Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Questions About Blood And Endoscope Testing On My 4-Year-Old


tiffanyk

Recommended Posts

tiffanyk Newbie

My almost 4 year old has chronic constipation since birth so I finally got our pediatrician to try to figure out what's wrong. She had some blood work come back in January with a positive ttg (77.8). The rest of the labs were normal. She had labs done again in May with another positive ttg (50). We finally got an appointment with a pediatric GI, who was horrible, last Tuesday. She just had a endoscope biopsy on Friday. The drs said that "everything looked normal."

We live in a very small community in western Canada. We actually had to travel 4.5 hours to Vancouver to see the pediatric GI and to have the biopsy, therefore information, education and medical professionals knowledge is extremely lacking.

I would like to know if my doctors blood work is a confirmed Celiac, or what those numbers actually mean. No one seems to be able to tell me. I want to start a gluten-free diet but I don't know if I should wait for the biopsy results (could be up to 4 weeks) or can I start now?

Can someone point this confused mommy in the right direction?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



shadowicewolf Proficient

My almost 4 year old has chronic constipation since birth so I finally got our pediatrician to try to figure out what's wrong. She had some blood work come back in January with a positive ttg (77.8). The rest of the labs were normal. She had labs done again in May with another positive ttg (50). We finally got an appointment with a pediatric GI, who was horrible, last Tuesday. She just had a endoscope biopsy on Friday. The drs said that "everything looked normal."

We live in a very small community in western Canada. We actually had to travel 4.5 hours to Vancouver to see the pediatric GI and to have the biopsy, therefore information, education and medical professionals knowledge is extremely lacking.

I would like to know if my doctors blood work is a confirmed Celiac, or what those numbers actually mean. No one seems to be able to tell me. I want to start a gluten-free diet but I don't know if I should wait for the biopsy results (could be up to 4 weeks) or can I start now?

Can someone point this confused mommy in the right direction?

The leading researcher for celiac uses this following criteria in testing:

 

Positive blood test

Positive biopsy

Positive genetic test

Symptoms of celiac

Symptoms go away on the gluten free diet

 

Four of the five are enough for a positive diagnosis according to him (i'm sure another member knows of the doctor i'm talking about, I cannot remember his name at the moment).

 

As of right now, feel free to do the diet.

justa Newbie

I got my 2 year old's endoscope Wednesday and everything "looked fine"

Biopsy results showed different. So you never know. I know it takes longer there in Canada but we had full biopsy results Friday afternoon.

nvsmom Community Regular

Do you happen to know the normal reference ranges for those labs? Are they 0-20 like out here in Alberta? If so, his tests are rather high and that makes it less likely it is caused by something else. A positive tTG IgA can also be caused by diabetes, chronic liver disease, thyroiditis, and I believe Crohn's and colitis, but the tests are usually not much above normal when caused by something else. 91-99% of the time, a positive tTG IgA is caused by celiac disease.

This report has more info on the tests: Open Original Shared Link

From what I have seen, most celiacs do not have damage visible to the naked eye. Most damage is found in biopsy,but there is a chance the damage could be missed if it is patchy.

Unless you are thinking of requesting more lab tests, which I don't think is necessary because you have a positive tTG already, she is done with celiac testing so she could move ahead with the gluten-free diet. If your entire house is going gluten-free, you should have the rest of the family tested first because it is a genetic disease.

You could also request nutrient testing for your daughter. Celiacs are often low in B12, D, calcium, ferritin, iron, potassium, and zinc. She can be gluten-free for those.

Dairy is sometimes an issue for celiacs for the first few months. If you don't notice a lot of improvement on the gluten-free diet, you might want to remove dairy from her diet for six months or so.

Best wishes. I hope she feels great soon.

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

here's the link Shadowicewolf was referring to:

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

pg. 9 and 10 is where they talk about the diagnostic criteria with the 4/5 rule.

 

it's authored by Alessio Fasano who is considered the top celiac go to doctor and Peter Green who's also top notch.  Hope this helps!

 

 

The leading researcher for celiac uses this following criteria in testing:

 

Positive blood test

Positive biopsy

Positive genetic test

Symptoms of celiac

Symptoms go away on the gluten free diet

 

Four of the five are enough for a positive diagnosis according to him (i'm sure another member knows of the doctor i'm talking about, I cannot remember his name at the moment).

 

As of right now, feel free to do the diet.

greenbeanie Enthusiast

My daughter's endoscopy also looked normal during the procedure, but biopsies confirmed celiac. Her tTG-IgA was 65 the week before (and DGP tests were positive too). Our pediatric GI does not give Marsh scale ratings for young children, but he said that her intestinal damage was clear in the biopsies but not as widespread as he'd expect given her blood test numbers. We went gluten-free immediately after the tests were done and had already seen very significant improvements by the time we got the biopsy results five days later. Good luck!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...