Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Genetic Test Results - 4 Yr Old


jeslk

Recommended Posts

jeslk Apprentice

I was diagnosed with celiac two years ago.  My primary doc did genetic and general celiac panel for the initial diagnosis, which was then confirmed by biopsy.  I have silent celiac so I've have never had a physical symptom / reaction to gluten.   I have had two types of cancer, though, and am not convinced there isn't a link.  I've been entirely gluten free since diagnosis.

 

My 4 year old daughter's pediatrician ordered blood work last month and included a test for celiac, which was negative.  She did test positive, though, for both DQ2 AND DQ8.  I am trying to research to find out the likelihood of her getting celiac down the road, and can't find much info.  

 

For those of you with family histories - did you keep your little one off of gluten before they were diagnosed, as a preventative measure?  She doesn't have reactions and the test for celiac was negative, so I don't want to worry unnecessarily but also want to do what's best for her.

 

Thanks!

Jess


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



StephanieL Enthusiast

In our family it is my oldest who was dx at the age of 3.5 (he's now 6.5).

 

I have 2 younger kids who are 4 and 18 months. Our 4 year old was tested after being exposed to gluten over months at preschool and was negative. They are all gluten free at home for safety and my sanity. The 18 month old is gluten free except for what may be passed through my breastmilk.  He won't get gluten till out of the house. 

Kids are just too messy with crummy, gluteny things so this is what we have chosen.  We have other actual allergies (peanut, tree nut, dairy, egg, banana and blueberry) none of which we let the kids eat in the house.

 

Oh, and our GI didn't even do the genetics. She's confident they all have at least one of the genes so it won't tell us anything we don't already know which is to test every 3 years or if there are any signs of issues.

jeslk Apprentice

Thanks Stephanie!  My daughter's doctor called this morning and said he strongly urges us to switch her to gluten free.  Turns out she has all eight (when you count the sub-markers?) of the genetic markers and so he said there's a much higher likelihood of her developing celiac in her lifetime and that by the time there's a biopsy diagnosis damage will already be done.  My husband and I have just started to talk about it, but given my health issues that may or may not be related to celiac, I don't think we want to risk it.  It's not going to be easy - the kid likes her bread, pizza and mac and cheese!

StephanieL Enthusiast

If gluten is the "only" thing you are avoiding, you can find subs for pizza and mac n cheese pretty easy!  You can do it Mama!!

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

My son has few markers compared to your daughter - but is IMO, symptomatic. He has tested negative on blood and biopsy.

Our house is gluten-free (except lately, when I let him have gluten at home - and now that's over) and he's become accustomed to the diet. If he went gluten-free now it would be so much easier than if I did it in the beginning, when I was learning. He's tasted gluten-free cooking, decided what he lines/dislikes...so that battle would be over. The hard part would be getting him to voluntarily be gluten-free away from home.

So, I don't have answers. But I do know the child must be on board. If she won't do it (because she feels no adverse effects) then it may be difficult.

wmramsel Explorer

I might be wrong, but I thought if they have the genetic markers but are not symptomatic, you SHOULD feed them gluten.  Again, I could be misunderstanding....

StephanieL Enthusiast

I might be wrong, but I thought if they have the genetic markers but are not symptomatic, you SHOULD feed them gluten.  Again, I could be misunderstanding....

I think it depends on the Dr. you see or the research you read.  Just because you have the markers does not mean you will ever have an activation of the disease. Just as many people have cancer genes but it doesn't mean they WILL get it.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



wmramsel Explorer

I think it depends on the Dr. you see or the research you read.  Just because you have the markers does not mean you will ever have an activation of the disease. Just as many people have cancer genes but it doesn't mean they WILL get it.

 

Gotcha.  Seems like everything about this disease is "it depends." :(  

pricklypear1971 Community Regular

Gotcha. Seems like everything about this disease is "it depends." :(

More like "incomplete information" than depends, IMO.

There are numerous studies in various aspects of celiac disease...but the more you read the more you realize most of the studies have skewed participant bases (because they're based on Celiacs who were primarily dxed based presenting with outdated criteria like "must have D", etc.". Then, you look at sample size, and dropout rate, then the term "statistically significant" creeps in.

All of these criteria are typical for medical studies; however, if there's one thing AI diseases are NOT - it's typical.

So, what you're left with are mostly studies on Celiacs who presented with "typical" celiac disease, tested positive on blood and biopsy (which isn't always achievable), and who are probably not "super sensitive" and can tolerate a degree of tinkering by medical professionals: being able to successfully change diet, successfully tolerate a gluten challenge, etc.

And in children....wow, the skew just gets more extreme since its harder to get an early + on blood work and that trickles down to fewer biopsies...which trickles down to fewer dx.

Then introduce NCGI....which helps but muddies at the same time. There are probably quite a few Celiacs carrying the NCGI label because one or more tests were -. Sometimes testing was done well, other times it was done poorly or not at all.

Gluten sensitivity dx and understanding is abysmally incomplete. More is known each day....but it's slow.

IMO what is REALLY needed is a test that can be performed WITHOUT a gluten challenge. Since medical advances and understanding of gluten sensitivity are on fast-forward these days, and the only way to manage gluten sensitivity is a gluten-free diet...retesting or investigating where an individual falls (Celiac or NCGI) requires a cruel and destructive event - a gluten trial. Not many are willing to do this. So, the already dxed (with a wealth of knowledge and successes and failures of the diet, lifestyle and challenges) are reluctant to undergo repeat testing.

Most of the best study participants don't wanna do it. And I am one of them, and I don't think any of us are making the wrong decision.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,762
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deborah Bolek
    Newest Member
    Deborah Bolek
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71.2k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Pat B
    • trents
      There really is no test for diagnosing celiac disease that does not require the consumption of wheat for weeks or months ahead of the testing. All testing either measures the antibodies produced by the inflammation in the small bowel lining produced by gluten consumption or looks for the damage the to that lining that the inflammation causes. If you take away the gluten, the inflammation subsides and so do the antibodies and healing takes place such that there is no damage to see. The only "test" that does not require gluten consumption is a genetic test but it can only be used as a rule out for celiac disease since 40% of the general population carries the one or both to the genes that have been tied to the development of celiac disease but only about 1% of the general population actually develops celiac disease.  The joint inflammation you describe could possibly be linked to gluten-related reaction, either celiac or NCGS.
    • fritz2
      Thank you.  Is there a test that does not include consuming wheat that I can request my doctor to have done?  Also, is it a celiac reaction for me to blow up my joints with gout like symptoms? thank you, is it safe to eat links that contain sucrose and dextrin?  
    • Scott Adams
      @fritz2, in the USA it is extremely rare for maltodextrin to contain wheat, although technically, according to the FDA, it can. Various celiac support groups over the last few decades have contacted the 3-4 biggest USA manufacturers of it to discover that corn is almost always used, rather than wheat. The sugar in the vitamin water, however, may have contributed to your gut issues.    
    • Scott Adams
      Thanks for this update, and it is scary that drug manufacturing is being outsourced to India, a country that is notorious for having very little, or extremely relaxed business regulations. 
×
×
  • Create New...