Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Advice Requested - Now Gluten Free, But No Diagnosis


Jmg

Recommended Posts

Jmg Mentor

Hi all,

 

I'd really appreciate any advice members could offer.  I've realised only recently that a lot of different symptoms that I've experienced over 20 years or more may be connected.

 

In January, following a period of ill health I changed my diet, conforming to a large extent to the 'paleo' lifestyle, with no processed foods or grains. Although I wouldn't have classed my previous diet as unhealthy, within days this change had a remarkable affect on my mood and physical well being. 

 

I didn't fully join the dots until March. By that point I had my first beer and noticed a reaction over the next couple of days. I started to wonder if gluten may be an issue after finding this site and several others.  I appear to have many of the symptoms of celiac disease including: Seborrheic dermatitis, depression, joint pain, chest pain, abdominal cramps, swollen lymph nodes, malaise, psoriasis, urinary tract infection and some signs of malabsorbtion. I also have asthma (from 12) hayfever and allergic reaction to animals.

 

I've had various medication or tests concerning each of them and have moreobver for a long time had a feeling of unease as if something wasn't right. At no time however as a doctor made any connection between them. In February of this year I started to put the pieces together.  

 

I went to my doctor and he arranged a blood test. I'd been gluten free for 2 months and started eating gluten immediately.  I reacted within about a day and a half, gradually feeling worse, wit my skin issues the first visible signs.  I was only back on gluten for 6 days before taking the test. By then I felt dreadful.

 

I returned to the doctor and found the test was negative. I asked him if 6 days would've been long enough for the test to take effect. He said he thought so, given that I reacted so strongly, however I've since read that this isnt the case and I may have had a false negative. The Doctor admitted he didn't know much about celiac and offered to write me a referral if I could find a specialist who may be better placed to help. 

 

Today I'm gluten free and feeling better every day.  I've had two instances where I think I've eaten gluten. Once in a soup, which I found had included a gluten containing seasoning. That brought the dermatitis back on scalp and chest. I appear to have reacted again since then, but have not nailed down the food. 

 

My problem is whether I should pursue the diagnostic route or simply get on with enjoying my life gluten free. I've read stories here and elsewhere of how long and hard others have strove for a diagnosis.  I reacted very badly in just those 6 days back on gluten and the thought of doing this for months to get a diagnosis is not a pleasant one. I'm also worried about the damage I may have inadvertently done to myself with many years of eating gluten as I've had some or all of these symptoms for over 20 years (I'm 41 now). My life is so much better since I made this change and there's no treatment at the end other than eating the way I do now. On the other hand I have no objective proof and for all I know this improvement could just be a placebo effect. I just don't know whether to go down the medical route or just get on with life as a non diagnosed celiac?

 

Thank you for reading this and any advice you can offer. :) 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



NoGlutenCooties Contributor

Hi Jmg and Welcome!

 

The question of whether to pursue testing is a personal one that really only you can answer for yourself.  All we can really do is give you some pros and cons - which it sounds like you've likely read already on other, similar threads.  Your doctor is wrong about the 6 days being enough to show up on the test (but at least he admitted he didn't know much about Celiac).  Once you've been gluten free and wish to do a gluten challenge for the purpose of testing you need to eat the equivalent of 2 pieces of bread each day for 8 to 12 weeks for the blood test and at least 2 weeks for the biopsy (give or take - I've seen variations of these numbers).  It sounds like that would be very difficult for you to do.  So you have to ask yourself how important it is for you to have an official diagnosis.  Can you stay 100% gluten free without it? 

 

In my opinion... if you have symptom improvement on a gluten free diet and react to gluten when you accidentally ingest it then you know you have a problem with gluten.  It could be Celiac.  It could be non-Celiac Gluten Intolerance.  But the course of action for either is the same - a 100% gluten free diet.  No cheating.  No... "I'll just have a little bit".  100%.  For life. 

 

If after 6 months on a gluten free diet you still have symptoms of something being wrong then pursue those issues with a doctor.  (Unless you have symptoms of something potentially life threatening, in which case don't wait!)

