Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Jefferson Adams
    Jefferson Adams

    Man Claims Hookworm Treatment Led to Remission of Celiac Disease

    Reviewed and edited by a celiac disease expert.

    Can hookworms really trigger remission of celiac disease? Yes, according to a man who says he's living symptom-free since receiving hookworm treatment for his celiac disease. 

    Man Claims Hookworm Treatment Led to Remission of Celiac Disease - Hookworm. Image: CC BY 2.0--Michael Wunderli
    Caption: Hookworm. Image: CC BY 2.0--Michael Wunderli

    Celiac.com 12/16/2022 - Recently, an interesting discussion thread popped onto our celiac disease and gluten-free forum. A member of the forum, going by the handle @dixonpete, claims his celiac disease went into remission after treatment with hookworms.

    Moreover, he claims that he is essentially cured, and able to eat gluten with no side effects, and has had at least one recent negative follow up tTG antibody test to back this up.

    History of Hookworm Infection to Treat Celiac Disease

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12):
    We've done more than a few articles on the potential to use hookworms to treat celiac disease. We've done a number of articles on hookworms as the potential future of celiac disease treatment, including: 

    Previously, we'd only reported data from various studies, some of which looked promising. Until recently we had never heard directly from anyone claiming to have gone through hookworm treatment firsthand.

    Because he is the first person we've heard from who claims direct experience with hookworm treatment for celiac disease, the information furnished by @dixonpete to the thread might be of interest to anyone who might be interested in the possibility of receiving hookworm treatment.

    Hookworms seem to work, at least partly, by blocking the inflammatory response in the gut of the host. One of the benefits of this treatment is that the hookworms may also block the gut's immune response to gluten in people with celiac disease.

    Could Hookworm Treatment Allow Celiacs to Eat Gluten Again?

    At this time, there's no data to confirm that hookworm treatment "cures" celiac disease in the classic sense of the word. In theory, if the hookworms were eliminated, then the celiac disease could return. And the hookworms don't reproduce, so you need just the right amount in the gut, but not too much.

    The current hypothesis is that the hookworms simply block the immune inflammatory response when people with celiac disease eat gluten. But even that remains unclear, and not well-supported by data. Clearly more studies need to be done to verify whether hookworms present a viable alternative for people with celiac disease.  A single example of this possibly working in real life isn't enough data to support the claim that the treatment should work for all celiacs. In fact, @dixonpete admits himself that he was suffering from both celiac disease and other conditions that drove his decision. Still, it's a compelling story. For more information, read the full discussion thread and the related articles.

    If hookworms prove to be effective treatment for celiac disease, would you be willing to consider a hookworm infection to treat your celiac disease? Let us know in the comments below.  



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    John Scott
    12 minutes ago, Blue-Sky said:

    In this trial hookworms were ineffective as a treatment or Celiac disease for over 2>gram a day of gluten but helpful for lower amounts.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678792/

    That's what the study authors concluded based on the the data they obtained, but the trial design was flawed. Most of the clinical trials conducted to date have been seriously flawed because the researchers used methodology designed for testing synthetic drugs rather than living organisms. If you're interested, the problems with this and other similar trials are detailed here: 

    Problems with clinical trials using live helminths
     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    John Scott
    2 hours ago, Scott Adams said:

    Yes, in fact the average human lifespan has more than doubled in the last 120 years, which can be attributed to better medicine, vaccines, fertilizer, pesticides, access to clean water, better nutrition, increased crop yields, etc.

    Still, if hookworms can provide what might be the first true cure for celiac disease and allow, at least some of them, to eat gluten again without issues, it's definitely worth more study and research. My thought here is that it is important to discover the source of exactly how the infection regulates an overactive immune system, and perhaps that could lead to a drug or vaccine that would provide the same effect, without the need to host a parasite.

    How the worms actually do it is quite complicated, and still not fully understood. One researcher who has been working on this for several decades has told me that the worms are particularly resistant to yielding up their secrets! For example, they excrete/secrete an entire "orchestra" of chemicals - at least 200 of them. Quite astonishing!

