Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

The Price Of Rice Flour


dogear

Recommended Posts

dogear Rookie

I've noticed that at the stores, I've seen so far rice flour is much more expensive than sorghum or millet.

Now the usual rational for the prices on gluten-free baking stuff, is that these are non-commodity items. But rice, despite the fact it isn't usually used as a flour, is much more mainstream in the modern world than millet or sorghum. However, rice is much more common in conventional gluten-free recipes. So here are the fact that don't add up.

1) Rice, millet, sorghum are all unconventional as flours.

2) But rice is grown and sold as a conventional food, sorghum and millet usually aren't.

3) Yet rice flour is more expensive than millet or sorghum flour.

Something doesn't add up. Rice certainly costs less than millet or sorghum grain.

So is something else going on? Are these companies charging more for rice flour because it is in fact the conventional cooking flour for what they perceive to be a "captive" market, where people have no chioce?

Furthermore, since Garfava flour is mentioned in so many gluten-free recipe books could it be the reason why Garfava flour costs more than twice as much as Garbanzo flour?

Or are Fava beans really that dear?

I've also noticed that xanthan gum is awfully expensive given it's presence in some pretty cheap gluten laden breads. Guar gum seems cheaper, even though it shouldn't be any harder to make-but it does give a lot of people diarhea at baking quantities.

Could we be looking at grain companies that are forcing high prices on the gluten-free community on the theory that most of the people have no choice, and are forced to pay?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

It's not just the commodity of growing, it's the commodity of milling and the competition for the resources in the processing. You can, also, get a mill yourself (small, counter-top units are available) and buy whole rice (and other grains) and grind it yourself. I agree there is some of the specialty marketing stuff, though I don't find the rice flours much more expensive than the amaranth and other alternatives myself. BTW, sorgum is actually grown in great quantity in the US, it's just not used in most human foods. ;-)

dogear Rookie

You see at the stores I see, a Bob's Red Mill Package of rice flour is $3.99, while the same size (Bob's again) package of sorghum or millet costs $2.79 and $2.29 respectively. Amaranth, quinoa and teff are more expensive, I think due to their non-commodity status. But I see no reason why rice should costs more than sorghum or millet.

I truly suspect a tactic of bilking on the theory of "these folks have no choice".

tarnalberry Community Regular
You see at the stores I see, a Bob's Red Mill Package of rice flour is $3.99, while the same size (Bob's again) package of sorghum or millet costs $2.79 and $2.29 respectively. Amaranth, quinoa and teff are more expensive, I think due  to their non-commodity status. But I see no reason why rice should costs more than sorghum or millet.

I truly suspect a tactic of bilking on the theory of "these folks have no choice".

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Interesting. I do not see that sort of price difference at the stores I usually shop at. I wonder how much it varies by location...

There is definitely an element of the "captive audience", but we DO have a choice - these flours are not mandatory for us. We don't have to have baked goods, and we don't have to use rice flour if we choose to make them. It can be a hard decision to not have baked goods, of course, but it is a choice we have.

dogear Rookie

I'm pretty much a millet flour cook myself. I prefer millet not only because of the price but for other reasons:

1) Sorghum gives me horrible gas, diarrhea, and "brain fog" for days, of the kind that many of the "normal celiacs" here described from being glutened. (I know that's ironic given my situation but true.) It happens even with the tiniest bit of unsulfured molasses. When I first tried cooking with sorghum, I sort of panicked and wondered if my body was asking for a specific carbohydrate diet instead of just liking the gluten-free!!! I feared, that I'd never get to sample amaranth, teff, and all the other new grains that I've yet to here about.

2) One of the things, I worry about is how few crops the modern world survives on. Millet is at least marginally "outside" the 20 crops from which 90% of humanity gets 90% of its calories. Rice is right up there with wheat and corn. Besides, I eat rice and corn for meal foods all the time. I wanted to diversify.

3) Where rice takes about twice as much water as wheat to grow, corn takes slightly more and sorghum about the same, millet actually takes a good deal less water. And I'm pretty environemntally conscious, so I didn't want to end up depending so much on that thirsty rice.

4) Millet is more nourishing than rice.

I pretty much went without baked good, bread, or pizza for about the first nine months without gluten.

But either, way I think it is pretty bad for the grain companies to treat gluten-free products with a captive audience mentality. And it's short sighted to want to bilk a limited market rather than reach a larger one, in my thinking.