 

Oh... and if you have children you'll want to get them tested.  Celiac is genetic.  If one of them test positive you can be reasonably confident that you have it too.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

I'd echo the advice that it's basically a personal choice. I would personally give the caveat though that you need to be very, very careful about reintroducing gluten after eliminating it, if you decide to go the gluten challenge route. (see my sig for my experience!)

Jmg Mentor

Thank you for your replies :)

 

NoGlutenCooties, you're quite right. It's because I've established to my own satisfaction that I don't get on with gluten that I  think I'll be quite happy to stay on the gluten free diet regardless of diagnosis. So the only real gains I can see are that of certainty, perhaps identifying other risk factors and help in persuading family members to consider a test themselves. All of which are important, but so is feeling well, happy, full of energy etc. It feels like I've come out of a long tunnel. hence the thought of going back is freaking me out a bit!

 

I'd echo the advice that it's basically a personal choice. I would personally give the caveat though that you need to be very, very careful about reintroducing gluten after eliminating it, if you decide to go the gluten challenge route. (see my sig for my experience!)

 

That's put my reaction into perspective!  It's the thought that if I do decide to get tested I'm better off doing it sooner rather than later which is giving me pause for thought.  I'm going to try and find a medical practitioner to discuss this with, but at the moment am leaning towards a self diagnosis and adoption of gluten free for life.  

 

Thanks again for your responses!

 

Matt

skelly247 Rookie

I was in the same boat as you are now, I went "paleo" and felt 100x better than I had.  I went out to eat at a steakhouse with friends about 2 months after going paleo and someone ordered one of those delicious deep fried battered onions and I had some.  Half way through the meal I started to not feel so good and then I had to find a bench to curl up on when we were walking around a shopping center afterwords because my stomach was hurting so much.  I tried again a few weeks later with chicken tenders at a restaurant, same deal.  I was also worried it was a placebo thing (my fiance offered to put flour in my food to see if I would have a reaction without noticing) but I opted to go the blood test route just to appease my mind.  I was borderline positive (with IgA deficiency) after being gluten free for a few months and only doing a 1.5 week gluten challenge as well as severely deficient in a few vitamins.  That was enough for me, I opted to skip the endoscopy.  It's really a personal choice whether the tests are worth it.  Personally, I wanted to know so that I could actually tell people my problem is "x" and this is what I have to do to fix it.

nvsmom Community Regular

Welcome to the board, Matt.

 

I agree with the others - all good advice. Testing can be helpful but not everyone can make it through the 8-12 week gluten challenge; 2-3 months of making yourself sick is a looonnnnggg time... reminds me of my pregnancies.  LOL ;)

 

Either way, you know treatment for celiac disease and for non-celiac gluten intolerance (NCGI) is going 100% gluten-free for life. There is not a lot of difference between the two besides intestinal damage, and both usually respond well to going gluten-free.  Good luck with whatever you decide to do.

Jmg Mentor

I was also worried it was a placebo thing (my fiance offered to put flour in my food to see if I would have a reaction without noticing) but I opted to go the blood test route just to appease my mind.

 
I also had the worry that this was all in my mind. However a few weeks ago I reacted very strongly to something which I believed had no gluten in it.  When I reacted and investigated it turned out that a seasoning mix had been used which had gluten.  It's not 100% proof of course, but it did reinforce what I'd already been thinking.

 

Welcome to the board, Matt.

 

I agree with the others - all good advice. Testing can be helpful but not everyone can make it through the 8-12 week gluten challenge; 2-3 months of making yourself sick is a looonnnnggg time... reminds me of my pregnancies.  LOL  ;)

 

 

I'd be prepared to do it if I could find a doctor who demonstrates some understanding of this. Unfortunately my recent experience hasn't been good in that regard. I'm also, for the want of a better word, angry, that over so many years and so many symptoms not one doctor has ever connected  the individual complaint I've presented with an underlying condition. I guess I don't have much faith in the medical community right now :(  Indeed I wish I'd asked for the full results of the blood test as I dont even know which antibodies they screened for or what the results were. 

