Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Receptionist Phone Ettiquette


CK1901

Recommended Posts

CK1901 Explorer

Just a quick phone ettiquette question - maybe someone else has experience with this?

 

I work in the Entertainment industry for a touring theatrical production company. Everyone once and awhile, I get a stray phone call from someone equesting contact information for former cast/crew members. I expect these are mostly debt collection offices or something of that nature. They almost never understand that our touring staff is under contract and are not permanent employees. Generally the callers are vague and refuse to disclose why they need the person's contact information. Therefore, I refuse to share it with them. I feel like saying "it's an important business matter" is not an adequate rationalization to issue personal information about our employees. We don't have  a real policy on this matter, so I usually just follow my instincts if I think it's a BS call. Even though the people we work with aren't exorbitantly famous or anything, I also worry about stalkers. Some of these people have been on broadway or are sort of famous within their circles. It's not that unreasonable to look out for their safety, right? Should I be taking messages and trying to reach out to our former cast members? This seems like a pain in the ass.

Sometimes I second guess myself because honestly, we get so many telemarketers, I almost automatically switch into kill mode if the call doesn't sound legit.

 

thoughts from any former or current admin professionals?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

No where that I have ever worked - retail, hospital, restaurant, big business - would give out personal info to someone without a legitimate subpoena.    So I see no reason why you shouldn't say that you are not allowed to give that out.  "Sorry.  We aren't allowed to give out that information.  Have a nice day" Hang up before they an argue.

 

It isn't your job to take messages for these people, either.  Except maybe while they are working for you.  I don't think your boss pays you to waste time trying to find people and give them messages.

cyclinglady Grand Master

I agree with Karen. At the companies I worked at, you can never disclose anything about a current or past employee. That is a lawsuit just waiting to happen. Oh, that includes references!

By the way I was stalked. A security guard broke into the HR files and preceding to call me, mail me and even broke into my car and took just my CDs (though I could not prove that one). He was terminated and I had to move. I was creeped out for a long time.

bartfull Rising Star

When I get calls here at my business (or even at home), I always ask who is calling. If they just say, "Jeff", I will ask, "Jeff whom?". If they respond, "Jeff Smith", I will ask, "And you're representing?" If they don't answer with the name of the company, I just tell them straight out that if they don't identify themselves I refuse to talk to them.

CK1901 Explorer

Thanks all! Usually if it's an employment verification, i just forward it along to our PEO. I thought I was behaving accordingly, but it's just one of those things that no one has ever discussed at my job. Instances where I would consider it acceptable would include insurance calls related to worker's comp claims or something else legitimate where you can reference that it's OKAY. Phone solicitors are very pushy these days and it honestly gets to me and tests my ability to remain polite- especially when you hang up on them and they CALL BACK. Drives me crazy.

kareng Grand Master

T Instances where I would consider it acceptable would include insurance calls related to worker's comp claims or something else legitimate where you can reference that it's OKAY. 

 

 

Oh No!  Don't give them info either!  First, if the person actually filed worker's comp - they would have given them an address or phone number.  So its not likely it is really worker's comp on the phone. Second, if its a claim against your company in some way, a receptionist should not get involved in making those legal decisions.

notme Experienced

it was our company policy - we do not give out any personal info over the phone.   if you need something like a reference, then mail the request to me and i'll do that.  all the people who worked for us were truckers, therefore never present at the office (or very rarely) and anybody who wanted phone #s, addresses, etc i would take a message for the driver and relay it the next time i spoke with them.   something like an emergency, i would hunt them down and give them info (like if their wife couldn't reach them or kid was sick, etc)  but never did give info out to callers.  i told them i'm the information pirate:  i only *take* info, i never *give* info back lolz  :D


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CK1901 Explorer

Oh No!  Don't give them info either!  First, if the person actually filed worker's comp - they would have given them an address or phone number.  So its not likely it is really worker's comp on the phone. Second, if its a claim against your company in some way, a receptionist should not get involved in making those legal decisions.

 

I'm not just a receptionist. I handle a variety of responsibilities within my office due to my manager's unwillingness to bring on additional staff. I also work with our insurance broker and manage all of our company's worker's comp claims within the office. As a result, I am able to verify the validity of insurance calls since I file and submit the paperwork and deal with the claims records. When employees fail to fill it out correctly or have illegible hand-writing, the insurance company usually calls and needs to speak with the employee. Since they are on the road, I have to connect them accordingly. This falls outside of the normal realm of receptionist phone protocol, but talking to insurance adjusters is sometimes a necessary part of that process.

CK1901 Explorer

Just to clarify, I'm versed on not issuing personal information willy-nilly. I was just wondering if I should be going above and beyond to contact former employees when people call for them. I hate to think that someone's credit report is getting hit because the collections agency has an old number on file. However, I think it's just too many people to keep track of and it's ultimately a time suck.

kareng Grand Master

I'm not just a receptionist. I handle a variety of responsibilities within my office due to my manager's unwillingness to bring on additional staff. I also work with our insurance broker and manage all of our company's worker's comp claims within the office. As a result, I am able to verify the validity of insurance calls since I file and submit the paperwork and deal with the claims records. When employees fail to fill it out correctly or have illegible hand-writing, the insurance company usually calls and needs to speak with the employee. Since they are on the road, I have to connect them accordingly. This falls outside of the normal realm of receptionist phone protocol, but talking to insurance adjusters is sometimes a necessary part of that process.

