Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Medicare denial of gastro ordered tests


TexasLadyBug

Recommended Posts

TexasLadyBug Newbie

I was confirmed as celiac in 2012 via blood tests and a EGD showing stomach damage.  I just did a follow up  procto but gastro didn't want to do another EGD.  He did order 2 tests Folic Acid Level (82746-GA) and cynocobalamin (Vitatmin B-12) level (82607-GA).  These tests were to check to make sure by body was getting vitamin absorption because of the celiac damage.

Medicare DENIED these 2 tests citing LCD (Local Coverage Determination) & Policy L34914.  This policy states:  "...Vitamin or micronutrient testing may not be used for routine screening. Once a beneficiary has been shown to be vitamin deficient, further testing is medically necessary only to ensure adequate replacement has been accomplished. Thereafter annual testing may be appropriate depending upon the indication and other mitigating factors."

Of course, one cannot determine "deficiency" until one tests for it.  Further I would think a celiac DX would be a "mitigating factor" since it causes malabsorption issues.   Has anyone every appealed this denial?  These tests cost me over $230. I'm thinking of appealing this denial but am seeking info from anyone who may have already done so and what result you got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

You have been gluten free for 5 years - you should be able to absorb your vitamins.  I think it would make more sense to test if you are compliant with your diet and our antibodies have gone down.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ravenwoodglass Mentor

You could call your doctors office and tell them what happened. Sometimes the doctor's office can contact the insurance company to let them know the test was medically needed. In some cases it is also a possibility that the wrong codes were put in for the reason for testing. In both instances the bill can be resubmitted. 

If the tests were done at your local hospital you could also call them and explain what is going on and depending on your income you may be able to get the costs reduced on a sliding fee scale.

I agree with Karen that a panel should be run to make sure that gluten isn't sneaking in somewhere. This is especially important if you are having any type of health problems.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 7 months later...
plumbago Experienced

Yes, I would appeal.

I am trying to gauge how often those on Medicaid (and Medicare for that matter) are ordered Celiac tests, because my fear is, it's not often at all. I started a separate thread on the topic, but so far, no replies. I wonder if it's even covered. At any rate, I think it would be a great idea to get some kind of campaign started for better coverage.

Plumbago

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
TexasLadyBug Newbie

We appealed. First appeal was denied since "no diagnosis" was stated. What we told Medicare was since they had all the claims, they had all the DX and info so just look it up.  Wrong!  The appeal goes to a Medicare contractor who doesn't give a flip about you--you have to "spoon feed" them all the info that Medicare ALREADY HAS so they can process.  We were referred to a 2nd appeal status.  I did some internet research and found the document they mentioned as the basis of the denial.  In one paragraph of that guidance document it specifically states that CELIAC DX makes these blood test reimburseable.

So at this 2nd stage of appeal I sent a copy of this document underlining the paragraphs relating to celiac and a copy of my Doc's DX of celiac.  Just got notice that we WON!  Medicare will pay for the following procedures with a celiac diagnosis:

82746: Blood Folic Acid Serum

82607: Vitamin B-12

Your lab may tell you these tests are NOT COVERED by Medicare and make you pay up front.  They may cite Local Coverage Determination (LCD) #L34914 (do a search for that document)  Under the caption "Group 3 Codes" of L34914 it stated that ICD-10 code K90.0 Celiac Disease is a COVERED DX for CPT codes 82607 and 82746.

Don't accept a denial -- appeal it but document as I stated above.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
squirmingitch Veteran

I am so glad you appealed! Persistence pays off! Yay you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
RyanPercival Newbie

That's really great that you appealed. My aunt has too enrolled herself under Medigap Plan G through a Medicare-approved company (Open Original Shared Link). This plan includes all the Part A and Part B coinsurance and co-pays, along with both parts deductibles and maximum hospital coverages including some tests too. Hope so that she does not have to face denial but in case, in future, she faces the denial, for sure I would suggest her to appeal for the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      124,664
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Fishincoug
    Newest Member
    Fishincoug
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      120.7k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In general I'm all for a formal diagnosis, except in cases where someone gets very sick when they eat gluten, and have already been on a gluten-free diet for a long time and don't plan to eat it again anyway. There seems to be more drawbacks that keep popping up with being formally diagnosed--at least here in the USA. I can testify that it's definitely harder to obtain life insurance, and if you can get it the premiums are quite a bit higher than if I did not have it, at least from my fairly recent experience when getting a new policy.  @Ginger38 you're very close to the end of your challenge, so let us know how it turns out.
    • cristiana
      Just to add something here... if any people in the UK are reading this, there can be definite advantages if you are formally diagnosed coeliac,  in terms of getting extra support from the NHS.  For free you get to see a nutritionist, additional vaccinations if deemed necessary, in some areas prescriptions for gluten free food; bone density scans, annual blood tests and reviews with a gastroenterologist, plus it has been my experience I've been able to see a gastroenterologist without a GP's re-referral when I've had complications.  That said, I don't know what impact there would be on health insurance; but I have found that when it comes to travel insurance I have had to declare it but it hasn't made any difference to the premium. However, I realise things can be very different in other parts of the world, and I am not sure where you are from, @Ginger38  
    • Ginger38
      Yes I figured out I couldn’t have gluten years ago when I was symptomatic and tested positive, but was misinformed and told I couldn’t have celiac but to go gluten free. I was already gluten free. I was never willing to go back on gluten and make myself so sick to have the biopsy especially when the biopsy isn’t 💯. But Now I have to have a procedure anyway and he told me he was doing the biopsy either way .. but I should consider the gluten challenge since I have never had the biopsy. He acted like it was super important to have this on paper.  I had no idea there were any possible negative drawbacks to having a formal diagnosis 🤦🏼‍♀️
    • Scott Adams
      While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like you will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if you should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS). Keep in mind that there are also drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications.  Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis.
    • Wheatwacked
      I take Clonidine for BP no gluten reaction.  It was originally prescribed for adolescence who could not take Ritalin.
×
×
  • Create New...