Guest nini

I find pure rice flour in the Hispanic market for very cheap... Mfr. in a plant that only processes rice and rice flour. I think I pay .30 cents for a small bag(don't remember how many oz)

lpellegr Collaborator

The Asian market I go to has rice flour in 1 pound bags, 3/$1. This is also a much finer flour than Bob's Red Mill, not at all gritty. They also have sweet rice flour, potato starch flour and tapioca equally cheap, so if you are making up the gluten-free flour mixes on a regular basis this is the way to go. From what I hear the ones from Thailand at least are considered safe, although you have to take your chances on cross-contamination possibilities since you probably can't get a statement from the manufacturer. I think I had found info out on the web discussing the safety of the Asian flours, enough to satisfy me and I've had no reaction to my baked goods.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

I just found sweet rice flour at Trader Joe's (in Washington) for $1.69 for a 24oz bag!

sweetie101282 Apprentice

you can get 4 lbs. of white rice flour at meijers for under $3 in the ethnic foods aisle.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,568
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Trish-e
    Newest Member
    Trish-e
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Cat M
      Ah ok, I just saw didn’t even post the DGP IgA at all. 😫 I started with itching and hives Jan 2024, been taking a ton of meds and on Xolair and even that is not providing total relief. The other primary symptoms: intermittent but worsening abdominal pain, diarrhea and bloating. This summer I am just exhausted. I uploaded my 23andMe data to genetic lifehacks and discovered quite a few variations, including DQ2, MTHFR, VDR and I have always had very low ferritin, vitamin D and B12. I still think that mast cell disease makes the most sense, but latest labs show I am barely in range for thiamine, zinc and vitamin A, so the GI stuff feels more important to figure out than the hives right now. I did SIBO testing this morning. TTG IGA <2   0-3 is negative TTG IGG  3   0-5 is neg DGP IGA 21    20-30 is weak positive DGP IGG 4    0-19 is negative Although total IGA is not resulted, there is a footnote stating it was low and the reason they ran IGG.  
    • Scott Adams
      This is an interesting case. A positive tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody with a negative endomysial antibody (EMA) and normal duodenal histology can present a diagnostic challenge, especially in an asymptomatic patient. While the absence of villous atrophy and negative EMA suggest that the likelihood of active celiac disease is low at this time, such serological discordance may still warrant monitoring. Some individuals may be in the early stages of celiac disease, often referred to as potential celiac disease, particularly if they carry the HLA-DQ2 or DQ8 haplotypes. HLA typing can be quite helpful in this situation; a negative result would virtually rule out celiac disease, whereas a positive result may justify periodic follow-up to monitor for evolving disease. The risk of progression to overt celiac disease is not well defined but appears to be higher in children, those with a family history, or those with autoimmune conditions. In this case, routine follow-up including repeat serology and consideration of symptoms or new risk factors over time would be a reasonable and cautious approach. For people with celiac disease hidden gluten in their diets is the main cause of elevated Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Antibodies (tTG-IgA), but there are other conditions, including cow's milk/casein intolerance, that can also cause this, and here is an article about the other possible causes:      
    • Scott Adams
      Have you tried to start a gluten-free diet since your diagnosis in 2019?
    • trents
      Welcome to celiac.com, @Wamedh Taj-Aldeen! Just curious, what is your relationship to the patient? Are you the attending physician? A medical student? A consulted physician? Was a total IGA test ordered? Some physicians are under the dated and mistaken impression that such is only necessary in young children. If total IGA is low, other IGA antibody numbers will be artificially depressed. By the way, it is not unusual to have a positive TTG-IGA and a negative EMA. Are the TTG-IGA numbers borderline high or unequivocally high? There are other diseases and medical conditions that can cause elevated TTG-IGA numbers besides celiac disease but when this is the case, the numbers are usually not dramatically elevated. It can also be the case that villous damage was patchy and affected areas were missed during the biopsy. Or, onset of celiac disease was very recent and villous atrophy has not yet progressed to the point of detectability.  We also have occasional anecdotal reports in this online community of positive antibody testing with negative histology, as you report. But we also know that gluten intolerance can manifest itself apart from enteropathy. It can damage other organ systems. Many celiacs are of the "silent" type, meaning there is an absence or a relative absence of symptoms until the disease has become advanced and there is significant damage to the villous lining or other organ systems. But to answer your questions: 1. I would definitely pursue a routine follow-up and recheck of the antibodies. And, I would order a complete celiac panel including total IGA and IGG stuff in say, six months. Sooner if symptoms manifest. 2. It is impossible to say what is the risk of the future development of over celiac disease. I refer you back to my #1 above concerning rechecking.  3. I would definitely pursue HLA DQ2/DQ8 typing as it can be used as a rule out for celiac disease, though not quite with 100% dependability. I hope my thoughts prove helpful to you.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @dominiqueccms! Unfortunately, your story is all too common. Some older physicians are dismissive when it comes to gluten intolerance disorders and have this attitude like, "It's the latest fad disease." My advice to you is to get another doctor who has more current knowledge in this area and will take this seriously. In the meantime, this might be helpful: In six months to a year you would do well to get your antibody numbers rechecked to see if you are succeeding in your efforts to eat gluten free. Do you have the numbers from the original testing?
×
×
  • Create New...