Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Receptionist Phone Ettiquette


CK1901

Recommended Posts

CK1901 Explorer

Just a quick phone ettiquette question - maybe someone else has experience with this?

 

I work in the Entertainment industry for a touring theatrical production company. Everyone once and awhile, I get a stray phone call from someone equesting contact information for former cast/crew members. I expect these are mostly debt collection offices or something of that nature. They almost never understand that our touring staff is under contract and are not permanent employees. Generally the callers are vague and refuse to disclose why they need the person's contact information. Therefore, I refuse to share it with them. I feel like saying "it's an important business matter" is not an adequate rationalization to issue personal information about our employees. We don't have  a real policy on this matter, so I usually just follow my instincts if I think it's a BS call. Even though the people we work with aren't exorbitantly famous or anything, I also worry about stalkers. Some of these people have been on broadway or are sort of famous within their circles. It's not that unreasonable to look out for their safety, right? Should I be taking messages and trying to reach out to our former cast members? This seems like a pain in the ass.

Sometimes I second guess myself because honestly, we get so many telemarketers, I almost automatically switch into kill mode if the call doesn't sound legit.

 

thoughts from any former or current admin professionals?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

No where that I have ever worked - retail, hospital, restaurant, big business - would give out personal info to someone without a legitimate subpoena.    So I see no reason why you shouldn't say that you are not allowed to give that out.  "Sorry.  We aren't allowed to give out that information.  Have a nice day" Hang up before they an argue.

 

It isn't your job to take messages for these people, either.  Except maybe while they are working for you.  I don't think your boss pays you to waste time trying to find people and give them messages.

cyclinglady Grand Master

I agree with Karen. At the companies I worked at, you can never disclose anything about a current or past employee. That is a lawsuit just waiting to happen. Oh, that includes references!

By the way I was stalked. A security guard broke into the HR files and preceding to call me, mail me and even broke into my car and took just my CDs (though I could not prove that one). He was terminated and I had to move. I was creeped out for a long time.

bartfull Rising Star

When I get calls here at my business (or even at home), I always ask who is calling. If they just say, "Jeff", I will ask, "Jeff whom?". If they respond, "Jeff Smith", I will ask, "And you're representing?" If they don't answer with the name of the company, I just tell them straight out that if they don't identify themselves I refuse to talk to them.

CK1901 Explorer

Thanks all! Usually if it's an employment verification, i just forward it along to our PEO. I thought I was behaving accordingly, but it's just one of those things that no one has ever discussed at my job. Instances where I would consider it acceptable would include insurance calls related to worker's comp claims or something else legitimate where you can reference that it's OKAY. Phone solicitors are very pushy these days and it honestly gets to me and tests my ability to remain polite- especially when you hang up on them and they CALL BACK. Drives me crazy.

kareng Grand Master

T Instances where I would consider it acceptable would include insurance calls related to worker's comp claims or something else legitimate where you can reference that it's OKAY. 

 

 

Oh No!  Don't give them info either!  First, if the person actually filed worker's comp - they would have given them an address or phone number.  So its not likely it is really worker's comp on the phone. Second, if its a claim against your company in some way, a receptionist should not get involved in making those legal decisions.

notme Experienced

it was our company policy - we do not give out any personal info over the phone.   if you need something like a reference, then mail the request to me and i'll do that.  all the people who worked for us were truckers, therefore never present at the office (or very rarely) and anybody who wanted phone #s, addresses, etc i would take a message for the driver and relay it the next time i spoke with them.   something like an emergency, i would hunt them down and give them info (like if their wife couldn't reach them or kid was sick, etc)  but never did give info out to callers.  i told them i'm the information pirate:  i only *take* info, i never *give* info back lolz  :D


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CK1901 Explorer

Oh No!  Don't give them info either!  First, if the person actually filed worker's comp - they would have given them an address or phone number.  So its not likely it is really worker's comp on the phone. Second, if its a claim against your company in some way, a receptionist should not get involved in making those legal decisions.

 

I'm not just a receptionist. I handle a variety of responsibilities within my office due to my manager's unwillingness to bring on additional staff. I also work with our insurance broker and manage all of our company's worker's comp claims within the office. As a result, I am able to verify the validity of insurance calls since I file and submit the paperwork and deal with the claims records. When employees fail to fill it out correctly or have illegible hand-writing, the insurance company usually calls and needs to speak with the employee. Since they are on the road, I have to connect them accordingly. This falls outside of the normal realm of receptionist phone protocol, but talking to insurance adjusters is sometimes a necessary part of that process.

CK1901 Explorer

Just to clarify, I'm versed on not issuing personal information willy-nilly. I was just wondering if I should be going above and beyond to contact former employees when people call for them. I hate to think that someone's credit report is getting hit because the collections agency has an old number on file. However, I think it's just too many people to keep track of and it's ultimately a time suck.

kareng Grand Master

I'm not just a receptionist. I handle a variety of responsibilities within my office due to my manager's unwillingness to bring on additional staff. I also work with our insurance broker and manage all of our company's worker's comp claims within the office. As a result, I am able to verify the validity of insurance calls since I file and submit the paperwork and deal with the claims records. When employees fail to fill it out correctly or have illegible hand-writing, the insurance company usually calls and needs to speak with the employee. Since they are on the road, I have to connect them accordingly. This falls outside of the normal realm of receptionist phone protocol, but talking to insurance adjusters is sometimes a necessary part of that process.

That is good to know.  If its part of your job, that is OK.

