Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Is Normal For First Ttg Antibody Check?

designerstubble

Recommended Posts

designerstubble Enthusiast
designerstubble
Posted

Hello

 

Had my blood taken 2 weeks ago, first tTg antibody test done since diagnosis last October. Normal protocol  here in UK is they write to you to let you know the outcome if everything is OK, but I have just received a letter with a new appt for my blood results. Doesn't bode well.

 

The main problem I have is that when they diagnosed me, the labs didn't supply an antibody level, just a Yes/Positive response, so I have no idea what my antibodies were at time of diagnosis.

 

I presented with classic symptoms, diarrhea, bloating, weightloss, pain, severe anaemia, low vit d etc, so I reckon I probably was at a high level of antibody at diagnosis.

 

I'm a stress head. I'm having lots of other problems going on at the moment (health related, heart, allergy, skin, also continued diarrhea)... I REALLY don't want to spend the next two weeks worrying about this too... Really struggling at moment.

 

I obviously appreciate that everyone is different and there is no rule, but I just want an idea of what I could expect numbers to be at given that I have been REALLY strict, and gluten-free 8 months...

 

I know labs in UK might have different ranges here, if 300+ is maximum, would I be expecting a drop to 250 in 8 months, or 100?? Or should I expect to show an almost full recovery?? Again, I know there are no givens, just looking for an idea, don't want to freak.

 

Appreciate any help or guidance

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


GottaSki Mentor
GottaSki
Posted

Good Morning!!!

 

Do you have the new tTG result in a number value with range?  Did they run only the tTG during this recent test?

 

I have seen it take some time to get the antibodies all the way back to normal range -- as you mention the most frustrating part is you don't know your starting number for comparison.

 

Given you have been strictly gluten-free for many months and you have had some health improvements that your starting number was quite high and thus has improved.  As I have know way of knowing for sure I suggest you do your best to hang tough, eat clean and re-test at three month intervals until your antibodies are all playing nice.

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

I agree with with Lisa, if you hav had health improvements, and your numbers have gone in a downward direction, then you are probably doing well. retesting will help prove that.

 

My tTG Iga went from >200 to 34 (reference range 0-20) in one year gluten-free. I think that's slower than many but it is getting there. I also have a thyroiditis and that could help keep my number elevated. On the other hand, my EMA IgA went from positive 1:40 to negative; since the EMA is thought to show advanced villi damage, I'm happy with that.

designerstubble Enthusiast
designerstubble
Posted
  • Author

Thanks for that girls :)

 

Am just going to post some results I received on a thread... Maybe you could help?? Doctor couldn't tell me anything??? Alas I am doomed with these doctors. But, maybe someone on here can??

 

Thanks for all you advice, hopefully someone can tell me what it all means.

 

And hopefully, it's good or ok news, can't cope with more crap!!

 

Thanks again 8D

designerstubble Enthusiast
designerstubble
Posted
  • Author

Ok, I've just learnt for myself that it isnt good news :(

It seems my levels are still very high after 8 months. I'm so upset, can't believe it. I am as gluten free as I can be. The only gluten in my house is my husbands beer, but he knows that i won't go near him if he's drinking it, we don't even kiss through my own paranoia.

 

I don't know what else to do?? What do you do if your levels are high??

 

Btw they were:

Anti-tissue transglutaminase level 1.2 u/ml (0-10)-Tissue transglutaminase equivocal range = 7-10u/ml

 

Seems as my readings are pretty stellar. What do you do in this situation?? Is this more indicative of refractory?? Since I'm still passing loose bowel movements (and undigested food sometimes)...

 

I guess that's why they are calling me in. To tell me how I have been non compliant. Even though I couldn't be more gluten free if I tried.

 

Its devastating after all the hard work, it really is. :(

GottaSki Mentor
GottaSki
Posted

Ok, I've just learnt for myself that it isnt good news :(

It seems my levels are still very high after 8 months. I'm so upset, can't believe it. I am as gluten free as I can be. The only gluten in my house is my husbands beer, but he knows that i won't go near him if he's drinking it, we don't even kiss through my own paranoia.

 

I don't know what else to do?? What do you do if your levels are high??

 

Btw they were:

Anti-tissue transglutaminase level 1.2 u/ml (0-10)-Tissue transglutaminase equivocal range = 7-10u/ml

 

Seems as my readings are pretty stellar. What do you do in this situation?? Is this more indicative of refractory?? Since I'm still passing loose bowel movements (and undigested food sometimes)...

