Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test While gluten-free

laurelfla

Recommended Posts

laurelfla Enthusiast
laurelfla
Posted

hi, guys --

i'm sure this has been covered before but i've been super busy lately and haven't had time to search on it. my dad went to get tested for celiac disease because both his daughters have been diagnosed with it. his doc told him to go gluten-free and scheduled the biopsy for a week or two later, i can't remember. while on the diet, Dad notes his bowel movements are different (i can talk about this stuff with the best of 'em now! ;) ) but claims it is probably due to not getting as much fiber in his diet. previously he had been having them 3 times a day or so.

the biopsy results are that some of his villi are rounded (i.e. *some* damage). the doc says it is inconclusive, and schedules bloodwork for the next week as well as bacteria tests (he refused to do the Celiac panel initially bc he said the tests weren't that accurate). my dad goes back for the bloodwork after i think 3 weeks on the gluten-free diet. the nurse has not given him the official numbers yet, but she told him they looked normal.

am i just crazy? granted i don't know all there is to know about this (but y'all do and that's why i'm asking you :D ), but it seems to me the dr. should have started with bloodwork BEFORE telling him to go on the diet, to get accurate numbers, then based on that perhaps and the response to the diet, ordering a biopsy. so now the biopsy and the bloodwork are going to be inconclusive, i imagine, and my dad is not really going to know what's up. he hasn't ever really had any symptoms, btw, other than insane back/disc problems.

what do you guys think? thanks!!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Rachel--24 Collaborator
Rachel--24
Posted
hi, guys --

i'm sure this has been covered before but i've been super busy lately and haven't had time to search on it. my dad went to get tested for celiac disease because both his daughters have been diagnosed with it. his doc told him to go gluten-free and scheduled the biopsy for a week or two later, i can't remember. while on the diet, Dad notes his bowel movements are different (i can talk about this stuff with the best of 'em now! ;) ) but claims it is probably due to not getting as much fiber in his diet. previously he had been having them 3 times a day or so.

the biopsy results are that some of his villi are rounded (i.e. *some* damage). the doc says it is inconclusive, and schedules bloodwork for the next week as well as bacteria tests (he refused to do the Celiac panel initially bc he said the tests weren't that accurate). my dad goes back for the bloodwork after i think 3 weeks on the gluten-free diet. the nurse has not given him the official numbers yet, but she told him they looked normal.

am i just crazy? granted i don't know all there is to know about this (but y'all do and that's why i'm asking you :D ), but it seems to me the dr. should have started with bloodwork BEFORE telling him to go on the diet, to get accurate numbers, then based on that perhaps and the response to the diet, ordering a biopsy. so now the biopsy and the bloodwork are going to be inconclusive, i imagine, and my dad is not really going to know what's up. he hasn't ever really had any symptoms, btw, other than insane back/disc problems.

what do you guys think? thanks!!

You're right about that. The doctors shouldn't be telling him to start the diet and then come back for tests. :blink: His results are going to be inconclusive or negative.

I dont understand this about doctors??? Why do they always tell people to go gluten-free BEFORE the tests....its like they WANT people to have negative results when it comes to celiac disease. I just dont get it. You would think that the doctors would know this *one* very important factor about testing for Celiac...HELLO. It totally baffles my mind.

Felidae Enthusiast
Felidae
Posted

I'm no expert but if his villi are rounded, meaning some damage, isn't that good evidence? His doctor doesn't seem very informed.

Rusla Enthusiast
Rusla
Posted

I find most doctors are not well informed, I truly wonder why they went to school for 7 years, or did they. Most of us are more informed than they are and this includes specialists.

I talked with another Celiac today who lost her best friend to the disease because they never diagnosed her until she was on her death bed. The blood tests were always negative and they told her because she was overweight that she couldn't be celiac.

I don't know how they can say that your fathers test results inconclusive.I think we all need to see veterinarians.

aikiducky Apprentice
aikiducky
Posted

Rounded vili doesn't sound inconclusive to me??? :blink:

Pauliina

jerseyangel Proficient
jerseyangel
Posted

I thought the same thing. Its almost as if that Dr. is trying not to find Celiac!

laurelfla Enthusiast
laurelfla
Posted
  • Author

well, the way my mom put it (and bear in mind this is highly scientific talk), "most of the villi were standing up, waving proud and tall, but every now and then there would be some rounded ones". apparently the damage was not enough to call the biopsy conclusive, but to my mind with the family history there's really no reason to be checking out bacteria. :angry:

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Rachel--24 Collaborator
Rachel--24
Posted
well, the way my mom put it (and bear in mind this is highly scientific talk), "most of the villi were standing up, waving proud and tall, but every now and then there would be some rounded ones".

