Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

At Home Test?!?


mmcc54

Recommended Posts

mmcc54 Contributor

During my research (our one yr old was just diagnosed) I came across bio card at home testing...any good? Any one ever used it? I plan on getting tested by my Dr but was just very curious about this??


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



VeggieGal Contributor

I'm not saying don't try it, but as far as I'm aware, a Biocard does not test the full celiac panel.

I used one on my 11yr old recently and it came up negative (he displays alot of symptoms of celiac). I'm really not confident in the result and as soon as hes brave enough to have a proper test done at the doctors, I'll take him.

Best wishes

nvsmom Community Regular

I did a Biocard home test a year ago. I'm one of those who (previously) avoided doctors so I appreciated being able to test at home. I did go to the doctor to confirm my results.

 

The Biocard test tests for above normal tTG IgA and normal levels of total serum IgA (control test). It looks like a pregnancy stick. the first window's line shows adequate levels of IgA, and the second window's line shows elevated levels of tTG IgA. My tTG IgA line was very faint but I had hard time squeezing enough blood out of my finger to do the test (to be honest, the finger poke hurt just as much as, if not more than a needle). Like a pregnancy test, a faint line is supposed to indicate a positive tTG IgA (and most like celiac disease) BUT there was a board member last year who had a faint line and when her doctor retested her tTG was negative... I believe that is unsusual though.

 

I think the Biocard test is good for people like me who had given up on going to doctors after being told 'there is nothing wrong' for so many years. I still think of most doctors as just a prescription pad that I occassionally need access to. I probably would have put off testing for a few more years without the Biocard test. For those who are more proactive about their health than I was, the Biocard test probably isn't needed or helpful.

 

Good luck with your testing

Mum in Norway Contributor

That test only looks for high levels of IgA. So if its positive it is likely he has celiac, but if it is negative, that doesen't realy mean anything.

I took it twice, not knowing this. Both times negative.

Now, many years later, i went to the doc, it turns out i have elevated dgp-IgG, and likely celiac...

nvsmom Community Regular

That test only looks for high levels of IgA. So if its positive it is likely he has celiac, but if it is negative, that doesen't realy mean anything.

I took it twice, not knowing this. Both times negative.

Now, many years later, i went to the doc, it turns out i have elevated dgp-IgG, and likely celiac...

The Biocard test look at IgA levels (a control) and tTG IgA, but even in lab situations the tTG IgA misses up to 25% of celiacs.  I agree that it is best to go to a doctor and try to have multiple types of tests run.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...