Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate
  • Jefferson Adams
    Jefferson Adams

    What's the Status of New Celiac Disease Drug Treatments?

    Reviewed and edited by a celiac disease expert.

    With some promising new drugs in the pipeline, clinicians are optimistic about having the first generation of pharmacologic agents for celiac disease within the next 5 years. How likely is that?

    What's the Status of New Celiac Disease Drug Treatments? - Image: CC BY-ND 2.0--gfpeck
    Caption: Image: CC BY-ND 2.0--gfpeck

    Celiac.com 11/21/2022 - Following a gluten-free diet for life can be difficult, Most celiacs on a gluten-free diet get exposed to gluten on a regular basis, especially if they eat in restaurants. Currently, a gluten-free diet is the only effective treatment for celiac disease. Because of this, there is substantial interest in drug therapies that can help to protect celiacs on a gluten-free diet, and, ideally, free them from a strict gluten-free diet.

    There are a number of drugs still in the pipeline that promise the former, at least. So what's the status of the multiple new therapies that are under investigation? To answer this question, a team of researchers recently set out to review existing and upcoming clinical trial programs for pharmacologic agents for celiac disease.

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A12):
    The team conducted a narrative review using searches of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane CENTRAL Library and clinicaltrials.gov. In their review, the team summarizes the pathophysiology of celiac disease, and the specific steps that might help to speed pharmacologic treatment. They also assess the evidence in support of current and future drug targets, including trials of peptidases, gluten sequestrants, tight junction regulators, anti-transglutaminase 2 therapies, immune tolerizing agents, advanced biologics and small molecules, and microbiome-targeted strategies. 

    The team also spotlights the special challenges of conducting celiac disease trials, including identifying appropriate study populations, assessing results in the context of a gluten challenge, and interpreting celiac disease-specific clinical and histologic outcomes. 

    Understanding these factors is crucial for accurately appraising the evidence. Finally, they outline what the future of celiac disease therapy may hold with the introduction of viable drug treatments.

    There is a definite need for drug options for treating celiac disease, either for accidental or intentional gluten exposures, as part a gluten-free diet, or for refractory disease. 

    The big takeaway, is that, according to the team's reading of the data, multiple promising celiac disease drug therapies are in development, and these trials are likely to lead to approvals for the first generation of pharmacologic agents for celiac disease within the next 5 years.

    Color us skeptical, but that seems a pretty bullish view, especially given the crowded graveyard of once seemingly promising celiac drug therapies, especially the very recent demise of the highly touted Larazotide. Basically, we'll believe in successful drug treatments for celiac disease when we see a successful product make it to celiacs. Meanwhile, stay tuned for more on this and related stories.

    Read more in Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022;55(10):1277-1296

     

    The research team included Michael Klonarakis, Christopher N. Andrews, Maitreyi Raman, Remo Panaccione and Christopher Ma. They are variously affiliated with theDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; the Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; the Alberta's Collaboration of Excellence for Nutrition in Digestive Diseases, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; and the Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.



    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    CBird

    Granted I'm not celiac, my sister is; I'm NCGS. I'm starting to resent the idea of continuing to treat NCGS, possibly even Celiac, as a disease. We just happen not to be able to eat wheat in a wheat-centric country when there are viable substitutes we can safely eat. Why should we have to take a drug in order to fit in to a culture that's refusing to acknowledge Celiac and gluten sensitivity. Seems from my reading there are whole cultures in this world, certainly in history, that didn't use wheat at least certainly not a staple. Please set me straight if my knowledge in some way lacking here because my resentment has started to build and I'd definitely be open to things I may not be getting or understand!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    trents

    It basically boils down to how you define "disease". If you define it as a biological condition that puts you at a disadvantage in functionally engaging the culture in which you live, then being a celiac or being gluten sensitive is having a disease. If you look at being a celiac or gluten sensitive as a normal biological variation, like having red hair or the ability to roll your tongue, then it is not. Is your complaint about how others see you or how you see yourself.

