Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Should Enriched gluten-free Flour Be The Next Battle?


plumbago

Recommended Posts

mommida Enthusiast

In all honesty, I have been trying to fortify baked goods at home.  Swapping out some of the flour blend with almond flour or adding a Tablespoon of chia seeds into baked goods.  By adding 1 Tablespoon chia seed = another 60 calories, 2g of protein, 65mg of Calcium, 1 mg of iron, 41mg of Magnesium, and 80mg of Potassium.  You just have to watch the "tipping point" for recipes, when you screwed up the taste/texture.

 

Maybe we should start a thread,  "How do you make gluten free food healthier/ or vitamin fortified?"

 

I Hide kale in vegetable soup.  (kids asked what the green bits were, and weren't grossed out by the answer.  Will they eat kale by itself?  No way.  In soup? yes.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mommida Enthusiast

My kids and I will take that ice cream off your hands! :P

LauraTX Rising Star

If anyone is looking for an enriched gluten-free flour, King Arthur Flour has their gluten-free flour blend and their gluten-free All Purpose Baking Mix (I use it like self rising flour), their page is here:  Open Original Shared Link  Click the product, then buy online, and "read the label".   Their bread mix is also enriched.  If you want things to change, the best way to vote is with your money.  However, it is each person's responsibility to take charge of their own health.  If they don't do that, forcing gluten-free food makers to enrich their product isn't going to save them.  

Adalaide Mentor

My kids and I will take that ice cream off your hands! :P

 

I very carefully make a dent in it at least every other day. I was doing really well and down to 3, but then a brand of ice cream local to where I grew up that they just recently started selling here went on sale. My hips can't take much more of these summer ice cream sales, but it certainly does my heart good. As a matter of fact, it's sounding good right now! B)

dilettantesteph Collaborator

I tried to find something saying that fortified foods are better than vitamins, but I found the opposite from the Harvard school of public health.: Open Original Shared Link

bartfull Rising Star

I don't worry about ice cream. It has CALCIUM! It's GOOD FOR US! :D  :D  :D And I have a double dose of calcium every day!!

mommida Enthusiast

Now if we could just get doctors and nutritionist to read that article instead of going on a holier than thou tirade.... :rolleyes:

 

Enrichment of food/ water is highly debated.  vitamin b enrichment to prevent beriberi, iodine fortified salt to prevent goiter, (these 2 seem ok, right) but golden rice to prevent vitamin A deficiency to prevent blindness ~ genetically modified crops, fluoride in drinking water to prevent cavities.

 

But, living in the mid west ~people are vitamin D deficient from lack of sunshine. :(


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



plumbago Experienced

I tried to find something saying that fortified foods are better than vitamins, but I found the opposite from the Harvard school of public health.: Open Original Shared Link

They are talking about folic acid.

 

This is something I cited in an earlier post, by the way. I referred to a Harvard study.

 

From the article:

"Take a standard multivitamin every day, but stay away from heavily fortified foods that deliver a full day’s dose—or sometimes more—of folic acid"

 

What I'm about to say may not be a scientific statement as it is subjective, but that, to me, is hardly a pronouncement that all fortified foods are not as 'good' as supplements. It is rather, a warning to keep away from overly fortified foods. You would have to look on the back of individual fortified foods to see if it delivers a full day's dosage. Does a loaf of gluten bread deliver that much? I bet not. Generally, enriched grains and breads that were enriched as part of the 1942 Act are done so in pretty small amounts.

 

From the article you cite (and that I referred to earlier):

"Since 1998, folic acid has been added to most enriched bread flours, cornmeal, pasta, rice, and other grain products in the U.S. and Canada. This was done to help prevent spina bifida and anencephaly, two birth defects that are caused in part by too little folate in a mother’s body around the time her baby is conceived.This program has increased average folic acid intakes by about 100 micrograms a day (Open Original Shared Link) and has decreased the number of American children born with a neural tube defect by 25% to 50%. (Open Original Shared Link) The overall evidence from controlled trials shows that extra folic acid also helps protect against stroke (Open Original Shared Link), and many studies suggest it probably reduces the risk of heart disease, too."