 

Thanks to you both for your advice and good wishes. I've reached out to someone with celiac in my local area and I'm going to talk to them and see if they have any advice on living with this or finding a nearby doctor who could help me with testing.  Until then however I'm staying gluten free and I may yet decide to forgo the diagnostic route and self diagnose. Not something I would ever have contemplated before, but having been a docile adherent of the medical process for all my life, I'm now a lot more sceptical about how I've been treated, the various medications which have been prescribed to me and the lack of any desire on medical practitioners to look for underlying causes. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



  • 2 weeks later...
Jmg Mentor

I've been given the name of a specialist and have asked my local doctor for a referral. :)  I'll wait till I've spoken to him before I make any further decisions, so still gluten free for now.

 

I am however noticing that I'm now much more sensitive to foods than before I took the gluten out of my diet. I've had a couple of odd reactions to ostensibly gluten free foods. My stomach is noisy, I had some 'safe' chicken at a bbq and reacted very quickly, within 20 minutes or so of eating. Had bad stomach pains, I don't think this was happening before like this and it's left me worried over just how sensitive I may wind up and more importantly just how brutal a gluten challenge for the sake of testing may turn out to be.  :o

Jmg Mentor

Hello again. To recap after removing gluten from diet for 2 months and seeing a profound impact I had a negative test after 6 (painful) days consuming gluten. I've now obtained a copy of my results and I'd appreciate any insight you could share, as I'm none the wiser!  I don't seem to have the spread of figures I've seen posted here, although I'm in the UK so appreciate some of the following may be related to how we set out our tests. 

 

My first issue is that the Dr has put down comments that are completely unrelated to what I told him. He's sent me for a 'Allergy Total/Specific IgE report' and indicated that food allergies are the primary focus. He's not described my skin issues accurately either. It's like he wasn't listening :(

 

On to the results:

 

ALLERGY Total/Specific igE report

Immunoglobulin E level (XE2bT) - Above range 26.6 ku/L (<15.0) - Above high reference limit

Food mix RAST test (XaldN) <0.10 ku/L (<.35) Food panel includes codfish, Egg white, Milk, Peanut, Soybean and Wheat

Autoantibody level (XaEWg) 

Biochemical test (X77W9)    - Negative Assay includes antibodies for igA Endomysial Anti-Gliadin Anti-tTG Anti-Reticulin

Immunoglobulin A                - 3.14 g/l (0.4-3.5)

 

This is all the test shows, no breakdown for tTG levels etc?

 

I can't tell much from this, can anyone? I'm guessing I can rule out wheat allergy from the food panel? I don't know what the abnormal IgE reading means, it doesn't seem to concern my Dr...

GFinDC Veteran

Hi JMG,

 

Here's a list of the tests for blood antibodies for celiac disease.

Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgA
Anti-Gliadin (AGA) IgG
Anti-Endomysial (EMA) IgA
Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA
Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgA and IgG
Total Serum IgA

 

It doesn't look like you got all those tests done.

 

Have you read about DH (dermatitis herpetiformis)?  It is a skin rash associated with celiac disease.  They test for it differently.  They take a biopsy sample of skin next to the lesion and check it for antibodies.  There is a section of the forum dedicated to DH that has more info.

Jmg Mentor

Thanks GFinDC. It's only from reading this forum that I realised that maybe the test hadn't covered all the bases.  It may be because the UK labs do things differently, but I can't tell because the report doesn't seem to break it down properly.

 

I have read about DH. I have had a rash on my chest off and on for over 20 yrs which could be that, Dr's have given me various creams and antibiotics but they never seemed to work. It's got lot better since I changed my diet, but hasn't gone completely. 

 

I've asked to be referred to a specialist as I don't think my regular dr's have much understanding of this... :(

nvsmom Community Regular

 

ALLERGY Total/Specific igE report

Immunoglobulin E level (XE2bT) - Above range 26.6 ku/L (<15.0) - Above high reference limit

Food mix RAST test (XaldN) <0.10 ku/L (<.35) Food panel includes codfish, Egg white, Milk, Peanut, Soybean and Wheat

Autoantibody level (XaEWg) 

Biochemical test (X77W9)    - Negative Assay includes antibodies for igA Endomysial Anti-Gliadin Anti-tTG Anti-Reticulin

Immunoglobulin A                - 3.14 g/l (0.4-3.5)

 

.

