Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Publications & Publicity

Share stories, news, and articles here. 


16,605 topics in this forum

  1. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.2k views
  2. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1k views
  3. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.2k views

  4. Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  5. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.3k views
  6. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1k views
  7. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.1k views
  8. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 939 views
  9. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.1k views
  10. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.2k views

  11. Celiac.com Sponsor (A10):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A10):

  12. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 962 views
  13. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.4k views
  14. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 994 views
  15. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.7k views
  16. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.1k views
  17. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.2k views
  18. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 960 views
  19. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 866 views
  20. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.6k views
  21. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.1k views
  22. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 938 views
  23. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.5k views
  24. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 865 views
  25. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 974 views
  26. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.6k views
  27. Scott Adams
    • 0 replies
    • 1.1k views

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,130
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Anna Poulin
    Newest Member
    Anna Poulin
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Skg414228
      Fair enough! I very easily could have misread somewhere. Celiac is very confusing lol but I should know in a little over a month what the final verdict is. Just thought chatting with people smarter than myself would get me in the right mindset. I just thought that DGP IGA was pretty high compared to some stuff I had seen and figured someone on here would be more willing to say it is more than likely celiac instead of my doctor who is trying to be less direct. She did finally say she believes it is celiac but wanted to confirm with the biopsy. I did figure it wouldn't hurt seeing what other people said too just because not all doctors are the best. I think mine is actually pretty good from what I have seen but I don't know what I don't know lol. Sorry lot of rambling here just trying to get every thought out. Thanks again!
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, these articles may be helpful:    
    • trents
      No, you don't necessarily need multiple testing methods to confirm celiac disease. There is an increasing trend for celiac diagnoses to be made on a single very high tTG-IGA test score. This started in the UK during the COVID pandemic when there was extreme stress on the healthcare system there and it is spreading to the US. A tTG-IGA score of somewhere between 5x and 10x normal is good enough by itself for some physicians to declare celiac disease. And mind you, that is the tTG-IGA, not the DGP-IGA. The tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of celiac antibody testing, the one test most commonly ordered and the one that physicians have the most confidence in. But in the US, many physicians still insist on a biopsy, even in the event of high tTG-IGA scores. Correct, the biopsy is considered "confirmation" of the blood antibody testing. But what is the need for confirmation of a testing methodology if the testing methodology is fool proof? As for the contribution of genetic testing for celiac disease, it cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease since 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease while only 1% of the general population actually develops celiac disease. But it can be used to rule out celiac disease. That is, if you don't have the genes, you don't have celiac disease but you might have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • Skg414228
      Okay yeah that helps! To answer your last bit my understanding was that you need to have multiple tests to confirm celiac. Blood, biopsy, dna, and then I think symptoms is another one. Either way I think everything has to be confirmed with the biopsy because that is the gold standard for testing (Doctors words). You also answered another question I forgot to ask about which is does a high value push to a higher % on those scales. I truly appreciate your answers though and just like hearing what other people think. Digging into forums and google for similar stuff has been tough. So thank you again!
    • trents
      The tests outlined in the article I linked are rated according to "sensitivity" and "specificity". Sensitivity refers to how well the test does in not missing those who actually have the disease being tested for, in this case, celiac disease. The DGP-IGA test is estimated to have a sensitivity of 75% to 95%.  Specificity refers to how well the test does in not producing a positive score to medical conditions other than the one being tested for, in this case, celiac disease.  The DGP-IGA test is estimated to have a specificity of 90% to 100%. Obviously, in your case there is no issue with sensitivity. So, the only remaining question would be in relation to specificity. It is my observation from participating in this forum for many years and reading the posted test results from many, many forum contributors, that the likelihood of misdiagnosis due to a specificity issue diminishes greatly with high test score numbers. Still, there is a slight chance it could be due to something else. Think about it. If this were not so, why would your GI doc even be scheduling you for a biopsy?
×
×
  • Create New...