Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Please Help Me Figure Me Out! Pos. Biopsy, Neg. Bloodwork


MTOkieDokie

Recommended Posts

MTOkieDokie Newbie

Hello, Just joined up because I really need help figuring out what is going on. I am a 34 year old female and I have been seeing a GI doc for the last 6 months to figure out what is going on with my gut. I have all the lovely symptoms of bloating, diarrhea, bloody stools, nausea. These are also accompanied by low B/P of about 80/50 numbness/tingling in my extremities, generalized pain, weakness, faintness, and a rash covering different parts of my body at random places/times. I also have had my gall bladder out about 6 years ago, and have gotten kidney stones several times in my life if any of that matters. My GI has done a colonoscopy which showed inflammation, and an EGD which also showed inflammation. The report on the EGD Biopsy said it was "consistent with Celiac". I thought "Not what I was expecting, but ok, cut out gluten, will do." Now here is my problem , my doc sent me for the celiac antibody panel, and it came back negative. So I ask him if I should still try a gluten free diet and he said no. Too bad I have already been trying it for the last 3 days and I can already tell that my stomach isn't hurting near as much as it always has. SO where does this leave me? Can it be celiac if the blood test was negative, but the biopsy was positive? Is there anything that any of you are aware of that can mimic celiac in such a way? Thanks so much in advance for any help any of you can offer. I am at my wits end right now because I really thought we were getting me figured out and then just so quickly I feel like I am right back at square one.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

welcome  :)

 

check out this link:  Open Original Shared Link

IMO you've got celiac with that positive biopsy.  

 

Do you know which blood tests were run?  also do you have a copy of your blood tests?  If not, I would suggest getting a copy.  In order for blood tests to be accurate you do need to be consuming gluten.  here is a complete celiac panel:

 

Comprehensive Celiac Panel:

DGP iga/igg

ttg iga/igg

EMA

Total iga serum-this is a control test to make sure you make enough iga to validate the other testing

check out page 12 in this report for testing information:

Open Original Shared Link

 

In addition I would suggest you get the following nutrient levels tested as celiac affects absorption.

 

Vitamin/Minerals:

Complete Blood Count (CBC)

Complete Metabolic Profile (CMP)

Vitamin B-12

Folic Acid

Vitamin A, D, E, K

Ferritin

Iron

Magnesium

Zinc

Copper

Niacin

Riboflavin

C-Reactive Protein

Good info from University of Chicago Celiac Center:

Open Original Shared Link

 

also here is a great newbie thread: https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/

 

I know there is a lot of information in this post, but don't let it overwhelm you.  You can do this!  Hope this all helps!

Barbarara Newbie

Hello, Just joined up because I really need help figuring out what is going on. I am a 34 year old female and I have been seeing a GI doc for the last 6 months to figure out what is going on with my gut. I have all the lovely symptoms of bloating, diarrhea, bloody stools, nausea. These are also accompanied by low B/P of about 80/50 numbness/tingling in my extremities, generalized pain, weakness, faintness, and a rash covering different parts of my body at random places/times. I also have had my gall bladder out about 6 years ago, and have gotten kidney stones several times in my life if any of that matters. My GI has done a colonoscopy which showed inflammation, and an EGD which also showed inflammation. The report on the EGD Biopsy said it was "consistent with Celiac". I thought "Not what I was expecting, but ok, cut out gluten, will do." Now here is my problem , my doc sent me for the celiac antibody panel, and it came back negative. So I ask him if I should still try a gluten free diet and he said no. Too bad I have already been trying it for the last 3 days and I can already tell that my stomach isn't hurting near as much as it always has. SO where does this leave me? Can it be celiac if the blood test was negative, but the biopsy was positive? Is there anything that any of you are aware of that can mimic celiac in such a way? Thanks so much in advance for any help any of you can offer. I am at my wits end right now because I really thought we were getting me figured out and then just so quickly I feel like I am right back at square one.

Yes you still can have celiac.  Often doctors don't know that there is NO definitive test for celiac.  You can have a negative test and still have it.

Your biggest clue for me is the rash associated with celiac: dermatitis herpetiformis, which is what I had.  Mine went away after going gluten free and hasn't come back.  Google images for the rash and see if it looks similar to the pics.  They also can do a skin test to diagnose, but if you're already starting gluten free, don't bother. 

 

The previous post mentions vitamin and mineral testing.  Because our gut is so messed up from celiac, we have malabsorption and malnutrition.

I see a chiropractor who is a clinical nutritionist and also does applied kineseology to see which supplements my body wants.  It's a different approach.

 

This is my two cents. 

 

Let me know what you think about this. 

MTOkieDokie Newbie

Thanks so much for the welcome and all the info! 