 

What they are warning against are some foods.

 

"Some breakfast cereals, nutrition bars, and other fortified foods deliver up to 800 micrograms of folic acid, and that’s about double the recommended daily dose. The Institute of Medicine’s upper limit is 1,000 micrograms of folic acid from fortified foods a day."

 

From The Ups and Downs of Folic Acid Fortification:

Open Original Shared Link

 

"The bottom line? Unless you’re pregnant or lactating or have a recognized folate deficiency, the recommended daily intake of folic acid is 400 mcg per day — the amount found in a typical multivitamin. According to Dr. Walter Willett, Chairman of the Department of Nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health, “the added folic acid from food fortification is on average 100 to 200 mcg per day, but this varies widely, depending on food choice.” The tolerable upper intake level (UL) — the maximum safe amount — of folic acid from fortified foods and supplements is 1,000 mcg per day. With all the fortified foods on the market, you may exceed that limit, especially if you’re already taking a daily multivitamin containing 400 mcg of folic acid. So it’s a good idea to check the nutrition labels of cereal and grain products to find out how much you’re getting from fortified foods. (For some examples of fortified foods and their folic acid content, see "Open Original Shared Link.")"

 

They add at the end of the original article you cited:

 

"We will continue to monitor the evidence as it emerges, particularly from long term studies, to fine tune guidance about the optimal intakes of folic acid, vitaminB12, and other nutrients."

 

(Again, Vitamin B12 is not really part of our conversation, although it works in conjunction with folate.)

 

The article you cite worries about cancer and folic acid fortification/supplementation. It was written in 2008. In class, we are learning, also, that folate can help prevent pancreatic cancer. To me, I do not know enough to make a cancer judgment either way, and neither I suspect does Harvard. You could make a counter argument (non Celiacs could): given the amount of fortification, you do not need to supplement - with the obvious exceptions, such as women who are thinking of becoming pregnant.

plumbago Experienced

Yellow rice and its GMO nonstop promises are hype, whereas the victories from fortification are provable and real.

Adalaide Mentor

One of the things that I specifically cited to my husband as a reason we will never move into Salt Lake county, even though I would prefer to live there for the culture is the water. Here in Utah County the water is not fluoridated, it is in Salt Lake county. We could move another 15-20 minutes drive north, but no more than that. I already refuse to drink tap water (for taste reasons, it tastes like a mouthful of pool water), but for economical reasons I cook with it.

 

I've suffered with severe dietary restrictions that encompassed wide ranges of fruits and vegetables and included cutting out most packaged foods. During this time I was very careful to be tested for any deficiencies that may come up. I was also very aware that because I was on a restricted diet, first by going gluten free and removing all of those enriched products from my diet, then by removing so many otherwise healthy foods that I needed to carefully balance what I was eating. The only thing I ever came up deficient in was folic acid, and that was because I was forced to cut out basically every food it naturally occurs in. (Which I normally super love.) Eventually tests showed that my borderline anemia had crossed over, again probably because of all the greens I had to cut out. Now that I am ever so slowly adding these foods back in I suspect I may be able to remove my supplement after another year or so. During all this time, I haven't been eating enriched products. Simply a balanced diet. If celiac does anything for us, it should above all teach us to take responsibility for our health and not expect others to take that responsibility for us. While a law protecting the health of 1% of the population from others is good, one protecting us from our own willful ignorance and laziness is kind of stupid. IMO

 

 

I don't worry about ice cream. It has CALCIUM! It's GOOD FOR US! :D  :D  :D And I have a double dose of calcium every day!!

 

I tell myself this with every bowl. Even the chocolate with marshmallow swirls and nuts. ^_^ I wonder if it counts double if we sit in the sun to eat it so we can "harvest" our vitamin D for the day? Triple if we sit in the sun naked? :P

plumbago Experienced

While a law protecting the health of 1% of the population from others is good, one protecting us from our own willful ignorance and laziness is kind of stupid.

