac disease and those without, confirming its ability to identify disease-related features.

    Advantages of the Automated Approach

    This new method offers several potential benefits over traditional histological assessment:

    • Consistency and Objectivity: By using a computer model, the analysis is standardized, reducing the variability between different pathologists.
    • Detailed Measurements: The ability to quantify features like villous surface area and immune cell density provides a more nuanced understanding of disease severity.
    • Streamlined Process: The model works with standard biopsy images, which are already used in clinical settings, making it easy to integrate into existing workflows.
    • Potential for Clinical Trials: The precise measurements produced by the model could be used to track small changes in tissue during clinical trials, providing a more reliable way to evaluate the effectiveness of new treatments.

    Limitations and Future Directions

    While promising, the study also highlighted some limitations of the automated approach. For example:

    • Small Sample Size: The model was trained on a relatively small number of biopsy samples, so larger studies are needed to validate its performance.
    • Tissue Orientation: The model analyzes entire tissue slides, which may include variations in how the samples are oriented. This could affect the accuracy of the measurements, so future versions of the model may need to account for these differences.
    • Regional Variability: Celiac disease can cause patchy damage, meaning that some areas of the tissue may appear normal while others are severely affected. Future models could focus on specific regions of interest within the tissue to provide a more comprehensive assessment.

    Why This Study Matters for People with Celiac Disease

    For individuals living with celiac disease, this study represents an exciting step forward in diagnosis and disease management. By providing a more reliable and precise way to analyze biopsies, the automated approach could lead to earlier and more accurate diagnoses. It also holds promise for monitoring the effectiveness of a gluten-free diet or new treatments, offering a way to measure progress in a detailed and objective manner.

    This innovation could reduce the burden on pathologists, improve consistency in patient care, and advance our understanding of how celiac disease affects the small intestine. As the technology continues to evolve, it has the potential to improve outcomes for people with celiac disease and pave the way for new advancements in treatment and research.

    Read more at: nature.com

    Watch the video version of this article:


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    There are no comments to display.



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate
  • About Me

    Scott Adams

    Scott Adams was diagnosed with celiac disease in 1994, and, due to the nearly total lack of information available at that time, was forced to become an expert on the disease in order to recover. In 1995 he launched the site that later became Celiac.com to help as many people as possible with celiac disease get diagnosed so they can begin to live happy, healthy gluten-free lives.  He is co-author of the book Cereal Killers, and founder and publisher of the (formerly paper) newsletter Journal of Gluten Sensitivity. In 1998 he founded The Gluten-Free Mall which he sold in 2014. Celiac.com does not sell any products, and is 100% advertiser supported.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Related Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Does Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity Have Distinct Duodenal Histological Signs?
    Celiac.com 05/30/2018 - One of the key aspects of non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) is that patients are diagnosed partly by the absence of celiac disease. That is, patients with NCGS, whatever their symptoms, do not have celiac disease. But could those patients still have some kind of gut damage, or permeability issues? Do people with non-celiac gluten sensitivity have distinct duodenal histological features? Researchers are seeking a better understanding of this still undefined condition.
    Some researchers have suggested that histology may play a key role in NCGS, but there is still no consensus. A recent review by Bardella et al. revealed that histology is not always reported in NCGS studies, and exclusion of celiac disease is generally done by showing negative serology and/o...


    Posterboy
    How Low Thiamine Can Thin Villi: Old Research Rediscovered and its Clinical Significance in Celiac Disease
    Celiac.com 02/29/2020 - It has been a long and winding road, and around each curve something new has been discovered. I have learned more than I ever thought there was to know about celiac disease. I am forever grateful for having received a celiac diagnosis because it was on that day that I began my journey back to health.
    On my first day of diagnosis I set out to find out as much as possible about this seemingly rare, but obviously complicated disease. My diagnosis answered a lot of questions for me, yet I was also struck by how many new questions arose.
    What was the trigger for celiac disease, of course gluten played a part, but what in my past history put me over the edge? What had changed? Did the doctors know so little about the trigger for celiac disease that it was...


    Scott Adams
    What are the Marsh Classification Pathology Criteria for Celiac Disease Patients?
    Celiac.com 06/13/2022 - In 1992 Dr. Michael Marsh developed his "Marsh Classification" system to describe the various stages of microscopic damage to the small intestine (histological changes) seen in those with celiac disease. The original system ranged from 0 - 4, and 3 or higher meant celiac disease, but his system was modified for consistency and reproducibility between pathologists.
    Today, anyone who has been diagnosed with celiac disease has likely heard about the Marsh classification system. Using the Marsh Classification allows clinicians to accurately measure the full extent of the damage to the villi that line the small intestine, to determine the extent of celiac disease progress and damage. Modified Marsh Classification of histologic findings in celiac disease (Oberhuber) ...


    Jefferson Adams
    The Correlation Between Anti-tTG Antibody Levels and Histological Severity in Celiac Disease
    Celiac.com 01/12/2024 - Celiac disease is a complex autoimmune disorder, which manifests as a spectrum of histological damage to the intestinal mucosa. A recent study led by researcher Muhammad Hassan Qureshi delves into the correlation between anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibody levels, and the histological severity of celiac disease. His meta-analysis offers quantitative insights, based on a diverse range of studies, and represents a small step forward in enhancing our comprehension of diagnostic approaches in celiac disease.
    Qureshi, associated with institutions including CMH Lahore Medical College, Institute of Dentistry in Lahore, Pakistan, and Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge, United Kingdom, embarked on this research to address the existing gaps in understanding ...


  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Kiwifruit's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Years of testing - no real answers

    2. - Kiwifruit replied to Kiwifruit's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Years of testing - no real answers

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Tyoung's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      2

      Celiac Disease and Mild Chronic Gastritis

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Bebee's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Testing for celiac


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,091
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Michelle24077
    Newest Member
    Michelle24077
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Popular Now

    • Dc91
      6
    • KRipple
    • Karmmacalling
      6
    • Bebygirl01
  • Popular Articles

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
  • Upcoming Events

×
×
  • Create New...