 

It looks like the X77W9 test tested for most of the celia tests, but to me it looks like it might have just been the IgA based ones (tTG IgA, EMA IgA, etc).  They missed the new DGP tests but added the old anti-reticulin test - that one isn't seen often anymore.

 

If possible, it could be helpfulto have the IgG version of those tests run. A minority of celoacs are positive in the IgG based tests (tTG IgG, DGP IgG, etc) but not in the IgA based ones - even if they are not IgA deficient (your IgA levels are fine).

 

Retesting after a longer gluten challenge might be helpful too - if its not too painful that is. Some people's antibody levels can drop to normal in two months gluten-free where as others may take much longer. You may be one whose numbers normalize quickly.

 

I agree that testing the area beside the rash may be the way to go. For some celiacs, the insanely itchy rash is their only symptom.

 

It's also possible that you have non-celiac gluten intolerance (NCGI) in which case the blood tests will be negative (except for possibly the AGA ones but it's not widely accepted that it can show NCGI and they are not that sensitive).

 

Good luck finding answers! I know it can be a frustrating process.

Jmg Mentor

Thank you once again! This:

 

It looks like the X77W9 test tested for most of the celia tests, but to me it looks like it might have just been the IgA based ones (tTG IgA, EMA IgA, etc).  They missed the new DGP tests but added the old anti-reticulin test - that one isn't seen often anymore.

 

If possible, it could be helpfulto have the IgG version of those tests run. A minority of celoacs are positive in the IgG based tests (tTG IgG, DGP IgG, etc) but not in the IgA based ones - even if they are not IgA deficient (your IgA levels are fine).

 

is really helpful. 

 

I still don't know whether the health system here can offer the more sophisticated test, but it seems as if cyrex labs are available privately: Open Original Shared Link - If I do another gluten challenge I may pay for one of these lab tests at the same time for y own peace of mind, because at least I won't have to put myself through it a third time. Although if they're not being used for diagnostic purposes over here it may not help me in any subsequent referral.

 

I've found the entire process of getting good information and advice difficult so thanks again to you and the other members of this board for sharing your hard won experience. Your help is very much appreciated. 

 

Matt

Mi Samba Newbie

I just heard on the " Katie " TV show that you have to have gluten in your system to test positive. Also this is not always accurate. It can come up negative and then you need a gastrointerologist to test you.

nvsmom Community Regular

...I still don't know whether the health system here can offer the more sophisticated test, but it seems as if cyrex labs are available privately: Open Original Shared Link - If I do another gluten challenge I may pay for one of these lab tests at the same time for y own peace of mind, because at least I won't have to put myself through it a third time. Although if they're not being used for diagnostic purposes over here it may not help me in any subsequent referral.

...

 

I don't know much about private testing, but I do know it's available. Perhaps start a new thread asking about Cyrex labs or other labs available through the UK. I think there are a few around here who did private tests.

 

I did do a home Biocard test, which was a tTG IgA test. In Canada it's about $50, and it's basically the same ones the labs run except you don't get a number for a result -  just positive or negative (like a pregnancy test).

 

If you do do more testing, eat gluten for as long as possible prior to the test. 8-12 weeks is usually recommended.  The DGP and EMA tests are usually the first to revert back to normal. In some the tTG can linger positive longer (in both IgA and IgG based tests)

 

Best wishes.

NoGlutenCooties Contributor

I just heard on the " Katie " TV show that you have to have gluten in your system to test positive. Also this is not always accurate. It can come up negative and then you need a gastrointerologist to test you.

 

Just to clarify - it's not the gluten that must be in your system, but the antibodies.  And yes, false negatives do occur.  False positives are more uncommon.