 

So the first link says that it is possible, but rare to have Celiac and a negative blood test. ( Again, thanks so much for that link.  I have only been finding results on pos. blood work and neg. biopsy)  I believe that he had the complete panel run on me, but I don't have the exact results in front of me. My doc is really hard to understand over the phone and when I asked he basically got kinda mad at me asking so many questions and told me that I was just a hard case. lol 

 

I just started eating gluten-free after I had my lab drawn so I should have had plenty of gluten in my system for my test.  That's why I was confused about the biopsy result, as my doc didn't seem to think that I had Celiac even though it suggested that I did.  I was honestly thinking I could have mastocytosis or crohns going into all of this, but I don't know if they can appear as the same kind of damage to the small intestines as Celiac.  What I do know is that going gluten free the last few days has really helped my stomach.  I am not running to the bathroom after eating each time and my stomach isn't cramping up and burning as bad so I plan on sticking to the gluten-free diet even if he doesn't think it is warranted. 

 

Before going to the GI, I know my GP did run a CBC and CMP and both came back normal.  He started me on Zantac (H2 blocker), and Zyrtec (H1 blocker), and that got rid of the hives and sandpaper like rashes I was breaking out in.  Then the GI stared me on Questran powder 3 times a day and that has been helping a bit with the diarrhea.  I have no doubt that I stay pretty dehydrated and am lacking in several nutrients.  Right now I am 5'9 and weigh 135, but I was 118 last summer before swinging up to 160 during the winter.  The last few years I have been having huge swings in my weight which has normally stayed right around 135. IS this a problem with folks with celiac?

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular

I would print out that link for your doctor since Chicago is considered one of the top celiac centers in the country.  From what I get, it seems like your doctor is frustrated because he doesn't know the answer, but that spells it out for him  :)

 

there are some around here that had a positive biopsy and negative blood work, so hopefully they'll comment soon!  The biopsy is considered the gold standard anyway.  My situation is the opposite positive blood work, negative biopsy  :P

 

As for the weight issue, mine has always been on the higher side, so I can't speak much to that.  I hope your doctor is more cooperative next time.  Just sounds like his ego is a little bruised  :P

 

 

Thanks so much for the welcome and all the info! 

 

So the first link says that it is possible, but rare to have Celiac and a negative blood test. ( Again, thanks so much for that link.  I have only been finding results on pos. blood work and neg. biopsy)  I believe that he had the complete panel run on me, but I don't have the exact results in front of me. My doc is really hard to understand over the phone and when I asked he basically got kinda mad at me asking so many questions and told me that I was just a hard case. lol 

 

I just started eating gluten-free after I had my lab drawn so I should have had plenty of gluten in my system for my test.  That's why I was confused about the biopsy result, as my doc didn't seem to think that I had Celiac even though it suggested that I did.  I was honestly thinking I could have mastocytosis or crohns going into all of this, but I don't know if they can appear as the same kind of damage to the small intestines as Celiac.  What I do know is that going gluten free the last few days has really helped my stomach.  I am not running to the bathroom after eating each time and my stomach isn't cramping up and burning as bad so I plan on sticking to the gluten-free diet even if he doesn't think it is warranted. 

 

Before going to the GI, I know my GP did run a CBC and CMP and both came back normal.  He started me on Zantac (H2 blocker), and Zyrtec (H1 blocker), and that got rid of the hives and sandpaper like rashes I was breaking out in.  Then the GI stared me on Questran powder 3 times a day and that has been helping a bit with the diarrhea.  I have no doubt that I stay pretty dehydrated and am lacking in several nutrients.  Right now I am 5'9 and weigh 135, but I was 118 last summer before swinging up to 160 during the winter.  The last few years I have been having huge swings in my weight which has normally stayed right around 135. IS this a problem with folks with celiac?

notme Experienced

oh, me!  me!  

 

my blood test was neg but my doc could see the damage caused by celiac disease.  but the biopsies/blood tests were all negative.  by the time the tests were performed, though, i was already on the gluten-free diet, (and gained some weight, finally, and was able to keep food 'in' me lolz)  so, with the response to the diet <people forget that this is also used as a diagnostic criteria), and the damage shown on my endoscopy, she diagnosed me as celiac.  i wasn't ever going back to eating gluten again, because i felt so much better - she could have pronounced me aphrodisiac lolz still not eating gluten.  if i was ever on the fence about it, i am sure now that i made the right choice.  a myriad of maladies have resolved with this diet.  good luck! :)   and welcome to the club you never wanted to join  :blink:

cyclinglady Grand Master

I'm diagnosed with celiac disease (mild positive on blood, biopsy: Marsh Stage IIIB), but my husband is not.  He's been gluten-free for 12 years based on his GP and my allergist suggesting he lay off the wheat to relieve body aches, flu-like symptoms, and chronic sinus conditions.  It was a tough first year, but he's been completely compliant and feeling great since then.  He'd never do a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis of either celiac disease or a gluten intolerance. 

 

My cousin's biopsy showed only inflammation, so she's off gluten based on her Mom being gluten free (no formal diagnosis).   She too, thinks she has an intolerance or just the start of celiac disease.  Again, she's gluten free and feeling good.

 

So, it not always necessary to have a diagnosis -- though it can help more people to comply. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...