Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Higher Ttg Than At Diagnosis


mattthom77

Recommended Posts

mattthom77 Newbie

It's been 4 months now since getting diagnosed and starting on the gluten-free diet.  When I first had the TTG blood test it came back as 33.  It's 4 months later, and I've still been having all the symptoms so I went back to the doctor and he did another TTG test and it came back 47.  He said that I've still been consuming gluten.  This shocked me because I have done so much reading and been very strict on my diet.  For the last month and a half I've not eaten out.  I've basically only eaten meats, vegetables, nuts, rice, and fruits.  My vitamins are all gluten-free, my toothpaste, shaving cream.  Two questions:  What does that 47 indicate?  And what hidden gluten could it possibly be?  Now I've tried to really up the bar on any possible cross-contamination, but the 47 seems high enough that I'm getting a gluten ingredient, not just some iota of cross-contamination on a rare occasion.  Is that true?  Also I was eating a lot of gluten-free processed products, and eating out when I first started on the gluten-free diet.  It seems like the 47 is high enough that I am still consuming gluten.  It seems like it wouldn't be so high if my stricter diet over the past month or two solved it.  I just want to feel better and get my life back as soon as possible.  Thanks for any help.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GottaSki Mentor

It's been 4 months now since getting diagnosed and starting on the gluten-free diet.  When I first had the TTG blood test it came back as 33.  It's 4 months later, and I've still been having all the symptoms so I went back to the doctor and he did another TTG test and it came back 47.  He said that I've still been consuming gluten.  This shocked me because I have done so much reading and been very strict on my diet.  For the last month and a half I've not eaten out.  I've basically only eaten meats, vegetables, nuts, rice, and fruits.  My vitamins are all gluten-free, my toothpaste, shaving cream.  Two questions:  What does that 47 indicate?  And what hidden gluten could it possibly be?  Now I've tried to really up the bar on any possible cross-contamination, but the 47 seems high enough that I'm getting a gluten ingredient, not just some iota of cross-contamination on a rare occasion.  Is that true?  Also I was eating a lot of gluten-free processed products, and eating out when I first started on the gluten-free diet.  It seems like the 47 is high enough that I am still consuming gluten.  It seems like it wouldn't be so high if my stricter diet over the past month or two solved it.  I just want to feel better and get my life back as soon as possible.  Thanks for any help.

 

Welcome!

 

Did the doctor run any of the other Celiac Antibody Tests?

 

The Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) - both IgA and IgG are most sensitive...they are the first to rise with gluten ingestion and the first to fall when completely gluten-free.

 

If you are being as careful as stated above -- I would carry on and wait another three months to test again.

 

Is your kitchen gluten-free?  If you are in a shared kitchen do make sure you are aware of all the places gluten can hid.  Here is a link for great info:

 

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/91878-newbie-info-101/

cyclinglady Grand Master

I'm at a loss.  I hope someone else can help you. 

 

I've been gluten-free for over three months.  I only had abdominal symptoms that developed between my blood test and biopsy (yes, I ate a loaf of good bread a day, I kid you not!).  Those symptoms dissipated after six weeks.  Now, it's hard to tell if I get glutened which is dangerous since my initial  symptoms were only anemia and Hashimoto's Thyroiditis.   Having fractured a vertebrae (bone scan in two weeks), I'm worried that I'm not building bone despite all the supplements I'm taking.  Though I believe my anemia has been resolved, so that's a good sign.  So, I might very well be in the same boat as you!

nvsmom Community Regular

It can take a while for the antibodies to turn off. It is not instantaneous as soon as gluten is cut out of your diet. If your body have been making tTG antibodies for a while, it may continue to do so for months yet. Some of the antibodies are in response to damage in the gut, so until the damage is gone, you might still have them... I know that seems crazy since tTG makes more damage but as long as you aren't eating gluten, and revving up those antibodies to high levels, it will slowly come down in most cases.

 

My tTG levels are pretty close to yours, but I have been gluten-free for over a year. we have to be patient.

 

tTG levels can also be elevated by diabetes, chronic liver disease, crohn's or colitis, as well as hashimotos thyroiditis. If you have any of these problems (I have thyroiditis) it could cause your tTG levels to stay higher than most people's, or to be slower to come down.

 

Keep doing what you are doing. Recheck your lables everytime you eat something (even if it is already opened) and you might find something that has slipped past you.  I know I had a slip-up at 6months gluten-free because I didn't re-read a label, it happens.

