Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy Biopsy Results Were "could Reflect Mild Celiac Sprue"?

mandykeily

Recommended Posts

mandykeily Newbie
mandykeily
Posted

I am beyond frustrated.  Ok, so here's a little background:

 

My mother was diagnosed (via biopsy) with celiac in 2000.

 

Last month, I had a miscarriage at 20 weeks.  I have two kids (6 and 2) and have never had a history of miscarriages or pregnancy issues.  In fact, they couldn't find anything wrong with my baby, except that it was small.

 

I have anemia, diarrhea, constipation, gas and stomach pain, vomiting on occassion, headaches, anxiety and irritability.

 

I had the blood work and endoscopy with biopsy.... blood work was negative and the biopsy report says "mildly increased epithelial lymphocytes"..."the changes may have no clinical consequence, but could reflect mild celiac sprue".  I did however get diagnosed with eosinophilic esophagitis (EE), which is common to have if you have celiac ((sigh)).

 

My GI doctor said my symptoms don't reflect those of celiac... Um are you kidding me???  First off, my mother vomits when she eats gluten and SHE HAS CELIAC!  I get that it may not be super common, but combined with everything else I think that statement is ridiculous!

 

Here's the thing.  We want to try to get pregnant again, and I am terrified about getting pregnant and then losing the baby and finding out 6 months or a year from now that, yep I have celiac, and had I been on the gluten-free diet, my baby would have survived.  I have an appointment with another GI doctor to get a second opinion... what do ya'll think??  How can my biopsy report say that I MAY have celiac???  I thought you either have it or you don't.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


beth01 Enthusiast
beth01
Posted

I would get a new doctor. Ask for your pathology slides to get a second opinion. If this isn't a viable option, go gluten free and live as a celiac. There is no " mild celiac sprue", you have it or you don't. The line on the pregnancy test might be light pink or dark pink, but it's still a line.

That being said, I had multiple lost pregnancies. This was 13 years before my diagnosis but I still have all the same symptoms, just not nearly as bad as I have the last year leading up to my diagnosis. Can I say it was from undiagnosed Celiac? No, I can't without a doubt say that. Do I suspect that was the issue? Hell yes I do.

I am so sorry you have had to go through this. I know how hard it is getting the nerve to get pregnant again, I know the anxiety of finding out you're pregnant again and being a wreck with worry. I did go on to have two children but I also had awful pregnancies, both my kids were early. My daughter ( she is celiac also, confirmed by blood tests a month after my diagnosis, I will tell you that story in a bit) was 4 weeks early and my son was almost 8. She was 5 lbs 12 oz and he was 3 lbs 6 oz. Both times my placenta was nearly dead when I delivered and had decreased amniotic fluid with both. I nearly lost both of them and would have lost my son had they not watched me so close because of the issues I had with my daughter. I'm not trying to scare you, just give an experience.

My doctor who was seeing my whole family at the time, didn't want to test my kids when I asked for them to be tested. He told me " don't worry, they won't be positive". Now mind you, my daughter had just spent the last year fainting oddly at school. They sent her for an EKG, ECHO, she wore a halter monitor for a month, but he wouldn't test her blood for a KNOWN GENETIC disease? Well, you know how that turned out. I also don't see that doctor any more and neither do my children.

If you could post copies of your lab results, we could help you with those. Some doctors don't do all the needed blood tests. Also, have you had your thyroid, and vitamin levels tested?

I am sure someone else will chime in and give you some more advice. Once again, I'm so sorry you are going through all this.

1desperateladysaved Proficient
1desperateladysaved
Posted

I think you did the right thing by asking for a second opinion and I hope that the next doctor will listen.  Best wishes

 

Dee

CajunChic Explorer
CajunChic
Posted

I was diagnosed the same way. Seronegative with a marsh 1. I had my genes tested and found I have double DQ2 genes. Went gluten free and saw changes, then felt bad again. Found other intolerances. There are days I doubt this dx and wonder since I'm not "officially " diagnosed. But, my body speaks for me. My dr and I are confident its celiac.

