Jump to content
  • You are not alone. Join Celiac.com for trusted gluten-free answers and forum support.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

Biopsy result?


Jlewisrn

Recommended Posts

Jlewisrn Contributor

I had a biopsy on Friday but he biopsied the rash not the skin next to it. I know this is wrong when testing for DH but he said that's not what it is. Can anyone tell me if they had a biopsy of the rash before they knew what it was and what the pathology report said? He just called me and said it is a drug allergy. I only take one medication and I have been on it for several years. I also stopped taking it for several months and the rash didn't go away. How do they know this? Just based on what it looks like? Because the last biopsy said "atopic dermatitis" and she said it was eczema. So 2 different diagnosis same rash. Is one right? Us either of them right? 


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



apprehensiveengineer Community Regular

I've been told a lot of things over the years... from allergic dermatitis, to "sensitive skin" to ???? to acne. I have tried to no avail to get the skin biopsy, so take my statements with a grain of salt. I am fairly confident (as was the GI I saw recently) that I have DH as my outbreaks are always directly linked to GI distress from gluten ingestion, and come in discrete "batches" as opposed to continuously, as one might expect for the other conditions I've been purported to have.

Though there is some variability in the timeline, I will get GI issues within a couple of hours of eating something bad and a couple of days later the rash breaks through the top layer of my skin. It always hits the exact same regions, and I can usually tell where it's going to show up beforehand. It will take several weeks to stop bleeding/crusting and then a purple mark will appear on the healed skin for a few months. The treatments for the various other things I've been told it is are categorically useless or irritate it further. The only thing that has helped is a very strict version of the GFD (I essentially eat no processed foods) and avoidance of super high iodine foods (seafood).

I think in my case, the thing that has stumped all the doctors when I've suggested that it might be DH is that it isn't "textbook" in the sense that it isn't restricted to my stomach and elbows. Ironically, I have read a few dermatology textbooks and they all said that DH was highly variable in appearance and could appear almost anywhere, and that it commonly appears on extensor surfaces such as the elbows because these are high friction areas - the rash appears where the skin gets microdamaged and irritated. Most of them also cited locations such as the shoulders, back, buttocks and scalp as very common locations for the rash.

I guess the silver lining is that you don't "need" dapsone to fix the problem if it actually is DH, just a super strict GFD. But... I understand the frustration. Hope this helps?

 

Jmg Mentor
On 8/8/2017 at 5:23 PM, Jlewisrn said:

So 2 different diagnosis same rash. Is one right? Us either of them right? 

I had two different diagnoses of a rash in two consecutive visits. I get the feeling its not an exact science!

 

 

Victoria1234 Experienced
On 8/8/2017 at 0:23 PM, Jlewisrn said:

I had a biopsy on Friday but he biopsied the rash not the skin next to it. I know this is wrong when testing for DH but he said that's not what it is. Can anyone tell me if they had a biopsy of the rash before they knew what it was and what the pathology report said? He just called me and said it is a drug allergy. I only take one medication and I have been on it for several years. I also stopped taking it for several months and the rash didn't go away. How do they know this? Just based on what it looks like? Because the last biopsy said "atopic dermatitis" and she said it was eczema. So 2 different diagnosis same rash. Is one right? Us either of them right? 

I was biopsied in 2006 or 2007 the correct way and they called it dh. But no one told me anything about celiac then. It wasn't until I joined this board that, I think it was jmg, told me dh meant celiac diagnosis. 

Btw the rash presented on my elbow area and a bit down from that. First year or two of going gluten-free I knew I was sensitive to something as I got the itch, not the rash.

  • 1 month later...
Tina Morris Newbie

I suffered with rashes on my elbows knees and has of spine for years. The itching was intense and made me totally miserable. Rash started as large blisters which eventually popped and scabbed over.. Doctor prescribed every cream known to man and none worked. In the end I saw a new doctor who knew immediately what it was. One visit to the hospital and biopsies on the rash area revealed DH. I am registered Coeliac and now never eat  gluten and I never have problems. 

 

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Wheatwacked replied to Ginger38's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      6

      The Struggle Has Overtaken Me

    2. - cristiana replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    3. - CC90 replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    4. - Wheatwacked replied to CC90's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Coeliac or not coeliac

    5. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Origins of Celiac Disease
      19

      Do Antibiotics in Babies Increase Celiac Disease Risk Later in Life? (+Video)

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      134,192
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      10,442

    LINDA ZIEL
    Newest Member
    LINDA ZIEL
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Hi @Ginger38, By now you know that these things improve without gluten. I once saw an interview with a corporation executive where he proudly declared that his wheat products are more addictive than potato chips. Dr Fuhrman (Eat to Live) said find foods that are friendly to you to be friends with.  
    • cristiana
      Hi @CC90 Ah... that is very interesting.  Although it is very annoying for you to have to go through it all again, I would say that almost sounds like an admission that they didn't look far enough last time?   I could be wrong, but I would not be at all surprised if they find something on the next attempt.  Coeliac damage can be very patchy, as I understand it, so that's why my own gastroenterologist always likes to point out that he's taken lots of samples!  In the kindest possible way (you don't want to upset the person doing the procedure!) I'd be inclined to tell them what happened last time and to ask them in person to take samples lower down, as  if your health system is anything like the one in my country, communication between GPs, consultants and hospitals isn't always very good.  You don't want the same mistake to be made again. You say that your first endoscopy was traumatic?  May I ask, looking at your spelling of coeliac, was this done at an NHS hospital in England?  The reason for the question is that one of my NHS diagnosed friends was not automatically offered a sedative and managed without one.  Inspired by her, I tried to have an endoscopy one time, in a private setting, without one, so that I could recover quicker, but I had to request sedative in the end it was so uncomfortable.    I am sorry that you will have to go through a gluten challenge again but to make things easier, ensure you eat things containing gluten that you will miss should you have to go gluten free one day. 😂 I was told to eat 2 slices of normal wholemeal bread or the equivalent every day in the weeks before , but I also opted for Weetabix and dozens of Penguin chocolate biscuits.  (I had a very tight headache across my temple for days before the procedure, which I thought was interesting as I had that frequently growing up. - must have been a coeliac symptom!)  Anyway, I do hope you soon get the answers you are looking for and do keep us posted. Cristiana  
    • CC90
      Hi Cristiana   Yes I've had the biopsy results showing normal villi and intestinal mucosa.  The repeat endoscopy (requested by the gastro doc) would be to take samples from further into the intestine than the previous endoscopy reached.      
    • Wheatwacked
      Transglutaminase IgA is the gold-standard blood test for celiac disease. Sensitivity of over 90% and specificity of 95–99%. It rarely produces false positives.  An elevated level means your immune system is reacting to gluten.  Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS) does not typically cause high levels of tTG-IgA. Unfortunately the protocols for a diagnosis of Celiac Disease are aimed at proving you don't have it, leaving you twisting in the wind. Genetic testing and improvement on a trial gluten free diet, also avoiding milk protein, will likely show improvement in short order if it is Celiac; but will that satisfy the medical system for a diagnosis? If you do end up scheduling a repeat endoscopy, be sure to eat up to 10 grams of gluten for 8 - 12 weeks.  You want  to create maximum damage. Not a medical opinion, but my vote is yes.
    • trents
      Cristiana asks a very relevant question. What looks normal to the naked eye may not look normal under the microscope.
×
×
  • Create New...