MEC Newbie

JMG- I literally just joined this forum and went immediately to your post. I self- diagnosed a week ago and am 100% positive I have Celiac's and am not going to put myself through the tests. I'm sure some will disagree but in my research, although symptoms vary, Celiac's just fits for me!   I don't know about others but right now, I'm thrilled to be feeling better. I actually didn't know how crappy I felt until I cut out the glutens. I was just assuming that this was the 'new me' and just had to deal with it.

Here is my timeline leading me to conclude my diagnosis.

  • My niece was diagnosed with celiac's at the age of 2.
  • I had breast cancer 10 years ago followed by chemo and radiation (trauma to my body when disease was most likely triggered)
  • Was in great shape my entire life never weighing more than 120 lbs. After Chemo/radiation, I blew up like a balloon- belly looks six months or more pregnant and just gained a ton of weight.
  • Exhaustion- was extremely tired all winter to the point where I would wake up, put my son on the bus, and then go back to bed. 
  • very low energy
  • IBS
  • foggy brain
  • white spots on finger nails
  • tingling in toes and fingers

After a week

  • I have energy!!
  • have a good night sleep and don't feel need to go back to sleep
  • IBS- GONE
  • bloating- this will take a while but it's noticeable in my face and I feel my stomach changing
  • skin is softer
  • hair is shinier
  • I didn't know I had a 'foggy brain' until stopped the glutens. 
  • dread the thought of having to 'gluten up' to be tested. Diagnosis to me is not necessary as I don't feel I need a doctor to tell me to change my diet which I am working on already! 

Wish me luck and good luck to you too in your decision to test or not. One last factor in me deciding to test or not- I'm 46 and don't have any biological children. We adopted our son after my cancer diagnosis. If I had a biological child, I would probably get tested.

Jmg Mentor

Thanks for the further responses.  I've had some good news, my local dr is referring me so I'll get to see a GI specialist. :) Depending on what they say I may try to complete a gluten challenge, not keen on the idea after my last experience but at least I may then know for sure and I'll be getting an expert view. 

 

MEC, thanks for sharing your story, it really struck a chord. Especially:

 

 I actually didn't know how crappy I felt until I cut out the glutens

 

I feel a different person than I was in January. It's uncanny.

  • 2 months later...
Jmg Mentor

Hello again. :)

 

After starting to feel much better, putting on some weight and feeling even better than I had when first cutting out gluten I finally met the GE consultant today. The good news was that he was happy to send me for a endoscopy rather than a blood test, the bad news was that he suggested an 8-10 week gluten challenge, I'd been hoping for only 2 weeks for the endoscopy as some here have suggested.  

 

After my last experience I really don't think I could manage that long. We settled on 6 weeks, so I'm going to start consuming gluten again.  Frankly I'm dreading it, far from being excited about the food and drink I'm scared about just how this is going to affect me. Having been on an upward curve for months now and working so hard to avoid any slip ups I'm now going to be deliberately exposing myself. Seems crazy!

 

I'm now looking for any advice on how to get through the challenge with as little negative outcomes as possible. I'm going to continue with multivitamins, probiotics and a healthy diet. Should I re introduce gluten gradually, starting small and upping quantities or does that not really help? The consultant didn't give me any firm info on quantity of gluten to eat, just said the more the better....

nvsmom Community Regular

For a biopsy, I usually see a gluten challenge of 2-4 weeks with the equivalent of 1-2 slices of bread per day.  Because you are going longer than that, I would ease into it a bit and start at 1 slice of bread or less for a few days.  I don't know if easing in will help but it might make it a slightly less of a shock to your system.  Just don't overdo it - some people eat toast for breakfast, buns for lunch, noodles for supper with baked goods for snacks - that would be a recipe for disaster.

 

Try eating your gluten in the evening so your day is not ruined (if you are the type who reacts quickly).  

 

Good luck.  I hope it isn't too bad for you.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

I wouldn't say that more is better! I ate gluten with every meal for my gluten challenge and it was a total disaster. I would think that smaller amounts would increase the chance that you could actually finish the challenge.