 

I wonder where the moderator is on that one.

 

Actually I don't mind my ideas being called stupid that much. I'm pretty much all for free expression. What I do object to is having the conversation interrupted by a moderator, demanding scientific proof here and ther of select commenters only, while not demanding it of others, and also permitting ideas to be called stupid. Either enforce the rules for everyone or no one, is kind of how I see it.

 

BTW, can I see a copy of these rules? Thank you very much.

 

Plumbago

GF Lover Rising Star

As stated, this is her opinion AND is not directed at any one person.

 

Board Rules: https://www.celiac.com/gluten-free/index.php?app=forums&module=extras&section=boardrules

 

Moderators are not the Board Police.  

 

Colleen

Adalaide Mentor

I'm sorry you feel my statement was an attack on your idea. It wasn't. While in general an online forum is a bad place to discuss things like politics, I'm going to break this protocol just a little for a moment. This statement is in keeping with my general political views about the government meddling in our daily lives and has nothing at all to do with you personally and just happens to also apply to this idea. In keeping with the forum rules (which if my memory serves me correctly we are all supposed to read and agree to when we sign up here?) I followed my statements with "IMO" specifically to point out that my statements were in fact a matter of opinion and nothing more to avoid any confusion. The remainder of what I shared was my experiences, which I was hoping would show that I've dealt with not only celiac but additional restrictions and was still able to appropriately deal with my nutrition without government interference. I'm not really sure why it is you feel attacked, but you weren't.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,356
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deb powell
    Newest Member
    Deb powell
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.1k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Welcome, @Morgan Tiernan, The best thing to clear my dermatitis herpetiformis is to take Niacin, Vitamin B 3, the form called nicotine acid, the kind that causes flushing of the skin.  Flushing Niacin clears my skin quickly.   Yes, the flushing might seem really strange, but it opens the tiny capillaries in the surface of the skin which helps remove the antibodies that gather in those pustules.  The flushing lessens the longer Niacin is taken, but still works at keeping the blisters away.   Be sure to take a B Complex and Benfotiamine, a form of Thiamin , Vitamin B 1.  Covid, shingles and other infections like strep throat deplete our Thiamine quickly.  Having frequent infections can indicate low Thiamine.  We have a higher metabolic demand during infections, physical trauma or surgery, emotional and mental stress, and while physically active like dancing.    Thiamine has anti-virus and antibacterial properties.  The eight essential B vitamins work together.  Taking Benfotiamine in addition to the B Complex is safe and nontoxic.  Excess B vitamins are easily excreted because they are water soluble.  New Celiacs are often low in vitamins and minerals due to malabsorption.  Vitamin D can help calm the immune system.  Following a low histamine Paleo diet , like the Autoimmune Protocol Diet by Dr. Sara Ballantyne, a Celiac herself, is also very helpful.  Steroids lower histamine, but the low histamine AIP diet is safer.   This research may be old, but Flushing Niacin does work!!! Nicotinic acid therapy of dermatitis herpetiformis https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15412276/ P.S. Wearing natural fibers helps my dermatitis herpetiformis.  Synthetic fibers keep sweat next to the skin, causing further irritation.  Natural fibers wick moisture away, keeping skin dry and exfoliated.
    • Morgan Tiernan
      Hey @Rogol72! thanks for your very helpful response. Those videos are great and super educating! I’ve forwarded them to my family members too as often it can be very difficult to explain to those around you just what you’re going through. Though, I’m fortunate that they’re super supportive and keen to help me get to the bottom of the problem. Interesting how you mentioned soaps and shower gels irritating too! Is it better to rinse off the sweat straight after exercising just with some cool water? Additionally, is minimising soap in those areas during showering helpful too? Or is there a particular soap that may be helpful! I have some more questions about dapsone too, if you don’t mind me asking. As mentioned in my response to Trents, I take prednisolone for when I am glutened or when my symptoms become too unbearable. With oral steroids it’s usually a 4 week dose as I have to reduce my dose to slowly come off them. How long can you take dapsone for? Can it impact your immune system in the same way as oral steroids (I have to be super careful I don’t pick up any infections whilst on my steroids as my immune system is compromised.) Yes, I’m from South Wales in the UK. Though my grandfather is Irish, explaining my surname (very well spotted!)
