Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Jefferson Adams
    Jefferson Adams

    The Gluten Contamination Study We've Been Waiting For

    Reviewed and edited by a celiac disease expert.

    Do you really need that dedicated gluten-free toaster and dedicated flatware? A new study says you might not.

    The Gluten Contamination Study We've Been Waiting For - Image: CC BY-SA 2.0--threefingeredlord
    Caption: Image: CC BY-SA 2.0--threefingeredlord

    Celiac.com 10/14/2019 - One of the big debates among people with celiac disease concerns how vigilant celiacs need to be to make sure they avoid gluten. What does science say about gluten contamination in three common scenarios? How careful do you need to be about gluten contamination?

    For example, how likely are you to get gluten over 20ppm if you share a toaster, pasta water, or slice a cupcake with the same knife used to cut a non-gluten-free cupcake?

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12):
    A team of researchers recently set out to assess three common scenarios where people with celiac disease might reasonably fear gluten contamination. How did the actual risk for each situation measure up?

    • Scenario 1: Water used to cook regular pasta is reused to cook gluten-free penne and fusilli. The gluten-free pasta is then rinsed and served.
    • Scenario 2: Toasting Gluten-Free Bread in an Uncleaned Shared Toaster Gluten-containing bread is toasted in a toaster. Immediately afterward, gluten-free bread is toasted in the same toaster.
    • Scenario 3: Slicing a Gluten-Free and Regular Cupcake with Same Knife

    The research team included Vanessa M. Weisbrod, BA; Jocelyn A. Silvester, MD PhD; Catherine Raber, MA; Joyana McMahon, MS; Shayna S. Coburn, PhD; and Benny Kerzner, MD. They are variously affiliated with the Celiac Disease Program, Children’s National Health System, Washington, DC, USA; and the Harvard Celiac Disease Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA.

    Their paper titled, Preparation of Gluten-Free Foods Alongside Gluten-Containing Food May Not Always Be as Risky for Celiac Patients as Diet Guides Suggest, appears in Gasterojournal.org.

    Control samples of gluten-free pasta, bread, and cupcakes all tested below the limit of detection. Samples were individually packaged in plastic bags with randomized sample numbers. To avoid “hot spots” and ensure even analysis, all items were homogenized for analysis. 

    Gluten content was measured with R5 sandwich ELISA (R7001, R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany) which has a limit of detection of 5 ppm gluten by Bia Diagnostics (Colchester, Vermont). All control samples were similarly tested. 

    The team then quantified gluten samples as under 5ppm, 5-10ppm, 10-20ppm, or over 20ppm, and based their confidence intervals upon binomial distribution.

    Boiling Gluten-Free Pasta in Regular Pasta Water

    In the first scenario, the team boiled sixteen-ounce packages of gluten-containing Barilla brand penne and fusilli separately in stainless steel pots in fresh tap water for 12 minutes, then removed with strainers. The water was reused to cook Dr. Schar gluten-free penne and fusilli. The team also tested the effect of rinsing some samples of the cooked and contaminated pasta under cold tap water for 30 seconds. 

    The team found that Gluten was detected in all pasta samples cooked in water used for gluten-containing pasta, ranging from 33.9ppm to 115.7ppm. The rinsed gluten-free pasta samples tested at 5.1 ppm and 17.5 ppm detectable gluten. 

    Interestingly, rinsing pots with water alone after cooking gluten-containing pasta was as effective as scrubbing with soap and water to prevent detectable gluten transfer. 

    Toasting Gluten-Free Bread After Non-Gluten-Free Bread

    In the second scenario, the team toasted regular gluten-containing bread in two rolling toasters in a busy hospital cafeteria at 20-minute intervals, or in one of three shared pop-up toasters. Immediately after toasting the gluten-containing bread, they toasted Dr. Schar Artisan White Bread. Gluten-containing crumbs were visible in all toasters. They team did not clean the toasters. 

