Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help! DQ2 negative & DQ8 positive


MK16

Recommended Posts

MK16 Rookie

Had the genetic test done and one gene came back positive and the other negative.  Per my GI the negative gene is the major gene for celiac and therefore she does not believe I have celiac.  My upper Endo biopsy was also negative.  My initial bloodwork I had that started all of these tests showed celiac.  So now I'm so confused.  I've been gluten free for about 3 weeks and do feel an improvement but not 100%.   My symptoms pre gluten-free diet were bloating, gas and daily diarrhea.     Post gluten-free diet the gas and bloating has really improved.  Still have soft stool but that seems to be getting better.

GI dr now wants to put my back on antibiotics to treat SIBO which I have been on 3 different courses of.  I have continued to still test positive for SIBO.

so is celiac, SIBO, or something else?!

been dealing with all this since last June.  Just want an answer!!

 

 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



cyclinglady Grand Master

People with celiac disease can have ONE or BOTH genes.  Maybe your GI is not good at reading or understanding genetic celiac disease testing.  

Open Original Shared Link

or this in more detail:

Open Original Shared Link

Maybe post the actual results?  Exactly which celiac tests were positive?  Easy to miss damaged areas of the small intestine.  How many biopsies were taken?  

 

 

MK16 Rookie

 

Here is the celiac portion of my blood work

Tissue transglutaminase AB IGG 14. High

 
Immunoglobulin A. 77   Low
 
Tissue transglutaminase AB IGA  LESS THAN 1
 
Consider IGA deficiency.  Serological evidence of celiac disease
 
 not sure what that all means and still haven't been able to get explanation from GI
frieze Community Regular

it does not have to be one OR the other, could be both.  I would be tempted to hold of on the ABT for a little while to see if you continue to improve on GFD.

Jmg Mentor
On 23 January 2017 at 9:56 PM, MK16 said:

Had the genetic test done and one gene came back positive and the other negative.  Per my GI the negative gene is the major gene for celiac and therefore she does not believe I have celiac.  My upper Endo biopsy was also negative.  My initial bloodwork I had that started all of these tests showed celiac.  So now I'm so confused.  I've been gluten free for about 3 weeks and do feel an improvement but not 100%.   My symptoms pre gluten-free diet were bloating, gas and daily diarrhea.     Post gluten-free diet the gas and bloating has really improved.  Still have soft stool but that seems to be getting better.

GI dr now wants to put my back on antibiotics to treat SIBO which I have been on 3 different courses of.  I have continued to still test positive for SIBO.

so is celiac, SIBO, or something else?!

been dealing with all this since last June.  Just want an answer!!

 

 

Your GI may not believe its celiac but they have failed to exclude it. You have serological (blood) markers suggestive of it and you react to the gluten free diet, plus you have one of the genes... You may be one of those people who has damage further down the intestine only detectable via capsule endoscopy, or maybe yr non celiac gluten sensitive and don't have the atrophy they look for on the biopsy but still have a problem wi gluten. Unfortunately the diagnostic process isn't always clear and there are some that don't fit the criteria but do still have an issue with gluten. I'm one of them so I'm always worried when I read an account like yours that people will take he negative celiac diagnosis as proof that they don't have a problem with gluten. I think the best data you have in all of this is YOUR reaction to the gluten free diet, that's your body telling y something directly, listen to it! ?

Regarding SIBO I know very little, though a search of this forum will reveal a lot of experiences. From my ignorant standpoint however I agree with frieze, maybe it's time to ease off on the antibiotics and eat a really healthy gluten-free diet for a few months to see what level of improvement you can get that way?  

Good luck in whatever you choose to do, hope your improvement continues, don't let the tortuous process get you down!

TonyDexter Rookie
On 23.01.2017 at 11:56 PM, MK16 said:

Had the genetic test done and one gene came back positive and the other negative.  Per my GI the negative gene is the major gene for celiac and therefore she does not believe I have celiac.  

I'm not a doctor or in anyway good at understanding celiac disease, but this is the first time I see somebody differentiate between the genes as major and not major. Every other source I have seen thus far treats them equally, and says celiacs in 95% cases have at least one. So even if both genes test negatively, there is still a chance.

Anyway, have you read about low FODMAP diet? Is it better at explaining your problems?

Open Original Shared Link

I've just tested negative on celiac disease myself, and I've decided to try to go both low FODMAPs and gluten-free for some time. If there is some improvement, I'll try to reintroduce later gluten or high FODMAPs (but not at the same time) to see if there is a reaction, and which diet is actually working out for me (or none, if there is a totally different issue). You might want to adopt a similar approach. And by the way, SIBO is the primary suspect for me right now.