Good luck and stay diligent in your health. I had to be my own advocate!

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted

Get copies of your tests. Maybe they did not do a complete celiac panel. I only tested positive (3/2013) in one of the least popular celiac disease tests to give.

My hubby went gluten free per the bad advice of his GP and my allergist (no testing). It was a miracle (one of his symptoms was snoring)! He did that 13 years ago. No doctor suspected celiac disease even though thyroid, MS and other autoimmune disorders run in his family. He refuses to do a gluten challenge now. Can you blame him? He knows gluten makes him sick.

Your anemia? Did they figure that out or just blame in on your being a WOMAN with heavy period? Do not accept that!

Find another doctor!

Good luck and take care!

mandykeily Newbie
mandykeily
Posted
  • Author

Thank you all for your responses.  I truly appreciate it.

 

Yeah, the GI doctor goes "it looks like you're severly anemic" before doing my endoscopy.  At my appointment to discuss the results of my biopsy a couple days later, he said everything came back normal, except that I have EE (which he wrote me a 30 day steroid subscription for).  Then I get in the car and look at the report he gave me a copy of, and it says the mild celiac thing.  I definitely need to get a copy of my blood work lab results, because of course he didn't give me any numbers, just kept saying "you don't have it."  

 

I also had a genetic test done back in 2000 when my mom first got diagnosed and found out I do have the celiac gene.

 

It sucks because the soonest I can get in to get a 2nd opinion is January 6th.

 

hrenee101 Newbie
hrenee101
Posted

Sorry for your loss. I'm sorry you can't get a second opinion until January 6. I would call the office and ask to be put on a cancellation list or keep calling and see if anyone has cancelled their appointments and maybe you can get in early. This is what i do when i get told that i can't be seen in a "reasonable" time frame. I was just recently diagnosed and my doctor referred me to a nutritionist and they scheduled my initial appointment for March. They are supposed to help me learn how to eat right but i have to wait 4 months that's just ridiculous to me. Good luck, I hope you get the answers soon. 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


mandykeily Newbie
mandykeily
Posted
  • Author

Sorry for your loss. I'm sorry you can't get a second opinion until January 6. I would call the office and ask to be put on a cancellation list or keep calling and see if anyone has cancelled their appointments and maybe you can get in early. This is what i do when i get told that i can't be seen in a "reasonable" time frame. I was just recently diagnosed and my doctor referred me to a nutritionist and they scheduled my initial appointment for March. They are supposed to help me learn how to eat right but i have to wait 4 months that's just ridiculous to me. Good luck, I hope you get the answers soon. 

Thanks!!  That's a great idea!  I am going to do that this morning.  I was able to pull up all the lab work the first GI ordered... turns out, he never did a celiac panel!!!!!!!!!!!!!  I just assumed it came back negative since he said all my blood work came back normal (shame on me for not being more diligent).  From looking over the blood work, I have found that along with being anemic, I am vitamin D deficient, ANA positive (which I guess can indiciate the presence of an autoimmune disease), and have high cholesterol (LDL)... can't believe he never told me all this!  Anyway, I am definitely going to try to get seen sooner!  

mandykeily Newbie
mandykeily
Posted
  • Author

Well, I was able to get in with the GI doctor I am going to for the 2nd opinon today (someone cancelled so I got their spot).  I'll be going in for another endoscopy as well as a colonoscopy tomorrow morning.  Fingers crossed I get some answers finally.  I will post an update when I get my biopsy results back.

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

Gosh I hope you read this before you go to the appointment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

If you're on the steroids they 1st GI prescribed for you then it will skew the tests!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You have to be off those for a while before tests!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Open Original Shared Link

mandykeily Newbie
mandykeily
Posted
  • Author

Gosh I hope you read this before you go to the appointment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

If you're on the steroids they 1st GI prescribed for you then it will skew the tests!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You have to be off those for a while before tests!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Open Original Shared Link

Oh man, thank goodness I didn't fill the prescription!!  Thanks for looking out!

