Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Cross Contamination even though it's marked "Certified gluten-free"?


GiGi29

Recommended Posts

GiGi29 Newbie

I bought a snack bar the other day called "Chia Bar" at Target.  I wouldn't recommend it if you're looking for a substantial snack, though.  On sale, it was $4 for a box of 5 bars.  Not too bad, until you get home and realize that the size of the bar is 0.88 oz.  TINY!

Anyway, on to my question: the bar is labeled "Certified Gluten Free" with that black circle with "gluten-free" written in it.  When I see this, I think "yay! Something I can for sure eat!". BUT, on the back of this bar, it reads in part, "Good manufacturing practices are used to segregate ingredients in a facility that processes other products, which may contain ... wheat...".  So, my question is: How can this be labeled "Certified gluten-free" when it appears that there is a chance of CC?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



bartfull Rising Star

I could be wrong but I believe if it is certified gluten-free it has been tested. Did you get sick?

GiGi29 Newbie

I ate it this morning, and I don't have GI reactions (just brain fog, confusion, etc. reactions), so I don't know.  I think I'll be fine, but I was just curious about the certification process.  If it's been tested and is OK, then I'm fine with it. 

shayre Enthusiast

If it's labeled "gluten free" then there is still 20 ppm (parts per million) contamination allowed, though I am SURE that some don't test and are much greater.  If it is "certified gluten free" then they are allowed 10ppm.  I still question testing sometimes.  I react to 10ppm still.  My threshold is somewhere between 5ppm and 10ppm, but 10 being too high.  Most people are not as sensitive as I, so for most 10ppm is probably okay.  It DOES however add up, so watch out for that...10ppm for breakfast, 10ppm for lunch...etc....suddenly you are way over the limit.  I bought some rice rolls from Costco not long ago that were gluten free.  I called on them, because I was feeling bad.  They told me that they tested, and the contamination tested at 7ppm.  There was 6-8 rolls in the pack.  I said wait a minute, is that "per roll" or "per package"?  He said that he thought that it was the package, but he would double check to make sure.  He called me back...and it was actually per ROLL!  Holy snikeys!  I was eating a couple of rolls...or 3 at a time.  It also adds up for me from day to day...not just during the course of one day.  A little bit everyday seems to build up for me also.  Beware...I also bought some organic fruit snacks for my kids, but I was eating them too.  It said gluten free, but I called to get the contamination information.  She assured me that they tested to 5ppm an below.  Well...kept getting sick on those too.  Same thing with some organic gluten free popsicles...sick every time.  I called, and they said that they don't test at all...but they labeled it gluten free...so how do they know if it is (or the if the ingredients that they order are really free of gluten).  They do not. 

bartfull Rising Star

If you ate three rolls it would add up to 21 parts per THIRTY million. That still comes to 7 PPM.

squirmingitch Veteran

Here is the info. on the Certified Gluten Free Certification process which the Health Warrior Chia bars come under:

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

GiGi29 Newbie

Wow - you guys are so helpful!  Thanks so much!  I'm feeling good today, so I don't think I got glutened, but I'll keep the "it adds up" comment in mind for similar products.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



squirmingitch Veteran

GiGi, it doesn't really add up. See Bartful's comment above. If you add up the ppm of gluten for each thing then you also have to add the TOTAL of non gluten ppm of each item & in the end you STILL end up with say the 7 ppm for the whole day or the week or whatever.

Example: If you add 1 drop of bleach to 100 drops of water & then do that to 10 containers then you have an end product of 1 to 100 NOT 10 to 100. If you total all the drops of bleach then you have to ALSO total all the drops of water. See?

GiGi29 Newbie

Yes, I know.  I actually have a math degree, but it was interesting to know that shayre had some gluten-ing symptoms after eating several foods like that even though, in total, the ppm was still under 20.

cyclinglady Grand Master

I have eaten these little chia seed bars on some of my bike rides and I did not get glutened.  I can say that when I was first diagnosed, I thought I was getting glutened from certified gluten-free foods like bread.  Turns out I had and still have an issue with Xanthan Gum.  Go figure! It never bothers my husband and he's been gluten-free for 14 years.  I switched to Guar Gum in baking and avoid Xanthan Gum.  It's just a "me" intolerance. 