 

Just to clarify, I'm versed on not issuing personal information willy-nilly. I was just wondering if I should be going above and beyond to contact former employees when people call for them. I hate to think that someone's credit report is getting hit because the collections agency has an old number on file. However, I think it's just too many people to keep track of and it's ultimately a time suck.

  

 

"my manager's unwillingness to bring on additional staff"  Sounds like you don't have the time to be tracking people down who haven't paid their credit card bills!

CK1901 Explorer

That is good to know.  If its part of your job, that is OK.

 

  

 

"my manager's unwillingness to bring on additional staff"  Sounds like you don't have the time to be tracking people down who haven't paid their credit card bills!

 

haha probably true. I wish we had more concrete policies in place in my office. I think i will just create a list for the next person when I hopefully get a new job within the next year. Sometimes I have flashes of self-doubt over the dumbest things because I'm only relying on my common sense to make decisions.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to McKinleyWY's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Accuracy of testing concerns

    2. - trents replied to McKinleyWY's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Accuracy of testing concerns

    3. - McKinleyWY posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Accuracy of testing concerns

    4. - trents replied to Teaganwhowantsanexpltion's topic in Introduce Yourself / Share Stuff
      4

      A little about me and my celiac disease

    5. - Peace lily replied to AristotlesCat's topic in Super Sensitive People
      118

      Gluten Free Coffee

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,238
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    tcpb
    Newest Member
    tcpb
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Welcome to the forum, @McKinleyWY, For a genetic test, you don't have to eat gluten, but this will only show if you have the genes necessary for the development of Celiac disease.  It will not show if you have active Celiac disease.   Eating gluten stimulates the production of antibodies against gluten which mistakenly attack our own bodies.  The antibodies are produced in the small intestines.  Three grams of gluten are enough to make you feel sick and ramp up anti-gluten antibody production and inflammation for two years afterwards.  However, TEN grams of gluten or more per day for two weeks is required to stimulate anti-gluten antibodies' production enough so that the anti-gluten antibodies move out of the intestines and into the bloodstream where they can be measured in blood tests.  This level of anti-gluten antibodies also causes measurable damage to the lining of the intestines as seen on biopsy samples taken during an endoscopy (the "gold standard" of Celiac diagnosis).   Since you have been experimenting with whole wheat bread in the past year or so, possibly getting cross contaminated in a mixed household, and your immune system is still so sensitized to gluten consumption, you may want to go ahead with the gluten challenge.   It can take two years absolutely gluten free for the immune system to quit reacting to gluten exposure.   Avoiding gluten most if the time, but then experimenting with whole wheat bread is a great way to keep your body in a state of inflammation and illness.  A diagnosis would help you stop playing Russian roulette with your and your children's health.      
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @McKinleyWY! There currently is no testing for celiac disease that does not require you to have been consuming generous amounts of gluten (at least 10g daily, about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for at least two weeks and, to be certain of accurate testing, longer than that. This applies to both phases of testing, the blood antibody tests and the endoscopy with biopsy.  There is the option of genetic testing to see if you have one or both of the two genes known to provide the potential to develop celiac disease. It is not really a diagnostic measure, however, as 30-40% of the general population has one or both of these genes whereas only about 1% of the general population actually develops celiac disease. But genetic testing is valuable as a rule out measure. If you don't have either of the genes, it is highly unlikely that you can have celiac disease. Having said all that, even if you don't have celiac disease you can have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which shares many of the same symptoms as celiac disease but does not involve and autoimmune reaction that damages the lining of the small bowel as does celiac disease. Both conditions call for the complete elimination of gluten from the diet. I hope this brings some clarity to your questions.
    • McKinleyWY
      Hello all, I was diagnosed at the age of 2 as being allergic to yeast.  All my life I have avoided bread and most products containing enriched flour as they  contain yeast (when making the man made vitamins to add back in to the flour).  Within the last year or so, we discovered that even whole wheat products bother me but strangely enough I can eat gluten free bread with yeast and have no reactions.  Obviously, we have come to believe the issue is gluten not yeast.  Times continues to reinforce this as we are transitioning to a gluten free home and family.  I become quite ill when I consume even the smallest amount of gluten. How will my not having consumed breads/yeast/gluten for the better part of decades impact a biopsy or blood work?  I would love to know if it is a gluten intolerance or a genetic issue for family members but unsure of the results given my history of limited gluten intake.   I appreciate the input from those who have gone before me in experience and knowledge. Thank you all!
    • trents
      I know what you mean. When I get glutened I have severe gut cramps and throw up for 2-3 hr. and then have diarrhea for another several hours. Avoid eating out if at all possible. It is the number one source of gluten contamination for us celiacs. When you are forced to eat out at a new restaurant that you are not sure is safe, try to order things that you can be sure will not get cross contaminated like a boiled egg, baked potatos, steamed vegies, fresh fruit. Yes, I know that doesn't sound as appetizing as pizza or a burger and fries but your health is at stake. I also realize that as a 14 year old you don't have a lot of control over where you eat out because you are tagging along with others or adults are paying for it. Do you have support from your parents concerning your need to eat gluten free? Do you believe they have a good understanding of the many places gluten can show up in the food supply?
    • Peace lily
      Okay went online to check green mountain k cups .It was said that the regular coffees are fine but they couldn’t guarantee cross contamination.with the flavors. im trying to figure out since I eliminated the suyrup so far so good. I’m hoping. thanks it feels good to listen to other people there views.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.