    The team found that toasting in a shared toaster was not associated with gluten transfer above 20ppm; the four samples with detectable gluten had levels ranging only from 5.1 ppm to 8.3 ppm gluten.

    Slicing a Gluten-Free Cupcake with Knife Used on Gluten Cupcake

    In the third scenario, the team used a knife to slice frosted gluten-containing cupcakes. The knife was then reused to slice a frosted gluten-free Vanilla Cupcake from Whole Foods Gluten-Free Bake House. 

    The knife was then washed in soap and water, rinsed in running water, or cleaned with an antibacterial hand wipe (Wet Ones) and a new gluten-free cupcake was sliced. Both gluten-free cupcakes were analyzed for gluten content.  Although 28/30 cupcake samples had detectable gluten transfer, only 2/28 tested over 20ppm. 

    The team found that cutting cupcakes with a knife used to cut frosted gluten-containing cupcakes was associated with low-level gluten transfer even when crumbs were visible on the icing adhered to the knife. All three knife washing methods tested were effective in removing gluten. 

    The team acknowledges the limitations of their study, including small sample size, etc. They are calling for further study to assess best kitchen practices for people with celiac disease who are trying to avoid gluten contamination in shared kitchens.

    Main Takeaways

    1) Some kitchen activities may pose less of a risk of cross-contact with gluten than is commonly believed. 
    2) Standard washing effectively removes gluten from shared utensils.
    3) Cooking gluten-free pasta in the same water as regular gluten-containing pasta is likely okay, as long as the pasta gets rinsed well.
    4) Sharing a toaster is unlikely to result in gluten contamination.

    Read more in Gastrojournal.org

    Conflict of Interest Declaration: JAS has served on an advisory board of Takeda Pharmaceuticals and received research support from Cour Pharma, Glutenostics, and the Celiac Disease Foundation. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Funding Source: Supported by philanthropic gifts from the Celiac Disease Foundation, Dr. SCHAR USA, and Bia Diagnostics. JAS is supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K23DK119584. 



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Ella07
    On 10/21/2019 at 7:41 AM, Karen B. said:

    And for someone that reacts to gluten levels lower than 20 ppm?

    It took me awhile to believe my body was that sensitive but I have proved it to myself over and over. All this"study" accomplished is providing ammo to people to dismiss the concerns and requests of people with Celiac.   

    Yes, exactly! Seems irresponsible to spread this nonsense especially on this site of all places!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    anonymousplease

    I don't think it's bad to perform studies like this, but I do think the results can be more harmful than helpful depending on who's lap the information falls in. This study is interesting, but is it useful or helpful to people cooking at home or at restaurants? In my opinion it is not. I think it could even give false hope to celiacs who might read it and think it's ok to trust a restaurant with food prep, or make people feel more relaxed about cross contamination. I don't know how most celiacs feel but the only thing that would make me feel more relaxed about cross contamination is if everyone was more well educated about gluten allergies and how they work.

    5ppm, 10ppm, 20 ppm, this is not basic knowledge for most people. It's not helpful to most people to talk about a food item being under 20ppm or not. What we really need to do is teach people how to properly clean. How to use their eyes to check a fork while it's being washed, to see if it has any food stuck to it. We need to teach people how to take their time and be meticulous about removing gluten from a countertop, dishes, or sponge. It just take a little work and a little effort. We need to teach restaurants and bars NOT to label menu items gluten-free if they don't have a dedicated prep area. They need to understand basic hand washing, outfit and apron changes, etc, how to be really careful if they are preparing both gluten-free and non gluten-free items. 

    Honestly for me it comes down to just use your eyeballs! If you see gluten, wipe it off. If you see crumbs on a plate and you're not sure what it is, scrape it off. There is no need for separate plates and utensils in your own home if stuff is cleaned properly. I do think in your own home if you have to be meticulous and careful every day, that is very stressful, so I think everyone needs to help out, or everyone needs to be ok with the household being mostly gluten free. Don't eat at restaurants unless you know the owner's level of knowledge (like they have celiacs or their wife has celiacs etc etc). 