 

I guess that's why they are calling me in. To tell me how I have been non compliant. Even though I couldn't be more gluten free if I tried.

 

Its devastating after all the hard work, it really is. :(

 

I don't understand the results as you typed them.  I think it says you tested at 1.2 and normal range is (0-10).  If this is the case you are not high at all.  Sorry if I am not understanding your results.

 

Edited to add...way too early in the game to start thinking refractory -- IMO -- you have had improvement in some symptoms -- healing can take longer than 8 months.

designerstubble Enthusiast
designerstubble
Posted
  • Author

I don't understand the results as you typed them.  I think it says you tested at 1.2 and normal range is (0-10).  If this is the case you are not high at all.  Sorry if I am not understanding your results.

 

Edited to add...way too early in the game to start thinking refractory -- IMO -- you have had improvement in some symptoms -- healing can take longer than 8 months.

I'm confused. I typed them exactly as they appeared on my lab report. I thought the same as you to start with and I was elated. Then I researched and found out that 7-10 u/mL is a high reading. Unless thats a reference for labs.

 

I don't understand why it says 'Anti-tissue transglutaminase ' and then under result it says' tissue transglutaminase'??? 

 

I read it to mean my Anti-tissue transglutaminase is 1.2 and my tissue transglutaminase is 7-10. Am I being a total idiot?? I SO hope so, right now I'd LOVE to be a complete and utter silly *expletive!* that has gotten her knickers in a twist! 

 

Thanks for responding I do really appreciate it, and I know you are right about refractory. I think my adrenals are way off lately and I just can't cope with the scares anymore, I get straight into my tunnel of doom. 

 

You know, I'd just like a few months of getting on with it instead of, "here's another health problem this month, and oh, would you like another, yes, have some heart trouble while you're there too, lets send you to the dermatoligist, and don't forget the allergy clinic for your 40 intolerances!). 

 

And relax!

Lisa, as always, apologies for the rant (bad day!), and THANK YOU for being there as usual. 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


designerstubble Enthusiast
designerstubble
Posted
  • Author

For your ref I'm typing EXACTLY as it appears:

 

Code                                                           Result

Anti tissue transgluaminase level                 1.2u/mL (1-10)-Tissue transglutaminase equivocal range =7-10u/mL

 

 

Is it just telling me what the equivocal range is? OR is it telling me my Tissue transglutaminase is in the equivocal range??

 

Whats the diff between Anti-tissue transglutaminase and Tissue transglutaminase levels?

 

Thanks again for ALL your help ;) you cheered me up btw, thanks, feel better

GottaSki Mentor
GottaSki
Posted

They mean the same thing...but this is strange wording.  I still think your result is 1.2 with "normal" range being 0-10 and that you are well within normal -- perhaps your doc has a copy of your original antibody test in your file with the exact numbers on which tests -- positive is positive...but it sure does help to know how much it has lowered after over six months gluten-free!!!

 

Hang in there and you never bother me....I've been in your shoes -- hope they are cute today ;)

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

My interpretation is the same as Lisa's. To me, it looks like your normal now.... But I don't speak "medical-ese". That wording is really strange.

designerstubble Enthusiast
designerstubble
Posted
  • Author

Thanks Lisa

My docs are completely useless and I have to fight them for copies of any bloods. (They think I'm a trouble maker for even asking questions).

I'm starting to think you are right you know, that my numbers are low and within normal range. I know it's not as good as being told the biopsies are normal but it's a bloody good place to start! In fact it makes me very happy! Just knowing that I'm doing something right, and it's one less thing to worry about with my health!!

I've been reading that ttg is actually a measure of gut damage? Is that right? I thought it was a measure of antibodies! I'm so naive still.

Thanks Lisa, my shoes are SO cute today!! Hugs

Kamma Explorer
Kamma
Posted

Morning, Designer Stubble...

 

Tissue Transglutaminase (ttg) is actually an enzyme contained in your body that cross links with the gluten proteins in wheat, rye and barley stimulating the immune system to respond with B Cells (White Blood Cells) to produce the Anti transglutaminase antibodies IgA and IgG to go on the attack.

 

I'm reading your results as the normal range is 1 - 10 and the equivocal range (antibodies are present but not enough to confirm celiac disease causing an inconclusive test result) is 7 - 10.  Anything above 10 would be confirmation of celiac disease or not responding to the diet.