    Edited by trents
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Scott Adams

    Most of the therapies being developed will not allow a celiac to eat a regular gluten diet, and are geared towards dealing with cross-contamination issues, which is a real problem for most celiacs. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Guest C.W.
    On 11/30/2022 at 9:45 PM, CBird said:

    Granted I'm not celiac, my sister is; I'm NCGS. I'm starting to resent the idea of continuing to treat NCGS, possibly even Celiac, as a disease. We just happen not to be able to eat wheat in a wheat-centric country when there are viable substitutes we can safely eat. Why should we have to take a drug in order to fit in to a culture that's refusing to acknowledge Celiac and gluten sensitivity. Seems from my reading there are whole cultures in this world, certainly in history, that didn't use wheat at least certainly not a staple. Please set me straight if my knowledge in some way lacking here because my resentment has started to build and I'd definitely be open to things I may not be getting or understand!

    Personally, I'd rather have a treatment be available rather than demand the whole world bend to my demands or demands of a very small number of the population. I may not like the fact I have an autoimmune condition but that doesn't change the fact that that's what it is. I'd like more options available when I eat at restaurants, but I'm not going to ask the world to give up wheat. That just isn't possible. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    Wheatwacked
    On 11/30/2022 at 9:45 PM, CBird said:

    whole cultures in this world

    There were no cases of diabetes in Icelandic Eskimo until they were introduced to the Western Diet around 1950.  The difference between your sister's Celiac Disease and your NCGS could be vitamin D plasma levels.

    Even if the role of vitamin D in celiac disease pathogenesis is not completely known, its potential role in immune regulation could link vitamin D deficiency to this condition, considering that vitamin and mineral deficiencies have been noted both in newly diagnosed celiac disease patients and in celiac disease patients with a gluten free diet (GFD)

     The Implication of Vitamin D and Autoimmunity: a Comprehensive Review

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    CBird
    On 11/30/2022 at 7:14 PM, trents said:

    It basically boils down to how you define "disease". If you define it as a biological condition that puts you at a disadvantage in functionally engaging the culture in which you live, then being a celiac or being gluten sensitive is having a disease. If you look at being a celiac or gluten sensitive as a normal biological variation, like having red hair or the ability to roll your tongue, then it is not. Is your complaint about how others see you or how you see yourself.

    I'm getting resentful at how the U.S. medical world sees the medical need to be gluten free as a 'disease', rather than just being different. I'm not in 'disease' if I stay away from gluten, I'm healthy. Are they looking for drugs to "cure" peanut allergies? I don't think I should have to educate my doctor. I don't think I should have to take a drug to get my body to conform. My life changed for the good 'immensely' when I discovered that I couldn't eat gluten. I've been elated about it as so many chronic 'diseases' clear up. I'm more than okay until I go to the doctor for my annual checkup or have to acquire a new doctor. I'm tired at the skeptical look I get when defining NCGS or even celiac. I'm tired of saying, "okay, you pay for the emergency room bill."

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    trents
    1 hour ago, CBird said:

    I'm more than okay until I go to the doctor for my annual checkup or have to acquire a new doctor. I'm tired at the skeptical look I get when defining NCGS or even celiac. I'm tired of saying, "okay, you pay for the emergency room bill."

    Seems to me you are confusing some doctors' denial that gluten intolerance exists with the question of whether it is a normal biological variant or a disease.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    CBird
    On 12/3/2022 at 5:57 PM, Guest C.W. said:

    Personally, I'd rather have a treatment be available rather than demand the whole world bend to my demands or demands of a very small number of the population. I may not like the fact I have an autoimmune condition but that doesn't change the fact that that's what it is. I'd like more options available when I eat at restaurants, but I'm not going to ask the world to give up wheat. That just isn't possible. 