    • Morgan Tiernan
      Hi Trents, thank you so much for your help and support. Yes it’s not ideal from my surgery practice. This is just one of the many problems I have experienced with them, we’ve had to pay to go to a private consultant now instead (I’m from South Wales in the UK, spot on about the spelling of “coeliac”! I completely forgot there was another way of spelling it around the world!) The dermatologist I have been seeing over the last few months has been amazing. And thank goodness for places like google and forums like these, I don’t think I would’ve ever thought it could be gluten! Interesting about the iodine. I’ll definitely start to limit this out of my diet. It makes sense as the places of irritation are places I sweat or pressure points (wrists, waist etc.) Dapsone was mentioned in my last appointment also. He’s reluctant to put me on it just yet, probably just until this biopsy is done so we can confirm for definite. At the moment I’m being put on prednisolone (oral steroids) every time I either become glutened or my symptoms reach an ultimate. I think he’s said if I need to be in them for any more than 3 times a year, dapsone will be more considered. I’m keen to go on it as every time I come off the prednisolone I can see the blisters creeping back. I’ve got loads that have burst on my hairline. I also start to get flaky/peeling skin as well which I’m not sure is related?    As well as limiting iodine, is there anything else that might help irritation with sweat? Is it better to wear more loose fitted clothing? Can I apply something to stop the irritation of sweat whilst i’m exercising?    Thanks for all your help so far! I will keep you all updated on my journey! 
    • Lynnard
      Thank you - that makes perfect sense and I understand. celiac disease is an autoimmune disease which will cause further damage while gluten sensitivity is different. Based on my symptoms and bloodwork, I am almost certain I have celiac disease.  I kind of hate to hope for a positive biopsy but a negative one would be frustrating for sure. Regardless, I have done a lot of research on gluten-free diet and am prepared to begin a new lifestyle journey - with a lot of questions along the way.  I appreciate your information and advice! 
    • trents
      Let's talk about terminology for the sake eliminating (as much as possible) confusion. Unfortunately, the terms "gluten sensitive" and "gluten intolerant" have, historically, been used indiscriminately. There are two primary categories of gluten disorders whose "official" terms are 1. celiac disease and 2. Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or NCGS for short.  I believe there is an evolution toward using the term "gluten intolerance" to refer to celiac disease and "gluten sensitive" to refer to NCGS. I say that because the words "gluten sensitivity" are actually found in the official medical term for the non celiac medical disorder involving gluten. Does that make sense? The difference between celiac disease and NCGS is that celiac disease causes inflammation in the small bowel lining and (over time) does damage to it so that it becomes inefficient in absorbing nutrients from what we eat. This is the area of the intestinal track where all of our nutrients are absorbed. Of course, this can lead to any number of other medical problems. NCGS, on the other hand, does not cause inflammation or damage to the lining of the small bowel and therefore does not produce the antibodies that celiac disease antibody tests look for. Neither will NCGS, therefore, produce a positive biopsy result. NCGS and celiac disease, however share many of the same symptoms in the area of GI distress and NCGS is 10x more common than celiac disease. There is, at the present time, no defining test for NCGS so an NCGS diagnosis is arrived at by first eliminating celiac disease for which we do have tests for. Having said that, some experts believe that NCGS can be a precursor to celiac disease.  Yes, you are correct in stating that both conditions require a gluten free diet.  So, in the absence of official testing for celiac disease (and official testing done under the proper conditions) a person who is experiencing distress when consuming gluten cannot be certain whether they are dealing with celiac disease or NCGS. Not to have an official diagnosis of celiac disease while actually having the condition makes it difficult for some folks to stay on the gluten free bandwagon. It's just the psychology of the situation and wanting to rationalize away a very inconvenient and socially isolating medical condition.
×
×
  • Create New...