    Cleanliness (to the extent celiacs need) and food prep dedication is really difficult and probably not cost effective for most restaurants. Not to mention, purchasing ingredients and understanding certifications and the ppm issues. This is just not feasible for most places. I don't expect this to change any time soon, and I don't think this study helps with these real life issues either. 

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    sc'Que?
    On 9/24/2019 at 7:22 AM, PhilSieg said:
    17 hours ago, Ali Rae said:

    I don't think it's bad to perform studies like this, but I do think the results can be more harmful than helpful depending on who's lap the information falls in. This study is interesting, but is it useful or helpful to people cooking at home or at restaurants? In my opinion it is not. I think it could even give false hope to celiacs who might read it and think it's ok to trust a restaurant with food prep, or make people feel more relaxed about cross contamination. I don't know how most celiacs feel but the only thing that would make me feel more relaxed about cross contamination is if everyone was more well educated about gluten allergies and how they work.

    5ppm, 10ppm, 20 ppm, this is not basic knowledge for most people. It's not helpful to most people to talk about a food item being under 20ppm or not. What we really need to do is teach people how to properly clean. How to use their eyes to check a fork while it's being washed, to see if it has any food stuck to it. We need to teach people how to take their time and be meticulous about removing gluten from a countertop, dishes, or sponge. It just take a little work and a little effort. We need to teach restaurants and bars NOT to label menu items gluten-free if they don't have a dedicated prep area. They need to understand basic hand washing, outfit and apron changes, etc, how to be really careful if they are preparing both gluten-free and non gluten-free items. 

    Honestly for me it comes down to just use your eyeballs! If you see gluten, wipe it off. If you see crumbs on a plate and you're not sure what it is, scrape it off. There is no need for separate plates and utensils in your own home if stuff is cleaned properly. I do think in your own home if you have to be meticulous and careful every day, that is very stressful, so I think everyone needs to help out, or everyone needs to be ok with the household being mostly gluten free. Don't eat at restaurants unless you know the owner's level of knowledge (like they have celiacs or their wife has celiacs etc etc). 

    Cleanliness (to the extent celiacs need) and food prep dedication is really difficult and probably not cost effective for most restaurants. Not to mention, purchasing ingredients and understanding certifications and the ppm issues. This is just not feasible for most places. I don't expect this to change any time soon, and I don't think this study helps with these real life issues either. 

     

     

    Best comment here yet!  (And also very diplomatic.) 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest Deb

    There is no way I could eat pasta that has been cooked in gluten contaminated water, use a toaster that is also used for gluten laden bread or use kitchen utensils used for glutened foods.  This is study is more for the gluten intolerant than the celiac.  I practically look at gluten and have an attack.  My kitchen will remain completely gluten free, thank you very much.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    cyclinglady
    On 10/21/2019 at 5:02 PM, Jefferson Adams said:

    Actually, this study used rigorous scientific methodology, and makes its full results public without cost, unlike the site you mentioned. As for the takeaways, many folks have long believed they needed separate eating utensils because they thought that gluten would not rinse off, but this study clearly shows that gluten easily washes off flatware with standard washing methods.  Having a rigorous study actually quantify contamination levels for these scenarios is not only not flawed, it helps people actually quantify and understand actual risk levels. More and broader studies of this kind can help people move from fear and worry to actual knowledge and risk management. We welcome more of them.

    Here are comments from Dr. A. Fasano, (one of the world’s leading celiac disease researchers), about this study:

     

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    sc'Que?

    CyclingLady, thank you for posting this poignant followup from Dr. Fasano!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    kareng

    I guess my take away from all this is - sometimes using the same knife or oil or toaster doesn’t get gluten on the food ....... but sometimes it does.  And why would we relax our standards and hope we get lucky?   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    anonymousplease
    1 hour ago, kareng said:

    I guess my take away from all this is - sometimes using the same knife or oil or toaster doesn’t get gluten on the food ....... but sometimes it does.  And why would we relax our standards and hope we get lucky?   

