Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Mildly Positive, Bloodwork Negative On Gluten-Free Diet


Noobette

Recommended Posts

Noobette Apprentice

Hello! I apologize in advance for a long post. Some background: I started eating a mostly Paleo diet 5 years ago, for general health reasons. I would cheat and eat wheat on special occasions about once a month, with little ill effect.

 

One year ago, I did the 23andme genetic testing, which to my surprise, showed I carried 2 genes putting me at high risk for celiac: HLA-Dq2.5 and HLA-Dq8. This came as a surprise because no one in my family had been diagnosed with celiac, and the only common celiac symptom from before this current episode was lifelong canker sores in my mouth, which largely went away after going Paleo. I decided to stop eating wheat (and rye and barley) altogether, and have not knowingly consumed gluten in a full year. HOWEVER, I am not careful about cross-contamination; my messy teenagers still cook with wheat in my kitchen. I figured I did not have celiac, and minimizing my gluten exposure to traces would be enough to prevent me getting it (since gluten exposure is required for developing the disease).

 

Eight months ago, after a period of major stress (thanks, teenagers!), I started getting upper GI symptoms (dyspepsia, fullness/bloating/discomfort and chest pressure after eating). I had a bunch of negative testing, and tried a variety of different things (omeprazole, various supplements, low FODMAP diet) with no relief. I also developed fatigue and exercise intolerance, and lost 10 pounds (this was alarming because I was already pretty thin).

 

A month ago, I had an upper endoscopy (I’m an OR nurse and work a lot in the endoscopy room). I was very surprised when my biopsy results came back mildly positive:

  • “Duodenal mucosa with focal intraepithelial lymphocytosis without villous blunting. Features are mild and not entirely specific but they can be in association with mediation effect (sic). Clinical correlation is recommended to exclude a possibility of Celiac enteropathy.”

My doctor was as surprised as I was; since I’d been off gluten for a full year, he didn’t think testing for celiac would show anything. He talked to the pathologist, who felt that celiac was the most likely reason for my biopsy results. My doc then ordered a celiac panel, which I got back yesterday: all negative. The normal ranges didn’t print out, but I saw them and I am well within the normal or negative range.

  • Endomysial IgA Ab            negative
  • Tiss Transglutamin IgG      <1.2
  • Tiss Transglutamin IgA       <1.2
  • Gliadin (deamidat) IgG        <10.0
  • Gliadin (deamidat) IgA        <10.0
  • Also negative: H. pylori and complete blood count (except a low WBC of 3.8, which isn't very low)

I know I went about this bass-akwards, but I never thought I had a chance of having celiac until years after I had stopped eating wheat except very occasionally. 

 

MY QUESTIONS: now what?! How likely is this to be celiac? Is there anything I can do short of a gluten challenge to get an accurate diagnosis? Is Cyrex testing legit?

 

I don’t mind being wheat-free, but being STRICTLY gluten-free sounds so much harder, especially when away from home, and I don’t want to be a pain-in-the-ass party guest if it’s not necessary. I talked to one auto-immune expert, and she thought it was likely I had celiac before, but was asymptomatic.

 

I'm going to a GI doc in a couple of weeks, but I wanted to run this by you experts before running out to buy new kitchen stuff. Any advice is very welcome!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



BlessedMommy Rising Star

It sounds like you do have celiac, if you have the genes for it and the villous atrophy. The blood is most likely negative from your diet.

 

Good luck with your GI appointment!

beth01 Enthusiast

I would assume that your antibody tests would have been positive had you been eating gluten.  I would wait and see what the GI recommends.  Maybe they will want the gluten challenge or maybe they will say you are a celiac and quit the gluten for good, cc and all.  Good luck and welcome to the board.

SMRI Collaborator

I agree, you are most likely Celiac and your diet altered the blood work results.  The question is, does it matter to you to get a firm diagnosis or not?  If not, start eating gluten-free and don't cheat.  You could look at your numbers more like a 1 year check up for a Celiac and say "wow, going gluten-free really does make a difference" :D.  If you want total confirmation then you can prepare yourself for feeling like crud for the next 2 months and do the gluten challenge and see what happens.

