Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I Am Completely Discouraged!


Sbwife14

Recommended Posts

Sbwife14 Rookie

I've posted on other forums but I need to start here. I have all of the classics symptoms of gluten intolerance. I had celiac panel drawn and it was negative. My PCP is convinced I have a food intolerance. She referred me to a different GI doctor out of town wanting a colonoscopy and another EGD. My visit was today. She wouldn't run another celiac panel and said repeat EGD is not necessary and also said she sees no reason to have a colonoscopy. I could have a gluten intolerance but there is no test for that. She does not believe I have celiac. Instead thinks I might have intestinal spasms?? That does not explain my clear negative reactions when I consume gluten. This is the second GI doctor and neither seem interested in granting my requests! I just crIed after she left....I have no idea what to do next?? Except go back to a strict gluten free diet. I had been gluten light and avoiding foods that triggered huge responses of migraines!! Any advice? This is so frustrating!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nvsmom Community Regular

If they aren't going to test you further, you may just need to go back on the gluten-free diet (not gluten-light) without a GI doctor's blessing.  Treatment is the same for celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) - the gluten-free diet.  Be strict with it.  If you are a celiac you can't have any gluten or you'll hurt yourself, and if you have NCGS you will negatively affect your health with small amounts of gluten.  Consider jumping in 100%.  You already know you feel better that way... No matter what the doctors think.

 

Best wishes.

Tricia7 Newbie

While getting a diagnosis is ideal, even if they won't test you further just stay gluten free. My test was negative, but my reaction to eating gluten is too severe to even consider going back to it. Those tests have a high rate of false negatives. Do you have some reason you have to PROVE you can't have gluten?  I've heard people talk about how they need medical proof for work or school, or even to keep them strictly on a gluten free diet.

 

My complete migraine relief is enough to keep me 100% gluten-free. Not to mention all the other numerous other symptom relief I have had.  And while my primary care doc doesn't seem to understand celiac disease, and just marked that off the list when my test was negative, I've told him I am still strict gluten-free and all the benefits I have seen from it and he's supportive in that if it's working for me to keep doing it. (even thoughI can seem to convince him I could possibly have celiac disease) 

 

Bottom line is you're not alone. The average person with celiac disease takes years to get a diagnosis. Don't wait for it, if you're feeling better off gluten and worse on it, stay the course and do what makes you feel better.

Sbwife14 Rookie

I guess what I was hoping from this visit to a second GI was more of a clinical confirmation that I do have a gluten intolerance and prove whether it is def not celiac or if it's NCGS. I don't need proof for work or school...just my own peace of mind. I went 100% gluten-free for 7 days when I connected my symptoms to possible Celiac and all of my symptoms disappeared. And I felt good! I guess I was hoping for something concrete from a doc standpoint. Migraines, foggy headed, inflammation and constipation are my biggest complaint...oh and sneezing after eating certain things. It's just very frustrating for me to actually do the research and trial and feel the difference and a specialist who is supposed to know about celiac is unwilling to even try to get answers. My negative labs were one year ago and why not biopsy?? Regarding food, one question I have is why things like pizza and noodles and white bread give me migraines but breaded things like chicken or eating a hamburger with the bun does not...eating baked goods like cookies, biscuits, cinnamon rolls makes me sneeze at least 10 times....it's all wheat flour and gluten...why are certain foods have worse reactions than others? She does have me staying off of gluten stating that I could be gluten intolerant but I do understand the only test for that is being gluten-free and see what happens. I did that and saw very positive results so I know I should stay on it. Just hoping for clinical diagnosis...*sigh*

Sbwife14 Rookie

One of the main reasons I went is intermittently I also have attacks where I have bloating, excess GERD, gas and waves of epigastric pain. This all lasts for several days at a time when it happens. And I have an area in the upper abdomen around the pancreas that does not look right. It "pooches out and just looks odd". She never addressed this. We have a patient who is celiac and I asked her questions about her diagnosis and she mentioned her doc to her that her to school would never be the same again...that her "pooch " was a result of damage. So many unknowns. I was hoping for more answers.

Sbwife14 Rookie

Oh geez auto correct is crazy! Her doctor mentioned to her that her stomach would never be the same, that her pooch was the result of damage to her intestines.......