 

Best wishes.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,254
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    brigette
    Newest Member
    brigette
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.8k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • MI-Hoosier
      Thanks again. My mom was diagnosed over 50 years ago with celiac so grew up watching her deal with the challenges of food. I have been tested a few times prior due to this but these results have me a bit stunned. I have a liver disease that has advanced rapidly with no symptoms and an allergy that could be a contributing factor that had no symptoms. I guess I’ll call it lucky my Dr ordered a rescreen of a liver ultrasound from 5 years ago that triggered this or I would likely have tripped into cirrhosis. It’s all pretty jarring.
    • Heather Hill
      Many thanks for your responses, much appreciated.  The tests did include tTg IgA and all the other markers mentioned.  I also had sufficient total IgA so if I'm reading the Mayo clinic thing correctly, I didn't really need the anti-deaminated gliadin marker? So, if I am reading the information correctly do I conclude that as all the other markers including tTg IgA and DGP IgG and tTg IgG and EMA IgA are all negative, then the positive result for the immune response to gliadin, on it's own, is more likely to suggest some other problem in the gut rather than Coeliac disease? Until I have a view from the medics (NHS UK) then I think I will concentrate on trying to lower chronic inflammation and mend leaky gut, using L glutamine and maybe collagen powder. Thank you for your help so far.  I will get back in touch once I have a response, which sadly can take quite a long time.   Kindest Heather Hill 
    • trents
      To put this in perspective, most recent pretest "gluten challenge" guidelines for those having already been eating reduced gluten or gluten free for a significant time period is the daily consumption of 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of two weeks leading up to the day of testing (antibody or biopsy). And I would certainly give it more than two weeks to ensure a valid test experience. Short answer: If it were me, yes, I would assume I have celiac disease and launch full bore into gluten-free eating. I think the tTG-IGA is reliable enough and your score is solid enough to make that a reasonable conclusion. Here is an article to help you get off to a good start. It's easy to achieve a reduced gluten free state but much more difficult to achieve consistency in truly gluten-free eating. Gluten is hidden in so many ways and found in so many food products where you would never expect to find it. For example, soy sauce and canned tomato soup (most canned soups, actually), pills, medications, health supplements. It can be disguised in terminology. And then there is the whole issue of cross contamination where foods that are naturally gluten free become contaminated with gluten incidentally in agricultural activities and manufacturing processes: Eating out at restaurants is a mine field for those with celiac disease because you don't know how food is handled back in the kitchen. Gluten free noodles boiled in the same water that was used for wheat noodles, eggs cooked on the same griddle that French toast was, etc.  
    • MI-Hoosier
      Thank you for the response and article. I was placed on the Mediterranean diet and been on that now for about 3 weeks. While not gluten free I am eating very little bread or anything with gluten ie a slice of whole wheat bread every couple days so assume that would cause issues now with a biopsy.  With the condition my liver is in I am unsure moving back to higher bread consumption is ideal.  In this scenario would my test results be enough to assume positive Celiac and just move forward gluten free?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @MI-Hoosier! You are operating on a misconception about your "mixed" test results. You only had two celiac disease diagnostic tests run out of six that could have been ordered if your doctor had opted for a complete celiac panel. It is perfectly normal to not test positive for all possible celiac disease diagnostic tests. That is why there is more than one test option. It is the same way with other diagnostic testing procedures for many or most other diseases. Generally, when diagnosing a condition, a number of different tests are run and a diagnosis is arrived at by looking at the total body of evidence. The tTG-IGA test is the centerpiece of celiac disease blood antibody testing and the one most commonly ordered by doctors. You were strongly positive for that test. It was not an unequivocal result, IMO.  Having said that, it is standard procedure to confirm a positive celiac disease blood antibody test result with an endoscopy/biopsy which is still considered the gold standard of celiac disease diagnosis. Had your tTG-IGA been 150 or greater, your doctor many have opted out of the endoscopy/biopsy. The absence of GI distress in the celiac disease population is very common. We call them "silent celiacs". That can change as damage to the lining of the small bowel worsens. Elevated liver enzymes/liver stress is very common in the celiac population. About 18% of celiacs experience it. I was one of them. Persistently elevated liver enzymes over a period of years in the absence of other typical causes such as hepatitis and alcohol abuse was what eventually led to my celiac disease diagnosis. But it took thirteen years to get that figured out. Within three months of going gluten free my liver enzymes were back into normal range. Thank goodness, there is more awareness these days about the many long fingers of celiac disease that are not found in the classic category of GI distress. Today, there have been over 200 symptoms/medical conditions identified as connected to celiac disease. It is critical that you not begin a gluten free diet until your endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel is over. Doing so before that procedure will invalidate it because it will allow healing of the small bowel lining to begin. Here is a link to an article covering celiac disease blood antibody testing:  
×
×
  • Create New...