    I'm not asking that the world give up wheat either. Nor do I 'demand' the world bend to my needs. Right now as a NCGS I'm not acknowledged. I'd like NOT to have to educate my doctors about my condition. I like people to NOT roll their eyes when I order food that I can eat. I'd rather not have to frustratingly tell them 'how about you pay the emergency room bill if I eat that." I'd like to have been diagnosed in my teens, at least, instead of spending my life with anxiety/panic/depression, chronic constipation, bouts of painful IBS attacks, inability to focus, and unnecessary rages that anyone would rather not have to deal with, including ME! I don't feel this way most of the time. But, after a lifetime lack of self esteem due to the issues mentioned, I'd rather not now think of myself as 'diseased'. How about just 'different'!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    trents
    2 hours ago, CBird said:

    I'm not asking that the world give up wheat either. Nor do I 'demand' the world bend to my needs. Right now as a NCGS I'm not acknowledged. I'd like NOT to have to educate my doctors about my condition. I like people to NOT roll their eyes when I order food that I can eat. I'd rather not have to frustratingly tell them 'how about you pay the emergency room bill if I eat that." I'd like to have been diagnosed in my teens, at least, instead of spending my life with anxiety/panic/depression, chronic constipation, bouts of painful IBS attacks, inability to focus, and unnecessary rages that anyone would rather not have to deal with, including ME! I don't feel this way most of the time. But, after a lifetime lack of self esteem due to the issues mentioned, I'd rather not now think of myself as 'diseased'. How about just 'different'!

    Let me ask you, do you think you would feel less strongly about this if you had been diagnosed as a celiac instead of NCGS? At least with celiac (disease?) there are some genes involved and some tests that go in your medical record to prove it's not all in your head.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    CBird
    33 minutes ago, trents said:

    Let me ask you, do you think you would feel less strongly about this if you had been diagnosed as a celiac instead of NCGS? At least with celiac (disease?) there are some genes involved and some tests that go in your medical record to prove it's not all in your head.

    Interesting idea, being diagnosed celiac certainly might have made things a bit less awkward. Sometime I get fed up enough that I simply say celiac to avoid lengthy unwanted explanations or the eye rolls. Doctors and nurses however require explanation. It's really annoying when it's clear by their faces they don't have a clue what I'm talking about, or the other response is to simply ignore what I'm saying as 'woo woo, crazy Californian". I'm finally healthy in my life, so I've put up with it. But I'm NOT going to define myself as diseased.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    trents
    11 minutes ago, CBird said:

    Interesting idea, being diagnosed celiac certainly might have made things a bit less awkward. Sometime I get fed up enough that I simply say celiac to avoid lengthy unwanted explanations or the eye rolls. Doctors and nurses however require explanation. It's really annoying when it's clear by their faces they don't have a clue what I'm talking about, or the other response is to simply ignore what I'm saying as 'woo woo, crazy Californian". I'm finally healthy in my life, so I've put up with it. But I'm NOT going to define myself as diseased.

    I am a celiac but I find that not many non medical people (such as restaurant personnel) have a clue what "celiac" is so I combine the two into, "I have gluten intolerant celiac disease" to cover all the bases.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate
  • About Me

    Jefferson Adams

    Jefferson Adams is Celiac.com's senior writer and Digital Content Director. He earned his B.A. and M.F.A. at Arizona State University. His articles, essays, poems, stories and book reviews have appeared in numerous magazines, journals, and websites, including North American Project, Antioch Review, Caliban, Mississippi Review, Slate, and more. He is the author of more than 2,500 articles on celiac disease. His university coursework includes studies in science, scientific methodology, biology, anatomy, physiology, medicine, logic, and advanced research. He previously devised health and medical content for Colgate, Dove, Pfizer, Sharecare, Walgreens, and more. Jefferson has spoken about celiac disease to the media, including an appearance on the KQED radio show Forum, and is the editor of numerous books, including "Cereal Killers" by Scott Adams and Ron Hoggan, Ed.D.

