Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Forum Section For Non-Celiac On The Gluten-Free Diet?


GFinDC

Recommended Posts

GFinDC Veteran

I was thinking it might be good to have a section of the forum for non-celiacs who are following the gluten-free diet.  There lots of people interested in eating gluten-free these days for various reasons.  Celiac disease is one very  important reason to eat gluten-free.  But other people might want to eat gluten-free because they have health issues that might be improved even though they don't test positive for celiac disease.  Some examples would be people with NCGI (non-celiac gluten intolerance) which there are no standard medical tests for right now.  Another might be people with Crohn's disease, who sometimes follow the gluten-free diet and find it helps their Crohn's symptoms.  Another group would be diabetics, who might sometimes follow a very low carb diet to control their glucose levels, which means they end up essentially following a gluten-free whole foods diet.  Then there are a large number of people who just want to try gluten-free to see if it helps their symptoms that haven't got an official doctor's diagnosis yet.

 

There is a pre-diagnosis section of the forum that fits some of these categories, but it doesn't fit them all.  It seems to me the best place for people to get information on eating gluten-free effectively is right here on this forum.  Opening it up to non-celiacs and making it more welcome to people without an official doctor's blessing seems like it would make it easier for them to find information.  Many people these days want to try eating gluten-free for a while to see if they feel better.  While the forum is geared towards supporting celiacs, it seems like it could be used to help support other people also.  Some have a clear medical condition that is benefited by eating gluten-free, others may have a less clear medical situation but want to try gluten-free as a test.

 

Many of us have experienced years of trying to get a medical diagnosis for our celiac disease, so we know it can be hard to get a real answer from the medical establishment.  Medicine seems to be advancing at a rapid pace, but it is not at the point where we know everything about the effects of gluten and wheat etc on the human body.

 

What I suggest would be nice, is to have a section of the forum for people who want to try eating gluten-free to see if they feel better, for whatever reason.  There doesn't seem to be a better informed group of people on eating gluten-free than right here on this forum.  So many people could benefit from asking questions here and not feeling like they aren't accepted just because they aren't celiacs IMHO.  I think this forum is pretty accepting of non-celicas, including those with NCGI, but an actual section set aside for non-celiacs might be good to set up.  Hopefully it could be made clear that people posting in that section are not celiacs and are not asking for celiac advice so much as gluten-free eating advice.  There is plenty of confusion in the public about eating gluten-free, and there is plenty of knowledge here to share.

 

There are some obvious issues that could arise.  Like celiac members getting irritated about non-celiacs taking the gluten-free diet less seriously than them.  And people with Crohn's or diabetes not understanding the strict avoidance of gluten that celiacs have to do.  And people giving advice will have to remember that it is non-celiacs they are talking to and trying to help.

 

It seems to me that there is a concentration of knowledgte on this forum about eating gluten-free, and many people wanting to learn the same.  But they may not feel welcome because the forum is so geared to celiacs and NCGI only.  Or it may appear that way to an outsider at least.

 

So, what do the other peeps think?  How about the Scott-head who is the admin and chief honcho?  Personally, I think eating gluten-free and whole foods is good for many people, even non-celiacs.  Can we share the hard learned rules and help some other peeps?

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gilligan Enthusiast

I think the name - celiac.com - says it all.  Personally, I know that when I first started having issues, and didn't know I had celiac, this is where I came for information.  I don't see that the information is any different for someone diagnosed with celiac or someone needing info for ncgi or other health related.  The information would remain the same, so why would a separate category be necessary?

