Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Are Normal Iga And Igg Levels?


heliosue

Recommended Posts

heliosue Apprentice

Still trying to pin down whether I have Celiac Disease or Non-Celiac Gluten Intolerence. Based on a suggestion from a forum member, I just had my IGA total serum test and won't know the results for awhile.  But.. I have a question about normal levels based on the descriptions that I have read in a few online articles. The articles offer several possible outcomes if the total IGA is low, and the rest of the antibody tests are "normal".  Where can I go to find out what is "normal" on these other tests.  Is it "no antibodies detected"? Is it any result that falls below the upper range?  I have a feeling that the result of this latest test is going to continue to place me in the inconclusive category, as the ONLY positive on the previous tests was the TTG Antibody, IGG, which was at 10 (high according to the report). (Does anyone know what the high range is for that TTG, IGG test?  Is it 10 out of 100? or 10 out of 1000?) The previous tests were taken when I was eating a partially gluten free diet. (I hadn't been told that a Celiac/Gluten panel was going to done as part of my broader annual bloodwork), so I'm not at all sure those negative results mean much.  I feel so much better now that I'm gluten-free, that I really don't know if I can make myself go back to eating gluten in order to verify the previous test results or even go the biopsy route.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Brit1612 Apprentice

I think each lab can be different, but for example, my son's ttg igg was "slightly elevated" the first time he had it done and it was a 7, the second time it was a 15 (clear positive) and the last time is was .5 (negative).  The range for all of these labs was <6 was considered "normal", Between 6 and 8 was like a mild positive and >8 was positive.  So if your lab was the same your result would have been a clear positive for that test.  Just so you know, my son had that test positive with others negative and we just had a negative biopsy.  He also came back negative for the same test (while consuming gluten).  We are being told that it could have been some kind of infection causing the positive, and now that it is negative we are being told not to worry but to trust the results we are getting now (including the biopsy).  Just thought I would share.

nvsmom Community Regular

Yes.  Lab normal ranges can vary quite a bit.  I've seen from 0-4 up to 0-20.  My lab range was the 0-20, and everything above a 20 was considered high.  If you have 19.8, you are not a celiac but 20.2 probably is.   :rolleyes:   My result was stated at greater than 200 so I have no idea what it actually was - could have been 201 or 1000.  ;)

 

The normal range usually starts at 0 though.  If your 10 was high, your upper normal limit was probably 4, 5, or 6.  Perhaps you can request a copy of the lab report and then you'll know for sure.

 

If you want to stay gluten-free yet want to verify your diagnosis, try retesting after 6 months.  If your result has come down, it probably was celiac disease.... A positive test result means it is probably celiac disease anyways.  Those tests are pretty specific to celiac disease. This report shows that the specificity of a positive for celiac disease for the tTG IgG (SP) is about 95%. Open Original Shared Link

 

Best wishes.

heliosue Apprentice

I think each lab can be different, but for example, my son's ttg igg was "slightly elevated" the first time he had it done and it was a 7, the second time it was a 15 (clear positive) and the last time is was .5 (negative).  The range for all of these labs was <6 was considered "normal", Between 6 and 8 was like a mild positive and >8 was positive.  So if your lab was the same your result would have been a clear positive for that test.  Just so you know, my son had that test positive with others negative and we just had a negative biopsy.  He also came back negative for the same test (while consuming gluten).  We are being told that it could have been some kind of infection causing the positive, and now that it is negative we are being told not to worry but to trust the results we are getting now (including the biopsy).  Just thought I would share.

Thanks for sharing your son's experience.  Talk about a roller coaster ride! It really is frustrating not being able to pin things down, even more so for you when it's your son you're worrying about.  Thanks again, I'll keep this information in mind.

heliosue Apprentice

Yes.  Lab normal ranges can vary quite a bit.  I've seen from 0-4 up to 0-20.  My lab range was the 0-20, and everything above a 20 was considered high.  If you have 19.8, you are not a celiac but 20.2 probably is.   :rolleyes:   My result was stated at greater than 200 so I have no idea what it actually was - could have been 201 or 1000.   ;)

 

The normal range usually starts at 0 though.  If your 10 was high, your upper normal limit was probably 4, 5, or 6.  Perhaps you can request a copy of the lab report and then you'll know for sure.

 

If you want to stay gluten-free yet want to verify your diagnosis, try retesting after 6 months.  If your result has come down, it probably was celiac disease.... A positive test result means it is probably celiac disease anyways.  Those tests are pretty specific to celiac disease. This report shows that the specificity of a positive for celiac disease for the tTG IgG (SP) is about 95%. Open Original Shared Link

 

Best wishes.