    >VIEW ALL ARTICLES BY JEFFERSON ADAMS

     


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Related Articles

    Jefferson Adams
    Promising Celiac Disease
    Celiac.com 07/01/2019 - Drugmakers have pulled the plug on a phase II trial of Nexvax2, a promising drug for treating celiac disease. Pharmaceutical company ImmusanT, said that "results from an interim analysis revealed Nexvax2 did not provide statistically meaningful protection from gluten exposure for celiac disease patients when compared with placebo."
    That's a lot of fancy language to say that the drug simply didn't work. It did no better than a placebo. If there were any other way to spin it, the company would have spun it. They didn't. That basically means total failure.
    We've written about Nexvax2 over the years, and followed it through its development. It was promising enough to earn fast-track development status by the FDA.
    The company's press release reads...


    Kelly Carter
    A Participant's Perspective on the Failure of the Nexvax2
    Celiac.com 07/09/2019 - Everyone in the Celiac community has read the press release about ImmusanT stopping the Phase 2 clinical trial of their drug Nexvax2. The drug was going to modify the immune system to ignore gluten. The hope was no more worries about cross contamination! However, in late June, ImmusanT issued a press release stating, "Nexvax2 did not provide statistically meaningful protection from gluten exposure for celiac disease patients when compared with placebo." Wait what?
    Let's go back a bit and talk about my experience in the clinical trial.
    I was in the Nexvax2 clinical trial. It consisted of five phases. The first phase was screening where they got all of your medical records that confirmed a celiac diagnosis and a gluten challenge. The gluten challenge ...


    Jefferson Adams
    FDA Issues New Guidelines for Celiac Drug Trials
    Celiac.com 07/04/2022 - The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a set of new guidelines for companies doing celiac disease drug trials. The agency noted that the guidance is intended only to provide clarity regarding existing requirements, and should be viewed solely as recommendations, unless they mention specific regulations or laws.
    The FDA directs sponsors of trials for clinical drugs to ensure the following regarding celiac disease patients on a gluten-free diet:
    Trial population
    Patients should undergo diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy, with multiple biopsies to confirm celiac diagnosis. The biopsies should include one or two samples of the duodenal bulb and at least four samples of the distal duodenum.
    To avoid inclusion of patients whose ...


    Jefferson Adams
    Once Promising Celiac Drug Larazotide Looks Doomed After Disappointing Phase 3 Trial
    Celiac.com 07/18/2022 - Currently, a gluten-free diet is the only treatment for people with celiac disease. A number of companies have been attempting to create treatments that reduce or eliminate celiac disease symptoms, mostly for patients on a gluten-free diet. 
    Larazotide, whose clinical trial is dubbed "CedLara," is such a drug. It's designed to reduce persistent celiac disease symptoms for people on a gluten-free diet. 
    In an earlier phase 2 trial, Larazotide was shown to reduce celiac symptoms in patients who had been on a gluten-free diet for at least 12 months. Many were excited to see how it would do in a phase 3 trial. The answer, unless we get some better news from 9 Meters Biopharma, the company that has been developing it, is badly.
    For the phase 3 t...


  • Recent Activity

    1. - StaciField replied to StaciField's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      My bone structure is disintegrating and I’m having to have my teeth removed

    2. - Wheatwacked replied to More2Learn's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Celiac Maybe a Possibility?

    3. - Scott Adams replied to Vozzyv's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Weird Symptoms

    4. - Jeff Platt replied to Vozzyv's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Weird Symptoms

    5. - cristiana replied to Vozzyv's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      5

      Weird Symptoms


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,114
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    KJF02
    Newest Member
    KJF02
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Popular Now

    • Vozzyv
      5
    • Kathleen JJ
    • Captain173
      10
    • jjiillee
      7
    • Kristina12
      7
  • Popular Articles

    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
    • Scott Adams
  • Upcoming Events

×
×
  • Create New...