Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Are Certain Tests More Accurate For Those With Neurological Symptoms?


greenbeanie

Recommended Posts

greenbeanie Enthusiast

For anyone diagnosed with celiac who had significant neurological problems, which of the blood tests came up positive for you? Are some tests better at testing the neurological manifestations of celiac than others? I've read conflicting information on this. Some sources say that the older anti-gliadin tests are actually better at detecting celiacs with neurological issues, while most other sources say that the older IgA and IgG tests are no longer recommended for anything. 

 

I finally see a GI doctor next Monday. My daughter was just confirmed with celiac through blood tests and biopsy, so I'm hoping the GI will agree to do an endoscopy on me on the basis of life-long symptoms and family history, even though my blood tests were negative (while gluten light). They only ran the tTG-IgA and DGP tests on me. Should I request the older IgA tests?

 

I have been in the ER three times in the past ten years for unexplained ataxia and other weird neurological symptoms. The first time I was low on potassium, and they gave me some in the ER and it helped with the immediate problem, but we never figured out the root cause. The second time I tested positive for anti-nuclear antibodies, but a follow-up MRI with a neurologist was normal and again they dismissed it as some weird idiopathic  problem. The third time I lost 10 pounds in one week without trying, was extremely dizzy and disoriented, had weird vision problems, and kept forgetting words. This time they admitted me to the hospital and ran all sorts of tests (but not celiac tests), but again they found no cause. For what it's worth, one of my daughter's main symptoms was neurological problems (reflex problems and twitching in her sleep without evidence of seizures, sensory integration disorder, and extremely frequent explosive tantrums). After just a week gluten-free, her neurological problems are hugely improved. Regardless of my own diagnosis, I will also go gluten-free as soon as testing is over. But I just hope the GI will take me seriously and do an endoscopy even though my blood tests were negative.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Carolann444 Rookie

For anyone diagnosed with celiac who had significant neurological problems, which of the blood tests came up positive for you? Are some tests better at testing the neurological manifestations of celiac than others? I've read conflicting information on this. Some sources say that the older anti-gliadin tests are actually better at detecting celiacs with neurological issues, while most other sources say that the older IgA and IgG tests are no longer recommended for anything. 

 

I finally see a GI doctor next Monday. My daughter was just confirmed with celiac through blood tests and biopsy, so I'm hoping the GI will agree to do an endoscopy on me on the basis of life-long symptoms and family history, even though my blood tests were negative (while gluten light). They only ran the tTG-IgA and DGP tests on me. Should I request the older IgA tests?

 

I have been in the ER three times in the past ten years for unexplained ataxia and other weird neurological symptoms. The first time I was low on potassium, and they gave me some in the ER and it helped with the immediate problem, but we never figured out the root cause. The second time I tested positive for anti-nuclear antibodies, but a follow-up MRI with a neurologist was normal and again they dismissed it as some weird idiopathic  problem. The third time I lost 10 pounds in one week without trying, was extremely dizzy and disoriented, had weird vision problems, and kept forgetting words. This time they admitted me to the hospital and ran all sorts of tests (but not celiac tests), but again they found no cause. For what it's worth, one of my daughter's main symptoms was neurological problems (reflex problems and twitching in her sleep without evidence of seizures, sensory integration disorder, and extremely frequent explosive tantrums). After just a week gluten-free, her neurological problems are hugely improved. Regardless of my own diagnosis, I will also go gluten-free as soon as testing is over. But I just hope the GI will take me seriously and do an endoscopy even though my blood tests were negative.

I have those symptoms also, ataxia, double vision, dizzy, confused, can't think, drop things, etc.  I guess I should call my doctor and find out exactly what they tested.  But my allergist told me that both the antibodies were highly elevated and I tested positive in both areas.  So I guess I should find out what that means!  He diagnosed me as celiac and said there is no doubt.  I am gluten free now and the only time I have those neurological symptoms is usually 30 mins after I have eaten and I can track what went wrong and how I was accidently glutenized!

greenbeanie Enthusiast

It's good to hear that it got better after going gluten-free. I can't wait until all this testing is done so that I can stop eating gluten and start feeling better!

Does anyone who had neuro symptoms remember which tests on the celiac panel they were positive for?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...