Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Possible Celiac, Negative Blood Test


kitty-el

Recommended Posts

kitty-el Newbie

I'm wondering if anyone can offer advice. I have suffered stomach pains, severe bloating, furling stomach, wind, low iron, teeth grinding for as long as I can remember. I have a family history of celiac disease, I had a blood test in 2012 that came back negative so I just left it at that.

Over the past 6 months my symptoms have become much worse, I have headaches, brain fog, dry flaking skin, joint pain and difficult sleeping.

I was reading an article on celiacs and I literally have all the symptoms, I'm wondering if a blood test can be negative and what else I can do?

In the past I have done diets like Atkins so eliminating all gluten and my stomach problems disappear completely but I'm not sure if that's gluten or some other sensitivity.

Thank you


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



zs1994 Newbie

From what I've read, on rare occasions blood tests can be negative if you have Celiac. Best thing to do is to continue having gluten in your diet and then explain to your doctor about your symptoms and push for a biopsy! All the best :)

kareng Grand Master

Your blood test was 3 years ago.  It is possible to develop Celiac since then.

kitty-el Newbie

Kareng, I didn't even think about that. I presumed if you had the blood test then that was that.

Thank you for your replies

Jeepasch Newbie

There is a chance for false-negative with the blood test which is why doctors advise having the scope and biopsy done first. If the biopsy reveals there is gluten damage then the doctor will order the blood test to confirm celiac disease. If you decide to pursue a scope it is very important that you continue to eat gluten in order for the test to be accurate.

 

Good luck!!

psawyer Proficient

Jeepasch, I think you have the process backwards. The blood tests are used for screening, and a positive result will likely cause the doctor to order the endoscopy for confirmation. Once damage has been confirmed by the biopsy, a diagnosis cane be made based on that alone. False negatives can occur with both the blood test and the endoscopy, particularly in children. And, yes, you must be eating gluten on a regular basis for either test to be accurate.

cyclinglady Grand Master

Kitty, ask for the complete celiac blood panel:

-Tissue Transglutaminase (tTG) IgA and (tTG) IgG

-Deamidated Gliadin Peptide (DGP) IgA and (DGP) IgG

-EMA IgA

-total serum IgA and IgG (control test)

-AGA IGA and AGA IgG - older and less reliable tests largely replace by the DGP tests

-endoscopic biopsy - make sure at least 6 samples are taken

(Source: NVSMOM -- )

I tested positive in just the DGP IGA and the rest were negative, yet biopsies revealed moderate to severe intestinal damage!

Welcome to the forum and let us know how it goes!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jeepasch Newbie

psawyer, my gastroenterologist approaches the process this way. It could be that he encountered false-negative blood tests with other patients which led to problems. 

squirmingitch Veteran

Kitty, if any of your relatives who have celiac are first degree relatives then you should be tested every 2 years or sooner if symptoms present and with you the symptoms are presenting. Be SURE to tell your doc you have celiac in the family. We can't stress enough that if you've been eating gluten free or gluten light then you will need to do a gluten challenge or risk false negative tests. 

Open Original Shared Link

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,390
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ozz lock
    Newest Member
    Ozz lock
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...