    What we do know already is covered here:

    The effects of helminths on the immune system

    A number of scientists are agreed that the worms themselves will likely always be superior to synthetic helminth-derived medications.

    Living helminths are better than helminth-inspired drugs 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Blue-Sky
    22 minutes ago, John Scott said:

    That's what the study authors concluded based on the the data they obtained, but the trial design was flawed. Most of the clinical trials conducted to date have been seriously flawed because the researchers used methodology designed for testing synthetic drugs rather than living organisms. If you're interested, the problems with this and other similar trials are detailed here: 

    Problems with clinical trials using live helminths
     

    I am not convinced that the study was poorly designed. I don't have time to go through all of the claims on that site you linked to but it doesn't seem to me to be giving a very balanced picture at all.

    It is easy to say for example that a trial needs more time to get positive results but it is more likely the worms aren't very effective for treating celiac disease for most people.

    I am also very suspect of the claim that the body needs this particular organism to function.

    It is very easy to explain why developed countries have more autoimmune conditions compared to other countries because of other causes.

    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/jan/08/global-spread-of-autoimmune-disease-blamed-on-western-diet

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    trents

    It also concerns me that helminth infections are not always beneficent. There was a reason those meds were developed to kill them. Just because we develop the capacity to live with them does not mean we live better with them.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    trents

    Wait, something from the article, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678792/, linked above referring incidentally to the prevalence of celiac disease:

    "The condition is becoming increasingly diagnosed and is estimated to affect 2% of many ethnically diverse populations (5,6)."

    For some years now, we have been operating under the 1% statistic for the prevalence of celiac disease.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    dixonpete
    1 hour ago, trents said:

    Wait, something from the article, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678792/, linked above referring incidentally to the prevalence of celiac disease:

    "The condition is becoming increasingly diagnosed and is estimated to affect 2% of many ethnically diverse populations (5,6)."

    For some years now, we have been operating under the 1% statistic for the prevalence of celiac disease.

    "More recently, a study from Finland, found even a higher prevalence of biopsy-proven celiac disease (2.13%) in older people (52-74 years of age)." - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3227015/

    I read somewhere else recently a figure of 2.7% celiac incidence by the time people reach end of life. If I come across the source I'll come back and post it.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Scott Adams

    We published a study done years ago that was done on the blood from US solders in the 1950's which was has been stored since then and it was determined that there was indeed a lower overall rate of celiac disease in the 1950's compared to today, so yes, it does appear that the rate of celiac disease is increasing.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    dixonpete
    3 hours ago, trents said:

    It also concerns me that helminth infections are not always beneficent. There was a reason those meds were developed to kill them. Just because we develop the capacity to live with them does not mean we live better with them.

    Helminthic Therapy only advocates for the use of the most benign and controllable helminths, not the ones that are generally seen in the wild that cause blindness, elephantiasis, etc. Wikipedia claims there are 68 species of hookworm (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hookworm#Species), HT only advocates for one, Necator americanus. Dog hookworms, for example, can't penetrate the deeper levels of human skin and create all kinds of nastiness in humans (google for images for "dog hookworm humans").

    The way I look at it, it's a matter of choosing your poison. The cost and other downsides of being a host to hookworms vs the pain and disability of inflammatory bowel disease. If the relief from IBD that you get from hosting isn't substantial then you don't continue to do it and the hookworms die off by themselves (or you take a couple of pills to kill them). Pretty simple.

    In my case I went from a life of pain and disability and only being able to eat from a list of 12 or so food items to being a normal human being again. I just finished a piece of delicious blueberry pie. It was great. But absolutely I can tell you some people choose not to continue hosting after trying it because it didn't help or help enough.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Scott Adams
    4 hours ago, Blue-Sky said:

    In this trial hookworms were ineffective as a treatment or Celiac disease for over 2>gram a day of gluten but helpful for lower amounts.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7678792/

    Thank you for sharing this. I see nothing about this study that would indicate that it was flawed, or that the results can't be trusted. On the contrary, it seems to indicate that hookworms are not a magic bullet for most celiacs, and that @dixonpete should definitely be doing regular celiac blood panels to make sure his antibodies don't start going up again. 

