Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Are Normal Iga And Igg Levels?


heliosue

Recommended Posts

heliosue Apprentice

Still trying to pin down whether I have Celiac Disease or Non-Celiac Gluten Intolerence. Based on a suggestion from a forum member, I just had my IGA total serum test and won't know the results for awhile.  But.. I have a question about normal levels based on the descriptions that I have read in a few online articles. The articles offer several possible outcomes if the total IGA is low, and the rest of the antibody tests are "normal".  Where can I go to find out what is "normal" on these other tests.  Is it "no antibodies detected"? Is it any result that falls below the upper range?  I have a feeling that the result of this latest test is going to continue to place me in the inconclusive category, as the ONLY positive on the previous tests was the TTG Antibody, IGG, which was at 10 (high according to the report). (Does anyone know what the high range is for that TTG, IGG test?  Is it 10 out of 100? or 10 out of 1000?) The previous tests were taken when I was eating a partially gluten free diet. (I hadn't been told that a Celiac/Gluten panel was going to done as part of my broader annual bloodwork), so I'm not at all sure those negative results mean much.  I feel so much better now that I'm gluten-free, that I really don't know if I can make myself go back to eating gluten in order to verify the previous test results or even go the biopsy route.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Brit1612 Apprentice

I think each lab can be different, but for example, my son's ttg igg was "slightly elevated" the first time he had it done and it was a 7, the second time it was a 15 (clear positive) and the last time is was .5 (negative).  The range for all of these labs was <6 was considered "normal", Between 6 and 8 was like a mild positive and >8 was positive.  So if your lab was the same your result would have been a clear positive for that test.  Just so you know, my son had that test positive with others negative and we just had a negative biopsy.  He also came back negative for the same test (while consuming gluten).  We are being told that it could have been some kind of infection causing the positive, and now that it is negative we are being told not to worry but to trust the results we are getting now (including the biopsy).  Just thought I would share.

nvsmom Community Regular

Yes.  Lab normal ranges can vary quite a bit.  I've seen from 0-4 up to 0-20.  My lab range was the 0-20, and everything above a 20 was considered high.  If you have 19.8, you are not a celiac but 20.2 probably is.   :rolleyes:   My result was stated at greater than 200 so I have no idea what it actually was - could have been 201 or 1000.  ;)

 

The normal range usually starts at 0 though.  If your 10 was high, your upper normal limit was probably 4, 5, or 6.  Perhaps you can request a copy of the lab report and then you'll know for sure.

 

If you want to stay gluten-free yet want to verify your diagnosis, try retesting after 6 months.  If your result has come down, it probably was celiac disease.... A positive test result means it is probably celiac disease anyways.  Those tests are pretty specific to celiac disease. This report shows that the specificity of a positive for celiac disease for the tTG IgG (SP) is about 95%. Open Original Shared Link

 

Best wishes.

heliosue Apprentice

I think each lab can be different, but for example, my son's ttg igg was "slightly elevated" the first time he had it done and it was a 7, the second time it was a 15 (clear positive) and the last time is was .5 (negative).  The range for all of these labs was <6 was considered "normal", Between 6 and 8 was like a mild positive and >8 was positive.  So if your lab was the same your result would have been a clear positive for that test.  Just so you know, my son had that test positive with others negative and we just had a negative biopsy.  He also came back negative for the same test (while consuming gluten).  We are being told that it could have been some kind of infection causing the positive, and now that it is negative we are being told not to worry but to trust the results we are getting now (including the biopsy).  Just thought I would share.

Thanks for sharing your son's experience.  Talk about a roller coaster ride! It really is frustrating not being able to pin things down, even more so for you when it's your son you're worrying about.  Thanks again, I'll keep this information in mind.

heliosue Apprentice

Yes.  Lab normal ranges can vary quite a bit.  I've seen from 0-4 up to 0-20.  My lab range was the 0-20, and everything above a 20 was considered high.  If you have 19.8, you are not a celiac but 20.2 probably is.   :rolleyes:   My result was stated at greater than 200 so I have no idea what it actually was - could have been 201 or 1000.   ;)

 

The normal range usually starts at 0 though.  If your 10 was high, your upper normal limit was probably 4, 5, or 6.  Perhaps you can request a copy of the lab report and then you'll know for sure.

 

If you want to stay gluten-free yet want to verify your diagnosis, try retesting after 6 months.  If your result has come down, it probably was celiac disease.... A positive test result means it is probably celiac disease anyways.  Those tests are pretty specific to celiac disease. This report shows that the specificity of a positive for celiac disease for the tTG IgG (SP) is about 95%. Open Original Shared Link

 

Best wishes.

Thanks. I just read the page you linked to and copied it into my Celiac file.  My doctor (internist) doesn't seem to think that it's important that I know one way or the other, but I do think that I should let nieces and brother know if it is Celiac.  He said that  a 10 on the TTG, IgG was borderline, but he couldn't tell me what the benchmarks were in upper range.  Also, I had to remind him that my blood labs a year ago showed that I was low in iron, B-12, and folic acid and he had me taking supplments for each. Six months ago, my dentist asked what I was doing that caused me to be losing enamel on my teeth. I had no idea. So many of the possible symptoms can be symptoms for myriad other illnesses. Thanks for mentioning taking the Celiac panel again in 6 months. It hadn't occurred to me that if the antibody count decreased that that would be a good indication of celiac disease.  From my perspective that is so much more preferable to eating gluten again for any length of time.  Thanks again for your help.  It really does ease my mind to know that there are folks like those in this forum who can relate and answer questions for me.

nvsmom Community Regular

I think most people around here can relate to your struggle.  Those who had a stomach ache for a month, were diagnosed with clear results, and trained on the gluten-free diet, aren't the ones who come here... Sadly, we are the majority of celiacs.  ;)

Brit1612 Apprentice

Thanks for sharing your son's experience.  Talk about a roller coaster ride! It really is frustrating not being able to pin things down, even more so for you when it's your son you're worrying about.  Thanks again, I'll keep this information in mind.

You're right it is really frustrating when it is happening to your child, especially a child that can't even talk.  I can't ask him how are you feeling, or explain to him the things he's been having to go through.  But I am still grateful for his health; I know there are parents out there dealing with life threatening illness in their children, so I try to keep it in perspective.  Hope you get answers quicker and easier than we have!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Rogol72 replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      8

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    3. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,441
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Linda Boxdorfer
    Newest Member
    Linda Boxdorfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Rogol72
      @HAUS, I was at an event in the UK a few years back. I remember ringing the restaurant ahead to inquire about the gluten free options. All I wanted was a few gluten free sandwiches, which they provided and they were delicious. The gluten-free bread they used was Warbutons white bread and I remember mentioning it on this site before. No harm in trying it once. It's fortified with Calcium and Iron. https://www.warburtonsglutenfree.com/warbs_products/white-loaf/ The only other gluten-free bread that I've come across that is fortified is Schar with Iodized salt, nothing else.
    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.