I would get your kids tested as well before they go off gluten!

frieze Community Regular

I don't see a total IgA here...

BlessedMommy Rising Star

There are other members here who have gotten negative bloodwork and a positive biopsy and their doctors diagnosed them with celiac. I think that unless you can find some other explanation of why the biopsy is positive, then that is pretty diagnostic right there.

BlessedMommy Rising Star

Keep in mind that there is a 5 factor list. If you have 4 out of 5, it is solid enough for a celiac diagnosis.

 

1) Symptoms of celiac

2) Resolution of symptoms on the gluten free diet

3) Genes for celiac

4) Positive bloodwork

5) Positive biopsy

 

So if you had everything but the positive bloodwork, then likely the doctor could diagnose it from those other factors.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Noobette Apprentice

Thanks for all the responses!

One clarification: my biopsy did not show villus atrophy, just intraepithelial lymphocytes.

BlessedMommy, I would say I have 3 out of the 5 criteria for diagnosis: symptoms (but they are vague and could be blamed on many things), genes, and (mildly) positive biopsy. Resolution of symptoms can't be tested since I've already been gluten free for a while.

Frieze, I read about the total IgA after getting my labs back. Would that be worth asking for, given that I've been gluten-free for a year and my celiac panel is likely to be negative anyway?

I'm leaning towards going full bore and cleaning/rearranging my kitchen so cross-contamination is less likely.

1desperateladysaved Proficient

Welcome Noobet,

 

Resolution of canker sores could certainly be one evidence of the diet working.  Perhaps you could find more changes if you recall them from early gluten free days.  Maybe you could take a list to the GI doctor if you looked at the 300 symptom list.  Your doctor seems to be up on things, not too many know that you would be falsely negative if you currently avoid gluten.  It sounds to me like you would possibly have social trouble if you did not have very decisive results.  IF that is the case a gluten challenge would be in order.  If there are reasons that you wouldn't want to do that, put them on your symptoms list!

 