    It is well known that some celiacs will go into remission after going gluten-free for many months or years, and if they start eating gluten again it could take years for some to start reacting to it again. It possible that @dixonpete going through such a remission.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    John Scott
    6 hours ago, Blue-Sky said:

    I am not convinced that the study was poorly designed. I don't have time to go through all of the claims on that site you linked to but it doesn't seem to me to be giving a very balanced picture at all.

    It is easy to say for example that a trial needs more time to get positive results but it is more likely the worms aren't very effective for treating celiac disease for most people.

    I am also very suspect of the claim that the body needs this particular organism to function.

    It is very easy to explain why developed countries have more autoimmune conditions compared to other countries because of other causes.

    https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/jan/08/global-spread-of-autoimmune-disease-blamed-on-western-diet

     

    I doubt you will be convinced that the study was poorly designed when you admit to not having read the details at the link I gave you. I wrote that analysis of the reasons why so many trials using living worms are flawed, and I was careful to make sure that all the points made would be clear to anyone who actually takes the time to read them.

    Regarding being "very suspect of the claim that the body needs this particular organism to function", this isn't what I said. What I did say is that the human immune system needs the presence of worms in order to be able to function *optimally*. 

    "Independent lines of evidence, including epidemiologic studies, studies using animal models and clinical observations, point to the idea that we need exposure to helminths in order to avoid biota alteration and immune hypersensitivity."
    Between a hygiene rock and a hygienic hard place

    "All immunocompetent humans need regular exposure to helminths in order to maintain optimal immune function and avoid risk for inflammation-associated disease."
    Production and Use of Hymenolepis diminuta Cysticercoids as Anti-Inflammatory Therapeutics

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    John Scott
    3 hours ago, Scott Adams said:

    Thank you for sharing this. I see nothing about this study that would indicate that it was flawed, or that the results can't be trusted. On the contrary, it seems to indicate that hookworms are not a magic bullet for most celiacs, and that @dixonpete should definitely be doing regular celiac blood panels to make sure his antibodies don't start going up again. 

    It is well known that some celiacs will go into remission after going gluten-free for many months or years, and if they start eating gluten again it could take years for some to start reacting to it again. It possible that @dixonpete going through such a remission.

    In this Croese et al, 2020 study (1), the trial participants received two doses of either 10x or 20x N. americanus (NA) larvae at weeks 0 and 8, and were challenged with gluten between weeks 12 and 42, with an optional 52 week extension for those participants without celiac disease symptoms. Based on the data, this trial’s authors stated the conclusion that infection with NA does not obviate the need for a gluten-free diet. However, the trial design was undoubtedly flawed.

    * The trial period was too short. While some of the benefits derived from hosting NA may begin to appear within a few weeks, they do not become consistent until at least 12 weeks, and, in some cases, can take up to 2 years to develop fully. (2)

    * Some participants may not have received an adequate number of NA. The level of helminth dosing required to achieve disease remission in different hosts varies by more than a factor of 10. (3)

    * Dosing with NA may not have been continued for long enough to maintain efficacy. While NA have been reported to survive in hosts for many years, data gathered from the community of helminth self-treaters show that, in practice, NA may survive for as little as 2-3 months in some individuals, especially those with digestive diseases. (2)

    * The hookworms hosted by some trial participants may have lost efficacy before the end of the trial, due to the possible ingestion of certain dietary substances that can adversely affect, or even kill, NA in some individuals. (4)

    In 2022, Venkatakrishnan et al (3) highlighted the fact that some “gold standard” helminthic therapy trials, in spite of their double-blind, placebo-controlled design, have provided lacklustre or even false negative results due to a lack of adequate consideration of the biology of living helminths and their interactions with their hosts  - exactly the points I’ve made above.