 

Kind regards,

Kamma

  • 3 weeks later...
designerstubble Enthusiast
designerstubble
Posted
  • Author

Thanks Kamma! Sorry, only just seen this, been a manic month, not been able to get my fix on these forums!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,154
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    J. Nichols
    Newest Member
    J. Nichols
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      71.5k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Dora77
      Energy drink can has stains - potential gluten?

      By Dora77 · Posted

      It wasnt really eye catching, but they were small stains which looked like dried out liquid. I dont know if it was normal or shouldve been just completely clean. But if someone didnt pay attention, it wouldnt be noticeable.
    • RMJ
      Energy drink can has stains - potential gluten?

      By RMJ · Posted

      If there were stains or particles on a drink can in an area that would either contact the drink or my lips, I would wash that can whether or not I had celiac disease.
    • Bebygirl01
      Not Just Wheat, Barley and Rye Glutens that make us sick

      By Bebygirl01 · Posted

      You are on the money, but I should also add that Italian, French and other countries research shows exactly what I have said. Our FDA is behind the ball when it comes to this research and I am hopeful that Kennedy can straighten this out soon, albeit he is giving the food companies too long to just remove food dyes from our foods when in fact they have to remove all that in order to sell for example, in the UK as they aren't allowed such things. The food companies and the cola companies have also changed their formulas to have just sugar in them instead of corn gluten aka high fructose corn syrup and corn starch in them. Misinformation here in America is a very dangerous thing. I also have been grain free for a long time now and at no time can I even have the smallest amount of corn gluten -I recently got glutened from a supplement that claimed to be grain free yet upon further research I found that it had erythritol (corn sugar) in it and that is what got me sick for 7 days straight. I am not hopeful to ever be able to add back into my diet any of the grain glutens, but perhaps those who were only gluten intolerant might be able to, but for me being celiac, I have no hope in that. Thank you for the article, I will add it to my collection of research as I am collecting everything I can find on this subject and posting it on X as well as other places.  I also don't use psuedo grains i.e. quinoa as that also reacts negatively with my gut, so I am 100% a cassava/tapioca/arrow root girl and that is my go to bread replacement. There are some new items made with chicpea/green peas that are sold as rice alternatives, i bought one to try but haven't yet. So food companies are getting creative, but like you said, I am fresh whole foods and don't buy many processed foods, I make my own cheese, ketchup, pickles, jams, etc.
    • Dora77
      Energy drink can has stains - potential gluten?

      By Dora77 · Posted

      There were small spots (stains) on the drinking area at the top of the energy drinks can from the store that looked as the same color as milk — maybe oat milk (Hafermilch) or a wheat-based drink (Weizendrink), but I’m not sure what it was. There were also some particles that looked like either flour or dust, but not many. Could it have been a gluten-containing drink spilled onto the can or just regular small stains which I shouldn‘t worry about? Do you watch out for stuff like that or am I overthinking? Would it cause damage to a celiac?
    • Scott Adams
      Not Just Wheat, Barley and Rye Glutens that make us sick

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is such an important discussion! While corn gluten (zein) is structurally different from wheat gluten, emerging research suggests some celiac and gluten-sensitive individuals may still react to it, whether due to cross-reactivity, inflammation, or other factors. For those with non-responsive celiac disease or ongoing symptoms, eliminating corn—especially processed derivatives like corn syrup—might be worth exploring under medical guidance. That said, corn’s broader health impact (GMOs, digestibility, nutritional profile) is a separate but valid concern. Like you mentioned, ‘gluten-free’ doesn’t automatically mean ‘healthy,’ and whole, unprocessed foods are often the safest bet. For those sensitive to corn, alternatives like quinoa, rice, or nutrient-dense starches (e.g., sweet potatoes) can help fill the gap. Always fascinating (and frustrating) how individualized this journey is—thanks for highlighting these nuances! Many people with celiac disease, especially those who are in the 0-2 year range of their recovery, have additional food intolerance issues which could be temporary. To figure this out you may need to keep a food diary and do an elimination diet over a few months. Some common food intolerance issues are dairy/casein, eggs, corn, oats, and soy. The good news is that after your gut heals (for most people who are 100% gluten-free this will take several months to two years) you may be able to slowly add some these items back into your diet after the damaged villi heal. This article may be helpful:    
×
×
  • Create New...