Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Celiac Testing. Ttg Tests Not The Most Accurate To Detect Early Stage celiac disease


answerseeker

Recommended Posts

answerseeker Enthusiast

Here's an interesting article. Only 64% accuracy with the ttg test in early stage celiac. Kaiser doesn't do the whole panel. It's so important to get the celiac panel because you can see in this article the accuracy goes up pretty significantly with the ema tests. This refers to early stage celiac with little or no villi damage (marsh I)

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/21063208/

My insurance changes in Jan, no more Kaiser. I'm getting my children retested with the whole celiac panel


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

Interesting. The EMA IgA's ability to detect early celiac disease surprised me. It usually doesn't show up until there is already damage (from tTG IgA) and then it tries to wipe out the top damage layer of the villi... like a second wave of attack.  At least that how I understood it. :ph34r:

answerseeker Enthusiast

I think they are always learning new things about this disease! I don't think there is enough research yet in early stage celiac. But it does seem to me that the ttg has a high false negative. My kids tested almost the same exact numbers on the ttg as I did and as each other did which is odd to me. My ttg was false negative. I thought it was due to prednisone but this makes me wonder. Regardless, they are getting a whole celiac panel done the minute our insurance changes!

NoGlutenCooties Contributor

I can't put my finger on where I read this but I remember seeing that a negative bloodtest is only about 70% accurate.  However, a positive bloodtest is about 97% accurate.  Also, it is important to get the actual numbers from the doctor (which it sounds like you did) rather than just the "positive" or "negative".  There are discrepancies in what different labs and different doctors consider "positive".  For example, my doctor doesn't consider it to be a positive result unless the number is over 11.  But most nutritionalists will tell you that anything over 3 is positive - just not "positive enough" for the insurance companies to want to pay for the endoscopy.  In this case you'd have to get tested annually and see if the number goes up.

nvsmom Community Regular

The numbers that I usually quote are from the Open Original Shared Link On page 12 it shows that the tTG IgA's sensitivity (how many cases of celiac disease out of 100 it would catch) is 75-95% - meaning it misses 5-25% of celiac disease with false negatives- and the specificity (how many cases of 100 positives are actually celiac disease) is 91-99% - meaning 1-9% of all positive tests are false positives for celiac disease and probably attributed to something else like crohn's, colitis, diabetes, thyroiditis, liver disease, or some other infection.

 

False negatives are definitely more common than false positives.

 

I'm glad you have a doctor who will interpret the grey areas, NoGlutenCooties. Most doctors won't, there is just positive or negative nevermind that the numbers seperating them may be next to nothing.

NoGlutenCooties Contributor

I'm glad you have a doctor who will interpret the grey areas, NoGlutenCooties. Most doctors won't, there is just positive or negative nevermind that the numbers seperating them may be next to nothing.

 

I actually insist on getting the specific numbers from the doctor, to include a copy of the test results, and do my own independent research.  I don't trust doctors to explain - or even to really know - what the grey areas mean.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,506
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Lj314159
    Newest Member
    Lj314159
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      71k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Mettedkny! Your ttg-igg numbers are elevated but what about your ttg-iga numbers? Were your ttg-iga numbers elevated at your original diagnosis? The reason I ask is because elevated igg antibody test scores are more likely to be caused by something else besides a celiac reaction to gluten. The ttg-iga test is considered to be the centerpiece of celiac disease blood antibody testing. But some people are seronegative for the iga celiac tests, particularly if they are iga deficient. If they are iga deficient, the igg tests can be helpful. Have you ever had a "total iga" test run to check for iga deficiency?
    • Mettedkny
      Not sure where to start - been diagnosed for 17 years, and for 16 years my bloodwork has been perfect. Last May I started on HRT (estrogen patch & progesterone pill) for post menopausal symptoms, and to help with mild osteoporosis. In June my Gliadin IgG numbers suddenly went up to 59 (from previously being below 5 for 16 years). Did a deep dive on the progesterone pill manufacturer (Aurobindo) to ensure that the medication IS gluten free - and was told multiple times that there is no gluten in the pills. The pill is the ONLY thing that has changed, and my son, who is also celiac has perfect numbers.  Scoured my life to try and find out where the gluten could be coming from and the only thing I found was a tea I drank that had "possible wheat straw" (had been drinking this tea for about 5 years with no issues - and was confirmed by the manufacturer that their tea is certified gluten-free despite the "straw") - cut the tea out thinking that it MUST be the tea. Repeated the blood test 3 months later and it dropped to 55 - not indicative that the gluten has been found and removed from my diet. Had bloodwork done again yesterday and it is now 95 😳 I am completely floored. WHERE is it coming from??? I am SO careful. Would NEVER cheat, don't eat out and like I said, my son has NO issues and his number is 3 (as of yesterday). Has anyone had a problem with progesterone pills? It is the only variable that I can think of, but how do I prove that it is the problem without discontinuing to take the HRT (which I really need for post menopausal symptoms, sleep, anxiety, brain fog and hot flashes).
    • Nicbent35
      That’s a good thought, I didn’t think of that aspect of waiting longer! Thanks 
    • trents
      Thanks for reporting back @Nicbent35! You seem to understand the options and the risks. So, it is a decision you will just have to make. But you don't have to make it right away. You might consider keeping her gluten-free for a while yet. I would give it six months before considering adding gluten back in. Make sure the improvement you are seeing is due to removing gluten and not something else that will pass such that you see a reversion to former behavior and symptoms.
    • trents
      If you have been on a strict gluten-free diet for several years, it would be normal for testing to show no evidence of celiac disease. No gluten, no inflammation. No inflammation, no antibodies and healing of the small bowel lining would result.  Personally, I think the doc gave you bad advice and I feel confident that trialing a return to gluten consumption would not be the advice that the vast majority of GI docs would give you. If I were you, I would seek a second opinion before resuming gluten consumption. 
×
×
  • Create New...