Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I Am Confused After Being Diagnosed With Celiac Disease


gwynanne4life

Recommended Posts

gwynanne4life Rookie

I am 57 years old and was recently diagnosed with Celiac Disease through the Gold Standard biopsy test through Endotscopy.  Following the positive biopsy, i had blood work done, and tested positive for the genetic marker, but negative for antibodies. Six weeks after being diagnosed - I had to swallow the mini-camera to get a view of the small bowel to look for inflammation.  When I went in to get the results yesteday, The doctor said - that overall I had a few small inflammatory spots  which she showed me - possibly about 3 or 4 but otherwise my small intestines appeared to look fine.  She asked me how i was feeling and I told her since being gluten-free the stomach bloating was gone, as was the esophageal spasms and upper abdominal pain - but I had developed some other weird symptoms like tingling in my feet and legs and fatigue.  All of my blood work came back fine for nutrients and rbc and she said maybe it I was lacking in some micronutrient that they cannot test for.  She said if it didn't go away I might need t see a neurologist.  Anyway,  she then told me that I might want to try eating gluten again to see if those symptoms subsided - do a gluten challenge test.  I REALLY do not want to do that - I want to get healed and sealed and move on in this new life style of eating gluten free.  Has anyone gotten frustrated with their GI doctor or had similar symptoms? 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



NoGlutenCooties Contributor

I have not had those symptoms, but I'm what's known as an asymptomatic Celiac - meaning I didn't have any symptoms before going fluten-free even though they found a ton of inflammation and the biopsy showed a moderate to severe level of damage.  As for the negative bloodtest for antibodies - that test is notoriously unreliable.  I've seen estimates that a negative test result is only about 70-75% accurate.  Positive test results are closer to 97-98% accurate.  That said, many people seem to report an increase in symptoms, or even the development of new symptoms, when they first go gluten-free - it's all part of the healing process.  There can also be other food sensitivities going on so most will tell you to avoid dairy for awhile and stick to simple, whole foods until you've had a chance to heal.

 

Also, as far as the minimal inflammation - the inflammation tends to come and go.  So you could have no inflammation for one test and then a ton of it 6 months later.

 

If you're feeling better after going gluten-free, to me that's the true test.  Doing a gluten challenge after you've gotten the positive results from a biopsy seems really silly and unnecessary to me - but that's just me.

 

One last thought... make sure you are 100% gluten-free.  No hidden gluten cooties hanging around anywhere.  And absolutely NO cheating.

 

Good luck!

shadowicewolf Proficient

I am 57 years old and was recently diagnosed with Celiac Disease through the Gold Standard biopsy test through Endotscopy.  Following the positive biopsy, i had blood work done, and tested positive for the genetic marker, but negative for antibodies. Six weeks after being diagnosed - I had to swallow the mini-camera to get a view of the small bowel to look for inflammation.  When I went in to get the results yesteday, The doctor said - that overall I had a few small inflammatory spots  which she showed me - possibly about 3 or 4 but otherwise my small intestines appeared to look fine.  She asked me how i was feeling and I told her since being gluten-free the stomach bloating was gone, as was the esophageal spasms and upper abdominal pain - but I had developed some other weird symptoms like tingling in my feet and legs and fatigue.  All of my blood work came back fine for nutrients and rbc and she said maybe it I was lacking in some micronutrient that they cannot test for.  She said if it didn't go away I might need t see a neurologist.  Anyway,  she then told me that I might want to try eating gluten again to see if those symptoms subsided - do a gluten challenge test.  I REALLY do not want to do that - I want to get healed and sealed and move on in this new life style of eating gluten free.  Has anyone gotten frustrated with their GI doctor or had similar symptoms? 

There is no reason for that gluten challenge. You are already diagnosed with the endoscopy.

