Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Dr. Ford Said It Best: Dgp Vs. Aga


powerofpositivethinking

Recommended Posts

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

little bit of a rant...

 

ok so as I continue to research everything, I now have a good grasp on the difference between DGP and AGA and what they do and measure.  One of the first things I read was this page by Dr. Rodney Ford:

Open Original Shared Link

 

he lays things out in easy to understand terms that I truly do appreciate :)

 

I have to use LabCorp for my insurance, and I found this comical, but also sad at what they have listed on this page under Additional Information:

Open Original Shared Link

 

 

"A negative IgA result in an untreated patient does not rule out gluten-sensitive enteropathies, especially when associated with IgG gliadin antibodies. This can be explained by selective IgA deficiency, a relatively frequent finding in celiac disease. False-positives are possible as other gastrointestinal disorders are known to induce circulating antigliadin antibody, mainly Crohn's disease, food protein intolerance, and postinfection malabsorption."

 

I HATE that they use terms AGA and DGP interchangeably.  If I was reading this, and was completely new to everything, I would think that means maybe I have Crohn's, protein intolerance, and/or postinfection malabsorption, but they are referencing AGA on this page for the DGP testing :blink:  No wonder people get confused.  Right now the only thing DGP shows is celiac, and until that is proved otherwise, that's what it is.  I've asked my GI, asked others on the board, and currently that's what DGP tests show.  I can't wait until more studies are done in regards to DGP!  Yes, I fixate on the DGP test :) They should have named the DGP test something COMPLETELY different than the AGA test.  Oh modern medicine is a love-hate relationship with me :P

 

done rant.  thanks for listening  :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



psawyer Proficient

You second link takes me to a generic search page, not a document.

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

I can't get it to link correctly, so Plan B :)

 

if you're interested to see what I'm griping about when you get to the search box put in

 

Gliadin Antibody Profile, IgA, IgG, EIA

 

Edit: If I completely sign-out of my account and close my browser, and then open the browser again as a guest, the first time I click on it the link it brings me to a search page.  If I go from the Labcorp search page and use the back arrow to my original post, and then click the link again, it brings me to the actual testing page...strange...

kareng Grand Master

I can't get it to link correctly, so Plan B :)

 

if you're interested to see what I'm griping about when you get to the search box put in

 

Gliadin Antibody Profile, IgA, IgG, EIA

 

Edit: If I completely sign-out of my account and close my browser, and then open the browser again as a guest, the first time I click on it the link it brings me to a search page.  If I go from the Labcorp search page and use the back arrow to my original post, and then click the link again, it brings me to the actual testing page...strange...

 

 

Not sure what exactly you want us to see but ...could you copy it and paste it here?  I'll take your word that its what the lab says as I'm too lazy to look it up.  I think I had a Celiac panel done by Lab Corp before. 

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

geez this is turning out to be quite a process :P it bothers me when I can't figure something out, and I don't know why it isn't linking...

 

Ok anyway onto the point:

 

This is a screening test of only Deamidated Gliadin Antibodies, but in the "additional information" for this screen it states the following:

A negative IgA result in an untreated patient does not rule out gluten-sensitive enteropathies, especially when associated with IgG gliadin antibodies. This can be explained by selective IgA deficiency, a relatively frequent finding in celiac disease. False-positives are possible as other gastrointestinal disorders are known to induce circulating antigliadin antibody, mainly Crohn's disease, food protein intolerance, and postinfection malabsorption.

 

Why are they discussing antigliadin antibodies if this is a DGP test, and in addition, all of their references in compiling this "additional information" section are from the early '90s :wacko:

 

I'm making a big fuss, and I didn't even get this particular test ordered :P I had the DGP tests done as part of their Celiac Disease Comprehsive Panel.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...