Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Need Help Interpreting Test Results


MarionG

Recommended Posts

MarionG Rookie

Hi All, 

 

I was wondering if you guys could help me to interpret these test results? These are from a celiacs blood panel that they did. Unfortunately I couldn't make it through the gluten challenge, I only lasted a week.

 

Lab: CELIAC DISEASE PANEL Name   Value   Reference Range GLIADIN AB IgA   2.3   <7 GLIADIN AB IGG   0.6   <7 IgA,SERUM   272   73-347 MG/DL (tTG) Ab, IgA   1.2   <7 U/mL TTG IGG   0.5   <7 U/mL

 

 

Thank you!

 

Marion


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

The Gliadin Ab is probably the older (and less reliable) AGA or anti-gliadin antibody tests. It looks like your AGA IgA and AGA IgG are normal.

 

Serum IgA is a conrol test to see if your body makes enough IgA for accurate IgA based testing (in your case, the AGA IgA and tTG IgA). About 5% of celiacs are IgA deficient. Yours is normal so testing should not be affected by that problem.

 

Your tissue transglutiminase tests (tTG IgA and tTG IgG) bothe look normal/negative as well.

 

Those tests point towards celiac disease not being present but the tests aren't perfect, and they missed the newer DGP (deaminated gliadin peptide) tests completely.  How long were you off gluten? If you've been off it since October, that could definitely cause false negatives.

MarionG Rookie

Thanks for the reply! 

 

That's starting to make alot more sense. These results were from 1 week gluten challenge. I was off gluten for about 2 yrs prior, so the Dr. suggested a gluten challenge but I only made it 1 week because my symptoms were so severe. 

NoGlutenCooties Contributor

One week of gluten after being gluten-free for 2 years is not long enough for your body to make enough antibodies for them to show up on the tests.  Unfortunately, in my opinion, this test was useless.  However, if you had symptoms so severe that you couldn't take eating gluten for more than a week I think you have your answer.  You have Celiac - or non-Celiac gluten intolerance.  Were you diagnosed before going gluten-free for those 2 years?

MarionG Rookie

No I was never diagnosed. I didn't have insurance or money at the time, but gluten was killing me so I cut it out and felt alot better. Recently though I started having symptoms again and seizures. I ended up in the ER twice so I had to finally try and get diagnosed. I think I was getting CC though and that's why the symptoms came back. I didn't think much about it back then but now I do! 

 

I agree with you the test was useless, oh well. I guess I'll just keep on with gluten free and being super careful about CC, it seems to be working so far. 

 

Regards!

Marion

NoGlutenCooties Contributor

Keep in mind that for many, after going gluten-free their reactions to even small amounts of gluten (i.e. cross contamination) can get more severe over time - they can also change over time.  So it is possible that cross-contamination may not have bothered you much in the past but will bother you more the longer you are gluten-free.  (Possible... but not inevitable... everyone is different.)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,265
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Planter
    Newest Member
    Planter
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      71.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      No. That is, unless the dietician themself has a gluten disorder or is managing a close family member who does and therefore is immersed in it daily so as to be up on the nuances of eating gluten free. Otherwise, they just give you very general information which you can get online.  
    • trents
      Yes, a very cryptic and uninformative lab result report indeed! But it does seem like this is typical for the UK. It's almost like the "professionals" in that healthcare system don't want you to try and figure anything out for yourself.
    • xxnonamexx
      Thanks for the explanation. Do you think a dietician is required? I see people ask about getting one but what now will they help with besides charge you to say start away from gluten.
    • trents
      Wow! I think the answers to your questions seem obvious to me but I'll oblige you. It's invasive because they are running a scope into an orifice and down through much of your body. Any procedure that invades the body is invasive. It's expensive because you are paying a trained professional (a doctor) to do it, plus nurses and an anesthesiologist plus you are using expensive equipment. It may not be expensive to you, depending on your insurance plan, but it is expensive as far as the health insurer is concerned. It involves some risk because you would be put under anesthesia and because there is always the danger of tearing something with the scope on the way down through your esophagus, stomach and into your small bowel.    
    • RMJ
      Maybe your followup is for the elevated total IgA, and not for celiac. It is strange not to have a numerical result for the tissue transglutaminase. I hope you get answers in the followup with your GP.
×
×
  • Create New...