Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Is A Celiac Dx Necessary?


FruitEnthusiast

Recommended Posts

FruitEnthusiast Enthusiast

I already know I'm gluten intolerant. I'm wondering how important it is to have an official Celiac DX, and I could use some opinions.

 

I just went to see a new GI at UCLA who specializes in Celiac/Gluten Intolerance to address my ongoing chronic C that is closely related to the multiple food sensitivities that started after I went gluten-free 2 1/2 years ago. I'm still sick and figuring out what I can and can't eat.

 

Of course this new Dr. thinks it's important to know if I have Celiac or not. I asked him how Celiac treatment would differ from NCGI treatment. He said Celiac is an autoimmune disorder with inflammation which makes it more serious, and it would be more important to monitor my vitamin/mineral levels to guard against bone loss, Vit D deficiency, Thyroid problems, etc.

 

I knew all of that already from what I've learned on this site and my other readings. So far he's given me a Celiac Genetic blood test, but I don't have the results yet. Will that test tell me anything?

 

I've always said I won't do the "Gluten Challenge", and he hasn't asked me to - yet. Honestly I don't think I'm well enough to do it. I have enough trouble getting what I can eat in my body… and out again (sorry if that's TMI)

 

Does anyone think doing the "Gluten Challenge" and getting a small intestine biopsy is worth it for a certain DX. Or can I continue to monitor myself and get tested for deficiencies/imbalances as if I had Celiac to be on the safe side?

 

Is it necessary to know for sure if I have Celiac? I'm going to continue being gluten-free regardless, and continue taking extra good care of myself.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



SMRI Collaborator

The only issue I could see is your insurance company not covering the tests without a diagnosis that supports needed those tests annually or however often.

FruitEnthusiast Enthusiast

Yes, I was wondering about that too, something to consider. Thanks.

WinterSong Community Regular

Besides the insurance issue.....

 

I'm fortunate enough to have a solid diagnosis. I've heard a lot of gluten sensitive people on this board say that they would get too sick doing the gluten challenge and for them it wasn't worth it. They just treat it as seriously as a Celiac would. My mom is also one of those people. 

 

Some people feel like they can cheat if they don't have a Celiac diagnosis. My sister is most likely gluten intolerant or Celiac, but she won't do a thing without positive blood work. 

1desperateladysaved Proficient

Is there some reason to believe you would ever have serious doubts?  Would someone very near (in the house) have serious doubts which could cause you trouble for you or them?  Would you qualify for tax advantages or other advantages if you had a celiac diagnosis?  Personally I thought for me the gluten challenge would be unethical, because I perceived my reaction could be extreme or dangerous.  I did a genetic test and think it was useful.  I found that incredibly I did have 2 copies each of DQ2 and DQ8.  From that I could somewhat guess at my children's having at least one of the genes and both of my parents had to have it.  Now, they can all watch for symptoms and hopefully won't have to suffer for 30 years before making a discovery of celiac.

 

  I do like to keep track of my nutrient levels and I think it could be much cheaper to check some of those than to do the challenge and associated testing.  Have you ever had anemia or other known deficiencies?  I also think it could be good to do an endoscopy (I finally did) to ) see if the damage is healed,( if there was any), and to look for other possible causes for the symptoms.  The celiac damage should be healed up after 2 years.  If you feel your symptoms changing when you went gluten free will keep you consistent with the diet, all you must do is get better!  Keep your diet as varied as possible.  I had to go for some new foods and a few old ones.

 

Best wishes for healing.

 

Dee

 

We have both been at this a couple of years.  I am sorry to hear that you are still having some really tough times. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,877
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    SamEsplanade
    Newest Member
    SamEsplanade
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Bebee
      I have been diagnosed with Microscopic Colitis (LC) for quite a few years, so I have been gluten-free and DF.  I would like to get tested for Celiac Disease because of the possibility of cross contamination and colon cancer.  And if you were hospitalized and didn't have a celiac diagnosis you could not get gluten-free food, I don't know if that is true or not.  Also because there is chance of colon cancer so I want to know if I have Celiac Disease and need to be on very restrictive diet.  The only testing I did was a sigmoid scope and Enter Lab but no gene testing.  I know I can go back to eating gluten for a few months, but I would worry you would have to stay home for the few months while getting gluten.  What other options do I have?  Should I do the gene testing?  Maybe through Entero Lab?  Any other tests?  How important is it to have Celiac diagnosed? Thank you! Barb
    • trents
      Take it easy! I was just prompting you for some clarification.  In the distillation process, the liquid is boiled and the vapor descends up a tube and condenses into another container as it cools. What people are saying is that the gluten molecules are too large and heavy to travel up with the vapor and so get left behind in the original liquid solution. Therefore, the condensate should be free of gluten, no matter if there was gluten in the original solution. The explanation contained in the second sentence I quoted from your post would not seem to square with the physics of the distillation process. Unless, that is, I misunderstood what you were trying to explain.
    • Mynx
      No they do not contradict each other. Just like frying oil can be cross contaminated even though the oil doesn't contain the luten protein. The same is the same for a distilled vinegar or spirit which originally came from a gluten source. Just because you don't understand, doesn't mean you can tell me that my sentences contradict each other. Do you have a PhD in biochemistry or friends that do and access to a lab?  If not, saying you don't understand is one thing anything else can be dangerous to others. 
    • Mynx
      The reason that it triggers your dermatitis herpetiformis but not your celiac disease is because you aren't completely intolerant to gluten. The celiac and dermatitis herpetiformis genes are both on the same chronometer. Dermatitis herpetoformus reacts to gluten even if there's a small amount of cross contamination while celiac gene may be able to tolerate a some gluten or cross contamination. It just depends on the sensitivity of the gene. 
    • trents
      @Mynx, you say, "The reason this is believed is because the gluten protein molecule is too big to pass through the distillation process. Unfortunately, the liquid ie vinegar is cross contaminated because the gluten protein had been in the liquid prior to distillation process." I guess I misunderstand what you are trying to say but the statements in those two sentences seem to contradict one another.
×
×
  • Create New...