Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Ttg Iga 14 - Not That High?


hazelnutty42

Recommended Posts

hazelnutty42 Rookie

I'm new here and have been reading through posts trying to find answers but didn't see anything about this specifically. I've had GI issues for a few years and finally had blood tests done and my TTG IgA was 14. I know that anything greater than 10 is positive but seems like most people here have numbers WAY higher (100+).  I have an biopsy and colonoscopy scheduled and my GI doc said there isn't much to say until he sees those results. He said 14 is technically celiac but he's "not convinced". Whatever that means. So is 14 just a little high? Not a big deal? Would love any feedback. Thanks! 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



GottaSki Mentor

I'm new here and have been reading through posts trying to find answers but didn't see anything about this specifically. I've had GI issues for a few years and finally had blood tests done and my TTG IgA was 14. I know that anything greater than 10 is positive but seems like most people here have numbers WAY higher (100+).  I have an biopsy and colonoscopy scheduled and my GI doc said there isn't much to say until he sees those results. He said 14 is technically celiac but he's "not convinced". Whatever that means. So is 14 just a little high? Not a big deal? Would love any feedback. Thanks! 

 

Positive is positive.  One need not have extremely high numbers on any of the celiac antibody tests to have celiac disease.  There are a few reasons other than Celiac Disease that raise the tTG, but with digestive issues and positive antibody test it certainly sounds like celiac.

 

Did this doctor run a complete celiac antibody panel or just the tTG?

 

Here is a complete panel:

 

Total Serum IgA

tTG - both IgA and IgG

DGP - both IgA and IgG

EMA - IgA

 

As an example...all of my celiac antibodies were positive, but most were only "weak" positive, yet I had complete villious atrophy - all samples.

 

Keep eating gluten until the endoscopy and do make sure your doctor is planning to take 6-8 samples from the small intestine.

 

Welcome to the forum!

SMRI Collaborator

It's kind of like being pregnant--either you are or you are not :D

BlessedMommy Rising Star

^I was just about to say the same thing! :)

 

My pregnancy test with my oldest was a very "weak positive" but I was just as pregnant! 

nvsmom Community Regular

Welcome to the board.  :)

 

You are 40% over and above the normal range... doesn't seem that weak to me.  ;)  Yes, some of us had really high tests, but many did not - that's part of the reason this forum is so popular is because the testing can be soooo confusing.  There are also those out there who had completely negative blood tests but a positive biopsy.  And then there is the reverse where you get a negative biopsy but positive labs....

 

I very rarely see someone whose lab results all scream "Celiac!"  It's definitely the minority. LOL

SMRI Collaborator

Welcome to the board.   :)

 

You are 40% over and above the normal range... doesn't seem that weak to me.   ;)  Yes, some of us had really high tests, but many did not - that's part of the reason this forum is so popular is because the testing can be soooo confusing.  There are also those out there who had completely negative blood tests but a positive biopsy.  And then there is the reverse where you get a negative biopsy but positive labs....

 

I very rarely see someone whose lab results all scream "Celiac!"  It's definitely the minority. LOL

 

I think I am one of the few here that tested positive for every test, the IGA, IGG, genes, biopsy, etc.  I would also say that I am one of the least symptomatic people here too....so you just never know. :D.  I was being tested for other things and my dr tossed in the Celiac testing.  My only real symptom was D.  I had other symptoms that I didn't know where related until they went away or started getting better without gluten--brain fog especially--but since most of my friends report the same in perimenopause-I just attributed it to that.

hazelnutty42 Rookie

Thank you everyone. These are the blood tests that I know where done:

 

Celiac AB:

Deamidated Gliadin IgA--?

TTG IgA --14

Serum IgA Quantitation--?

 

I wasn't told any answers except TTG IgA . My primary doc was the one to call me and say the "gluten test was abnormal and you'll need to follow a gluten free diet". Then at my GI appt yesterday that doc didn't even mention the abnormal test until I asked him. He was only going to do a colonoscopy to check for colitis but I asked him what that test result was my other doctor was talking about. That made him go back to look - like he hadn't before! - and said the TTG IgA was 14 and so he would do a biopsy as well. He still wasn't convinced. My liver, etc were fine. I just wonder what he's not convinced about. 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SMRI Collaborator

Thank you everyone. These are the blood tests that I know where done:

 

Celiac AB:

Deamidated Gliadin IgA--?

TTG IgA --14

Serum IgA Quantitation--?

 

I wasn't told any answers except TTG IgA . My primary doc was the one to call me and say the "gluten test was abnormal and you'll need to follow a gluten free diet". Then at my GI appt yesterday that doc didn't even mention the abnormal test until I asked him. He was only going to do a colonoscopy to check for colitis but I asked him what that test result was my other doctor was talking about. That made him go back to look - like he hadn't before! - and said the TTG IgA was 14 and so he would do a biopsy as well. He still wasn't convinced. My liver, etc were fine. I just wonder what he's not convinced about. 

