Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Genetic Tests Results


jeslk

Recommended Posts

jeslk Apprentice

We just had my daughter (4) tested for celiac.  The IgA came back <2 and the Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum came back as 119.  So both negative.  The genetic markers, on the other hand, are positive,  Initially I thought it was two markers, DQ2 and DQ8, but the doctor explained that there are actually four variations on each, for a total of eight, and she is positive on all eight.   She has never had any symptoms that we know of, but we tested her because I was diagnosed with celiac two years ago (after also being diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Thyroid Cancer) and I have a family history on my mom's side of thyroid issues.  I have never had a symptom of being glutened (silent celiac?) but have been strictly gluten free since diagnosis.

 

My daughter's doctor is strongly advocating that we put her on a gluten-free diet - arguing that with a 1:7 chance (given the markers), damage will already potentially be done by the time a diagnosis would occur.  He acknowledges that there is a chance that she doesn't ever develop celiac, but still thinks this is the safe course.  I'm inclined to agree, but would love to hear from anyone else with similar experiences.  The whole thing is daunting to say the least.

 

Thanks!

Jess


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

I know next to nothing about the genetic tests so I can't comment on those. There are many around here who do know about that and I'm sure they'll give great advice.   :)

 

I do know about celiac testing though and your daughter was not given a full panel. I think she only had one out of seven possible celiac tests done along with the control serum IgA test. You could request more testing. The deaminated gliadin peptide test are superior tests for detecting celiac disease in children.

 

This is the full celiac panel:

 

  • tTG IgA and tTG igG (I'm assuming she had the tTG IgA test run - it is REALLY common for doctors to just order the one test)
  • DGP IgA and DGP IgG (better tests for kids)
  • EMA IgA (usually indicates advanced damage and is similar to the tTG IgA test)
  • AGA IgA and AGA IgG (older, less reliable tests but thought by some to show non-celiac gluten sensitivity and cleiac gluten sensitivity)
  • total serum IgA (the control test she had done)

 

You might want to test her in those (especially DGP's) before going gluten-free. I agree that going gluten-free won't hurt her... not many docs seem to realize that.   :rolleyes:

 

Best wishes.

nora-n Rookie

that was a strange description of the gene test....can you get the actual result, or phone the lab and ask for the result? 

Here is and explanation of HLA DQ:

Open Original Shared Link

 

 

As you see, DQ2,5 and DQ8 are pretty common so it does not mean much.

We usually have two DQ (there is  a constellation where the DQ2,5 is from one half each, though) and there are four halves altogether, not eight....

 

Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum is not a celiac test per se

 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...