Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Cannot Get Diagnosis From Blood Test Alone?

WinterSong

Recommended Posts

WinterSong Community Regular
WinterSong
Posted

I was just listening to a podcast that said there is new research to say that you cannot get diagnosed with Celiac from a blood test alone. I know an endoscopy is the golden standard test, but I've always understood that there are rarely false positive where blood tests are concerned. Has anyone heard of this thought on blood tests? The person on the podcast said that you need to get four or five things done. I'd assume two are the endoscopy and gene test, but I have no idea what else she was talking about.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


kareng Grand Master
kareng
Posted

This is especially true for  someone with a slightly positive blood test.  In small children, they will sometimes forgo the endoscopy if there is a god response to the gluten-free diet, a really high ttg (over 100), and genes.  In adults, they still want to do the endoscopy.  Part if the reason for this is to make sure there aren't other issues like ulcers.

nvsmom Community Regular
nvsmom
Posted

I have found it depends on the doctor as well.  I had a high tTG IgA and a positive EMA test; those two are pretty specific for celiac disease so we stopped with that and skipped the endoscopy. I'm diagnosed as a celiac anyways.

 

Up here, doctors will only run the tTG IgA test. My kids were negative on that but had a great response to the gluten-free diet (well, 2/3 did). Without a positive tTG IgA, doctors will not do an endoscopy (I'm not an endoscopy fan anyways) so they will not have a diagnosis (can't retest if they are gluten-free). I tell them to consider themselves to be celiacs.

 

I don't believe they do any genetic testing up here either - could be wrong on that.

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular
powerofpositivethinking
Posted

the link below lists the info I think you're looking for right above the Dermatitis Herpetiformis section.  I copied and pasted it below.

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

The wide variability of celiac disease-related findings suggests that it is difficult to conceptualize the diagnostic process into rigid algorithms that can cover the clinical complexity of this disease. For this reason, a quantitative approach that can be defined as the 'four out of five rule' was proposed recently[Open Original Shared Link]. Using this method, the diagnosis of celiac disease is confirmed if at least four of the following five criteria are fulfilled:

 

1. Typical symptoms of celiac disease

2. Positivity of serum celiac disease IgA class autoantibodies at high titer

3. HLA-DQ2 and/or HLA-DQ8 genotypes

4. Celiac enteropathy found on small bowel biopsy

5. Response to a GFD

WinterSong Community Regular
WinterSong
Posted
  • Author

That's interesting. I had never hear of the 4 out of 5 method. I always thought it was just the blood test and endoscopy. I had a tTg that was off the charts, an endoscopy with blunted villi, symptoms of Celiac, and a positive response to the diet. My doctor had wanted to do a gene test, but I didn't feel the need to since he told me I already had the diagnosis. The paranoid part of me thinks that I should have gotten it done, lol. But I'm confident in my diagnosis.

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular
powerofpositivethinking
Posted

If you still want the gene test, it is the one test that results are valid regardless of gluten consumption because your genes do not change  :)

 

 

That's interesting. I had never hear of the 4 out of 5 method. I always thought it was just the blood test and endoscopy. I had a tTg that was off the charts, an endoscopy with blunted villi, symptoms of Celiac, and a positive response to the diet. My doctor had wanted to do a gene test, but I didn't feel the need to since he told me I already had the diagnosis. The paranoid part of me thinks that I should have gotten it done, lol. But I'm confident in my diagnosis.

WinterSong Community Regular
WinterSong
Posted
  • Author

Ok, humor me with this one (with my personality I'm prone to anxiety and I've been dealing with a lot of stressful events lately).

I'll probably go in for the gene test at some point, but it's silly of me to be worrying about my diagnosis now, right? I mean, I had four out of the five...

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


GottaSki Mentor
GottaSki
Posted

Ok, humor me with this one (with my personality I'm prone to anxiety and I've been dealing with a lot of stressful events lately).

I'll probably go in for the gene test at some point, but it's silly of me to be worrying about my diagnosis now, right? I mean, I had four out of the five...

You were diagnosed correctly.

Most folks only have a gene test IF the other criteria are not clear OR they are looking for answers for their family. You clearly have the most important diagnostic criteria.

No question here...you have Celiac Disease.

Carry on :)

powerofpositivethinking Community Regular
powerofpositivethinking
Posted

You've got the 4/5, so I wouldn't bother  :)

 

Personally for myself, I would like to get the gene test at some point because I have

 

1. Typical symptoms of celiac disease *check

2. Positivity of serum celiac disease IgA class autoantibodies at high titer *I had IgG class only, but DGP IgG which is 99% specific to celiac.

3. HLA-DQ2 and/or HLA-DQ8 genotypes *hasn't been tested

4. Celiac enteropathy found on small bowel biopsy *no damage found

5. Response to a GFD *check

 

The GI I went to wouldn't order a gene test for me because I'd already gotten a positive DGP IgG score.  He said the gene test is not diagnostic alone, which is true, but I still wish he would have ordered it.  Eventually I'll pay out of pocket to get it tested, but that time isn't right now.  I need that money to pay for my food  :lol:

 

Ok, humor me with this one (with my personality I'm prone to anxiety and I've been dealing with a lot of stressful events lately).