    Those were my feelings exactly. I worry about what happens when studies like this are misinterpreted. I think they need to be followed up with how to apply what we've learned to everyday life safely and successfully. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Jefferson Adams
    On 10/31/2019 at 12:56 AM, sc'Que? said:

    CyclingLady, thank you for posting this poignant followup from Dr. Fasano!

    Dr. Fasano is not wrong. The study has little or no scientific or medical value. That only means no doctor or clinician is going to change their approach to the study, understanding or treatment of celiac disease because of this study. However, from the standpoint of trying to live gluten-free, the study can provide some helpful perspective, and eliminate some concerns, such as using common eating utensils.  Simply knowing that washing eating utensils in soap and water is a safely removes gluten, and makes them safe for people with celiac disease, while not medically or scientifically helpful, is a real benefit to a study like this. I would think that most people, including Dr. Fasano would agree.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    cyclinglady
    On 12/5/2019 at 1:31 PM, Jefferson Adams said:

    Dr. Fasano is not wrong. The study has little or no scientific or medical value. That only means no doctor or clinician is going to change their approach to the study, understanding or treatment of celiac disease because of this study. However, from the standpoint of trying to live gluten-free, the study can provide some helpful perspective, and eliminate some concerns, such as using common eating utensils.  Simply knowing that washing eating utensils in soap and water is a safely removes gluten, and makes them safe for people with celiac disease, while not medically or scientifically helpful, is a real benefit to a study like this. I would think that most people, including Dr. Fasano would agree.

    I think we all know (active forum members) that washing eating utensils in soap and water (rinsing with running water and not dunking) makes it safe for celiacs.  That includes hand washing or in a dishwasher.  I am living proof (biopsy-confirmed healing) that washing non-porous surfaces works.    What is not clear is using a knife that had previous cut through a cake with visible stuck on crumbs, using a shared toaster or boiling gluten free pasta in water that previously boiled regular wheat pasta even though the gluten-free pasta was rinsed is safe for celiacs.  

    More research is needed.  But I suppose anyone could take comfort in that cleaning utensils will eliminate gluten as you pointed out.   I am not sure I would feel comfortable ingesting chemicals from an antibacterial wipe like they used in the study.  

    That said, the study could mislead celiacs into thinking they are safe to use shared toasters, gluten water or a dirty knife with crumbs.  When 60% of celiacs do not heal, I think this study was released prematurely and could be dangerous.  With only 60% healing, I can see the need now for a pharmaceutical solution because the diet and food preparation information posted in the internet is confusing and often mis-leading.  

    Open Original Shared Link

    Edited by cyclinglady
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    sc'Que?

    To use an example I think we can all relate to:  I have no problem using a stainless pan that's been washed with soap and water after cooking glutenous pasta.  But I would not make the same concession for a cast-iron pan (or wok) that never touches soap... and certainly not a multi-tasking cutting board that had contact with traditional flour!   

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    sc'Que?
    11 hours ago, Jefferson Adams said:

    That only means no doctor or clinician is going to change their approach to the study, understanding or treatment of celiac disease because of this study. 

    Yes, Jeff, but we all know that lesser-educated folks will read this sort of thing and draw their own conclusions. Which is what WE ALL HERE are railing against. Articles like the one in question do nothing but dilute the reliable information that is available online to every single person who chooses to (try to) read and comprehend it. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate
  • About Me

    Jefferson Adams

    Jefferson Adams is Celiac.com's senior writer and Digital Content Director. He earned his B.A. and M.F.A. at Arizona State University. His articles, essays, poems, stories and book reviews have appeared in numerous magazines, journals, and websites, including North American Project, Antioch Review, Caliban, Mississippi Review, Slate, and more. He is the author of more than 2,500 articles on celiac disease. His university coursework includes studies in science, scientific methodology, biology, anatomy, physiology, medicine, logic, and advanced research. He previously devised health and medical content for Colgate, Dove, Pfizer, Sharecare, Walgreens, and more. Jefferson has spoken about celiac disease to the media, including an appearance on the KQED radio show Forum, and is the editor of numerous books, including "Cereal Killers" by Scott Adams and Ron Hoggan, Ed.D.

