Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Low Does Total Serum Iga Have To Be, To Be Considered Deficient?


MoMof2Boyz

Recommended Posts

MoMof2Boyz Enthusiast

Just wondering,  is anything below the lab's range considered deficient or just low?  Seems like everything I find on the internet about this  mainly talks about selective IgA deficiency which is below 10(I think)...so if mine is at 76 and the low end of the range is 91 wouldn't that be considered deficient?  curious as to what others think? if you have a low total serum IgA did your doc say that you are deficient?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

If the normal range for total IgA starts at 91, and your result is 76, I would definitely consider you to be IgA deficient.  To be sufficient you have to be within range.

1desperateladysaved Proficient

Wow!  My IgA was 5.6.  My MD told me that I just wasn't an allergic person.  Meanwhile, I had been to her office with an allergic looking rash a month or so before???  That rash (I think) was caused by eating a minute quantity of mango skin.  It causes trouble like poison ivy.  My children said they eat it all the time with no problem.  At any rate, I saw a familiar cycle:  fatigue, swelling, irritated bladder.  I never could pinpoint a specific cause and follow the cycle before.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,411
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nstvns03
    Newest Member
    Nstvns03
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Nstvns03! Immunoglobulin A Qn is not a test for celiac disease per se. It's what we commonly call "total IGA" and it is a test used to determine if there is IGA deficiency. If there is IGA deficiency, the individual IGA tests done to look for celiac disease are going to be artificially low and this can produce false negatives. Obviously, you are not IGA deficient. But the question needs to be asked, had you already been practicing a reduced gluten diet when the blood draw was done for these tests?
    • Nstvns03
      I had celiac testing done and the only think in that test that was high was the immunoglobulin A Qn results was off the chart high at 419. Does this confirm celiac if everything else but that test was normal? 
    • Itsabit
      Thank you for clarifying! Something to possibly consider as I continue on my “non-gluten” quest and if I do not improve, but being new to this whole realm and already overwhelmed and stressed, this would have pushed me over the edge right now. 🥹
    • trents
      Thanks for the information, knitty kitty. It helps bring some clarity and reduces the confusion that misinformation such as is contained in this thread title introduces into the community. People new to the celiac experience are already struggling to wrap their minds around not being able to eat just wheat, barley and rye any longer. We don't need to unnecessarily add to the list on "no no" foods. And I saw where you added this same post to the thread on oats as well.
    • FayeBr
      Thank you for your reply. 56 years! Wow!  It seems we all suffer for many years before this diagnosis and I’ll stay hopeful that I can try more foods after healing. I have a very limited diet at present. Onwards and upwards 😊
×
×
  • Create New...