GFinDC Veteran

Hi Gilligan,

 

Thanks for responding.  The thing is, people who follow the gluten-free diet for reasons other than celiac disease may not have the same motivation to be strictly 100% gluten-free.  They aren't nessecarily going to have an autimmoune reaction to slight amounts of gluten or cross-contamination like a celiac would.  So the advice they would get could be somewhat different.  Also, it would be confusing for people who are celiac to answer questions for them in the regular forum sections.  As they would expect to be answering questions from a fellow celiac, vs a person with diabetes, or Crohn's etc.   So keeping the info separate would be less confusing for current celiac members, and for the  people who aren't celiac but still want to learn.

kareng Grand Master

I think that, because this is Celiac dot com, people will come on the forum as a whole expecting Celiac info. It is about more than just a gluten-free diet. Many people don't even pay attention to the titles of the sub- sections. They just know they have logged onto C.com or googled something and it is on c.com. Many people do come on here to figure out what is gluten-free and how to eat gluten-free - even if they are fad dieters or have another illness.

I would still encourage every one of them to get tested for celiac before they go gluten-free.

I would hate for people, new to Celiac, to come to c.com and get bad info like " it's ok to take the burger off the bun " or something like that becuse they didn't see the title of the topic section where the posts are located. As you have seen, people often google something and then respond on c.com to threads about products that are many years out of date. They don't notice the date. I can't tell you how many put their questions in the wrong forum section because they don't pay attention to it.

LauraTX Rising Star

I agree with Kareng.  People pulling up and replying to posts from 8 years ago shows to me that the category wouldn't be noticed and potentially spread information about non-celiac levels of seriousness about the diet as true to celiacs- it is named celiac.com.  I think welcoming non-serious fad dieters on here would chase people away who really need the forum for celiac and NCGI.  If someone is just a diabetic or just paleo they are not following a gluten free diet, they are eating low carb/no carb and that just happens to eliminate most gluten.  I would LOVE to be able to take the burger off the bun, but what I have is a step above that in seriousness and I like this forum because that is wholly understood by anyone who has been around for a while.

 

Any time someone comes on here asking about things that are not celiac related and admits to not having celiac or not caring about it, they pretty much get nicely ran off and told we only know about celiac, not whatever other disease.  I don't think it would be right for celiac members to be opening themselves up to give advice to people with other health conditions that we have not had the experience of becoming our own personal experts on like our own ailments.  I think the Related Disorders category covers any overlapping issues well.

 

Lastly, if someone wants to non-seriously eat gluten-free, there is a TON of information on the internet nowadays for them to peruse.  If they are going to have extensive questions on the issue, then they probably do take it seriously and would be welcomed here. But like Karen said, anyone who thinks they may improve/does improve on a gluten-free diet really should be tested for Celiac anyways, and that is just the hard truth.

 

TL;DR:  Please don't make me comingle with crazies who eat gluten-free misguidedly, I think it will drive out the Celiacs who need this forum.

GFinDC Veteran

Humpf!!!  Time to think aother great idea then.  This one seems to be shot down in flames! :D  Thanks for your input everyone.  I guess they can all figure it out on their own.

  • 1 month later...
gatita Enthusiast

Humpf!!!  Time to think aother great idea then.  This one seems to be shot down in flames! :D  Thanks for your input everyone.  I guess they can all figure it out on their own.

 

Awww... As someone diagnosed with wheat allergy, I liked the idea. Just a little sub-forum, nothing major LOL. But I can also understand  the points raised above.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GottaSki Mentor

Humpf!!!  Time to think aother great idea then.  This one seems to be shot down in flames! :D  Thanks for your input everyone.  I guess they can all figure it out on their own.

 

I like this idea.  We have an other intolerance section -- but this is not another intolerance -- it is the subject intolerance.

FruitEnthusiast Enthusiast

Maybe I have the wrong idea about this thread, but as a NCGI who tested negative for Celiac because my Dr. told me to go off gluten before getting tested, I really wouldn't want to be lumped together with non-celiacs who don't have to take gluten seriously just because they don't have an official dx. I've been extremely sick for two years and consider this a very serious disease for me no matter what my diagnosis is. I see this as a site for those who have been or are seriously ill in relation to gluten. I wouldn't dare touch the stuff again.

 

I may be overly sensitive about this since I sometimes feel I'm not in the "club" of those who have a positive dx, even though I've been so sick. This just struck a chord in me I guess because I wouldn't want to be further separated or put into a category of "the people who aren't really sick" by opening the forum up to potential fad dieters or others who don't take this issue seriously.