GFinDC Veteran

It would have been better for them to do the DGP  IGA and DGP IGG tests IMHO.  Although you seem to be IgA deficient so only the DGP IgG would mean anything.

Sometimes the only answer we can get is that gluten makes us sick.  And that's a pretty good reason not to eat it.  Celiac disease testing isn't perfect, and there are no tests for NCGS yet.  That's unfortunate since there are many more people with NCGS (around 6%) than there are with celiac (around 1%) and they have no test to prove NCGS.  There are no long term studies to say if NCGS is dangerous or not.  So it's up to the NCGS patient to decide if they want to eat gluten and be sickly or stay away and be healthy.

Not a tough choice IMHO, but some people do find it hard.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,154
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    J. Nichols
    Newest Member
    J. Nichols
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      71.5k

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Dora77
      It wasnt really eye catching, but they were small stains which looked like dried out liquid. I dont know if it was normal or shouldve been just completely clean. But if someone didnt pay attention, it wouldnt be noticeable.
    • RMJ
      If there were stains or particles on a drink can in an area that would either contact the drink or my lips, I would wash that can whether or not I had celiac disease.
    • Bebygirl01
      You are on the money, but I should also add that Italian, French and other countries research shows exactly what I have said. Our FDA is behind the ball when it comes to this research and I am hopeful that Kennedy can straighten this out soon, albeit he is giving the food companies too long to just remove food dyes from our foods when in fact they have to remove all that in order to sell for example, in the UK as they aren't allowed such things. The food companies and the cola companies have also changed their formulas to have just sugar in them instead of corn gluten aka high fructose corn syrup and corn starch in them. Misinformation here in America is a very dangerous thing. I also have been grain free for a long time now and at no time can I even have the smallest amount of corn gluten -I recently got glutened from a supplement that claimed to be grain free yet upon further research I found that it had erythritol (corn sugar) in it and that is what got me sick for 7 days straight. I am not hopeful to ever be able to add back into my diet any of the grain glutens, but perhaps those who were only gluten intolerant might be able to, but for me being celiac, I have no hope in that. Thank you for the article, I will add it to my collection of research as I am collecting everything I can find on this subject and posting it on X as well as other places.  I also don't use psuedo grains i.e. quinoa as that also reacts negatively with my gut, so I am 100% a cassava/tapioca/arrow root girl and that is my go to bread replacement. There are some new items made with chicpea/green peas that are sold as rice alternatives, i bought one to try but haven't yet. So food companies are getting creative, but like you said, I am fresh whole foods and don't buy many processed foods, I make my own cheese, ketchup, pickles, jams, etc.
    • Dora77
      There were small spots (stains) on the drinking area at the top of the energy drinks can from the store that looked as the same color as milk — maybe oat milk (Hafermilch) or a wheat-based drink (Weizendrink), but I’m not sure what it was. There were also some particles that looked like either flour or dust, but not many. Could it have been a gluten-containing drink spilled onto the can or just regular small stains which I shouldn‘t worry about? Do you watch out for stuff like that or am I overthinking? Would it cause damage to a celiac?
    • Scott Adams
      This is such an important discussion! While corn gluten (zein) is structurally different from wheat gluten, emerging research suggests some celiac and gluten-sensitive individuals may still react to it, whether due to cross-reactivity, inflammation, or other factors. For those with non-responsive celiac disease or ongoing symptoms, eliminating corn—especially processed derivatives like corn syrup—might be worth exploring under medical guidance. That said, corn’s broader health impact (GMOs, digestibility, nutritional profile) is a separate but valid concern. Like you mentioned, ‘gluten-free’ doesn’t automatically mean ‘healthy,’ and whole, unprocessed foods are often the safest bet. For those sensitive to corn, alternatives like quinoa, rice, or nutrient-dense starches (e.g., sweet potatoes) can help fill the gap. Always fascinating (and frustrating) how individualized this journey is—thanks for highlighting these nuances! Many people with celiac disease, especially those who are in the 0-2 year range of their recovery, have additional food intolerance issues which could be temporary. To figure this out you may need to keep a food diary and do an elimination diet over a few months. Some common food intolerance issues are dairy/casein, eggs, corn, oats, and soy. The good news is that after your gut heals (for most people who are 100% gluten-free this will take several months to two years) you may be able to slowly add some these items back into your diet after the damaged villi heal. This article may be helpful:    
×
×
  • Create New...