Your Mom has a great way of explaining things. I like that kind of "scientific" talk! :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,698
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    HBVB
    Newest Member
    HBVB
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.3k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Colonoscopy with large are of inflammation

      By trents · Posted

      Sounds like your doctor is not very knowledgeable about celiac disease and may not be supportive of your efforts to run this down. Unfortunately, there is still a lot of ignorance in the medical community with regard to celiac disease. He/she may not even know what tests to run. Those of us who have been on the celiac journey for sometime have come to realize we need to be our own advocate and need to be appropriately assertive in order to get proper testing done. So, when the day comes for the appointment, here are some recommended tests you should discuss with your doctor that are celiac specific: At the bare minimum, the doctor should or: 1. total IGA. This test checks for IGA deficiency. If you are IGA deficient, then next test, #2 below, will give falsely low scores and may produce a false negative. 2. tTG-IGA This is the centerpiece of celiac disease testing and is the most popular test run by doctors. If  the doc is willing, ask for these in addition: 3. DGP-IGA 4. DGP-IGG 5. tTG-IGG These five tests would constitute a fairly complete celiac panel and give fuller picture. What one test may miss another may catch. Here is an article giving an overview of celiac disease blood antibody testing, the relative sensitivities and accuracies of each test. The one test mentioned in this article I did not include in my list is the EMA which is not used often anymore. It is expensive to run and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA. One other thing to be aware of and that is if there are positives in the antibody testing, you likely would get a referral to a GI doc who may want to do an endoscopy with biopsy of the small bowel lining to confirm the antibody testing results. You would needs to still be consuming gluten for this one as well.
    • trents
      Not sure if this is Celiac or just a gluten-free intolerance

      By trents · Posted

      I question your terminology. I believe "gluten intolerance" is used as a synonym for celiac disease in most circles today whereas "gluten sensitivity" is used of NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) though you still see a lot of inconsistency in how the terms are deployed.
    • cameo674
      Testing positive for antibodies, are there visible changes to the colon that could be seen without a biopsy?

      By cameo674 · Posted

      Because of my brother’s supplement regime and my and my husband’s known gene mutations, all of the kids (26,28,30 - I should not call then kids) take PureTherapro RX Methyl Multi without iron, the MagTech magnesium supplement with 3 forms of magnesium, and D3.  I am still trying to find a Fish Oil supplement for them that comes in smaller size capsules.  I take the Metagenics lemon flavored Fish Oil Epa Dha 1000mg gels and the kids call them horse pills.  They want something 1/2 that size bur don’t have a fishy taste. 
    • growlinhard1
      Colonoscopy with large are of inflammation

      By growlinhard1 · Posted

      Thank you for the response. I didn't think of  the things you presented but they make a ton of good sense. I'm in the USA so no stipend for a formal dx. With the added cost of gluten free food, I wish there was some program to help. I bought a loaf of gluten free bread that cost $7.99 and my usual multi grain is $2.57!  I REALLY felt the doctors taking you more seriously comment. That is a huge issue. I just had fairly extensive blood work done, none of which was testing for celiac, and everything came back normal. I felt completely dismissed by my doctor even though my symptoms remained unchanged. As a matter of fact, Celiac disease wasn't even on my regular doctors radar. I think after studying the symptoms and comparing them with my symptoms that should have been one of his top differential diagnoses. I will follow your advice and wait until after the bx to begin eating gluten free. I'm fairly certain of the diagnosis at this point because 4 days of no gluten has made a difference. I feel somewhat stronger, nowhere near as anxious or irritable, urinating every 2 hours instead of every 30 minutes to an hour and much less nausea.  If anybody has any other words of wisdom, advice, really anything, please let me know..I'm kind of alone in this.
    • knitty kitty
      Not sure if this is Celiac or just a gluten-free intolerance

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Yes, some people with Celiac do react to quinoa.  I know i do.  Apparently, two different "breeds" of quinoa can stimulate the immune system. Read here... Variable activation of immune response by quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) prolamins in celiac disease https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22760575/#:~:text=Cultivars Ayacuchana and Pasankalla stimulated,for patients with celiac disease. And some of us react to corn (maize) as well. Maize prolamins could induce a gluten-like cellular immune response in some celiac disease patients https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24152750/   P.S. @Brook G have you thought about getting a genetic test done for known Celiac genes?  
×
×
  • Create New...