    >VIEW ALL ARTICLES BY JEFFERSON ADAMS

     


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Related Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Can New Checklist Help Prevent Gluten Contamination in Food Industry?
    Celiac.com 02/02/2017 - Scientists have devised a universal gluten cross-contamination checklist they hope will help to reduce gluten contamination in the food services industries.
    The newly created food services checklist was compiled after an extensive literature review, input from 11 different experts with PhDs and experience with food services and/or gluten and celiac issues, along with documents from various organizations such as the Gluten-Free Certification Program from the Canadian Celiac Association.
    The final checklist consists of 88 items divided into 12 sections, which cover everything from building and facilities maintenance, cleaning and ventilation, to employee clothing and hygiene, to food production and transport.
    The checklist also includes a robust section on...


    Jefferson Adams
    Fifteen Symptoms that can Make Celiac Disease Hard to Diagnose
    Celiac.com 03/21/2018 - Many people with celiac disease suffer from non-gastrointestinal symptoms. Here are 15 non-gastrointestinal symptoms that can make celiac disease difficult to diagnose. If the general public knows anything about celiac disease, it is likely that eating wheat can cause stomach problems in people with the condition. And that’s often true, classical celiac symptoms include abdominal bloating and pain, chronic diarrhea and/or constipation, and vomiting. 
    Young children are more likely to show classic signs of celiac disease, including growth problems (failure to thrive, chronic diarrhea/constipation, recurring abdominal bloating and pain, fatigue, and irritability.
    Older children and adults tend to have symptoms that are not entirely gastrointestinal in...


    Jefferson Adams
    Commercial Gluten-Free Food Compliance is Improving, But Contamination Still Too High
    Celiac.com 06/04/2018 - Rates of contamination in commercial food advertised as gluten-free are improving, but nearly one in ten still show unacceptable levels of gluten. As part of a government mandated food sampling program, the city of Melbourne, Australia recently conducted a survey of 127 food businesses advertising gluten-free options. 
    For the tests, government officers conduct unannounced site visits and take a sample of at least one food item declared to be gluten-free.  Ridascreen Gliadin R5 ELISA analysis showed that 14 of 158 samples (9%) contained detectable gluten in excess of the official Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) definition of gluten-free.
    Nine of the 14 samples (6% overall) registered gluten above 20 parts per million, which exceeds the o...


    Jefferson Adams
    Gluten and Allergen-Contamination Causing Surge in Food Recalls as Popularity Rises
    Celiac.com 01/31/2019 - The popularity of gluten-free and allergen-free foods is on the rise, and that’s generally good news. In theory, that’s good news, as it means more products, better selection and lower prices. However, it seems that the proliferation of gluten- and allergen-free products also means higher rates of allergen contamination.
    We’ve written about the upswing in gluten contamination in foods labeled gluten-free, but it appears as though the problem of allergen contamination in products labeled allergen-free is neither restricted to America, nor restricted to gluten.
    The latest information coming out of New Zealand shows that food recalls due to allergens have quadrupled over the past five years, with the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) leading 144 i...


  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Vozzyv's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Weird Symptoms

    2. - Jeff Platt replied to Vozzyv's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Weird Symptoms

    3. - cristiana replied to Vozzyv's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Weird Symptoms

    4. - Scott Adams replied to More2Learn's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Celiac Maybe a Possibility?

    5. - More2Learn posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Celiac Maybe a Possibility?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,107
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Jenn Parsons
    Newest Member
    Jenn Parsons
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Popular Now

    • Vozzyv
      5
    • Kathleen JJ
    • Captain173
      10
    • jjiillee
      7
    • Kristina12
      7
  • Popular Articles

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
  • Upcoming Events

×
×
  • Create New...