I'll probably go in for the gene test at some point, but it's silly of me to be worrying about my diagnosis now, right? I mean, I had four out of the five...

WinterSong Community Regular
WinterSong
Posted
  • Author

Haha, thanks guys. I figured I have a solid diagnosis, which is why I didn't order the gene test in the first place. At the time, I actually thought that my doctor was getting a little test happy, and I don't like it when doctors run tests for no reason.

africanqueen99 Contributor
africanqueen99
Posted

It must be doctor specific, right? 

 

My one year old was DX on blood work alone.  Granted, her numbers were off the chart.  We even redid blood because they were so alarmingly high for such a young person.

 

Then my seven year old was DX based on blood, having a 1st degree relative and lack of growth in a year.  We did the scope, but she had her DX first.

 

I'd like to get the gene test on all of us.  Who knows if I'll get around to it, though?  I wonder if insurance will even pay for it if we've already done the DX process...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,071
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Kathy Herivel
    Newest Member
    Kathy Herivel
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      69.9k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Sprouts packaged roasted, salted nuts - says "made in a facility that processes wheat" - has anyone had a problem?

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @Amyinwyoming! Answers to your question that you might receive may not be helpful to you as an individual since sensitivity levels vary significantly within the gluten sensitive/gluten intolerant/celiac community. The other complicating factor is that low levels of gluten in a product may not cause obvious symptoms but may still generate low level inflammation in the small bowel. When in doubt, it is best to pass on the product. I'm not a particularly sensitive celiac so I might allow myself to eat something at a guest's house that was made from a food product with the kind of disclaimer label you describe but I typically shy away from buying them or consuming them when I have a choice.
    • Soleihey
      Gluten Ataxia and Malabsorption

      By Soleihey · Posted

      Started having ataxia symptoms (tremor, twitching, leg weakness, slurred speech) approx 1 year ago. I have had extensive neurological testing and negative. However, I had celiac blood and gene testing that were both markedly positive. Have been gluten free for almost 1 year but still having episodes or flairs. Has anyone else experienced this?  I have been pretty strict about my diet and am also dairy free.  How long before it took you to feel like symptoms mostly resolved?    I would like to add I’ve also been pregnant for most of this time, so I’m seeing a lot of my symptoms return postpartum. Now that I’m also having regular bowel movements in comparison to the constipation from pregnancy, I am noticing evidence of malabsorption in my stool. I also lost weight postpartum quickly. I have an upcoming appointment with a G.I. to hopefully get an endoscopy done. I’m on several supplements and have no known deficiencies on bloodwork. Has anyone found that increasing fiber or starting a digestive enzyme supplement helped?    I am hoping there is still some chance for my body to heal since it has been 11 months on the diet. 
    • Amyinwyoming
      Sprouts packaged roasted, salted nuts - says "made in a facility that processes wheat" - has anyone had a problem?

      By Amyinwyoming · Posted

      The package says - "made in a facility that processes wheat" - has anyone had a problem?
    • Scott Adams
      Can food allergies like milk and soy flatten villi?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Many people with celiac disease, especially those who are in the 0-2 year range of their recovery, have additional food intolerance issues which could be temporary. To figure this out you may need to keep a food diary and do an elimination diet over a few months. Some common food intolerance issues are dairy/casein, eggs, corn, oats, and soy. The good news is that after your gut heals (for most people who are 100% gluten-free this will take several months to two years) you may be able to slowly add some these items back into your diet after the damaged villi heal. This article may be helpful:    
    • RDLiberty
      Rice, corn, and other gluten-free grains.

      By RDLiberty · Posted

      So, it's been a while since I posted here and I've been doing fine with my diet. Haven't cheated, have gotten used to being gluten-free, and have even created a series of microwaveable, healthy, low cal dishes that take minutes to make because I don't cook and won't be starting to, ever. That said, many of those dishes incorporate rice and corn, not to mention many of the gluten-free products I eat such as Schar brand and other certified gluten-free breads, etc, contain rice and corn. I don't seem to have any issues with the two grains, though I have asymptomatic celiac, but I keep hearing these off the wall sources (opinion pieces by people who claim to be doctors, etc), saying that rice and corn contain a form of gluten, it's just different from wheat/barley/rye gluten but it still causes issues for celiacs. This is hearsay, right? I mean, I know some people who are ultra sensitive have issues or even people with other conditions that can cause reactions to rice and corn, but to claim it causes the same issues as wheat just strikes me as... nonsense? I can't find a single, true scientific study that says celiacs can't eat corn or rice, so long as it's not contaminated and they don't have other sensitivities to it. It causes me pause when I see this stuff, but every time I do a deep dive into medical research by reliable sources like the Mayo clinic, etc, they list non-contaminated corn and rice as safe ingredients for celiac diets. Has anyone else heard anything truly scientific about rice/corn in gluten-free diets, or is it simply misconception like so much of the 'medical' advice found dancing across the world wide web? I enjoy eating my prepared, certified gluten-free food and I'm not looking to become a betty crocker who makes everything from scratch, nor do I plan to go on an even more restrictive diet than I already have. Just curious what everyone else's take is. I know some people don't eat processed food, which is fine for them, but that's not me. lol Thanks everyone. Happy New Year.
×
×
  • Create New...