    For more about these issues, see: Problems with clinical trials using live helminths: Trialing the human hookworm (NA). (5)

    (1) Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial of Experimental Hookworm Infection for Improving Gluten Tolerance in Celiac Disease

    (2) Hookworm dosing and response

    (3) Socio-medical studies of individuals self-treating with helminths provide insight into clinical trial design for assessing helminth therapy

    (4) Human helminth care manual

    (5) Helminthic therapy research: Problems with clinical trials using live helminths

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    trents
    8 minutes ago, John Scott said:

    In this Croese et al, 2020 study (1), the trial participants received two doses of either 10x or 20x N. americanus (NA) larvae at weeks 0 and 8, and were challenged with gluten between weeks 12 and 42, with an optional 52 week extension for those participants without celiac disease symptoms. Based on the data, this trial’s authors stated the conclusion that infection with NA does not obviate the need for a gluten-free diet. However, the trial design was undoubtedly flawed.

    * The trial period was too short. While some of the benefits derived from hosting NA may begin to appear within a few weeks, they do not become consistent until at least 12 weeks, and, in some cases, can take up to 2 years to develop fully. (2)

    * Some participants may not have received an adequate number of NA. The level of helminth dosing required to achieve disease remission in different hosts varies by more than a factor of 10. (3)

    * Dosing with NA may not have been continued for long enough to maintain efficacy. While NA have been reported to survive in hosts for many years, data gathered from the community of helminth self-treaters show that, in practice, NA may survive for as little as 2-3 months in some individuals, especially those with digestive diseases. (2)

    * The hookworms hosted by some trial participants may have lost efficacy before the end of the trial, due to the possible ingestion of certain dietary substances that can adversely affect, or even kill, NA in some individuals. (4)

    In 2022, Venkatakrishnan et al (3) highlighted the fact that some “gold standard” helminthic therapy trials, in spite of their double-blind, placebo-controlled design, have provided lacklustre or even false negative results due to a lack of adequate consideration of the biology of living helminths and their interactions with their hosts  - exactly the points I’ve made above.

    For more about these issues, see: Problems with clinical trials using live helminths: Trialing the human hookworm (NA). (5)

    (1) Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial of Experimental Hookworm Infection for Improving Gluten Tolerance in Celiac Disease

    (2) Hookworm dosing and response

    (3) Socio-medical studies of individuals self-treating with helminths provide insight into clinical trial design for assessing helminth therapy

    (4) Human helminth care manual

    (5) Helminthic therapy research: Problems with clinical trials using live helminths

    It just seems like there are too many variables involved with this helminth therapy to have any certainty that it is working. You're saying it can take up to two years for it to become effective? How do you even know when it has become effective? What, do you have to get a celiac antibody test every few months? Sorry, I'm not interested in this until the process gets more refined and more reliable. I'll just keep avoiding gluten.

    Edited by trents
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate
  • About Me

    Jefferson Adams

    Jefferson Adams is Celiac.com's senior writer and Digital Content Director. He earned his B.A. and M.F.A. at Arizona State University. His articles, essays, poems, stories and book reviews have appeared in numerous magazines, journals, and websites, including North American Project, Antioch Review, Caliban, Mississippi Review, Slate, and more. He is the author of more than 2,500 articles on celiac disease. His university coursework includes studies in science, scientific methodology, biology, anatomy, physiology, medicine, logic, and advanced research. He previously devised health and medical content for Colgate, Dove, Pfizer, Sharecare, Walgreens, and more. Jefferson has spoken about celiac disease to the media, including an appearance on the KQED radio show Forum, and is the editor of numerous books, including "Cereal Killers" by Scott Adams and Ron Hoggan, Ed.D.

