Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biocard Home Test - Faint Positive? You Be The Judge


jvdb

Recommended Posts

jvdb Rookie

So I caved and decided to get the biocard celiac home test sold at Rexall.  I followed the instructions and within 5-10 minutes (proper reading time) there was an EXTREMELY faint line in the positive area.  I mean so faint that it was hard to pick up on camera and you can only see it in proper light.  I have uploaded a picture and would like your opinions. 

 

The instructions do say that even a faint line is positive, but this one you have to practically squint to see.  Anyone else experience a super super faint positive, so faint that they were questioning if it was actually there? (hey this happened with my pregnancy test and it was positive lol)

 

Sorry it is very pic heavy.  A line in the FIRST box indicates positive.

10318058725_54f54b086c_c.webp10318067356_67f507ebf8_c.webp10318057326_5213b12e29_c.webp10318008834_8458bc30c2_c.webp


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GF Lover Rising Star

I would read that as Negative.  The faint line in the first box looks like the pre-scored line that would fill in if positive.

 

Colleen

nvsmom Community Regular

That line is pretty close to what I had when I did the Biocard test. I didn't quite get the right amount of blood so that could have affected my result and made it faint. When I went to the doctor and ran the test there (it's the tTG IgA) my result was over 10 times the normal range.... for me the test worked.

 

I remember googling the faint positive for Biocard tests and I found pictires of faint positives that were shown to nurses who often discounted them... but they were considered to be positive.

 

There was a board member last year (Stephanie) who had a faint line that was not supported by celiac tests; it turns out Lyme disease caused her symptoms so it isn't always correct BUT I think it usually is. It's like a pregnancy test - you can't get a faint line unless there is a reason for it. KWIM?

 

I would recommend getting further testing done. Perhaps request another tTG IgA, tTG IgG, DGP IgA and DGP IgG, and EMA IgA.... Just to be sure unless you are planning on going gluten-free anyways.  Good luck!

jvdb Rookie

Thank you to both the answers. I'm well aware that it could be simply the moisture revealing the area that would react simply due to a possible change in texture on the paper or who knows what. It is hard to see in the pictures especially, but there is no doubt the line did exist. From my experience reading pregnancy tests I know that often people would think they had a faint positive due to a situation like this, however I also know from my own experience that a line this faint can really also be a faint positive ( my husband thought I was imagining things when I showed him the test for our daughter, it looked very similar to my biosure test lol)

Nvsmom, I too had issues getting enough blood into the tube, it filled to about 70% despite having more blood ready on my finger. I have actually emailed the company about this and requested the possibility of receiving a retest since the purpose of purchasing this test out of pocket was to GET answers not to raise more questions.

The line did start to develop about 5 minutes in and I was able to see it at the ten minute mark. My husband and sister both agreed that they saw the line however they looked at the test an hour and two hours later when the line had darkened even more (you are not supposed to read it after 10 minutes, so them seeing a line that late is not really that helpful.)

nvsmom Community Regular

The line did start to develop about 5 minutes in and I was able to see it at the ten minute mark. My husband and sister both agreed that they saw the line however they looked at the test an hour and two hours later when the line had darkened even more (you are not supposed to read it after 10 minutes, so them seeing a line that late is not really that helpful.)

 

I couldn't see any line until I was at about the 10 minute line. I remember checking it just before 5 minutes and there was nothing so I almost dismissed it. I went back to a book for 10 more minutes and almost fell out of my chair when I saw the positive line - which I held closer to the light to be sure it was actually a line.

 

I would take that test to the doctor with you and request further testing. Are you planning on going gluten-free regardless of future test results?

jvdb Rookie

I won't stop eating gluten until I have gotten satisfactory test results. Which to me means at LEAST proper blood test results. I has been ten days since my blood was drawn and no word yet. If the result is positive I will speak to my dr about endoscopy but may or may not have it done depending on how long the wait will be. If I have a positive test and feel better gluten free then that is all the answer I need. If my dr pushes for endoscopy and the wait isn't too long I will do it to make the diagnosis official.

I my blood test ends up negative I will likely try gluten free anyways just to see if it does make a difference in how I feel. If I feel much better then great, if not then we are back to square one. Although celiac sounds like the perfect match to every symptom I have experienced, there are still other possible causes and perhaps it isn't gluten at all. I am keeping my mind open but would really like to get to the bottom of this. As difficult as it is to go gluten free I much prefer the idea of a dietary change to solve my problems rather than some of the possible alternatives such as crohns or the dreaded "we don't know what is wrong with you"= IBS

nvsmom Community Regular

Good luck..:) Let us know how the results go...and get copies of it all for yourself so you can double check your doctor - I've caught them in errors in the past.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Heather Hill replied to Heather Hill's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Does this definitely suggest Coeliac Disease?

