Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Silent Ncgi, Is It Possible?


Salax

Recommended Posts

Salax Contributor

For anyone out there, who has experienced this…I have a random question that I have searched for and can’t seem to find the answer too.

I know with Celiac disease there are folks that are silent Celiac’s.

 

Are there silent non-celiac gluten intolerant/sensitive folks? There is a reason I am asking.

 

In theory, let’s say someone has traditional celiac symptoms, and is diagnosed celiac via blood, but not villi (no villi damage) and the blood is only IGG higher none others, so….they go gluten free, but their symptoms continue even after years of gluten free, they remove other intolerant foods (corn and dairy) and then dying gall bladder and then finally they feel great.

 

Then, out of curiosity, they do the celiac gene test, and they don’t have either gene, but the doc interpreting the results says they have both genes for NCGI/NCGS. But then the person accidentally eats gluten and nothing happens, no symptoms nada…..they feel great.

 

How does that happen?  What does it mean? Has anyone had a similar experience? Theories, ideas?

 

Thanks guys, just need to bounce this off ya'll.

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



WestCoastGirl Apprentice

I don't personally have this experience, but since there can be silent celiac, I can't see why there couldn't be silent NCGI.

bartfull Rising Star

IS there a gene for NCGI?

 

I don't think they know very much about NCGI yet. From what I understand the symptoms are the same as for celiac, but there is supposedly no villi damage. According to that "definition", the only "symptom" is symptoms, so if you DON'T have symptoms, you don't have it.

 

All that being said, I PERSONALLY suspect there is a lot more going on with NCGI than doctors and scientists realize. I have a feeling they will eventually come to the conclusion that it does do damage, perhaps to the villi, perhaps to other parts of our bodies. It might even BE a form of celiac. But that's just me speculating.

 

So I don't have an answer for your question, but maybe someday they'll figure it out.

Salax Contributor

IS there a gene for NCGI?

 

I don't think they know very much about NCGI yet. From what I understand the symptoms are the same as for celiac, but there is supposedly no villi damage. According to that "definition", the only "symptom" is symptoms, so if you DON'T have symptoms, you don't have it.

 

All that being said, I PERSONALLY suspect there is a lot more going on with NCGI than doctors and scientists realize. I have a feeling they will eventually come to the conclusion that it does do damage, perhaps to the villi, perhaps to other parts of our bodies. It might even BE a form of celiac. But that's just me speculating.

 

So I don't have an answer for your question, but maybe someday they'll figure it out.

 

I didn't know there was a gene either but this guy is saying there is.

 

Gluten Sensitivity Gene Test

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 1 0301

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 2 0602

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 3,1 (Subtype 7,6)

TEST INTERPRETATION(S):

Interpretation of HLA-DQ Testing: Although you do not possess the HLA-DQB1 genes predisposing to

celiac disease (HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8), HLA gene analysis reveals that you have two copies of a gene

that predisposes to non-celiac gluten sensitivity, in your case HLA-DQB1*0301 and HLA-DQB1*0602.

Having two copies of a gluten sensitive gene means that each of your parents and all of your children (if

you have them) will possess at least one copy of the gene. Two copies also means there is an even

stronger predisposition to gluten sensitivity than having one gene, and the resultant immunologic gluten

sensitivity may be more severe. This test was developed and its performance characteristics determined

by the American Red Cross - Northeast Division. It has not been cleared or approved by the U.S. Food

and Drug Administration.

Adalaide Mentor

My memory isn't what it used to be, but when I last heard Dr. Fasano talk about genetic tests and celiac and NCGI he did not mention any such genes. If anyone would know about them, he would right? 

 

I'm sure this may be an unpopular opinion around here but maybe the problem was the gallbladder the whole time? Maybe wheat and/or gluten aren't and never were an issue. Just a possibility. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,090
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kerischultz
    Newest Member
    Kerischultz
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Kiwifruit
    • trents
      Thanks for following up with us on the results. This might be helpful to you now:  
    • Kiwifruit
      Hi I just wanted to update you all and let you know that I finally have my diagnosis. 2 weeks ago I had my third gastroscopy and the biopsy confirmed the damage. Thank you for giving me the information I needed to advocate for myself when I a was a feeling so lost!
    • Scott Adams
      I agree that the gastritis may go away after you've been on a gluten-free diet for a while. If you are concerned, it might make sense for you to do a follow up biopsy after  a year or so on a gluten-free diet. This article has some detailed information on how to be 100% gluten-free, so it may be helpful (be sure to also read the comments section.):    
    • Scott Adams
      Getting tested for celiac disease is a valid concern, especially given your history of microscopic colitis and the potential risks associated with undiagnosed celiac disease, such as cross-contamination, nutrient malabsorption, and increased cancer risk. Since you’ve been gluten-free for years, reintroducing gluten for the standard celiac blood tests or endoscopy would be challenging, as it requires consuming gluten for several weeks to months, which could worsen your symptoms and disrupt your daily life. Gene testing (HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8) through a lab like EnteroLab could be a helpful first step. While these genes are present in nearly all celiac patients, having them doesn’t confirm celiac disease—it only indicates genetic susceptibility. If you don’t have these genes, celiac disease is highly unlikely, which could provide some peace of mind. However, if you do have the genes, it doesn’t confirm celiac disease but suggests further testing might be warranted if you’re willing to undergo a gluten challenge. Another option is to discuss with your doctor whether a follow-up endoscopy or other non-invasive tests (like stool tests for gluten antibodies) could provide insights without requiring a gluten challenge. While a formal celiac diagnosis can be important for ensuring strict dietary adherence, access to gluten-free options in hospitals, and monitoring for complications, it’s also worth weighing the risks and benefits of reintroducing gluten. If you’re already strictly gluten-free and managing your symptoms well, the urgency of a formal diagnosis may depend on your personal health goals and concerns. Consulting a gastroenterologist familiar with celiac disease and Microscopic Colitis can help guide your decision.
×
×
  • Create New...