That is good to know.  If its part of your job, that is OK.

 

Just to clarify, I'm versed on not issuing personal information willy-nilly. I was just wondering if I should be going above and beyond to contact former employees when people call for them. I hate to think that someone's credit report is getting hit because the collections agency has an old number on file. However, I think it's just too many people to keep track of and it's ultimately a time suck.

  

 

"my manager's unwillingness to bring on additional staff"  Sounds like you don't have the time to be tracking people down who haven't paid their credit card bills!

CK1901 Explorer

That is good to know.  If its part of your job, that is OK.

 

  

 

"my manager's unwillingness to bring on additional staff"  Sounds like you don't have the time to be tracking people down who haven't paid their credit card bills!

 

haha probably true. I wish we had more concrete policies in place in my office. I think i will just create a list for the next person when I hopefully get a new job within the next year. Sometimes I have flashes of self-doubt over the dumbest things because I'm only relying on my common sense to make decisions.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to MicG's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Test interpretations

    2. - MicG posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Test interpretations

    3. - catnapt posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      0

      how long does it take for the genetic blood test for celiac to come back?

    4. - DebD5 commented on Scott Adams's article in Spring 2026 Issue
      3

      The Dark Side of Gluten-Free: Counterfeit Labels and Global Food Safety Failures

    5. - Scott Adams commented on Scott Adams's article in Spring 2026 Issue
      3

      The Dark Side of Gluten-Free: Counterfeit Labels and Global Food Safety Failures

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,655
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Murdy3
    Newest Member
    Murdy3
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Possibly. Your total IGA (Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum) is actually high so you are not IGA deficient. In the absence of IGA deficiency, the most reliable celiac antibody test would be the t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA for which your score is within normal range. There are other things besides celiac disease that might cause an elevated DGP-IGA (Deamidated Gliadin Abs, lgA) for which you do have a positive score. It might also be of concern that your total IGA is elevated as that can indicate some other health problems, some of which are serious.  Had you been practicing a gluten free or a reduced gluten free diet prior to the blood draw? Talk to your physician about these things. I would also seek an endoscopy/biopsy of the small bowel to check for damage to the villous lining, which is the gold standard diagnostic test for celiac disease.
    • MicG
      Test results as follows: Deamidated Gliadin Abs, lgA 40 H (normal range 0-19) Deamidated Gliadin Abs, IgG 4 (0-19) t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA <2 (0-3) t-Transglutaminase (tTG) IgG <2 (0-5) Endomysial Antibody IgA Negative (Negative) Immunoglobulin A, Qn, Serum 535 H (87-352) Do I have celiac?
    • catnapt
      how long does it take for the genetic blood test for celiac to come back? I saw the GI today, she was great. She says I def have an issue with gluten and that my symptoms align more with celiac disease than NCGS, so she's doing the genetic testing, Ordered a test for SIBO but said that's just to cover all bases, she doesn't think I have that. If the blood work comes back negative for the genes, then I will cancel the endoscopy. If positive, I will try the 2 week gluten challenge and get the endoscopy done. If I can't manage the gluten challenge (I had HORRIBLE symptoms last time and quit after 12 days) then we'll just assume it's celiac disease and go from there. She says she does a full nutrient panel on all her pts every year, that was nice to hear.I'm on so many supplements it would be nice to only have to get the ones I truly need! so yeh, really anxious about the test results for the genes!! I have an identical twin sister so I'd need to tell her if it's positive, she'd prob want to get tested too. *interesting note: when I said if the blood work comes back that I don't have the genes, then I'm in the clear - she said, well,,,,,,not necessarily. But she didn't want to go into as we had a lot to go over. I did make a  mental note of that comment and will ask her when I see her next time.   she was very thorough! I was impressed! she even checked- up on some lab work I had done that my Endo ordered. I like her, I am looking forward to seeing her again. I think I'll get some good advice and info from her she also complimented me on my diet.   said it was a very gut friendly and healthy diet 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not sure why "colonoscopy" keeps coming up for you, again it would be an endoscopy to diagnose celiac disease, but it seems that Kaiser should still have your records. If you were diagnosed by them in the 1990's using a blood test and endoscopy, then you definitely have celiac disease, and hopefully you've been gluten-free since that time. You should be able to contact Kaiser for those records.
    • Russ H
      This sounds like a GP who is ignorant regarding coeliac disease. The risk with consuming gluten for several days is that it triggers the coeliac immune response, leading to raised auto-antibodies and active disease for several months. People may not even be aware of symptoms during this process, but it is causing damage to the body. As trents has said, the gut lining normally recovers on a strict gluten-free diet, and this happens much faster in children than in adults.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.