    >VIEW ALL ARTICLES BY JEFFERSON ADAMS

     


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Related Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 11/16/2009 - Could unknown benefits from one of the oldest parasites of the human digestive tract hold the key to cure for celiac disease?
    Australian scientists think so. Encouraged by successful treatments of Crohn's and ulcerative colitis by American researchers using a pig whipworm (Trichuris sues), a team of Australian researchers is recruiting volunteers with celiac disease for trials using human hookworm (Necator americanus).
    The researchers have undertaken a similar preliminary study using a human hookworm in Crohn's patients.
    Researchers hypothesize that the disappearance of intestinal parasites from humans in developed countries may be responsible for the upsurge in many diseases including Celiac Disease, Crohn's, ulcerative colitis, asthma and hay fever. ...


    Jefferson Adams
    Celiac.com 10/03/2014 - Celiac disease patients in Australia have shown a major improvement in gluten tolerance after receiving experimental hookworm treatments. The study is part of an effort to determine if parasitic helminths, such as hookworm, might help to treat inflammatory disorders, including celiac disease.
    In this case, the research team assessed the influence of experimental hookworm infection on the predicted outcomes of three escalating gluten challenges in volunteers with confirmed celiac disease.
    The research team included John Croese, MD, Paul Giacomin, PhD, Severine Navarro, PhD, Andrew Clouston, MD, Leisa McCann, RN, Annette Dougall, PhD, Ivana Ferreira, BSc, Atik Susianto, MD, Peter O'Rourke, PhD, Mariko Howlett, MD, James McCarthy, MD, Christian Engwerda, PhD,...


    Dr. Vikki Petersen D.C, C.C.N
    Have Celiac Disease? Try a Little Hookworm with that Pasta!
    Celiac.com 07/26/2016 - What a gross title–it bothers me and I wrote it! It wasn't my idea originally. The research paper the data came from was entitled, "Experimental hookworm infection and gluten microchallenge promote tolerance in celiac disease" published recently in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.
    It might be gross but the results were pretty darn interesting. Now don't try this at home, needless to say, but let's look at what these professional researchers discovered.
    The hookworm, also known as a parasitic helminth, is known to have beneficial effects in inflammatory disorders. Therefore the researchers decided to see what would occur if they induced a hookworm infection into known celiacs and fed them escalating amounts of gluten.
    A one year study was e...


    Jefferson Adams
    Can Bloodsucking Parasites Help Treat Asthma and Celiac Disease?
    Celiac.com 11/30/2016 - Trials using hookworm as a possible treatment for celiac disease are already underway in Australia, but they latest hookworm news indicates that they might also be useful for treating asthma.
    The New World hookworm, aka necator americanus, is long and slender as an angel hair noodle. Adults are large enough to be seen with the naked eye. Seen up close, they look more like the sand worms in the movie Dune than anything people are used to seeing here on earth.
    Researchers are reporting that a protein produced by hookworms reduces the symptoms of asthma in mice, and could one day be used to treat asthma in humans, says the journal Science Translational Medicine. These parasites are some of the most maligned creatures in the animal kingdom. They chew into the human...


  • Recent Activity

    1. - RMJ replied to Jean Shifrin's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      1

      Implications of glutening after repairing villi

    2. - Jean Shifrin posted a topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      1

      Implications of glutening after repairing villi

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Patrick-Tyler's topic in Gluten-Free Restaurants
      5

      Is McDonald's Safe for Gluten-Free Orders?

    4. - trents replied to Patrick-Tyler's topic in Gluten-Free Restaurants
      5

      Is McDonald's Safe for Gluten-Free Orders?

    5. - Scott Adams replied to GeordieGeezer's topic in Food Intolerance & Leaky Gut
      17

      Anybody else have a similar experience...theories welcome as its something which i dont really understand.....


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,802
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Debra M
    Newest Member
    Debra M
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.8k
    • Total Posts
      69k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Popular Now

    • Patrick-Tyler
    • Elliebee
    • mswhis
    • Dhruv
      20
    • Mary Em
      10
  • Popular Articles

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
  • Upcoming Events

×
×
  • Create New...