 

As for the weird symptoms, you may have an intolerance to another food, such as soy, corn, or dairy. Keep a food diary and write down everything you eat in a day. If you start to see a pattern with the symptoms then you may find your answer.

nvsmom Community Regular

I agree, you're a celiac - don't make yourself ill with a gluten challenge.  :( Your doctor is not educated in this...

 

There are quite a few people around here who were diagnosed with a biopsy yet had negative blood work, and vice versa. Sometimes you just don't have enough autoantibodies in the blood to register but those autoantibodies they test for are the ones that cause the damage that they saw in the scope and there are not many things that cause celiac like damage.

 

Stay gluten-free and give it a few more months. Perhaps have your thyroid checked - thyroiditis (and diabetes) often accompany celiac disease.  The main nutrients to check are iron, ferritin, calcium, potassium, magnesium, A, D, B12, zinc and copper. Sometimes our adrenals need a boost after being stressed by autoimmune diseases for so long. Perhaps your doctors could check those out too?

 

I hope you are feeling better soon.

Gemini Experienced

I have not had those symptoms, but I'm what's known as an asymptomatic Celiac - meaning I didn't have any symptoms before going fluten-free even though they found a ton of inflammation and the biopsy showed a moderate to severe level of damage.  As for the negative bloodtest for antibodies - that test is notoriously unreliable.  I've seen estimates that a negative test result is only about 70-75% accurate.  Positive test results are closer to 97-98% accurate.  That said, many people seem to report an increase in symptoms, or even the development of new symptoms, when they first go gluten-free - it's all part of the healing process.  There can also be other food sensitivities going on so most will tell you to avoid dairy for awhile and stick to simple, whole foods until you've had a chance to heal.

 

Also, as far as the minimal inflammation - the inflammation tends to come and go.  So you could have no inflammation for one test and then a ton of it 6 months later.

 

If you're feeling better after going gluten-free, to me that's the true test.  Doing a gluten challenge after you've gotten the positive results from a biopsy seems really silly and unnecessary to me - but that's just me.

 

One last thought... make sure you are 100% gluten-free.  No hidden gluten cooties hanging around anywhere.  And absolutely NO cheating.

 

Good luck!

Actually., the blood tests for Celiac are not notoriously unreliable but they tend to only pick up damage once it has advanced to a more severe stage. Couple that with the fact

that people may be IgA deficient so autoimmune testing may not work for everyone. The biopsy is only as reliable as the doctor performing it and the amount of damage present. As the small intestine has the surface area of a tennis court, if they don't hit the right area of inflammation, the biopsy will be negative even in the presence of Celiac.

 

Having said that, if someone tests positive on either test, or certainly both, they have Celiac Disease. Factor in a dietary trial with positive results and that is a slam dunk. No one should ever have to consume gluten again for any reason if they do not wish to. Not should they doubt their diagnosis because a doctor does. To the OP....please stay gluten free.  Your other symptoms are not weird...they are neurological in nature and should subside over time if you follow a strict gluten-free diet.  They are common to Celiac so do not doubt your self in wanting to stay gluten-free.  Good luck!

NoGlutenCooties Contributor

This report was from Sept, 2011:

 

According to Dr. Thomas O'Bryan (an expert and lecturer about gluten intolerance), this test records a false negative 7 out of 10 times. These false negatives are due in part to the physician's interpretation as well as the patient's condition at the time of the test. Physicians may interpret the test as negative if the test for intestinal tissue damage (anti tTG and EMA) is negative -- even if the blood test results indicate a positive immune reaction. The intestinal tissue tests will only come back positive if there is severe damage or atrophy to this tissue -- the kind found in end-stage Open Original Shared Link. If there is only partial atrophy, the accuracy of this test goes down to 27-30 percent.