 

Again, no offense to anyone's ideas, and I realize this is my issue, but I found myself feeling potentially down graded to a non-serious category and it really upset me, so I felt the need to respond. I guess I'm in some sort of an in-between category which can be really hard. I don't know if NCGI is accepted as a serious thing, I don't mean on this site, but just in general. I don't know if I like the "NC" part of it. Gluten Intolerant can be serious without considering it's relationship to Celiac disease, or at least that's how it seems to me.

 

I may have opened up a can of worms not intended by the original post, but it seemed relevant here.

GottaSki Mentor

Hi FE...

 

I understand your thoughts...my read on Paul's idea is from the perspective that there are many folks that remain in the mis or undiagnosed category.  With Celiac Disease experts estimating over the 6% of population as having some level of gluten sensitivity -- the numbers of people left in the gray is likely to increase.

 

I'd like a section like Paul suggested so that we can pin important -- TEST FIRST -- information for anyone wandering through that may have tried gluten-free and felt better OR had their doctor tell them to remove gluten to see how they feel rather than testing them properly OR simply considering "trying" this gluten-free thing.

 

I would imagine about one quarter (possibly more) of my posts for a very long time were singing the TEST PROPERLY FIRST.....and here is how song.

 

Like it or not -- both the newly diagnosed with Celiac Disease along with many others trying to learn if gluten may be the key to their health issues find this forum.  This is why I'd prefer a separate category, so that we can direct folks to the proper testing and diet information.

 

It took a very long time for my teenaged son with the NCGS distinction to feel comfortable with his status -- it was even hard for me to explain to family and friends as we struggled through the flawed celiac diagnostic process.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

Maybe I have the wrong idea about this thread, but as a NCGI who tested negative for Celiac because my Dr. told me to go off gluten before getting tested, I really wouldn't want to be lumped together with non-celiacs who don't have to take gluten seriously just because they don't have an official dx. I've been extremely sick for two years and consider this a very serious disease for me no matter what my diagnosis is. I see this as a site for those who have been or are seriously ill in relation to gluten. I wouldn't dare touch the stuff again.

 

I may be overly sensitive about this since I sometimes feel I'm not in the "club" of those who have a positive dx, even though I've been so sick. This just struck a chord in me I guess because I wouldn't want to be further separated or put into a category of "the people who aren't really sick" by opening the forum up to potential fad dieters or others who don't take this issue seriously.

 

Again, no offense to anyone's ideas, and I realize this is my issue, but I found myself feeling potentially down graded to a non-serious category and it really upset me, so I felt the need to respond. I guess I'm in some sort of an in-between category which can be really hard. I don't know if NCGI is accepted as a serious thing, I don't mean on this site, but just in general. I don't know if I like the "NC" part of it. Gluten Intolerant can be serious without considering it's relationship to Celiac disease, or at least that's how it seems to me.

 

I may have opened up a can of worms not intended by the original post, but it seemed relevant here.

I totally get what you're saying, because I fall in a similar category.

kareng Grand Master

If I remember, this topic came about because we had a " Take the burger off the bun" type of dieter. I think it was actually beer. I am not in favor of a section for gluten-free Dabblers. The NCGS people on C .com are here for the same reasons that Celiacs are here - because they have very real issues with gluten.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

^Exactly!

GottaSki Mentor

Yes, they have very real issues with gluten but often have very separate issues from those with a diagnosis in dealing with their ambiguous status -- of course this comes from the perspective of a MamaBear that has had to defend her cubs that tested negative -- so don't "really" have an issue with gluten so others need not be careful around them.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

Yes, yes, and yes!

 

That's the main reason that I hate not having a DX is because I have to defend and explain why I need to be so careful. I also hate all the stuff circulating around about gluten free fads and so on, so forth. Because then people perceive that if you don't have a DX, you've jumped on the fad bandwagon.

