Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Results


greenbeanie

Recommended Posts

greenbeanie Enthusiast

I finally got a copy of my pathology report, and also my endoscopy procedural report. Here are the key parts:

 

Pathology report

1. Duodenum, biopsy (4 samples taken): No pathological abnormality. Villus architecture preserved.

2. Gastric biopsy (1 sample taken): Antral type gastric mucosa with no pathological abnormality.

3. Esophagus biopsy (several samples taken): Squamocolumnar junction with reflux esophagitis.

No H. pylori

Post-operative diagnosis: Gastritis and patulous GE junction

 

Endoscopy procedure report

Mild attenuation in the villus structure, but overall the duodenum appeared structurally normal. There is patchy erythema of the gastric body and striped erythema of the antrum. Retroflexion revealed patulous GE junction and a small hiatal hernia. The distal esophagus and mid esophagus all appeared normal. 

 

My tTG-IgA and DGP-IgA and IgG results were again negative. This was after being gluten-light for about 15 years, then 12 days totally gluten-free, then a six week gluten challenge in which I ate an average of about two slices of bread per day and all sorts of awful things happened like my hair started falling out, diarrhea worsened dramatically, ataxia and insomnia worsened, etc. I'm not IgA deficient (204 with a range of 81-463). I do wish they'd taken more samples from the duodenum, but there's nothing I can do about that now. Before the procedure I requested that she take at least six, but apparently she didn't.

 

The nurse did move up my appointment with the GI, which had originally been scheduled for September. I see her in ten days. Before the procedure she already recommended going gluten-free regardless of the results, due to a long history of symptoms, a rash all over my torso, and celiac in a first-degree relative. My intestinal symptoms are hugely improved in just the last two weeks gluten-free, and my hair has almost stopped falling out. Sorry if TMI, but my poop was even solid and sank for the first time in months! The rash and neurological symptoms haven't changed too much, but I know those can take longer. I'm obviously not going to return to eating gluten, but I do still wonder whether I'll get an official diagnosis of any sort. I'll happily remain gluten-free (and our kitchen is gluten-free due to my daughter's celiac anyway), but I don't know how long to wait to see whether the neurological and skin symptoms go away before I start investigating other possible causes.

 

Thoughts, anyone? I'm especially wondering what it means that "mild attenuation in the villus structure" of my duodenum was observed during the endoscopy, but those biopsies were normal.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

The neurological and skin can take a while to clear. You might want to limit iodine for a short time to help your skin clear faster. Do be sure to add it back in after your lesions have resolved. Sublingual B12 seemed to help my neuro issues improve but it still took some time. IMHO you should give yourself at least a couple months gluten free before worrying that something else might be going on. If those issues get worse or you get more neuro issues then you would need to talk to your doctor.

It is good to hear you are already feeling better. You may find the GI gives you an official diagnosis based on your recovery gluten free combined with your reaction to the challenge.

I hope you continue to improve quickly but you may need to be patient with some issues.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...