Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused by my blood work results

kg51

Recommended Posts

kg51 Explorer
kg51
Posted

32F with a lifetime of various digestive upsets, but nothing that's ever been super severe, and nothing that's been consistent throughout. I had a panel done through my primary care doctor and the results popped up in my online account. While I wait to hear back from her (though I'm a little doubtful of her knowledge and will follow up with a GI regardless)...

Immunoglobin A: 216 (range 70-312)

Gliad (Deanidated) Ab IgG: negative

Gliad Deanidated) Ab IgA: negative

Endomysial Antibody IgA by IF: negative <1:10 (range <1:10)

Tissue Transglutaminase Ab IgA: 19.8 (range <15)

Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Qualitative: positive

So I understand that testing the immunoglobin A is to make sure it's normal to rule out the potential for false negatives. Then IgG and IgA and Endomysial Antibody are all negative, but the Tissue Transglutaminase is positive.

Is 19.8 "low positive?" Why are the others negative? Is this still possible/probably celiac disease? 

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted
1 hour ago, kg51 said:

32F with a lifetime of various digestive upsets, but nothing that's ever been super severe, and nothing that's been consistent throughout. I had a panel done through my primary care doctor and the results popped up in my online account. While I wait to hear back from her (though I'm a little doubtful of her knowledge and will follow up with a GI regardless)...

Immunoglobin A: 216 (range 70-312)

Gliad (Deanidated) Ab IgG: negative

Gliad Deanidated) Ab IgA: negative

Endomysial Antibody IgA by IF: negative <1:10 (range <1:10)

Tissue Transglutaminase Ab IgA: 19.8 (range <15)

Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Qualitative: positive

So I understand that testing the immunoglobin A is to make sure it's normal to rule out the potential for false negatives. Then IgG and IgA and Endomysial Antibody are all negative, but the Tissue Transglutaminase is positive.

Is 19.8 "low positive?" Why are the others negative? Is this still possible/probably celiac disease? 

Welcome!  

Yes!  Ask for a Gastroenterologist (GI) referral.  A positive on the TTG that is slightly elevated could be celiac disease or another autoimmune disorder.    The blood test is just the first step in the diagnostic process.  Keep consuming gluten until you see a  GI.  Do not think that a slight elevation or “slightly moderate” equates to no intestinal damage.  

The other tests are negative because they are not all are 100% perfect.      I tested positive to only the DGP IgA and my GI labeled me as slightly positive, yet I had moderate to severe patches of intestinal damage.  

 

kg51 Explorer
kg51
Posted
  • Author

Is there a Tissue Transglutaminase range for celiac-positive people? Is my 19.8 considered low?

kg51 Explorer
kg51
Posted
  • Author

With a positive Tissue Transglutaminase now, even if a future biopsy were negative, is a gluten-free diet recommended? Goodness, I can't wait to talk to my doctor.

Before40 Newbie
Before40
Posted

Been through hell myself with all this. I went to so many doctors, specialists, etc. I recently found this place and have actually started getting answers. www.lab600.com I just posted in the forum a few minutes ago. Definetly worth checking out.

GFinDC Veteran
GFinDC
Posted
1 hour ago, Before40 said:

Been through hell myself with all this. I went to so many doctors, specialists, etc. I recently found this place and have actually started getting answers. www.lab600.com I just posted in the forum a few minutes ago. Definetly worth checking out.

A hair sample can't diagnose celiac disease.  The correct testing includes both blood antibodies and a biopsy via an endoscopy. 

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted
On 4/3/2018 at 11:33 AM, kg51 said:

Is there a Tissue Transglutaminase range for celiac-positive people? Is my 19.8 considered low?

It doesn't work that way. Different labs have different reference ranges so one can't judge anything by saying 19.8. That's why we always ask people to list the reference ranges from their paperwork which you did so we didn't have to ask you.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted
On 4/3/2018 at 11:38 AM, kg51 said:

With a positive Tissue Transglutaminase now, even if a future biopsy were negative, is a gluten-free diet recommended? Goodness, I can't wait to talk to my doctor.

The gold standard for diagnosis is positive blood work combined with positive endoscopic biopsy. Why the biopsy? Because the TtG IgA alone could possibly be indicative of some other AI disease going on such as Chron's. Therefore, in your case, it's best to do the endoscopy & find out if anything else is going on in there -- maybe several things are, maybe not but better to know. Right? After that, then you can consider giving the gluten-free diet a good try if the biopsies are negative for celiac. 

