Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Results


charlie76

Recommended Posts

charlie76 Newbie

Hi all, 

 

I'm trying to understand my blood test results from a couple of years ago. I'm in Australia.

 

The results are as follows:

 

Coeliac Serology

Gliadin IgA Abs     * 47  U/mL    ( 0 - 20 )

tTG IgA/IgG         * 52  U/mL    ( 0 - 20 )

 

Since the blood test I have been gluten free and feeling so much better. I did have a biopsy after the blood work, but it was clear. This could have been because I was at the time of testing (and had been for some time) on a low gluten diet (although, not totally gluten free).

 

Without going into the full story, my new gastroenterology doctor wants me to have the biopsy again now, and wants me back on a gluten diet for 4 to 6 weeks before the biopsy (I'm 1 week in now and feeling quite unwell at times).

 

I really don't know if it's worth it, but I've started back on the gluten now so I guess I'm committed.

 

Anyway, if anyone could help me understand the results above I'd be very grateful.

 

Thanks...!

 

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

Welcome to the board.  :)

 

The anti-tissue transglutiminase antibodies (tTG IgA or tTG IgG) are pretty specific to celiac disease. A positive result indicates that your body is attempting to do damage to your intestines in resposnse to gliadin. Your immune system is attempting to do damage to your intestinal villi but that damage isn't necessarily uniform - it could be spotty. It's also possible that your body is doing a good job of healing itself after every episode of damage, so it could have made it difficult for the doctors to find damage during an endoscopy... it really is not that uncommon around here for one to have positive test results and a negative biopsy, or vice versa.

 

The other test you had is probably the anti-gliadin antibodies test (AGA IgA or AGA IgG) which is actually the only celiac test that does not indicate damage is happening to the intestinal villi (unlike the tTG's, DGP's, and EMA). A positive AGA is shows a sensitivity to gliadin (gluten) and is thought by some to be a test that works for both celiac disease and the more common  non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) when no villi damage is occurring.

 

Basically, you have tests that say you are sensitive to gluten and that you are experiencing intestinal damage (or attempted damage at the very least). Occassionally, a tTG positive result can be caused by chronic liver disease, thyroiditis, crohn's or colitis, but because you know you have a problem with gluten (via a positive AGA and a positive response to the gluten-free diet), I would say that it's pretty likey that you have celiac disease ... But I'm not medically trained, I've just done a bunch of reading and research. ;) Usually if the tTG is barely above normal if it is caused by the previously mentioned reasons.

 

This report goes into some detail about the tests on pages 10-12. The rest of the report is an interesting read too.

Open Original Shared Link

 

Whatever the biopsy says, I would suggest going back to the gluten-free diet for life. i think you have celiac disease, and it was working for you, so I would stick with it.

 

Best wishes.

charlie76 Newbie

Thanks for your reply, Nicole. It was very helpful.  :)  And It's reassuring to know that I'm not the only one in this position.

 

Only 4 more weeks until my biopsy and I can't wait so I can go back to gluten-free again. The symptoms I'm getting in addition to gastrointestinal problems include headaches, feeling slightly nauseous when I wake, sleeplessness, brain fog, tiredness, irritability, tingling in my face and feet. I'm seeing my regular doctor tomorrow so I'll see what he thinks. Maybe we'll agree it's not worth putting my body through this for 4 more weeks!  :unsure:  

nvsmom Community Regular

You're having pretty common symptoms, and nasty ones. Some doctors think two weeks is enough for a biopsy. Perhaps discus a shorter gluten trial, or going gluten light (one serving of gluten before bed) until two weeks before your test, with your doctor. You don't want to feel lousy all summer...of course, a gluten trial means you can drink beer. Lol ;)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tim Semas
    Newest Member
    Tim Semas
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...