Jmg Mentor

For a biopsy, I usually see a gluten challenge of 2-4 weeks with the equivalent of 1-2 slices of bread per day.  Because you are going longer than that, I would ease into it a bit and start at 1 slice of bread or less for a few days.  I don't know if easing in will help but it might make it a slightly less of a shock to your system.  Just don't overdo it - some people eat toast for breakfast, buns for lunch, noodles for supper with baked goods for snacks - that would be a recipe for disaster.

 

Try eating your gluten in the evening so your day is not ruined (if you are the type who reacts quickly).  

 

Good luck.  I hope it isn't too bad for you.

 

Thank you.  I'm going to just have a small amount for the first few days. Now started off with a small very slice of rye bread. 

 

 

I wouldn't say that more is better! I ate gluten with every meal for my gluten challenge and it was a total disaster. I would think that smaller amounts would increase the chance that you could actually finish the challenge.

 

 

I hope so, am hoping to make it through as would be awful to get near and not make it for the endoscopy. 

 

Thanks as always for your replies. I've found this board very helpful and appreciate the efforts that you and others put into it. 

Jmg Mentor

Few days in, have started slowly, the first sign I had was scalp being itchy, then came the anxiety (although it was difficult at first to pick up as I was anxious about doing this even when gluten-free :) ) now the horrible hollow depression feeling is beginning, sort of like an ache behind my eyes. Only positive is that I know now what causes it and that once this is over it should be gone.

 

I meant to make a list of all the foods I'll have one last time but at the moment even though I can now in theory eat anything I'm not really tempted by any gluten other than the 2 slices of bread I'm forcing down. I'd really adjusted to the new diet and feeling healthy. 

BlessedMommy Rising Star

Good job, I hope that you can make it through. You either have celiac or NCGS, it's clear that gluten doesn't help you out any!

StephanieL Enthusiast

For a biopsy, I usually see a gluten challenge of 2-4 weeks with the equivalent of 1-2 slices of bread per day.  