 

I would give almost anything to have a "real" DX, but I wouldn't do another gluten challenge for a million dollars!  :ph34r:

 

There are a lot of psychological and social issues surrounding having to eat this way without a DX, that's for sure.

GottaSki Mentor

Yes, yes, and yes!

 

That's the main reason that I hate not having a DX is because I have to defend and explain why I need to be so careful. I also hate all the stuff circulating around about gluten free fads and so on, so forth. Because then people perceive that if you don't have a DX, you've jumped on the fad bandwagon.

 

I would give almost anything to have a "real" DX, but I wouldn't do another gluten challenge for a million dollars!  :ph34r:

 

There are a lot of psychological and social issues surrounding having to eat this way without a DX, that's for sure.

 

Exactly why I think Paul's idea has merit. 

 

I don't see it as excluding folks without a celiac card -- I see it as a place where we can talk about these frustrations without giving the entire back story/status.

FruitEnthusiast Enthusiast

GFinDC, what you say about the site being accepting NCGI members is true. Still I (obviously) feel somewhat like an outsider to some degree just because the site is called celiac.com. I guess I have to get over that. Your idea was intended to be more inclusive of NCGI members and others without a dx, like myself, so I appreciate it.

 

GottaSki, I didn't realize one of your kids was NCGI, so you can really understand my perspective. You make a good point about alerting people about testing in time for a dx. It would be nice to spare others from ending up in the same boat as me.

 

BlessedMommy, thanks for understanding. I wouldn't do a gluten challenge for anything either. I didn't realize how emotional I felt about being a NCGI on a celiac site. I think somehow I'm afraid someone will eventually tap me on the shoulder and say, "you don't really belong here".

 

LauraTX and kareng, thanks for including NCGI in the serious category and affirming my existence here.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

GottaSki, thanks for giving out good information about getting a DX. That could spare more people from the frustrations of being undiagnosed. 

BlessedMommy Rising Star

And I hope along with you, that the medical community gets onto the idea of doing a petri dish endoscopy some time in the future. It makes logical sense that if you put gluten into a dish with intestinal tissue, that if the person is a celiac, you should see damaged villi on the tissue sample. And in that case, there would be virtually no false negatives or false positives, nor the need to subject oneself to a painful gluten challenge. 

nvsmom Community Regular

I think a section on NCGI would work nicely. They have the same responses to gluten that the celiacs do, just minus the intestinal damage.  They are 100% gluten-free just like the celiacs. I think if we could set it up as a gluten-free NCGI thing it would work.  We would have to make a point that it is not a "gluten-light" board though - it's not for people who are cutting back on gluten for wahtever reason, it would be for people who have cut gluten out of their lives completely.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

I think that a lot of people on here don't fit neatly into either category. Because medically speaking NCGI only applies to individuals who have ruled out celiac disease as a possibility. 

 

But I think that NCGI people could comfortably fit with people who have to live indefinitely with no confirmed diagnosis (i.e. neither confirming nor ruling out celiac) because the issues that they will live with are much the same.

GottaSki Mentor

I think a section on NCGI would work nicely. They have the same responses to gluten that the celiacs do, just minus the intestinal damage.  They are 100% gluten-free just like the celiacs. I think if we could set it up as a gluten-free NCGI thing it would work.  We would have to make a point that it is not a "gluten-light" board though - it's not for people who are cutting back on gluten for wahtever reason, it would be for people who have cut gluten out of their lives completely.

I agree with Nicole....I am not suggesting a place for gluten-free trend followers.

