Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

High Platelet


david's mom

Recommended Posts

david's mom Newbie

My son was diagnosed with celiac in May of this year. He did not have the typical reactions, according to the doctors. The blood test in May came back with a platelet count of 427, they said that's a little high but nothing to worry about. We had another blood test done last week and it came back at 447,which they are saying is still no big deal. When does it become a big deal? He is having problems with things looking like they are far away, that's his way of descibing whatever is happening. It doesn't happen all of the time. And it doesn't seem to affect his vision. We are getting referred to a neurologist. I don't know what to expect or even where to start looking. I knew something was wrong when he was a baby, but was told he would out grow the vomitting. He did have reflux and throat nodules, both of which are healed. Anyway, I just thought I would see if anyone could help educate me on this. Thanks a bunch!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



julie5914 Contributor

Here's some info I found online. I don't believe that number is something to worry about. It is more something to worry about when it goes above 1,000. It could be a flag that something is going on, but that something is most likely celiac.

Too many platelets is called thrombocytosis. When it is caused by something else, it's secondary, or reactive, which is most likely the case. Here are some causes of secondary high platelet count:

Infection (acute and chronic)

Inflammatory disorders (eg Kawasaki's disease)

Chronic iron deficiency

Acute or chronic blood loss

Tissue damage from trauma or surgery

Medicines (steroid, vincristine)

Splenectomy and hyposplenism

Malignancy (Hodgkin's disease, solid tumours)

Rebound from chemotherapy

In your sons case, with a high count but still not too high, I would guess infection or iron deficiency, as these are likely in celiac.

I'm not a doctor or a nurse or anything though. I just read a lot. :D

david's mom Newbie

Thanks Julie. I found that info too. He's not on any meds for anything and hasn't been sick. I was also told that if he's on a gluten-free diet then he shouldn't have inflammation. I really appreciate you looking stuff up for me. I guess I'll just keep a watch on him and continue to do what we're doing. :)

julie5914 Contributor

I'm gluten free since June and still have all sorts of problems, so it may just take a while. I am like you though, I hate when they don't explain stuff unless it's a big sign something's already wrong. If a number is out of range and possibly going up, I want to stop it before it goes further. If it were that normal, it wouldn't be out of range, would it!

Eliza13 Contributor

I also had a high white blood cell count as part of my symptoms.

  • 6 months later...
helper Newbie

Has anybody out there researched a possible fungus or yeast link to celiac with a high platelet count? I was just reading on an internet site the other day that inflammation may be a cause of platelet count and I know that fungus overgrowth can sure cause inflammation. I also know that there are already some people who write in to celiac.com saying that when they cured their candida yeast problems their celiac symptoms disappeared, also. Yeast is another way of saying fungus, isn't it? Many who suffer Celiac Disease are told that corn is an acceptable grain since there's no gluten so I bet lots of you eat a plenty of it--especially kids. But corn is considered a universally contaminated grain--loaded with molds and fungus, or so I've read. If it were me I would try staying away from foods that not only have gluten but also high fungus or yeast contents like corn, peanuts, mushrooms and stay away from sugar also since yeast/fungus needs sugar to grow. What have you got to lose? I've heard a book that explains some of this reasoning is, The Fungus Link by Doug Kaufmann. He has a show on dish network and cable called, Know the Cause. I believe he has worked with a doctor in Texas who believes the way to treat celiac disease is by supplementing a good gluten-free diet with taking an anti-fungal drug like nystatin or diflucan along with a pro-biotic (good bacteria). This doctor says that a lot of celiac sufferers seem to have been a lot of anti-biotics in the past and may have destroyed the good bacteria that keeps yeast in check. This may not be new information but perhaps it will help someone. There has to be some reason why not everyone is helped by just following a gluten free diet and using the more traditional treatment. Maybe this is the missing link in some of your cases. I heard this discussed on another cable show called, Call to Health. They have a website too. The M.D. and nurse specializing in nutrition on the show seemed to agree with this fungus link idea for some celiac sufferers. I'd check out that book or shows and discuss it with my doctor.

Kaycee Collaborator

Years ago, nearly 20 years ago I had a high platelet count, antibodies, and the doctor thought it was a rumbling appendix. So he did not go further. It was not, but about 5 months later, he realized that I had a cyst besides my ovary about the size of a grapefruit. How he could miss that I don't know.

My question is, would the high levels be related to the cyst, or would it be related to having celiac all those years ago? Could it be both.

Needless to say, I never went back to that doctor, as and for 18 months I had complained about severe abdominal pain, only to be told it was physcosematic, However you spell that), then he thought it was my appendix after the test results came back.

I have only been diagnosed with celiac for 4 months, and would like to know whether I could've had it all those years back. As it is I think have had it for years and years.

Cathy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Tim Semas
    Newest Member
    Tim Semas
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...