Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Newly diagnosed, follow up endoscopy in 6 months?


Rosie72

Recommended Posts

Rosie72 Newbie

I was newly diagnosed. My TTG was 54 and my lab work was somewhat confusing. It showed 'mild' damage. My GI doctor also sent the biopsies to another pathologist for a 2nd opinion and they agreed that because of my TTG, I have celiac. I have also found out that it runs in the family on my mother's side. My GI doctor wants me to do the endoscopy again but not the blood work. Is this normal? How often do you follow up with biopsies/bloodwork?

Thanks,


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Gemini Experienced
1 hour ago, Rosie72 said:

I was newly diagnosed. My TTG was 54 and my lab work was somewhat confusing. It showed 'mild' damage. My GI doctor also sent the biopsies to another pathologist for a 2nd opinion and they agreed that because of my TTG, I have celiac. I have also found out that it runs in the family on my mother's side. My GI doctor wants me to do the endoscopy again but not the blood work. Is this normal? How often do you follow up with biopsies/bloodwork?

Thanks,

It really all depends on the patient. I never had a biopsy because my blood work was off the charts and I was too sick for a biopsy at the time I was diagnosed.  I did so well on the diet, I never felt the need to have one. It has been almost 11 years now and I am still doing well so you can see, it all depends on your experience. If you feel comfortable with the testing and you want to see what your gut looks like after 6 months, then you have the option of doing so.

The blood work should be repeated to make sure your tTg comes down well into the low normal range, at the one year mark. Then after that happens, every 1 to 2 years on the blood work should be fine.

Welcome and good luck!

kareng Grand Master

Maybe share this from Celiac experts with your doctor? 

"New celiacs should receive follow-up testing twice in the first year after their diagnosis. The first appointment should occur 3-6 months after the diagnosis, and the second should occur after 1 year on a gluten-free diet. After that, a celiac should receive follow-up testing on a yearly basis. We recommend checking both tTG and DGP (Deamidated gliadin peptides) at each screening."

 

Open Original Shared Link

 

Once I’ve been biopsy-diagnosed to confirm celiac disease, do I ever need to have another biopsy done?

Provided you received a clear diagnosis and aren’t experiencing issues there’s no reason to have another biopsy. Even though you may not notice any symptoms from consuming gluten, the disease is still active and can lead to severe complications over time if gluten is sneaking into your diet. Therefore, we recommend annual testing to check for elevated antibodies in your blood.

 

Open Original Shared Link

frieze Community Regular

follow the money.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      128,110
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    nrthcntrygrl
    Newest Member
    nrthcntrygrl
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.1k
    • Total Posts
      70.6k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Soleihey
      My TTG was 167 one year ago. Recently had it retested one month ago and it went down to 16. I only recently had an endoscopy done as I was pregnant within the last year. I did not eat gluten prior to this endoscopy as I get very sick. Prior to obtaining the biopsies, the endoscopy said “ diffuse moderately erythematous mucosa to the second part of the duodenum without bleeding.” However, the biopsy came back negative. I assume it’s a false negative as I have also had genetic testing to confirm celiac. However, what would cause the inflammation to the second part of the duodenum and continued positive blood markers if the intestines have healed?
    • TerryinCO
      Thank you for direction.  Eating out is a concern though we rarely do, but I'm prepared now.
    • trents
      This might be helpful to you at this point:   
    • cristiana
      Thank you for the update.  So interesting to know how things are changing, when I was diagnosed I had very similar blood results but still had to have the endoscopy.  Glad you know where you stand.  As your father has celiac disease you probably already know a lot about it, but do contact us if we can help further.
    • trents
      But isn't it easier to just take a D3 supplement? Is the D light somehow a superior source? Links?
×
×
  • Create New...