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

YVW! :)

And......

Have you been eating gluten-free? You need to be eating a full gluten diet for bloods & endoscopy or else you can get false negatives.

2 slices of gluten bread per day for 6 - 8 weeks.

GFinDC Veteran
GFinDC
Posted

Hi Mandy,

 

You might want to read Dr. Peter Green's book:

 

https://www.celiac.com/forums/topic/12782-new-book-celiac-disease-a-hidden-epidemic/

 

I think he recommends women wait 6 months after going gluten-free before another pregnancy.  Probably so the body has a chance to recover/heal some and restore vitamin levels to normal.  People on this forum sometimes report ongoing symptoms after going gluten-free that last up to a year or more.  Not everybody takes that long to recover but it does happen.  That time might be shortened by being extra careful of your diet choices.  Eating mostly whole foods and avoiding processed foods for example.

 

Like Squirmy said, if you aren't eating gluten before tests they are not reliable.  That means eating gluten for a period of time, not just a day before the test.

mommida Enthusiast
mommida
Posted

I am sorry for your loss.

 

I'm glad you are going for a second opinion.  It seems to me you may not have been made aware of the proper steps for an Eosinophilic Esophagitis diagnoses.  The steroid atomizer is one part of the process.  You should have been referred to an allergist (not always helpful, but if you can identify any "allergens" through testing it would be worth it)  WHEN ALL TESTING IS COMPLETE you start an elimination diet, to try and identify your "triggers"  that is usually the top 8 allergens, gluten, and peas.  If you are "triggered" by gluten ~ you are to avoid gluten just as seriously as any diagnosed Celiac.  You are at risk of getting food stuck in your esophagus from the long term damage of eosinophils.  If food gets stuck in your throat you may need emergency dilation surgery.  If you don not stop long term damage from happening, you may need to be on a feeding tube.

 

We have members here that avoid gluten because of EE diagnoses.

BlessedMommy Rising Star
BlessedMommy
Posted

Wow, so he never actually even ran the bloodwork!!

 

I would say, get that bloodwork drawn as soon as you can. Good luck!

  • 4 weeks later...
MitziG Enthusiast
MitziG
Posted

Oh SMH the idiocy of doctors never ceases to amaze me. With a first degree relative with celiac, your chances are 1 in 12. Throw in your symptoms, a questionable biopsy and a positive ANA and you might as well be waving a red flag at them. Sigh. Hope by now you have gotten some answers. I am so very sorry about losing your baby. How awful. Stories like yours are all the more heartbreaking when you know it maybe didn't have to be that way if more doctors were on the lookout for celiac. In my opinion, EVERYBODY should be screened. So very angry for you!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,256
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    GusV
    Newest Member
    GusV
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.8k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • MI-Hoosier
      Test uncertainty

      By MI-Hoosier · Posted

      Thanks again. My mom was diagnosed over 50 years ago with celiac so grew up watching her deal with the challenges of food. I have been tested a few times prior due to this but these results have me a bit stunned. I have a liver disease that has advanced rapidly with no symptoms and an allergy that could be a contributing factor that had no symptoms. I guess I’ll call it lucky my Dr ordered a rescreen of a liver ultrasound from 5 years ago that triggered this or I would likely have tripped into cirrhosis. It’s all pretty jarring.
    • Heather Hill
      Does this definitely suggest Coeliac Disease?

