Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Halloween Celiac Stereotypes


kenlove

Recommended Posts

kenlove Rising Star

just wondered how people  react to this type of cartoon.  Sure its funny  but with the increase of the fad, does it do us any good or cause more problems when these things appear?

 

post-11092-0-34771000-1414801785_thumb.j


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



StephanieL Enthusiast

Honestly, I don't like it. It makes it look like these are choices for some kids which it isn't. I wouldn't ever send a vegan kid out with the expectation that they can ask for special things. It's a "You get what you get and you don't throw a fit" thing for me.  Now I do "intercept" or tell my kiddo not to even tough the nutty things.  Because of allergies we actually don't allow them to keep any of the candy they get (the Switch Witch comes with small toys for them in place of the candy) and they get some safe things from us.  But if they went out and specifically ASKED for XYZ, it would be the last time they went out. 

bartfull Rising Star

But you know, in the grand scheme of things, the cartoon is (in a way) pointing out that America has become more health conscious, and that can only be a good thing.

nvsmom Community Regular

To me, it seems to be poking fun at the egocentric way of things now a days.  It seems that people want it their way, with a sense of entitlement, and feel that they should be accommodated.  I'm not saying that it isn't great to try to accommodate people but for those people without a food issue, these food problems won't be on their radar; asking to be accommodated in certain places (like trick or treating) would be beyond their level of understanding... so they poke fun back.

 

I'm babbling. This joke seems to be about how people want other people to look after them even when they should be looking out for them selves, its just geared at food issues.... Can you tell I'm a conservative?  LOL  ;)

BlessedMommy Rising Star

Yes, I think that no matter whether a person's food issue is voluntary, medical, or religious, they have an obligation to look out for their selves. 

InterstellarallergyGal Newbie

​I liked it in a way that it makes a point of American consumers because we have become more conscious to the food allergy movement. However, it also takes on the side that children are as easily related to the food movement topic as adults are. Although there are children with food allergy, not all take on this role in steering clear from the foods and its also a sad statement in the way that it represents the kids who can't go trick-or-treating normally. I would have been devastated as a child knowing that I couldn't eat candy, let alone revolve my life around what not to eat. It reminds me of a post I had got on Facebook about people with celiacs disease, saying " I have celiac disease, but the new gluten-free fad makes me sounds like a pretentious hipster."

SMRI Collaborator

I'd be mortified if my child went to someone's house T or T'ing and asked for specific candy.  If they had issues with food for whatever reason, we'd deal with that at home.  Health conscious or not, it's just rude.  I think the cartoon is more related to the turn our society is making into the the "all about me" mentality people have.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Brandiwine Contributor

I posted this on facebook the week before Halloween, I just thought it kinda funny and had a good point behind it such as the rising food allergies in our children. The comments I received I didn't take kindly to. Like it was a burden, like we choose to be gluten free or dairy free just because. My children Trick-or-Treat and when we get home we separate out what they can't have and they trade with their cousins for candy they can have. It bugs me that they see it like we are the problem.

  • 1 month later...
WinterSong Community Regular

I don't like it. What is a gender neutral candy? There are kids who will die if they accidentally eat a candy that has nuts in it. If you want candies that are 100% organic or do not have barbies or race cars plastered across the wrapper, go buy your own.

 

And I'm not trying to say anything mean about anyone and their specific life choices or the way they were born. But I had kids ask me this year if I had any candies that didn't have gluten or dairy in them because they had food intolerances. I thought that was really empowering for a child to be able to take responsibility for their own health like that. 

 

Yes, this is a cartoon poking fun at society (it's not necessarily about kids or Halloween), about how everyone wants something different and customized. But I feel like it's playing into the idea that everyone is picky. It doesn't comment that some of us have a life threatening disease.

  • 2 weeks later...
Googles Community Regular

I don't think it is funny. While we can see it as a comment on the larger aspects of society, kids with celiac (and other medical conditions) are bullied by other kids enough. They don't need to be made fun of by adults too. Even if it is social commentary. A kid who sees this isn't going to see the social commentary, just another thing that shows it is okay to make fund of kids with celiac. 

  • 1 month later...
Celiac Ninja Enthusiast

Seems funny, obviously I wouldn't go trick or treating with my specific allergies, that'd be stupid. I'd buy my own specific treats and not bother anyone else. Celiac's could just have a specialty Hallow-Treat party at home, baking specific dishes that simple but tasty, using proper precautions of course. Then invite friends/family with specific issues. AND HAVE A TREAT! :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      126,812
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    hmkr
    Newest Member
    hmkr
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.9k
    • Total Posts
      69.7k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      When you say a GI doc did an IGA five years ago and it was negative, which IGA measure do you speak of. There are several possibilities. Do you refer to the tTG-IGA? Have you had a total IGA test done? It isn't a test for celiac per se but can establish whether or not you are IGA deficient. If you are IGA deficient, it will drive individual IGA test scores down and can result in false positives. The tTG-IGA should always be accompanied by a total IGA test. When people are IGA deficient and actually do have celiac disease we often see it detected by the IGG tests. The same can be said if they have been skimping on gluten previous to the blood draw and, IMO, negatives in the IGA test spectrum with positives in the IGG spectrum can also point to NCGS or NCGS transitioning to celiac.
    • Scott Adams
      This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate. I agree that if your biopsy ends up negative, that you still may need to be gluten-free, as you could be in the non-celiac gluten sensitivity area. Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS. Be sure to eat lots of gluten daily until your endoscopy, otherwise you could get false negative results.    
    • hmkr
      I had several celiac blood tests done at a rheumatologist last month. I've had many possible symptoms over the last 23 years, including GERD/LPR, constipation, and recently joint stiffness and pain in my hands. It all started during my first pregnancy. 1/160 ANA back then as well as now with no autoimmune diagnosis. I've had undiagnosed high fevers, swollen lymphs nodes, ear pain, miscarriages, to name just a few more symptoms. I can't help but be upset at the many doctors I've been to that have missed this. A GI doctor only did the IgA 5 years ago, which was negative then too, and didn't do a biopsy as a result during an endoscopy shortly after. Deaminated Gliadin IgG Antibody test was 90, >15 being abnormal.   Deaminated Gliadin IgA Antibody, negative Tissue Transglutaminase IgG Antibody, negative Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Antibody, negative I'm scheduled for a biopsy at the end of January. The new GI doctor thinks if not celiac, I will still need to be gluten free the rest of my life due to the antibodies my body is producing. I feel like it's got to be celiac. I've been consuming gluten every day to prepare for this test. It can't come soon enough.  Thoughts on that IgG being positive and the others negative? I haven't gotten a clear explanation for that yet. Thanks in advance for any input!! 
    • Kiwifruit
      That’s good to know. Might be time to head back to my gastrointestinal doctor then.
    • trents
      Yeah, you may not have been consuming enough gluten to result in valid testing.
×
×
  • Create New...