A well respected Celiac expert recommended to us 6-8 weeks minimum for a challenge.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,010
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Bob Brengman
    Newest Member
    Bob Brengman
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Bebygirl01
      Ortiz-Sánchez JP, Cabrera-Chávez F, de la Barca AM. Maize prolamins could induce a gluten-like cellular immune response in some celiac disease patients. Nutrients. 2013 Oct 21;5(10):4174-83. doi: 10.3390/nu5104174. PMID: 24152750; PMCID: PMC3820067. AND SEE: Oats Intolerance in Celiac Disease. PLoS Med. 2004 Oct;1(1):e23. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0010023. Epub 2004 Oct 19. PMCID: PMC523841. AND ALSO SEE: Bascuñán KA, Orosteguí C, Rodríguez JM, Roncoroni L, Doneda L, Elli L, Araya M. Heavy Metal and Rice in Gluten-Free Diets: Are They a Risk? Nutrients. 2023 Jun 30;15(13):2975. doi: 10.3390/nu15132975. PMID: 37447301; PMCID: PMC10346754. Celiac disease is one of the most common autoimmune gastrointestinal diseases; over the last decades, its prevalence indicates a mean annual increase in frequency currently calculated at 7.5% per year [23]. celiac disease is triggered by gluten present in the diet and the disease involves autoimmune and inflammatory damage to the small intestine in genetically susceptible individuals. To develop celiac disease a person must inherit the genetic predisposition; however, about one third of the population carries the risk genes and only ~1% of the population develops the disease, indicating that genetics is not sufficient to explain the condition. The environment participates by providing the triggering factor, i.e., gluten, and the disease is activated by environmental factors which, until now, have not been fully understood, among which changes in eating habits and the intestinal microbiota are considered to be significant factors [24,25]; yet, current knowledge is insufficient to explain the mechanisms involved. Currently, the only treatment for celiac disease is a GFD for life. AND ALSO SEE: Dr. Osborne: Although rice is considered gluten-free based on the definition set forth by the FDA, rice does contain a different form of gluten prolamin called orzenin. In my experience, those with known celiac disease or non celiac gluten sensitivity issues do better when avoiding rice.
    • trents
      @Bebygirl01, if you want to play word games with the term, "gluten", we can do that. The proteins you list in these other cereal grains besides wheat, barley and rye are somewhat different from that found in wheat, barley and rye and, technically speaking, are not "gluten". Technically speaking, "gluten" should only be applied to a particular protein found in wheat, barley and rye. These other cereal grain proteins have their own names (avenin, secalinin, zein, etc). Unfortunately, confusion has been created in popular and pseudo scientific literature by the informal use of the term "gluten" when talking about the proteins found in these other cereal grains such that you sometimes read about "corn gluten", "oat gluten", "rice gluten", etc. But these are actually misnomers, with "gluten" having been added on as an informal appendage to the actual protein names. Having said that, the protein structures of these other cereal grains is close enough to gluten that, for some people, they can cause a celiac type reaction. But this is not true for most celiacs and those who fall into the NCGS category. Apparently, it is true for you. This whole idea that cereal grains are bad for all of us has been popularized by books such as Dangerous Grains for years but it is not a widely accepted idea in the scientific community.
    • Bebygirl01
      On my Celiac journey and discovered I was also reacting to other types of gluten. The FDA in it's finite wisdom only classifies 'wheat, barley and rye' as the gluten's to be considered when a company tests for and stamps their products as gluten free. I am curious as to how many of you are aware of the other types of glutens? And another question to those on a 'traditional' gluten free diet , who are also still sick and struggling, are you also reacting to these other types of gluten as listed below? NOTE:  The new movement if you want to call it that, is now called 'grain free' and that is the true definition of gluten free. I no longer suffer with ataxia, confusion, anxiety, depression, OCD, Insomnia, ADD, acid reflux, dermatitis herpetiformis, migraines, headaches, and weight issues all due to going 'grain free'. I hope to reach as many of you out there that are still struggling and unaware of what might be setting you off such as my most recent glutening was from a vegan supplement that contained 'magnesium sterate' and 'glucose syrup' both of which are from Zien (zane) gluten at 55%. I was covered in sores that were bleeding, I was seeing squigly lines when I was trying to drive, had acid reflux, insomnia, and nightmares all from the gluten in Corn. Here are the other types of glutens that Celiacs and Gluten Intolerant people also react to: Wheat -Alpha Gliadin Gluten- 69% Rye - Secalinin gluten-30-50% Oats-Avenin gluten -16% Barley-Hordein Gluten -46-52% Millet-Panicin Gluten-40% Corn-Zien Gluten -55% Rice-Orzenin Gluten-5% Sorghum-Kafirin gluten-52% and Teff-Penniseiten Gluten 11%.
    • Scott Adams
      I just want to mention again that IF thimerosal is used in a flu vaccine the amount of ethylmercury in a single vaccine dose would be extremely small, typically around 25 micrograms (µg) or less. For context, this is much lower than the levels of methylmercury found in some seafood. Ethylmercury is metabolized and excreted from the body much faster than methylmercury. Its half-life in the blood is about 7 days, compared to methylmercury, which can persist for months. The dose of ethylmercury in vaccines is far below the threshold known to cause toxicity so would not require chelation.
    • knitty kitty
      If you have poor reactions to vaccines, preservatives, sugar alcohols and metals, you may be deficient in Thiamine Vitamin B1.  Thiamine is needed in the immune response and production of antibodies.  Thiamine can be depleted by vaccines if you are already low to begin with due to the Malabsorption of Celiac Disease.  Thiamine can be destroyed by sulfide preservatives in vaccines, which can result in the body's poor response to vaccines.  Thiamine also chelates metals which allows those metals to be removed in the feces.  Chelation removes thiamine from the body, resulting in a state of thiamine deficiency.  Sugar alcohols need to be processed through the liver using thiamine.  Again, if you're low in thiamine as many Celiac are because of the Malabsorption of celiac disease, vaccines can be a tipping point, resulting in a thiamine deficient state. High doses of Thiamine required to correct thiamine deficiency states are safe and nontoxic.  Thiamine has no toxicity level.  Thiamine and the other B vitamins need to be taken together because they interact together to sustain health.   References: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25542071/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8533683/
×
×
  • Create New...