    2. - trents replied to MI-Hoosier's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Test uncertainty

    3. - MI-Hoosier replied to MI-Hoosier's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Test uncertainty

    4. - trents replied to MI-Hoosier's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Test uncertainty

    5. - MI-Hoosier posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Test uncertainty


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,254
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    brigette
    Newest Member
    brigette
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.8k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Heather Hill
      Many thanks for your responses, much appreciated.  The tests did include tTg IgA and all the other markers mentioned.  I also had sufficient total IgA so if I'm reading the Mayo clinic thing correctly, I didn't really need the anti-deaminated gliadin marker? So, if I am reading the information correctly do I conclude that as all the other markers including tTg IgA and DGP IgG and tTg IgG and EMA IgA are all negative, then the positive result for the immune response to gliadin, on it's own, is more likely to suggest some other problem in the gut rather than Coeliac disease? Until I have a view from the medics (NHS UK) then I think I will concentrate on trying to lower chronic inflammation and mend leaky gut, using L glutamine and maybe collagen powder. Thank you for your help so far.  I will get back in touch once I have a response, which sadly can take quite a long time.   Kindest Heather Hill 
    • trents
      To put this in perspective, most recent pretest "gluten challenge" guidelines for those having already been eating reduced gluten or gluten free for a significant time period is the daily consumption of 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of two weeks leading up to the day of testing (antibody or biopsy). And I would certainly give it more than two weeks to ensure a valid test experience. Short answer: If it were me, yes, I would assume I have celiac disease and launch full bore into gluten-free eating. I think the tTG-IGA is reliable enough and your score is solid enough to make that a reasonable conclusion. Here is an article to help you get off to a good start. It's easy to achieve a reduced gluten free state but much more difficult to achieve consistency in truly gluten-free eating. Gluten is hidden in so many ways and found in so many food products where you would never expect to find it. For example, soy sauce and canned tomato soup (most canned soups, actually), pills, medications, health supplements. It can be disguised in terminology. And then there is the whole issue of cross contamination where foods that are naturally gluten free become contaminated with gluten incidentally in agricultural activities and manufacturing processes: Eating out at restaurants is a mine field for those with celiac disease because you don't know how food is handled back in the kitchen. Gluten free noodles boiled in the same water that was used for wheat noodles, eggs cooked on the same griddle that French toast was, etc.  
    • MI-Hoosier
      Thank you for the response and article. I was placed on the Mediterranean diet and been on that now for about 3 weeks. While not gluten free I am eating very little bread or anything with gluten ie a slice of whole wheat bread every couple days so assume that would cause issues now with a biopsy.  With the condition my liver is in I am unsure moving back to higher bread consumption is ideal.  In this scenario would my test results be enough to assume positive Celiac and just move forward gluten free?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @MI-Hoosier! You are operating on a misconception about your "mixed" test results. You only had two celiac disease diagnostic tests run out of six that could have been ordered if your doctor had opted for a complete celiac panel. It is perfectly normal to not test positive for all possible celiac disease diagnostic tests. That is why there is more than one test option. It is the same way with other diagnostic testing procedures for many or most other diseases. Generally, when diagnosing a condition, a number of different tests are run and a diagnosis is arrived at by looking at the total body of evidence. The tTG-IGA test is the centerpiece of celiac disease blood antibody testing and the one most commonly ordered by doctors. You were strongly positive for that test. It was not an unequivocal result, IMO.  Having said that, it is standard procedure to confirm a positive celiac disease blood antibody test result with an endoscopy/biopsy which is still considered the gold standard of celiac disease diagnosis. Had your tTG-IGA been 150 or greater, your doctor many have opted out of the endoscopy/biopsy. The absence of GI distress in the celiac disease population is very common. We call them "silent celiacs". That can change as damage to the lining of the small bowel worsens. Elevated liver enzymes/liver stress is very common in the celiac population. About 18% of celiacs experience it. I was one of them. Persistently elevated liver enzymes over a period of years in the absence of other typical causes such as hepatitis and alcohol abuse was what eventually led to my celiac disease diagnosis. But it took thirteen years to get that figured out. Within three months of going gluten free my liver enzymes were back into normal range. Thank goodness, there is more awareness these days about the many long fingers of celiac disease that are not found in the classic category of GI distress. Today, there have been over 200 symptoms/medical conditions identified as connected to celiac disease. It is critical that you not begin a gluten free diet until your endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel is over. Doing so before that procedure will invalidate it because it will allow healing of the small bowel lining to begin. Here is a link to an article covering celiac disease blood antibody testing:  
    • MI-Hoosier
      Hi,  I was recently diagnosed with stage 3 NASH and doctor is concerned something is caused my disease to progress quicker than they would expect.   During blood tests a celiac screen was pulled as my mom is a celiac. My ttg was a 49.4 (normal >15) but my endomysial antibody was negative. I have never had gluten symptoms and no issues with bread and am 54. Do I need a biopsy to rule celiac in or out with this mixed test? Any thoughts are appreciated.  
×
×
  • Create New...