Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Jefferson Adams
    Jefferson Adams

    Standardizing Celiac Disease Diagnostics

    Reviewed and edited by a celiac disease expert.

    A new study compares outcomes from biopsies among American children at risk of celiac disease, with European thresholds that would deem such biopsies unnecessary. Here's what they found.

    Standardizing Celiac Disease Diagnostics - Patient Blood Draw by NIHClinicalCenter is licensed under CC BY 2.0.
    Caption:

    Celiac.com 10/23/2023 - A recent study conducted by a team of US investigators is shedding light on the use of European thresholds for diagnosing celiac disease in North America. This study seeks to determine how often biopsies are performed on children who are considered at high risk for celiac disease based on common diagnostic tests, yet meet the criteria for non-biopsy diagnoses according to European standards.

    Dr. Denis Chang, the study's lead author, discussed the trial's design and its implications for celiac disease diagnostics in North America during an interview with HCPLive at the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) 2023 Annual Meeting in San Diego.

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12):
    Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder that affects the small intestine and is triggered by the consumption of gluten, a protein found in wheat, rye, and barley. The gold standard for diagnosing celiac disease is through an endoscopy, which involves taking biopsies to confirm the damage caused by gluten. However, serology, or blood testing, has become a game-changer in the diagnostic process. It helps identify individuals who require an endoscopy based on a positive blood test, typically the tissue transglutaminase (tTG-IgA) test.

    While tTG-IgA is a reliable biomarker, it is not infallible and can yield false positives or negatives. In 2012, European colleagues established guidelines that allow for a celiac disease diagnosis in some cases where a highly positive tTG-IgA result is combined with another positive blood marker, EMA IgA. These guidelines initially included genetic risk and symptoms but no longer do.

    In contrast, North American guidelines have not incorporated these standards, partially due to the wide array of diagnostic assays used to identify celiac disease, each with its own methodology.

    Dr. Chang also emphasizes the concern of potentially overlooking other diagnoses by not conducting an endoscopy, such as eosinophilic esophagitis, which is commonly seen in celiac patients.

    In an ideal world, a standardized and widely accepted diagnostic assay strategy would simplify the diagnostic process and potentially pave the way for developing new clinical therapies for celiac disease. Currently, there are no FDA-approved drugs for treating celiac disease, and the most promising agents in development are primarily intended for adult patients.

    Dr. Chang explained that an alternative diagnosis method could help expand the pool of individuals, both providers and patients, who can collaborate to advance celiac disease research and treatment options. Additionally, it could offer clarity for patients who have received a presumed celiac disease diagnosis based solely on high blood markers, without undergoing a biopsy.

    This investigation into the use of European diagnostic thresholds in North America is a significant step toward streamlining the diagnosis of celiac disease.

    See more at the Conference|North American Society For Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition
     



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    OldNavyWife54

    I wasn’t diagnosed until age 53. It wasn’t for lack of trying (on my part) to get diagnosed earlier, but for me the “gold standard” blood test came back negative twice. At least that’s what the ordering doctors told me. But later when I went to a Naturopath, he ordered the blood test again, and said it wasn’t negative but a weak positive. Further testing revealed that I do have Celiac Disease, and finally going gluten free made a huge difference in my health. My symptoms were very obvious & I feel that doctors often give up too easily when seeking this diagnosis. Being diagnosed that late in life meant that not all of the damage to my small intestine was recoverable, and as such I require lots of supplements & will need them for the rest of my life. This disorder is far more common than most doctors know, and they absolutely need to look further in cases where initial testing may be negative in their estimation, but the patient’s symptoms clearly suggest otherwise.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Scott Adams

    It's great that you finally figured it out. Unfortunately most people who have it are still undiagnosed. 

    Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score. Some people go gluten-free before their endoscopy because their doctors don't follow protocol and tell them to keep eating lots of gluten daily for at least two weeks before the procedure--this can create false-negative results.

    Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis.

    The same is true for blood test results. We've heard over and over in this forum from people who were not told to eat at least two slices of bread daily for 6-8 weeks before a blood test for celiac disease--which is the standard protocol for the tests. Many people go gluten-free before their blood tests are taken, which can create false-negative results.

    Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion. There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!). 

    Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease.

    Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting the tests for celiac disease. Some will find out about the majority here who fall into the non-celiac gluten sensitivity zone and go gluten-free and recover, but many will continue suffer needlessly. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your issues and you've gone gluten-free, because many people never figure it out.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    OldNavyWife54
    13 minutes ago, Scott Adams said:

    It's great that you finally figured it out. Unfortunately most people who have it are still undiagnosed. 

    Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score. Some people go gluten-free before their endoscopy because their doctors don't follow protocol and tell them to keep eating lots of gluten daily for at least two weeks before the procedure--this can create false-negative results.

    Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis.

    The same is true for blood test results. We've heard over and over in this forum from people who were not told to eat at least two slices of bread daily for 6-8 weeks before a blood test for celiac disease--which is the standard protocol for the tests. Many people go gluten-free before their blood tests are taken, which can create false-negative results.

    Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion. There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!). 

    Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease.

    Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting the tests for celiac disease. Some will find out about the majority here who fall into the non-celiac gluten sensitivity zone and go gluten-free and recover, but many will continue suffer needlessly. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your issues and you've gone gluten-free, because many people never figure it out.

    If I had a dime for every doctor who told me I just had irritable bowel syndrome, I’d be a rich woman. I had started suspecting Celiac back in my 20’s, but my late husband was military so I was seeing military doctors. They wouldn’t even order the blood test, and just kept telling me it was only IBS.

    Celiac is so much more common than many would believe. I wish doctors would come up to speed on just how common it is. They could save lots of years of unnecessary suffering for many people.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    plumbago
    On 10/31/2023 at 2:03 PM, Scott Adams said:

    Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA.

    I was rather surprised to go back and look at my blood test results because none of them included a total IgA. But then, looking at the lab results from my original celiac disease diagnosis over 10 years ago, I see the reason for that. Part of the standard verbiage in that report says: "Between 2-3% of Celiac patients have selective IgA deficiency. If the tTG IgA result is negative but celiac disease is still suspected, total IgA should be measured to identify possible selective IgA deficiency and to rule out a false negative." In my particular case, my tTG IgA was high, so no total IgA was needed. This was verbiage spit out routinely, so really, the doctor didn't need to know this, since it's flagged for them right there on the report.

    But, in any event, I'm now learning about IgA deficiency and how it's tied to a few conditions, a couple of which I suffer from like frequent sinus infections, and two Covid infections less than 5 months apart. For better or worse, my parents decided to remove my tonsils and adenoids when I was a child, so maybe that has something to do with some upper respiratory struggles, who knows.

    My question is - given that over 10 years ago, I didn't have selective IgA deficiency, is it likely that I still don't? (My last celiac disease panel was about 6 years ago, and everything was normal. Total IgA was not run.)

    Plumbago

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Scott Adams

    I believe that IgA deficiency is genetic and won't change over a person's lifetime, so if you are IgA deficient you'll always be that way.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate
  • About Me

    Jefferson Adams

    Jefferson Adams is Celiac.com's senior writer and Digital Content Director. He earned his B.A. and M.F.A. at Arizona State University. His articles, essays, poems, stories and book reviews have appeared in numerous magazines, journals, and websites, including North American Project, Antioch Review, Caliban, Mississippi Review, Slate, and more. He is the author of more than 2,500 articles on celiac disease. His university coursework includes studies in science, scientific methodology, biology, anatomy, physiology, medicine, logic, and advanced research. He previously devised health and medical content for Colgate, Dove, Pfizer, Sharecare, Walgreens, and more. Jefferson has spoken about celiac disease to the media, including an appearance on the KQED radio show Forum, and is the editor of numerous books, including "Cereal Killers" by Scott Adams and Ron Hoggan, Ed.D.