I am going to repeat this b/c it bears repeating. This is VERY important!!!!

CONTINUE TO EAT GLUTEN EVERY SINGLE DAY UNTIL THE ENDOSCOPY HAS BEEN DONE.

cyclinglady Grand Master
cyclinglady
Posted
On 4/3/2018 at 8:38 AM, kg51 said:

With a positive Tissue Transglutaminase now, even if a future biopsy were negative, is a gluten-free diet recommended? Goodness, I can't wait to talk to my doctor.

Yes, a gluten free diet could be recommended but only after your GI has completed all testing (including the endoscopy).  Why?  Because your GI could miss damaged areas in the small damage as celiac disease can be patchy.  The small intestine is the size of a tennis court when stretched out.  

Squirmingitches comments are spot on, but I think she missed the range.  Your result was a 19 and the cutoff was 15.  Not a super positive, but it is a positive.  You do not know until you have the endoscopy as celiac antibodies elevations do not always correlate with intestinal damage.   

kg51 Explorer
kg51
Posted
  • Author
4 hours ago, squirmingitch said:

It doesn't work that way. Different labs have different reference ranges so one can't judge anything by saying 19.8. That's why we always ask people to list the reference ranges from their paperwork which you did so we didn't have to ask you.

I posted the range, it's <15 u/ml.

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

I said you posted the range so we didn't have to ask you. 

Maybe I need to clarify. IF a person came on here & said they tested @ 19.8 & gave no other information then we would have no clue as to whether that was positive or negative. 

OK, maybe you're still asking if the 19.8 is considered low. It's not a matter of it being low as long as it's positive which it is. A positive is a positive is a positive. Don't let a doctor trip you up by saying it's a low positive therefore doesn't mean anything. The only time the actual # means something is if it's off the charts high. Like 100 would be considered off the charts high for a range of <15 or 89 would be off the charts high but normally you don't look at how close to the positive range you tested. If your result was 16, it would STILL be positive & trigger moving to an endoscopic biopsy. 

If I didn't explain that well enough then don't hesitate to ask for clarification.

kg51 Explorer
kg51
Posted
  • Author

That was helpful, thank you for your further clarification on your previous comment. I wasn't sure if "a positive is a positive" or not or if a value's closeness to the range mattered.

squirmingitch Veteran
squirmingitch
Posted

Good, I'm glad I managed to explain that clearly this time. I knew what I meant before but I certainly didn't make it too clear otherwise -- totally hashed it!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      127,396
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    ElizHane
    Newest Member
    ElizHane
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121k
    • Total Posts
      70.1k
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Celiac, Fructose and Lactose

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Have you tried sheep's milk and goat's milk cheeses? After my diagnosis I could not tolerate cow's milk for ~2 years until my villi healed, but for some reason I did not have issues with sheep milk or goat milk cheeses.  I also had temporary issues with chicken eggs, but could eat duck eggs.
    • Scott Adams
      Waiting on Blood test results…

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is not a test for celiac disease, but your total IgA levels. This test is usually done with other celiac disease blood tests to make sure the results are accurate. Did they do a tTg-IgA test as well? Were you eating lots of gluten in the 6-8 weeks leading up to your blood tests? This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
    • ChrisSeth
      Waiting on Blood test results…

      By ChrisSeth · Posted

      Test results came back for everything that was tested now. Cholesterol is off the charts high. Not sure if that’s related to celiac, I have no idea how it could be so high. Also tested positive for H pylori  infection… is there a link to celiac and H pylori? Or am I just experiencing symptoms of the H pylori infection? 
    • ChrisSeth
      Waiting on Blood test results…

      By ChrisSeth · Posted

      I’m reading that some sites list a high Immunoglobulin A result for my age above 300, another site says above 356, and other sites are saying above 400. I don’t know what to make of this result 🤷‍♂️
    • trents
      Need Advice on Doctors

      By trents · Posted

      You got some bum steers my friend. I have little confidence that you can trust your test results as differentiating between NCGS and celiac disease. And I think you would be much more likely to have gotten that note you need if you had been diagnosed with celiac disease. But believe me, I understand the predicament you are in with regard to the risks of repeating the gluten challenge. We have heard this story many times on this forum. People experiment with the gluten free diet before getting an official diagnosis and then cannot tolerate the gluten challenge later on when they seek an official diagnosis.
×
×
  • Create New...