SMRI Collaborator

Being gluten-free for only 7 days and having all of your symptoms disappear is pretty amazing.  Obviously your body doesn't like something and if eating gluten-free makes you feel better, by all means, eat gluten-free.  If you had complete panels done twice, it is highly unlikely you have Celiac.  The false negative rate is very, very small and having tests done by 2 different doctors with the same results pretty much eliminates that possibility.  Whether it is Celiac or a gluten sensitivity really is irrelevant since the treatment is the same.  Stop eating gluten, feel better and move on.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Sbwife14 Rookie

To clarify, I had one full panel. The second GI doctor wouldn't run a second panel. Nonetheless, I was amazed as well and I wasn't expecting it! I ate pizza after 7 days and had the worst migraine ever!!! I plan on eating gluten free because doc or not, I know how I feel. It's just incredibly frustrating!!!!

BlessedMommy Rising Star

If you had a negative test and had all your symptoms resolve gluten free, just have the doctor diagnose you with non-celiac gluten sensitivity. That's still a diagnosis. 

squirmingitch Veteran

If you were gluten light or gluten free prior to your blood panel then that would have scotched the results. 

At any rate, you know how you felt gluten free so just go for it.

notme Experienced

false negatives on blood test are *very* common.  if you feel better off the gluten, no reason you need to eat it.  just eat a clean, nutrition-filled diet and don't worry about it.  honestly, i wish they would come up with a better test!!  one you wouldn't need to be eating gluten to be tested accurately.  that being said:  i wouldn't go back to eating gluten even if somebody told me i didn't have celiac.  that's what a difference this diet has made on my whole body :)  and my "pooch" is finally going away.  (whew.  thought i was gonna hafta work out there for a second lolz like i don't get enough exercise running up and down the stairs because i forgot what i went up there for....   <_<  )

BlessedMommy Rising Star

I don't have a definitive diagnosis and if someone offered me a million dollars to eat gluten for 3 months I would refuse. LOL!

 

Seriously, you know your own body best. As an adult, you can choose what goes in your own mouth. People who really love you and care about you will support you.

 

Lots of people don't even understand what celiac is or don't care about what I do or don't have anyway. They just know that gluten gives me serious complications and makes me miserable.

Sbwife14 Rookie

Thank you all so much! It helps to know I have a group of people that understands. I agree and I plan to be more strict with my diet. No lie...it's hard cause in the medical field I have to eat out a lot....and don't cook like I used to so I have a lot of changing to do to be successful!

SMRI Collaborator

false negatives on blood test are *very* common.  if you feel better off the gluten, no reason you need to eat it.  just eat a clean, nutrition-filled diet and don't worry about it.  honestly, i wish they would come up with a better test!!  one you wouldn't need to be eating gluten to be tested accurately.  that being said:  i wouldn't go back to eating gluten even if somebody told me i didn't have celiac.  that's what a difference this diet has made on my whole body :)  and my "pooch" is finally going away.  (whew.  thought i was gonna hafta work out there for a second lolz like i don't get enough exercise running up and down the stairs because i forgot what i went up there for....   <_<  )

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

Just for clarification, 1-2% test false negative and 1-3% test false positive.  It's not common.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to GlutenFreeChef's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      12

      Blood Test for Celiac wheat type matters?

    2. - trents replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    3. - JudyLou posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    4. - marzian commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      A Future Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet? Scientists Test a New Cell Therapy for Celiac Disease (+Video)

    5. - Jmartes71 posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      0

      Medications

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,142
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Mark Conway
    Newest Member
    Mark Conway
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      no argument. Never take the pills sold for Nuclear events, except in a nuclear event when instructed to by authorities.  Some of these go up to 130 milligrams per pill. 5000 times the strength of the dietary supplement.  130 times the safe upper limit.  130 mg = 130,000 mcg. Dietary supplements like Lugol's Solution and Liquid Iodine are 50 micrograms per drop.  It takes 20 drops to reach the safe upper limit. In the US the Safe upper limit is 1100 mcg.  In Europe 600 mcg and in Japan 3000 mcg ( 3 mg).
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
    • Jmartes71
      Hello, just popped in my head to ask this question about medications and celiac? I have always had refurse reaction to meds since I can remember  of what little meds my body is able to tolerate. I was taking gabapentin 300mg for a week,  in past I believe 150? Any ways it amps me up not able to sleep, though very tired.However I did notice it helped with my bloating sibo belly.I hate that my body is that sensitive and medical doesn't seem to take seriously. Im STILL healing with my skin, eye, and now ms or meningioma ( will know in April  which)and dealing with this limbo nightmare. I did write my name, address ect on the reclamation but im not tech savvy and not sure if went through properly. I called my city representative in Stanislaus County and asked if theres a physical paper i can sign for proclamation for celiac and she had no clue about what I was saying, so I just said I'll go back on website. 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not saying that some celiacs won't need it, but it should be done under a doctor's supervision because it can cause lots of problems in some people.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.