Dee

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,924
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vainoh
    Newest Member
    Vainoh
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      The first set of results show two positive results for celiac disease, so at the very least it looks like you could have it, or at the least NCGS.   Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.      
    • Scott Adams
      Elevated tissue transglutaminase IgA (tTG-IgA) levels are highly specific for celiac disease, and they are a key biomarker used in its diagnosis. However, there are some rare instances where elevated tTG-IgA levels have been reported in conditions other than celiac disease. While these cases are not common, they have been documented in the literature. Below are some examples and references to studies or reviews that discuss these scenarios:  1. Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS)    - NCGS typically does not cause elevated tTG-IgA levels, as it is not an autoimmune condition. However, some individuals with NCGS may have mild elevations in tTG-IgA due to intestinal inflammation or other factors, though this is not well-documented in large studies.    - Reference: Catassi, C., et al. (2013). *Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: The New Frontier of Gluten-Related Disorders*. Nutrients, 5(10), 3839–3853. [DOI:10.3390/nu5103839](https://doi.org/10.3390/nu5103839)  2. Autoimmune Diseases    - Elevated tTG-IgA levels have been reported in other autoimmune conditions, such as type 1 diabetes, autoimmune hepatitis, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This is thought to be due to cross-reactivity or polyautoimmunity.    - Reference: Sblattero, D., et al. (2000). *The Role of Anti-Tissue Transglutaminase in the Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease*. Autoimmunity Reviews, 1(3), 129–135. [DOI:10.1016/S1568-9972(01)00022-3](https://doi.org/10.1016/S1568-9972(01)00022-3)  3. Chronic Liver Disease    - Conditions like chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis can sometimes lead to elevated tTG-IgA levels, possibly due to increased intestinal permeability or immune dysregulation.    - Reference: Vecchi, M., et al. (2003). *High Prevalence of Celiac Disease in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease: A Role for Gluten-Free Diet?* Gastroenterology, 125(5), 1522–1523. [DOI:10.1016/j.gastro.2003.08.031](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastro.2003.08.031)  4. Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)    - Some patients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis may have elevated tTG-IgA levels due to intestinal inflammation and damage, though this is not common.    - Reference: Walker-Smith, J. A., et al. (1990). *Celiac Disease and Inflammatory Bowel Disease*. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 10(3), 389–391. [DOI:10.1097/00005176-199004000-00020](https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-199004000-00020)  5. Infections and Parasites    - While infections (e.g., giardiasis) are more commonly associated with false-positive tTG-IgA results, chronic infections or parasitic infestations can sometimes lead to elevated levels due to mucosal damage.    - Reference: Rostami, K., et al. (1999). *The Role of Infections in Celiac Disease*. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 11(11), 1255–1258. [DOI:10.1097/00042737-199911000-00010](https://doi.org/10.1097/00042737-199911000-00010)  6. Cardiac Conditions    - Rarely, heart failure or severe cardiovascular disease has been associated with elevated tTG-IgA levels, possibly due to gut ischemia and increased intestinal permeability.    - Reference: Ludvigsson, J. F., et al. (2007). *Celiac Disease and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study*. American Heart Journal, 153(6), 972–976. [DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.019](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.019)  Key Points: - Elevated tTG-IgA levels are highly specific for celiac disease, and in most cases, a positive result strongly suggests celiac disease. - Other conditions causing elevated tTG-IgA are rare and often accompanied by additional clinical findings. - If celiac disease is suspected, further testing (e.g., endoscopy with biopsy) is typically required for confirmation. If you’re looking for more specific studies, I recommend searching PubMed or other medical databases using terms like "elevated tTG-IgA non-celiac" or "tTG-IgA in non-celiac conditions." Let me know if you’d like help with that!
    • MaryMJ
      I called zero water and they state their filters do not contain gluten or gluten containing ingredients. 
    • trents
      I agree. Doesn't look like you have celiac disease. Your elevated DGP-IGG must be due to something else. And it was within normal at that after your gluten challenge so it is erratic and doesn't seem to be tied to gluten consumption.
    • Jack Common
      Hello! I want to share my situation. I had symptoms like some food intolerance, diarrhea, bloating, belching one year ago. I thought I could have celiac disease so I did the blood tests. The results were ambiguous for me so I saw the doctor and he said I needed to do tests to check whether I had any parasites as well. It turned out I had giardiasis. After treating it my symptoms didn't disappear immediately. And I decided to start a gluten free diet despite my doctor said I didn't have it. After some time symptoms disappeared but that time it wasn't unclear whether I'd had them because of eliminating gluten or that parasite. The symptoms for both are very similar. Giardiasis also damages the small intestine. The only way to check this was to start eating bread again as I thought. Now about my results.   These are my first test results (almost a year ago) when I had symptoms: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 6.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 3.0 is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.91 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) IgA Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) IgG Endomysial antibody (EMA) - < 1:10 titer (for the lab I did the tests < 1:10 titer is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 0.3 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 46.1 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests 0.0 - 6.0 is normal)   Then I didn't eat gluten for six months. Symptoms disappeared. And I started a gluten challenge. Before the challenge I did some tests. My results: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 0.5 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 28 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   During the challenge I ate 6 slices of wheat bread. After the challenge my results are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) The Tissue Transglutaminase IgG antibody - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.31 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgA - 2.0 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 2.13 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   To be sure I continued consuming gluten. I ate a lot each day. Two months after I did the tests again. My results I got today are: The Tissue Transglutaminase IgA antibody - 0.7 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal) Immunoglobulin A - 1.62 g/l (for the lab I did the tests 0.7 to 4 g/l is normal) Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG - 25.6 U/ml (for the lab I did the tests < 20 U/ml is normal)   Nowadays I didn't have any symptoms except tiredness but I think it's just work. I think it was this parasite because two years ago, for example, and before I didn't have these symptoms and I always ate gluten food. But I'm still not sure especially because the Deamidated gliadin peptide IgG results are sometimes high. What do you think? @Scott Adams
×
×
  • Create New...