Open Original Shared Link

 

 

Have the tests really gotten astronomically better since then?

kareng Grand Master

Getting our information from reliable sources like Celiac Medical Centers:

Maybe this will be helpful

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Do you know which blood tests you had? A few people ( about 5%) need a special blood test. Get a copy of the blood work and see what they did.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



IrishHeart Veteran

I do not see any citations in that article posted by NoGlutenCooties, so I am not willing to believe that the chiropractor dr. O'Bryan's estimate is accurate. Not everyone thinks he is a "celiac expert".

 

The article also asserts there is valid testing for gluten sensitivity, which is simply not true. There is no testing for NCGS at this time.

Leading celiac research centers are firm on this stance.

 

anyway that is irrelevant to the OP's questions.

 

Gwynanne,

 

A positive biopsy for celiac means you have celiac, hon.

Stay on your gluten free diet and heal.

 

I have absolutely no idea why someone would tell a confirmed celiac to go back on gluten to see if neurological symptoms will go away. That makes no sense whatsoever!

I had terrible neurological issues before my diagnosis, and it was only through time, healing and absence of gluten that they resolved.

 

 

Jebby (a member on here, who also is a doctor) had peripheral neuropathy occur after being

gluten-free and I will see if I can get her to chime in here to reassure you that hers did resolve in time.

 

Read her article and you can post a question to her .I am sure she would be happy to help.She's a sweetheart.

She is a mom and has a full-time job so be patient if she takes a bit to get back to you.

 

https://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/blog/1038/entry-1883-my-oh-my-peripheral-neuropathy/

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,132
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Cindy Ophaug
    Newest Member
    Cindy Ophaug
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Keep us posted and let us know the results of the biopsy. Your case is atypical in a way in that you have this high DGP-IGA but normal TTG-IGA so knowing how it turns out will give us more data for similar situations that may be posted in the future. 
    • Skg414228
      Fair enough! I very easily could have misread somewhere. Celiac is very confusing lol but I should know in a little over a month what the final verdict is. Just thought chatting with people smarter than myself would get me in the right mindset. I just thought that DGP IGA was pretty high compared to some stuff I had seen and figured someone on here would be more willing to say it is more than likely celiac instead of my doctor who is trying to be less direct. She did finally say she believes it is celiac but wanted to confirm with the biopsy. I did figure it wouldn't hurt seeing what other people said too just because not all doctors are the best. I think mine is actually pretty good from what I have seen but I don't know what I don't know lol. Sorry lot of rambling here just trying to get every thought out. Thanks again!
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, these articles may be helpful:    
    • trents
      No, you don't necessarily need multiple testing methods to confirm celiac disease. There is an increasing trend for celiac diagnoses to be made on a single very high tTG-IGA test score. This started in the UK during the COVID pandemic when there was extreme stress on the healthcare system there and it is spreading to the US. A tTG-IGA score of somewhere between 5x and 10x normal is good enough by itself for some physicians to declare celiac disease. And mind you, that is the tTG-IGA, not the DGP-IGA. The tTG-IGA is the centerpiece of celiac antibody testing, the one test most commonly ordered and the one that physicians have the most confidence in. But in the US, many physicians still insist on a biopsy, even in the event of high tTG-IGA scores. Correct, the biopsy is considered "confirmation" of the blood antibody testing. But what is the need for confirmation of a testing methodology if the testing methodology is fool proof? As for the contribution of genetic testing for celiac disease, it cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease since 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease while only 1% of the general population actually develops celiac disease. But it can be used to rule out celiac disease. That is, if you don't have the genes, you don't have celiac disease but you might have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).
    • Skg414228
      Okay yeah that helps! To answer your last bit my understanding was that you need to have multiple tests to confirm celiac. Blood, biopsy, dna, and then I think symptoms is another one. Either way I think everything has to be confirmed with the biopsy because that is the gold standard for testing (Doctors words). You also answered another question I forgot to ask about which is does a high value push to a higher % on those scales. I truly appreciate your answers though and just like hearing what other people think. Digging into forums and google for similar stuff has been tough. So thank you again!
×
×
  • Create New...