Gluten has serious consequences for many without an official celiac card ... Talking about these issues within the topic of NCGS makes sense to me.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to MI-Hoosier's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Test uncertainty

    2. - MI-Hoosier replied to MI-Hoosier's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Test uncertainty

    3. - trents replied to MI-Hoosier's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Test uncertainty

    4. - MI-Hoosier posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Test uncertainty

    5. - Sunshine4 replied to Sunshine4's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      3

      Neurologic symptoms - Muscle Twitching and Hand Tremors


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,253
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MI-Hoosier
    Newest Member
    MI-Hoosier
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.8k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      To put this in perspective, most recent pretest "gluten challenge" guidelines for those having already been eating reduced gluten or gluten free for a significant time period is the daily consumption of 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of two weeks leading up to the day of testing (antibody or biopsy). And I would certainly give it more than two weeks to ensure a valid test experience. Short answer: If it were me, yes, I would assume I have celiac disease and launch full bore into gluten-free eating. I think the tTG-IGA is reliable enough and your score is solid enough to make that a reasonable conclusion. Here is an article to help you get off to a good start. It's easy to achieve a reduced gluten free state but much more difficult to achieve consistency in truly gluten-free eating. Gluten is hidden in so many ways and found in so many food products where you would never expect to find it. For example, soy sauce and canned tomato soup (most canned soups, actually), pills, medications, health supplements. It can be disguised in terminology. And then there is the whole issue of cross contamination where foods that are naturally gluten free become contaminated with gluten incidentally in agricultural activities and manufacturing processes: Eating out at restaurants is a mine field for those with celiac disease because you don't know how food is handled back in the kitchen. Gluten free noodles boiled in the same water that was used for wheat noodles, eggs cooked on the same griddle that French toast was, etc.  
    • MI-Hoosier
      Thank you for the response and article. I was placed on the Mediterranean diet and been on that now for about 3 weeks. While not gluten free I am eating very little bread or anything with gluten ie a slice of whole wheat bread every couple days so assume that would cause issues now with a biopsy.  With the condition my liver is in I am unsure moving back to higher bread consumption is ideal.  In this scenario would my test results be enough to assume positive Celiac and just move forward gluten free?
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @MI-Hoosier! You are operating on a misconception about your "mixed" test results. You only had two celiac disease diagnostic tests run out of six that could have been ordered if your doctor had opted for a complete celiac panel. It is perfectly normal to not test positive for all possible celiac disease diagnostic tests. That is why there is more than one test option. It is the same way with other diagnostic testing procedures for many or most other diseases. Generally, when diagnosing a condition, a number of different tests are run and a diagnosis is arrived at by looking at the total body of evidence. The tTG-IGA test is the centerpiece of celiac disease blood antibody testing and the one most commonly ordered by doctors. You were strongly positive for that test. It was not an unequivocal result, IMO.  Having said that, it is standard procedure to confirm a positive celiac disease blood antibody test result with an endoscopy/biopsy which is still considered the gold standard of celiac disease diagnosis. Had your tTG-IGA been 150 or greater, your doctor many have opted out of the endoscopy/biopsy. The absence of GI distress in the celiac disease population is very common. We call them "silent celiacs". That can change as damage to the lining of the small bowel worsens. Elevated liver enzymes/liver stress is very common in the celiac population. About 18% of celiacs experience it. I was one of them. Persistently elevated liver enzymes over a period of years in the absence of other typical causes such as hepatitis and alcohol abuse was what eventually led to my celiac disease diagnosis. But it took thirteen years to get that figured out. Within three months of going gluten free my liver enzymes were back into normal range. Thank goodness, there is more awareness these days about the many long fingers of celiac disease that are not found in the classic category of GI distress. Today, there have been over 200 symptoms/medical conditions identified as connected to celiac disease. It is critical that you not begin a gluten free diet until your endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel is over. Doing so before that procedure will invalidate it because it will allow healing of the small bowel lining to begin. Here is a link to an article covering celiac disease blood antibody testing:  
    • MI-Hoosier
      Hi,  I was recently diagnosed with stage 3 NASH and doctor is concerned something is caused my disease to progress quicker than they would expect.   During blood tests a celiac screen was pulled as my mom is a celiac. My ttg was a 49.4 (normal >15) but my endomysial antibody was negative. I have never had gluten symptoms and no issues with bread and am 54. Do I need a biopsy to rule celiac in or out with this mixed test? Any thoughts are appreciated.  
    • Sunshine4
      Many apologies for somehow changing your first name Scott! 
×
×
  • Create New...