 

Without knowing the range the lab used, it's hard to say if it's "normal" or not.  My lab would have called you a weak positive and then referred you for further testing because lab errors could account for the 14 vs 10 or less that would signal a negative.  I would guess, given the GI's reaction, that your other tests were in normal ranges??  I would call the first dr and request a copy of the complete test results--or, if you have online access, they should be there.  My numbers were not 100+ high but my TTG IgA was 32, my TTG IgG was in the 65 range.  For my lab, anything over 20 was a definite positive but they still did the scope and biopsy for a baseline look and the gene testing.

cyclinglady Grand Master

My test results were "mildly positive" but the biopsy showed moderate to severe damage (Marsh Stage IIIB). My only symptom at the time was anemia and since I already had a genetic anemia and I was going through perimenopause (heavy periods), my doctors did not catch it. Only during a GI consult for a routine colonoscopy was my celiac disease caught (I seriously think my GI doc must have just attended a conference or recently read a paper about celiac diease.)

What was really shocking (and put me into denial), was the fact my husband had been gluten-free for 12 years. He went gluten-free per the advice of my allergist and his GP. Sinus infections, snoring, fatigue, body aches? Give up gluten. It worked!!!!!! We really would have like a formal diagnosis though!

GottaSki Mentor

Thank you everyone. These are the blood tests that I know where done:

Celiac AB:

Deamidated Gliadin IgA--?

TTG IgA --14

Serum IgA Quantitation--?

I wasn't told any answers except TTG IgA . My primary doc was the one to call me and say the "gluten test was abnormal and you'll need to follow a gluten free diet". Then at my GI appt yesterday that doc didn't even mention the abnormal test until I asked him. He was only going to do a colonoscopy to check for colitis but I asked him what that test result was my other doctor was talking about. That made him go back to look - like he hadn't before! - and said the TTG IgA was 14 and so he would do a biopsy as well. He still wasn't convinced. My liver, etc were fine. I just wonder what he's not convinced about.

Unfortunately not all gastroenterologists are well educated with regard to celiac disease. We should not have to convince our doctors...sadly it happens far too often.

Just a suggestion, but I would check if there are any celiac savvy GIs near you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Russ H replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    2. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      New Study Reveals Hidden Gut Damage in Celiac Disease—Even Without Gluten (+Video)

    3. - Wheatwacked replied to Ginger38's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      6

      The Struggle Has Overtaken Me

    4. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    5. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Coeliac or not coeliac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,197
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    Caron Ervin
    Newest Member
    Caron Ervin
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Russ H
      Do you have the standard range for the test results you received? A level of anti-tTG2 antibodies at least 10x the standard range is almost certainly (>98%) due to coeliac disease. Moderately raised levels can be caused by other conditions as well as coeliac disease. Accuracy of the No-Biopsy Approach for the Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis It is possible to have latent or early stage coeliac disease without histological changes visible by microscope. As has been suggest in this thread, if the repeat test comes up negative and serology is high, request an HLA genetic test from your specialist. Only 40 % of the population carries an HLA gene variant enabling the development of coeliac disease - if you test negative for this, it is quite unlikely that you have coeliac disease.  
    • Wheatwacked
      Hi @Ginger38, By now you know that these things improve without gluten. I once saw an interview with a corporation executive where he proudly declared that his wheat products are more addictive than potato chips. Dr Fuhrman (Eat to Live) said find foods that are friendly to you to be friends with.  
    • cristiana
      Hi @CC90 Ah... that is very interesting.  Although it is very annoying for you to have to go through it all again, I would say that almost sounds like an admission that they didn't look far enough last time?   I could be wrong, but I would not be at all surprised if they find something on the next attempt.  Coeliac damage can be very patchy, as I understand it, so that's why my own gastroenterologist always likes to point out that he's taken lots of samples!  In the kindest possible way (you don't want to upset the person doing the procedure!) I'd be inclined to tell them what happened last time and to ask them in person to take samples lower down, as  if your health system is anything like the one in my country, communication between GPs, consultants and hospitals isn't always very good.  You don't want the same mistake to be made again. You say that your first endoscopy was traumatic?  May I ask, looking at your spelling of coeliac, was this done at an NHS hospital in England?  The reason for the question is that one of my NHS diagnosed friends was not automatically offered a sedative and managed without one.  Inspired by her, I tried to have an endoscopy one time, in a private setting, without one, so that I could recover quicker, but I had to request sedative in the end it was so uncomfortable.    I am sorry that you will have to go through a gluten challenge again but to make things easier, ensure you eat things containing gluten that you will miss should you have to go gluten free one day. 😂 I was told to eat 2 slices of normal wholemeal bread or the equivalent every day in the weeks before , but I also opted for Weetabix and dozens of Penguin chocolate biscuits.  (I had a very tight headache across my temple for days before the procedure, which I thought was interesting as I had that frequently growing up. - must have been a coeliac symptom!)  Anyway, I do hope you soon get the answers you are looking for and do keep us posted. Cristiana  
    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
×
×
  • Create New...