Thanks. I just read the page you linked to and copied it into my Celiac file.  My doctor (internist) doesn't seem to think that it's important that I know one way or the other, but I do think that I should let nieces and brother know if it is Celiac.  He said that  a 10 on the TTG, IgG was borderline, but he couldn't tell me what the benchmarks were in upper range.  Also, I had to remind him that my blood labs a year ago showed that I was low in iron, B-12, and folic acid and he had me taking supplments for each. Six months ago, my dentist asked what I was doing that caused me to be losing enamel on my teeth. I had no idea. So many of the possible symptoms can be symptoms for myriad other illnesses. Thanks for mentioning taking the Celiac panel again in 6 months. It hadn't occurred to me that if the antibody count decreased that that would be a good indication of celiac disease.  From my perspective that is so much more preferable to eating gluten again for any length of time.  Thanks again for your help.  It really does ease my mind to know that there are folks like those in this forum who can relate and answer questions for me.

nvsmom Community Regular

I think most people around here can relate to your struggle.  Those who had a stomach ache for a month, were diagnosed with clear results, and trained on the gluten-free diet, aren't the ones who come here... Sadly, we are the majority of celiacs.  ;)

Brit1612 Apprentice

Thanks for sharing your son's experience.  Talk about a roller coaster ride! It really is frustrating not being able to pin things down, even more so for you when it's your son you're worrying about.  Thanks again, I'll keep this information in mind.

You're right it is really frustrating when it is happening to your child, especially a child that can't even talk.  I can't ask him how are you feeling, or explain to him the things he's been having to go through.  But I am still grateful for his health; I know there are parents out there dealing with life threatening illness in their children, so I try to keep it in perspective.  Hope you get answers quicker and easier than we have!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    2. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    3. - trents replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol

    4. - barb simkin replied to barb simkin's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      8

      celiac, chocolate and alcohol


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,330
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    SEQ
    Newest Member
    SEQ
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      So, you had both and endoscopy with biopsy and a colonoscopy. That helps me understand what you were trying to communicate. No, no! It never occurred to me that you were trying to mislead me. It's just that we get a lot of posters on the forum who are misinformed about what celiac disease is and how it is diagnosed so I need some clarification from you which you were so gracious to give.
    • barb simkin
      I had both the genetic genes for celiac.  My gastroenologist advised he also took a biopsy during one of my colonoscopies and endoscopy and advised I had celiac disease, along with stomach ulcers from my esophagus stomach down to my small bowel. I was shown the ulcers on the catscan and endoscopy report.  I also had polyps in 3 places throughout my large bowel. I was on a strict diet for months following.  I am sorry if I didnt define how I was diagnosed with celiac disease.  I am sorry if you think I was misleading you. I also had to pay $150.00 for the genetic testing.
    • trents
      So, I'm a little confused here. I understand you to say that you have not been officially diagnosed with celiac disease. Is this correct?  You have had genetic testing done to check for the potential for developing celiac disease and that was positive. Is this correct? I think you meant to type "gluten sensitivity" but you typed "gluten insensitivity". Just so we are clear about the terminology, there is celiac disease and there is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity). They are not the same but they have overlapping symptoms. Celiac disease causes damage to the small bowel lining but NCGS does not. NCGS is often referred to in short form as gluten sensitivity. However, people often use the terms celiac disease and gluten sensitivity interchangeably so it can be unclear which disease they are referring to. Genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population has one or both of  the genes that have been most strongly connected with the potential to develop active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develops active celiac disease. This makes the genetic test useful for ruling out celiac disease but not for diagnosing it. A colonoscopy cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease because it doesn't permit the scope to go up into the small bowel where celiac disease does the damage. They use an endoscopy ("upper GI) for checking the small bowel lining for celiac damage.
    • barb simkin
      I did nor read the chocolate pkg as it was of fered to me and I ate 2 pcs. I do know that only very dark chocolate and and a very few others are gluten free. Most alcohols contain gluten. I have several yrs of not knowing my celiac condition as docs would not do the test. After looking on the internet about my sufferings I insisted on the gene trsting which showed positive for gluten insensitivity and a biopsy on my next colonoscopy that also showed positive which could not help the damage done to my small bowel. So I very rarely have a glass of wine
    • trents
      @barb simkin, are you sure the chocolate products are gluten-free and not "manufactured on equipment that also handles wheat products and tree nuts", i.e., cross-contamination? And what kind of alcoholic beverages are we talking about? Most beers are made from gluten-containing grains. Just checking.
×
×
  • Create New...