    >VIEW ALL ARTICLES BY JEFFERSON ADAMS

     


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Related Articles

    Scott Adams
    Celiac Disease Blood Antibody Tests
    Celiac.com 02/05/2023 - If you have celiac disease symptoms, for example chronic diarrhea, anemia, bloating, abdominal pain, rashes, are in a higher risk group, etc., your doctor may order a blood test for celiac disease. Note that before doing any blood tests for celiac disease you must be eating gluten for a while beforehand, and the amount and length of time can vary, but is somewhere between 2 slices of wheat bread daily for 6-8 weeks and 1/2 slice of wheat bread or 1 wheat cracker for 12 weeks, otherwise you may end up with false negative results.
    For a celiac disease antibody test, a clinician collects a small amount of the patient's blood. The sample is then sent to a lab, where the blood cells are then removed, and the test is conducted.
    Celiac Disease Blood Tests <...>

    Scott Adams
    How Long Does It Take to Diagnose Celiac Disease?
    Celiac.com 05/23/2019 - One of the most common questions we see about celiac disease diagnosis is: How long does it take, on average for a person to be diagnosed with celiac disease from the time they first notice symptoms? The answer can vary from person to person, and from doctor to doctor. It can depend on what resources your doctor has to test you for celiac antibodies. It can vary by location and country.
    One doctors start looking for celiac disease, it doesn't usually take them very long. In theory, a diagnosis of celiac disease is fairly straightforward. The best case would be you notice symptoms, go see a doctor, receive a quick antibody screen, test positive for celiac antibodies, receive a biopsy and get a confirmation.
    In reality, it almost never works like that....


    Dr. Rodney Ford M.D.
    How Early Can You Diagnose Celiac Disease?
    Celiac.com 10/12/2016 - How early can you diagnose celiac disease? This is a most challenging question for everyone: children, parents, pediatricians, gastroenterologists and many other health professionals. This is because, like so many other diseases, celiac disease is a progressive condition that slowly creeps up on you. In addition, there is disagreement about what constitutes a definitive diagnosis of celiac disease. What if the small bowel biopsy result is at odds to the blood test results?
    It is my opinion that the fundamental diagnostic requirements for celiac disease remain unresolved. This makes early diagnosis problematic!
    Do you keep waiting (whilst suffering from symptoms) for classic gut damage to be visible in a bowel biopsy before adopting a gluten-free diet? Or do...


    Jefferson Adams
    Can We Reduce Diagnostic Delay and Under-diagnosis of Celiac Disease?
    Celiac.com 04/25/2022 - Even with numerous advances in celiac disease awareness and testing outreach, the path to diagnosis remains difficult for many patients, and misdiagnosis is still not uncommon. In general, celiac disease remains an under-diagnosed condition.
    A team of researchers recently set out to investigate possible biochemical abnormalities associated with celiac disease antibody positivity in a primary health care setting and thereby identify predictors that could potentially reduce diagnostic delay and under-diagnosis of celiac disease. 
    The research team included Line Lund Kårhus, Margit Kriegbaum, Mia Klinten Grand, Bent Struer Lind, Line Tang Møllehave, Jüri J. Rumessen, Christen Lykkegaard Andersen and Allan Linneberg.
    For their observational coh...


  • Recent Activity

    1. - RMJ replied to Jean Shifrin's topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      1

      Implications of glutening after repairing villi

    2. - Jean Shifrin posted a topic in Traveling with Celiac Disease
      1

      Implications of glutening after repairing villi

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Patrick-Tyler's topic in Gluten-Free Restaurants
      5

      Is McDonald's Safe for Gluten-Free Orders?

    4. - trents replied to Patrick-Tyler's topic in Gluten-Free Restaurants
      5

      Is McDonald's Safe for Gluten-Free Orders?

    5. - Scott Adams replied to GeordieGeezer's topic in Food Intolerance & Leaky Gut
      17

      Anybody else have a similar experience...theories welcome as its something which i dont really understand.....


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      125,802
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Debra M
    Newest Member
    Debra M
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.8k
    • Total Posts
      69k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Popular Now

    • Patrick-Tyler
    • Elliebee
    • mswhis
    • Dhruv
      20
    • GeordieGeezer
  • Popular Articles

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
  • Upcoming Events

×
×
  • Create New...