CeliacMom2008 Enthusiast

Squirmingitch, it actually does add up.  Yes, the PPM will still be below the limit, but the amount of gluten you consume will accumulate.  However, just because something is less than 20 PPM, it does not necessarily contain any gluten.  0 is less than 20.  The test just tests for less than 20.  There are also tests that test for under 5 PPM.  

  • 1 month later...
avlgrl Newbie

Shayre...I agree with you. Doesn't matter if the math adds up or not. Bottom line is that processed products are allowed a certain amount of gluten and if esp. sensitive as I am, then processed foods are always a risk - in any quantity.. The only ones I really trust are the ones that say they process their food in a gluten-free environment. Even then, some ingred that they may get from another source may not be 100% gluten-free.

Still, foods that clearly state they make in a contamination free environment are the only ones that really get it. Other companies just jump onto the gluten-free bandwagon, follow the FDA guidelines (which do not require notice of cross contamination processing) and are not so concerned about those of us with celiac. I agree with shayre that trusting their testing is sensible.

Really, I find it very difficult to be truly gluten-free when eating processed foods. Still, I give some a try because I get tired of all paleo all the time. Sometimes, I just want convenience.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,389
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Shavon
    Newest Member
    Shavon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.9k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      If you have been eating the gluten equivalent of 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for say, 4 weeks, I think a repeat blood test would be valid.
    • englishbunny
      it did include Total Immunoglobin A which was 135, and said to be in normal range. when i did the blood test in January I would say I was on a "light' gluten diet, but def not gluten free.  I didn't have any clue about the celiac thing then.  Since then I have been eating a tonne of gluten for the purpose of the endoscopy....so I'm debating just getting my blood test redone right away to see if it has changed so I'm not waiting another month...
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @englishbunny! Did your celiac panel include a test for "Total IGA"? That is a test for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, other IGA test resultls will likely be falsely low. Were you by any chance already practicing a reduced gluten free diet when the blood draw was done?
    • englishbunny
      I'm upset & confused and really need help finding a new gastro who specializes in celiac in California.  Also will welcome any insights on my results. I tested with an isolated positive for deamidated IGA a few months ago (it was 124.3, all other values on celiac panel <1.0), I also have low ferritin and Hashimotos. Mild gastro symptoms which don't seem to get significantly worse with gluten but I can't really tell... my main issues being extreme fatigue and joint pain. The celiac panel was done by my endocrinologist to try and get to the bottom of my fatigue and I was shocked to have a positive result. Just got negative biposy result from endoscopy. Doctor only took two biopsies from small intestine (from an area that appeared red), and both are normal. Problem is his Physician's Assistant can't give me an answer whether I have celiac or not, or what possible reason I might have for having positive antibodies if I don't have it. She wants me to retest bloods in a month and says in the meantime to either "eat gluten or not, it's up to you, but your bloodwork won't be accurate if you don't" I asked if it could be I have early stage celiac so the damage is patchy and missed by only having two samples taken, and she said doctor would've seen damaged areas when performing endoscopy (?) and that it's a good sign if my whole intestine isn't damaged all over, so even if there is spotty damage I am fine.  This doesn't exactly seem satisfactory, and seems to be contrary to so much of the reading and research I have done. I haven't seen the doctor except at my endoscopy, and he was pretty arrogant and didn't take much time to talk. I can't see him or even talk to him for another month. I'm really confused about what I should do. I don't want to just "wait and see" if I have celiac and do real damage in the meantime. Because I know celiac is more that just 'not eating bread' and if I am going to make such a huge lifestyle adjustment I need an actual diagnosis. So in summary I want to find another doctor in CA, preferably Los Angeles but I don't care at this stage if they can do telehealth! I just need some real answers from someone who doesn't talk in riddles. So recommendations would be highly welcomed. I have Blue Shield CA insurance, loads of gastros in LA don’t take insurance at all 😣
    • trents
      Okay, Lori, we can agree on the term "gluten-like". My concern here is that you and other celiacs who do experience celiac reactions to other grains besides wheat, barley and rye are trying to make this normative for the whole celiac community when it isn't. And using the term "gluten" to refer to these other grain proteins is going to be confusing to new celiacs trying to figure out what grains they actually do need to avoid and which they don't. Your experience is not normative so please don't proselytize as if it were.
×
×
  • Create New...