      By Heather Hill · Posted

      Many thanks for your responses, much appreciated.  The tests did include tTg IgA and all the other markers mentioned.  I also had sufficient total IgA so if I'm reading the Mayo clinic thing correctly, I didn't really need the anti-deaminated gliadin marker? So, if I am reading the information correctly do I conclude that as all the other markers including tTg IgA and DGP IgG and tTg IgG and EMA IgA are all negative, then the positive result for the immune response to gliadin, on it's own, is more likely to suggest some other problem in the gut rather than Coeliac disease? Until I have a view from the medics (NHS UK) then I think I will concentrate on trying to lower chronic inflammation and mend leaky gut, using L glutamine and maybe collagen powder. Thank you for your help so far.  I will get back in touch once I have a response, which sadly can take quite a long time.   Kindest Heather Hill 
    • trents
      Test uncertainty

      By trents · Posted

      To put this in perspective, most recent pretest "gluten challenge" guidelines for those having already been eating reduced gluten or gluten free for a significant time period is the daily consumption of 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of two weeks leading up to the day of testing (antibody or biopsy). And I would certainly give it more than two weeks to ensure a valid test experience. Short answer: If it were me, yes, I would assume I have celiac disease and launch full bore into gluten-free eating. I think the tTG-IGA is reliable enough and your score is solid enough to make that a reasonable conclusion. Here is an article to help you get off to a good start. It's easy to achieve a reduced gluten free state but much more difficult to achieve consistency in truly gluten-free eating. Gluten is hidden in so many ways and found in so many food products where you would never expect to find it. For example, soy sauce and canned tomato soup (most canned soups, actually), pills, medications, health supplements. It can be disguised in terminology. And then there is the whole issue of cross contamination where foods that are naturally gluten free become contaminated with gluten incidentally in agricultural activities and manufacturing processes: Eating out at restaurants is a mine field for those with celiac disease because you don't know how food is handled back in the kitchen. Gluten free noodles boiled in the same water that was used for wheat noodles, eggs cooked on the same griddle that French toast was, etc.  
    • MI-Hoosier
      Test uncertainty

      By MI-Hoosier · Posted

      Thank you for the response and article. I was placed on the Mediterranean diet and been on that now for about 3 weeks. While not gluten free I am eating very little bread or anything with gluten ie a slice of whole wheat bread every couple days so assume that would cause issues now with a biopsy.  With the condition my liver is in I am unsure moving back to higher bread consumption is ideal.  In this scenario would my test results be enough to assume positive Celiac and just move forward gluten free?
    • trents
      Test uncertainty

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @MI-Hoosier! You are operating on a misconception about your "mixed" test results. You only had two celiac disease diagnostic tests run out of six that could have been ordered if your doctor had opted for a complete celiac panel. It is perfectly normal to not test positive for all possible celiac disease diagnostic tests. That is why there is more than one test option. It is the same way with other diagnostic testing procedures for many or most other diseases. Generally, when diagnosing a condition, a number of different tests are run and a diagnosis is arrived at by looking at the total body of evidence. The tTG-IGA test is the centerpiece of celiac disease blood antibody testing and the one most commonly ordered by doctors. You were strongly positive for that test. It was not an unequivocal result, IMO.  Having said that, it is standard procedure to confirm a positive celiac disease blood antibody test result with an endoscopy/biopsy which is still considered the gold standard of celiac disease diagnosis. Had your tTG-IGA been 150 or greater, your doctor many have opted out of the endoscopy/biopsy. The absence of GI distress in the celiac disease population is very common. We call them "silent celiacs". That can change as damage to the lining of the small bowel worsens. Elevated liver enzymes/liver stress is very common in the celiac population. About 18% of celiacs experience it. I was one of them. Persistently elevated liver enzymes over a period of years in the absence of other typical causes such as hepatitis and alcohol abuse was what eventually led to my celiac disease diagnosis. But it took thirteen years to get that figured out. Within three months of going gluten free my liver enzymes were back into normal range. Thank goodness, there is more awareness these days about the many long fingers of celiac disease that are not found in the classic category of GI distress. Today, there have been over 200 symptoms/medical conditions identified as connected to celiac disease. It is critical that you not begin a gluten free diet until your endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel is over. Doing so before that procedure will invalidate it because it will allow healing of the small bowel lining to begin. Here is a link to an article covering celiac disease blood antibody testing:  
×
×
  • Create New...