Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Glutentox Tested Foods


jddh

Recommended Posts

jddh Contributor

While dealing with some stubborn symptoms that have persisted despite a “gluten-zero” diet (I’ve discovered I used to make some mistakes here and there without obvious reactions), I’ve bought a whole bunch of GlutenTox test strips to be absolutely sure some suspect foods are safe.

 
These test kits are widely approved for used in the food industry, and they can detect gluten down to 5ppm—pretty accurate! They are the surest way I know to guarantee a product is free of gluten contamination.
 
They cost a bundle and I hope to not have to use them for long. However, since I’m using them mostly on commercial products, I thought I would keep a thread of products that I’ve tested for your information.
 
You’ll see that most of these are confirmed safe, but I for one appreciated the 100% confirmation. Many of the products may be localized to BC, Canada. I hope you will benefit from it.
 
[EDIT—discussion about the validity of these tests in the thread below]
 
FALSE means a negative test—no gluten detected.
 
Udi’s Breads—various kinds
Open Original Shared Link
FALSE
(shocker)
 
Jamieson vitamins D, A & E
Open Original Shared Link
FALSE
 
Cotazym brand “MKF” (Canada)
FALSE
 
Domperidone brand “SNS” (Canada)
FALSE
 
Mirtazapine brand “SDZ” (Canada)
FALSE
 
Iberogast
Open Original Shared Link
FALSE
 
Taste Adventure curry lentil soup mix
Open Original Shared Link
FALSE
 
Amy’s Organic Refried Beans
Open Original Shared Link
FALSE
HOWEVER they note their facility also processes wheat…
 
Zatoun Za’atar (Palestinian spice)
Open Original Shared Link
TRUE!
 
Extra Strength Tylenol
FALSE
 
London Drugs acetaminophen 500mg
FALSE
 
European Foods Polish-Style mayonnaise
FALSE
 
Better Than Bouillon—Beef, Chicken, Vegetable
Open Original Shared Link
FALSE
 
Shwartz’s Montreal Smoked Meat
FALSE
 
Preferisco Organic Balsamic Vinegar
FALSE
 
EverFit L-Glutamine supplement
FALSE
 
Cineplex movie popcorn with butter topping
FALSE!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

Thanks!

Pretty interesting but I would be wary of completely trusting your "jddh" approved foods list! Ha!

Hey, what exactly is Polish Mayonnaise? I am of Plish decent, but live on the US West Coast. I recall my Grandma shipping food to Poland for years (post WWII). When she visited in the 70's, they served her tuna that she had sent. it was not presented as tuna salad as we know it. They knew nothing of mayonnaise. She started sending jars of mayonnaise after that. Maybe the product you are referring to was developed much later or it was not being produced under the Communist regime. Everything was hard to come by back then. Hence our packages that were sent for decades.

jddh Contributor

Well I wouldn't trust my old diet either, but believe you me, I'm careful now. I started ordering these test kits through a recommend by a food scientist when I was ruling out refractory and looking for hidden gluten. I don't know of anything better than this test; my father challenged it at the 5ppm setting with a tiny pinch of breadcrumbs added to a mash of otherwise gluten-free food; the test showed bright red, a positive.

 

I don't have any of that mayonnaise in the fridge at the moment, nor could I find a website for them. They're a local BC company. But here's a random youtube link discussing the very product: 

squirmingitch Veteran

jddh, I think there may be more to it than just using a test strip where "one size fits all". I am a member of The Gluten Free Watchdog

and have learned much about the testing of different foods for gluten. It isn't as easy as it seems. Early on when i went gluten free I began to suspect certain foods of containing gluten & got some of the test strips - the more popular, more reliably touted ones. it made me feel good to know the items I tested, tested clean. I have learned a great deal since then and would not rely on a test strip to determine if a food is or is not gluten free. There are so many different factors to consider when testing. The make up of the food makes a big difference in whether test method a or test method b or test method c is the correct way to test that particular food. Please take a look at this link and read the individual articles on there especially the ones about lateral flow devices.

Open Original Shared Link

jddh Contributor

Thanks for the info squirmingitch, that's fascinating. I certainly agree prima facie that home-kit tests can't be 100% relied upon, and the arguments by that RD are compelling. Just about everything I test is SUPPOSED to be gluten-free, so I'm hoping that the outset likelihood and agreement with a test strip is fairly good evidence.

That said, I should stress that the above list of course only shows MY results for those specific batches of foods that I tested with one kind of kit. Caveat emptor.

Do you find the gluten-free watchdog to be a worthwhile service?

squirmingitch Veteran

Thanks for the info squirmingitch, that's fascinating. I certainly agree prima facie that home-kit tests can't be 100% relied upon, and the arguments by that RD are compelling. Just about everything I test is SUPPOSED to be gluten-free, so I'm hoping that the outset likelihood and agreement with a test strip is fairly good evidence.

That said, I should stress that the above list of course only shows MY results for those specific batches of foods that I tested with one kind of kit. Caveat emptor.

Do you find the gluten-free watchdog to be a worthwhile service?

I really do not regret paying that monthly fee for the gluten free watchdog. I have learned a lot from her. I find her to be fair and she is not biased one way or the other. She explains everything well & goes in depth as far as explaining what test they did with this or that & why it had to be done that way. When chocolate is an ingredient in anything they have to do something else to it in order to get a valid test. I would copy & paste some of that info. but we are not allowed to do that under the rules of the site. 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,384
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    haleyspurlock1
    Newest Member
    haleyspurlock1
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
    • Levi
      When I was first Dg’d I researched like mad. One thing I remember from then, which may have changed with advancement in medical science, is that Coeliac is a first generation disease which means either you or your husband need be Coeliac for your daughter to have inherited it. Far as I know, and I’m not a scientist just a victim, the amount of gluten (wheat, rye, or barley) one consumes does not cause a person to contract Coeliac Disease. So if neither of you as her biological parents have Coeliac then your daughter cannot pass any blame should she contract this horrific disease.     It’s humbling, and sometimes I believe GOD allows such as these autoimmune diseases for those who need it most. 
    • Lori Lavell
      The body reacts to all grain proteins in all grains from my observation. Call it Gluten, Gliadin, which is what they test for commonly, however, I am Celiac and react with dermatitis herpetiformis to corn and the glutenous protein in it is called Zein. They only test for Gliadin. Testing needs to be updated in my opinion. It only take a small parts per million to continuously create systemic inflammation. This is not productive to healing and all grains contain some for gluten like substance. It's called Molecular Mimicry.
×
×
  • Create New...